We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Identification of hospital preparedness challenges against biological events such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is essential to improve dynamics, quality, and business continuity confidence in the health system. Accordingly, the purpose of the present study is to evaluate the challenges of hospital preparedness in biological events.
Methods:
This study used a qualitative method using content analysis in which 20 health-care managers and experts who are experienced in biological events were selected through purposeful sampling. The data collection was done through semi-structured interviews, which continued until data saturation. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis as well as the Landman and Graneheim Approach.
Results:
Six main concepts (training and practice, resource management, safety and health, patient management, risk communication, and laboratory and surveillance) and 14 subconcepts were extracted on hospital preparedness challenges in biological events through analyzing interviews.
Conclusions:
The present study indicated that the health system of the country faces many challenges in response to biological events and threats. Moreover, study participants indicated that Iranian hospitals were not prepared for biological events. It is recommended to design preparedness plans of hospitals based on preparedness standards for biological events. In addition, comprehensive measures are required to enhance their capacity to respond to biological emergencies.
Biological warfare has been a threat to humanity since ancient times and crude attempts at bioterrorism have been a growing concern for several decades. In June of 1999, U.S. public health experts met at CDC headquarters and used this rationale to develop a list of critical biological agents for health preparedness. Category A agents are those that, if released effectively, would be expected to have a high overall public health impact. Category B agents present a somewhat lesser requirement for preparedness, whereas category C agents require vigilance to guard against their future development as threat agents, but can be adequately managed within the framework of the existing public health infrastructure. To understand current biological warfare medical countermeasures research strategy and progress within the United States, it is useful to review weapons of mass destruction (WMD) medical countermeasure research programs led by Department of Defense, and the Department of Homeland Security.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.