To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter describes raised platforms, burial mounds, and topographic conformation of authority ranking in which elites’ dwellings are at higher elevations. Emperors palaces were often surrounded by vast private plazas, massive walls with high and strong gateways, and often stairs that have to be climbed to reach the palace. These are examples of iconic conformations of authority ranking using elevation, mass, and surface area. In cartography, the status of nations is conformed by their relative sizes and their position on the vertical axis of a map. For thousands of years, rulers have built massive, imposing monuments, including earthen mounds, pyramids, and huge, tall stone monoliths. The chapter concludes by explaining why these conformations of authority ranking cannot be fully explained by theories of costly signals, not by theories of conspicuous consumption of energy.
This chapter examines private architecture in Late Antiquity, focusing on the evolution of domestic structures and their role in social, political and religious life. It explores various building types, including domus, villas, insulae, palatia, praetoria and episcopia. The chapter argues that private architecture during this period was highly diverse, reflecting both continuity and transformation. While wealthy residences – whether aristocratic homes, episcopal residences or governor’s palaces – shared similar monumental features such as triclinia, courtyards, baths, and reception halls, often blurring the distinction between private and official spaces, imperial palaces frequently evolved from earlier residential buildings. At the same time, Christian bishops adapted aristocratic architectural models for their own use. Overall, archaeological evidence suggests that private architecture played a crucial role in expressing social status and power, with the design and decoration of homes reinforcing elite identity. At the same time, this study highlights how the economic and political shifts of Late Antiquity shaped domestic architecture, leading to both the persistence of elite housing and the gradual decline of multi-family insulae.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.