We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The chapter examines four economic models, the implications of behavioural economics and the main normative implications of the sanctioning policies. Classical economic analysis of sanctions and crimes presumes that decision-makers are sanctioned directly, personally. Yet this model can only be applied in the case of competition law sanctions levied on the company, if the decision-maker of the firm is at the same time the owner of the company. If companies are sanctioned, the key issue is whether they apply internal sanctions against the decision-maker. Such sanctions can be ex-ante or ex-post, fitted perfectly of imperfectly to the goals of the decision-maker. However, not all companies apply sanctions, some because of agency problems, others because the owners of the company are not able to learn who should be sanctioned and when. There are also cases where the owners are not interested in preventing unlawful decisions even if the company is later sanctioned. The reason for that might be that they do not bear the burden of the sanctions or they make a credible commitment not to levy full (or any) sanctions on managers in order to induce them to take more risks.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.