We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Driving is an essential and highly valued instrumental activity of daily living that becomes increasingly difficult to safely maintain with age-related medical conditions. Health-care providers are uniquely positioned to (1) identify and modify risk factors associated with on-road safety, (2) offer rehabilitation strategies to improve safety and extend driving life, and (3) combine clinical information with resources related to driving to support safe continued community for older patients. Clinicians face myriad challenges in assessing patients' medical fitness to drive, including multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, and reluctance to address driving issues due to the potential impact on the relationship with the patient, as well as legal/ethical concerns. However, assessment and intervention are important to prevent injury and the potential loss of driving privileges, the latter which may have a negative impact on quality of life. This chapter describes the functional abilities necessary to be a safe driver at any age; acute and chronic medical risk factors for driving impairment; clinical tools to stratify risk of medical impairment to drive; opportunities to intervene or refer patients flagged for impairments; resources to support patients transitioning from driver to nondriver; and ethical and legal concerns for clinicians advising patients on driving.
Most people with early-stage dementia lead relatively independent lives and many remain active drivers for several years after diagnosis. Independent mobility and driving are important features of their quality of life and enable the individual to continue living at home, thus reducing the financial burden on society. However, dementia-associated cognitive impairment can impact the ability to drive safely. This leads to a potential conflict between the individual’s autonomy and the safety of other road users. Regulations concerning drivers with dementia differ across countries, and clinical assessment procedures to determine fitness to drive differ within and across countries. No single examination method can classify a driver as safe or unsafe with complete certainty. Once a person with dementia has been cleared for driving, regular follow-up is necessary to determine when driving should cease. Clinical experience shows that the issue of driving is sensitive for cognitively impaired people and caregivers. Even a severely impaired person may react strongly when learning that driving is no longer permitted, as this represents a threat to his or her self-esteem as well as a practical challenge. This needs to be recognized and dealt with appropriately in the healthcare context, presenting and discussing alternative modes of transportation.
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), such as Alzheimer’s disease, frontotemporal dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, and Huntington’s disease, inevitably lead to impairments in higher-order cognitive functions, including the perception of emotional cues and decision-making behavior. Such impairments are likely to cause risky daily life behavior, for instance, in traffic. Impaired recognition of emotional expressions, such as fear, is considered a marker of impaired experience of emotions. Lower fear experience can, in turn, be related to risk-taking behavior. The aim of our study was to investigate whether impaired emotion recognition in patients with NDD is indeed related to unsafe decision-making in risky everyday life situations, which has not been investigated yet.
Methods:
Fifty-one patients with an NDD were included. Emotion recognition was measured with the Facial Expressions of Emotions: Stimuli and Test (FEEST). Risk-taking behavior was measured with driving simulator scenarios and the Action Selection Test (AST). Data from matched healthy controls were used: FEEST (n = 182), AST (n = 36), and driving simulator (n = 18).
Results:
Compared to healthy controls, patients showed significantly worse emotion recognition, particularly of anger, disgust, fear, and sadness. Furthermore, patients took significantly more risks in the driving simulator rides and the AST. Only poor recognition of fear was related to a higher amount of risky decisions in situations involving a direct danger.
Conclusions:
To determine whether patients with an NDD are still fit to drive, it is crucial to assess their ability to make safe decisions. Measuring emotion recognition may be a valuable contribution to this judgment.
Elderly drivers are an increasing group in society. Previous research has found that functional and cognitive abilities are more important for driving abilities than biological age. In an attempt to conserve independent mobility for elderly drivers, many researchers have focused on elderly drivers diagnosed with cognitive decline (mild cognitive impairment or mild Dementia). This study is the first to focus on elderly drivers with cognitive complaints or suspected of diminished fitness to drive by an (in)formal caregiver as an at-risk group.
Methods:
The main objective of this study was to develop a fitness to drive screening tool for elderly drivers to be used in a doctor's office. Furthermore, this study investigated the additional value of driving simulator tests in the assessment of fitness to drive. Both screenings (functional abilities and driving simulator test) were benchmarked against the official Belgian fitness to drive licensing procedure.
Results:
One-hundred thirty-six elderly drivers participated in a functional abilities screening, a driving simulator assessment and an on-road driving test. Sixty-five percent of the sample was considered fit to drive. Visual acuity, physical flexibility, and knowledge of road signs were found to be the best predictive set of tests for the on-road fitness to drive outcome. A performance based driving simulator assessment increased predictive accuracy significantly.
Conclusion:
The proposed screening procedure saves part of the at-risk elderly driver population from stressful and costly on-road driving evaluations. This procedure provides more information of an individual driver's specific driving parameters. This opens doors for personalized older driver training to maintain independent mobility in later life.
Driving a car requires adapting one's behavior to current task demands taking into account one's capacities. With increasing age, driving-relevant cognitive performance may decrease, creating a need for risk-reducing behavioral adaptations. Three different kinds of behavioral adaptations are known: selection, optimization, and compensation. These can occur on the tactical and the strategic level. Risk-reducing behavioral adaptations should be considered when evaluating older drivers’ traffic-related risks.
Methods:
A questionnaire to assess driving-related behavioral adaptations in older drivers was created. The questionnaire was administered to 61 years older (age 65–87 years; mean age = 70.2 years; SD = 5.5 years; 30 female, 31 male) and 31 younger participants (age 22–55 years; mean age = 30.5 years; SD = 6.3 years; 16 female and 15 male) to explore age and gender differences in behavioral adaptations.
Results:
Two factors were extracted from the questionnaire, a risk-increasing factor and a risk-reducing factor. Group comparisons revealed significantly more risk-reducing behaviors in older participants (t(84.5) = 2.21, p = 0.013) and females (t(90) = 2.52, p = 0.014) compared, respectively, to younger participants and males. No differences for the risk-increasing factor were found (p > 0.05).
Conclusions:
The questionnaire seems to be a useful tool to assess driving-related behavioral adaptations aimed at decreasing the risk while driving. The possibility to assess driving-related behavioral adaptations in a systematic way enables a more resource-oriented approach in the evaluation of fitness to drive in older drivers.
The publication of the new guidelines is a welcome step, bringing more lucidity to the subject and providing useful guidance to clinicians. However, the guidelines pose new and unique responsibilities on mental health services with resulting training needs, resource issues and ethical issues. We propose a collaborative model based on the development of regional specialised teams to perform this task. This may prove to be a more suitable and cost effective option in the long run.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.