How psychotic symptoms, depressive symptoms, cognitive deficits, and functional impairment may interact with one another in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder is unclear.

This study explored these interactions in a discovery sample of 339 Chinese, of whom 146 had first-episode schizophrenia and 193 had bipolar disorder. Psychotic symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale; depressive symptoms, using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; cognitive deficits, using tests of processing speed, executive function, and logical memory; and functional impairment, using clinical assessments. Network models connecting the four types of variables were developed and compared between men and women and between disorders. Potential causal relationships among the variables were explored through directed acyclic graphing. The results in the discovery sample were compared to those obtained for a validation sample of 235 Chinese, of whom 138 had chronic schizophrenia and 97 had bipolar disorder.

In the discovery and validation cohorts, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder showed similar networks of associations, in which the central hubs included ‘disorganized’ symptoms, depressive symptoms, and deficits in processing speed during the digital symbol substitution test. Directed acyclic graphing suggested that disorganized symptoms were upstream drivers of cognitive impairment and functional decline, while core depressive symptoms (e.g. low mood) drove somatic and anxiety symptoms.

Our study advocates for transdiagnostic, network-informed strategies prioritizing the mitigation of disorganization and depressive symptoms to disrupt symptom cascades and improve functional outcomes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.

Conveying information cohesively is an essential element of communication that is disrupted in schizophrenia. These disruptions are typically expressed through disorganized symptoms, which have been linked to neurocognitive, social cognitive, and metacognitive deficits. Automated analysis can objectively assess disorganization within sentences, between sentences, and across paragraphs by comparing explicit communication to a large text corpus.

Little work in schizophrenia has tested: (1) links between disorganized symptoms measured via automated analysis and neurocognition, social cognition, or metacognition; and (2) if automated analysis explains incremental variance in cognitive processes beyond clinician-rated scales. Disorganization was measured in schizophrenia (n = 81) with Coh-Metrix 3.0, an automated program that calculates basic and complex language indices. Trained staff also assessed neurocognition, social cognition, metacognition, and clinician-rated disorganization.

Findings showed that all three cognitive processes were significantly associated with at least one automated index of disorganization. When automated analysis was compared with a clinician-rated scale, it accounted for significant variance in neurocognition and metacognition beyond the clinician-rated measure. When combined, these two methods explained 28–31% of the variance in neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition.

This study illustrated how automated analysis can highlight the specific role of disorganization in neurocognition, social cognition, and metacognition. Generally, those with poor cognition also displayed more disorganization in their speech—making it difficult for listeners to process essential information needed to tie the speaker's ideas together. Our findings showcase how implementing a mixed-methods approach in schizophrenia can explain substantial variance in cognitive processes.