To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 1 provides a contextual outline of how colonial mobility and territorial expansion restructured the British Empire after the abolition of slavery. As colonial investment stepped up in pace around the empire from the 1830s, the principles of liberal imperial reform were most strongly expressed in terms of protecting freedom of labour mobility and implementing an integrative vision of an empire peopled with rights-bearing subjects. At the same time, new patterns of labour coercion and settler colonial violence put pressure on imperial and colonial governments to more closely regulate the relationship between British subjects and others. The growing presence of non-European immigrants in the settler colonies, constituting a mixture of British subjects and legal aliens, drew forth mixed views. Whether envisaged as disruptive forces or as assimilable into new economies and formations of settler colonial society, non-European peoples and their capacity for global mobility helped shape debates about the settler colonies’ place within a global empire.
At the end of the nineteenth century, settler states gained implicit imperial sanction to practice racialised border-policing on disingenuous grounds of language proficiency. As is well known, this outcome was the result of settler dominion efforts through the late nineteenth century to consolidate ‘whiteness’ as the structuring principle of future settler nationhood. But the pathway to this outcome was neither smooth nor inexorable: it emerged from an interconnected colonial world that was inherently multiracial and unsettled. Although the nineteenth-century experiment of settler colonisation was dominated by British migrants motivated by land ownership, the settler colonies were also occupied by a diverse mix of non-European people on the move. Their contributions formed an essential underpinning of settler colonial growth in ways that highlighted Australia’s dependency on broader patterns of colonial trade and migration around and beyond the empire. Of the ethnically diverse peoples who migrated to colonial Australia, some were already British subjects; others were not. But a great many became permanent settlers who asserted their own understandings of citizenship in empire.
Lying between the Indian and Pacific Oceans, Australia served as a crossroads for trade and migration across the British Empire. Australia's settler colonies were not only subject to British immigration but were also the destination of emigration from Asia and 'Asia Minor' on terms of both permanent settlement and fixed indenture. Amanda Nettelbeck argues that these unique patterns shaped nineteenth-century debates about the relationship of the settler colonies to a porous empire. She explores how intersecting concerns around race and mobility – two of the most enduring concerns of nineteenth-century governance – changed the terms of British subjecthood and informed the possibilities of imagined colonial citizenship. European mobility may have fuelled the invasive spread of settler colonialism and its notion of transposed 'Britishness', but non-European forms of mobility also influenced the terms on which new colonial identities could be made.
Adding a race and colonialism component, this chapter examines how citizenship has been used as a powerful tool to undermine the colonized and erect an essentially race-based firewall between white Europeans, who are citizens, and colonials who are given lesser status. Investment migration is inseparable from citizenship’s past as a colonial tool of racial domination and subjugation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.