We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Although manual-based treatments are widely available in mental health care, they are often not delivered according to protocol. Treatment-, therapist- and organizational-related determinants are known to affect therapist adherence to treatment protocols, and subsequently treatment success. This study examined which determinants are associated with therapist adherence to the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) manual, an evidence-based behavioural treatment programme commonly used in addiction care. Using a cross-sectional design, adherence to the CRA manual and potential contributing determinants were assessed through a self-report survey among therapists (N = 69) working in out-patient addiction care. Correlation analysis and backward stepwise regression analysis were used to examine which treatment-, therapist- and organizational-related determinants were associated with CRA adherence. Significant associations with self-reported CRA adherence were found for nine out of 16 determinants examined. Three independent determinants explained 43% of the variance in CRA manual adherence, namely compatibility with the working method therapists were used to, perceived outcome expectations, and perceived adoption of CRA procedures by colleagues. These determinants should be considered when implementing CRA in addiction care, for example by investing in training and taking into account therapists’ previous treatment experience. This also accounts for creating positive outcome expectations and the use of descriptive norms by making experiences explicit of therapists and teams that excel. Future research should investigate which other determinants contribute to therapists’ adherence and focus on clarifying causality between determinants and adherence.
Key learning aims
(1) To understand the importance of treatment, therapist and organizational determinants influencing therapist adherence to the CRA manual.
(2) To explain the three determinants that make the largest contribution to self-reported therapists’ adherence to the CRA manual, namely: compatibility with the working method, perceived outcome expectations, and perceived adoption of CRA procedures by colleagues.
(3) To reflect on the clinical implications regarding therapist training, implementation of manual-based treatments and future research.
This chapter contains the primary report of findings from the comparison of the Community Reinforcement (CRA) and traditional approaches. Study participants completed a comprehensive assessment at intake that included measurement of numerous demographic characteristics, motivation for change, psychological functioning, drinking history, and current drinking practices. The taking and monitoring of disulfiram were important distinguishing aspects of the treatment groups. The a priori treatment contrasts were made at proximal and distal follow-up points using three primary dependent measures. The three outcome measures were total standard drinks consumed during the assessment period, number of drinking days per week, and estimated peak blood alcohol concentration (BAC) for the assessment period. Traditional and CRA groups also had similar outcomes among the disulfiram-ineligible clients. The chapter concludes with a confessional litany of some errors the authors made along the way, in the hope of saving colleagues from similar pitfalls.
In considering the suitable options for a substance-abuse treatment program for the homeless, one solid choice was the empirically based behavioral intervention called the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA). CRA offers a comprehensive approach to substance-abuse treatment that addresses many of the needs of homeless men and women. The traditional CRA program was modified to better suit the needs of the homeless population. The study presented in this chapter was a controlled comparison of CRA and a day shelter's standard treatment for alcohol-dependent homeless individuals. The CRA condition outperformed the standard treatment (STD) on all three Brief Drinker Profile (BDP) drinking measures and across all follow-ups. The promising results were obtained while using a cost-effective group format by relatively inexperienced therapists. Future studies should focus on women's responses to the CRA program so that the necessary adaptations can be instituted.
This chapter outlines the components of the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) treatment program. One of the unique features of the CRA functional analysis is that both drinking and pleasurable, nonproblematic behaviors are examined routinely, with the goal of decreasing the substance-abusing behavior and increasing the nonproblematic behavior. Although functional analyses for drinking and nondrinking behaviors are completed at the beginning of CRA treatment, they are referred to throughout the program and new ones are introduced as needed. Many traditional alcohol treatment programs in the United States use abstinence as their only drinking goal. The CRA program's sobriety sampling procedure approaches the goals of treatment in a much gentler way. The foundation of CRA's behavioral treatment plan is built on two instruments: the Happiness Scale and the Goals of Counseling form. An essential component of the CRA program involves identifying behavioral skill deficits, and then providing training to improve those skills.
The degree of methodological control in Nathan Azrin's early studies and the surprisingly large treatment effects that were obtained established the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) as one of the more promising interventions for alcohol problems. With a larger sample of clients, the authors tested CRA in an ongoing public outpatient treatment program, the University of New Mexico Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse, and Addictions (CASAA), the largest public provider of addiction treatment services in New Mexico. A range of outcome measures was included to document drinking, alcohol-related problems and dependence, psychological adjustment, employment, and institutionalization. The authors have replicated Azrin's outpatient study by reproducing the same three treatment conditions: traditional treatment alone, traditional treatment plus disulfiram compliance, and full CRA. To these they added another group, who received CRA without disulfiram, in order to determine the extent to which disulfiram contributes to the overall effectiveness of the CRA.
The story of the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) begins 30 years ago, when indigent alcohol-dependent individuals in downstate Illinois were routinely admitted to the nearest state mental hospital. CRA was the brain child of George Hunt who worked as a Research Associate in the Behavior Research Laboratory of Dr Nathan Azrin at Anna State Hospital. Mark Godley, a social worker, began a 5-year collaboration with Nathan Azrin when he contacted him in the September of that year, about working together on behavioral alcoholism treatment research. John Mallams had served as a therapist in the second CRA inpatient trial and was especially eager to work in a community outpatient setting. In the course of training and preparation for the first outpatient trial, Mallams and Robert J. Meyers modified the inpatient procedures. To date, every clinical trial has shown that CRA has a better outcome compared with more traditional treatment practices.
This chapter reviews positive results from a series of well-controlled clinical trials supporting the efficacy of Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) treatments for cocaine and opioid dependence. It presents a brief description of the rationale for adding the voucher-based incentives to CRA. In developing this treatment for cocaine dependence in the late 1980s, the goal was to develop an intervention to treat cocaine dependence in outpatient settings. More substantially, the trial by Abbott and colleagues with opioid-dependent individuals did not involve vouchers and yet the CRA treatment resulted in greater reductions in opioid use than standard drug-abuse counseling. Delivered with or without vouchers, CRA represents an efficacious treatment that can enhance treatment outcomes with cocaine and opioid-dependent patients. Recognizing the importance of reinforcement to substance dependence and integrating systematic use of that principle into clinical efforts to reduce cocaine and opioid dependence has the potential to substantially improve treatment outcomes.
This conclusion presents some closing thoughts of the concepts discussed in the book A Community Reinforcement Approach to Addiction Treatment. The book deals with the story of the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) from its very beginning in the late 1960s through current research at the start of a new century. The studies have involved nearly a thousand clients treated with CRA for alcohol and illicit drug problems. CRA-based treatments have been tested, not against untreated or waiting list control groups, but in comparison with the most common, state-of-practice treatments available. It seems to be applicable across cultural differences, having been applied with affluent and poor, rural and urban, and minority populations including Hispanics and African-Americans. CRA procedures that have been applied effectively to increase disulfiram compliance could also be used to promote adherence to other pharmacotherapies. Reinforcement-based treatment procedures have been effective in managing pain, depression, and marital/family distress.
The Community Reinforcement and Family Training (CRAFT) program was developed with the belief that since family members can make important contributions in other areas of treatment, they can play a powerful role in helping to engage a resistant loved one into therapy. Some of CRAFT's basic components include discussing personal safety issues, outlining the context in which substance-abusing behaviors occur, teaching concerned significant others (CSOs) how to utilize positive reinforcers for both the substance user and themselves, and emphasizing lifestyle changes for the CSOs. Two CRAFT projects, one sponsored by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) and a second by National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), have shown that engaging and retaining an individual in treatment with substance-abuse problems is not only possible, but probable. A treatment development study is being conducted to explore the effectiveness of CRAFT with substance-abusing adolescents and their families.
In the early 1970s, George Hunt and his advisor, Nathan Azrin, developed a theory for describing the etiology and maintenance of alcohol problems and a therapy approach for addressing how to treat them. Azrin and his colleagues designed a series of subsequent studies, testing the relative effectiveness of specific treatment components in order to refine the approach. Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) was first tested on alcohol-dependent individuals in an inpatient setting, then tailored for use with outpatient populations who might have required residential treatment. As Azrin noted when conducting the 1976 study, disulfiram compliance difficulties were a significant barrier in alcohol treatment programs. The major contribution of the study that followed was a test of the relative importance of the disulfiram compliance procedures and the behavioral CRA components introduced in the previous trial. The effectiveness of the CRA procedures has now been demonstrated with a broader range of participant groups.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.