We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In its transition from pre-Islamic Arab custom to the Shari‘a, the Islamic law of homicide underwent a series of modifications, designed to make it fit Islamic values and principles. This chapter discusses two such major modifications. The first one involves restricting the liability for blood revenge to the perpetrator, while the second sharpens the distinction between accidental and intentional homicide. It is argued that by these modifications Muslim jurists emphasized individual responsibility, intention, fault rather than mere causation, and punishment rather than compensation, thereby bringing homicide closer to a crime. In this way, they expressed the conception that homicide is an offense against the interests of the entire community, and not just against private rights.
How did Christ's death overcome the estrangement and condemnation of sinners before a holy God, so as to reconcile them to Him? A great variety of theories of the atonement have been offered over the centuries to make sense of the fact that Christ by his death has provided the means of reconciliation with God: ransom theories, satisfaction theories, moral influence theories, penal substitution theories, and so on. Competing theories need to be assessed by (i) their accord with biblical data and (ii) their philosophical coherence.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.