We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The amputations and bodily harm inflicted on Russian society prompted a revolution on the medical and legal levels. An unprecedented right to both collective and individual health care arose out of a military necessity (of sending the greatest possible number of men back to battle) and international scientific competition. As a vast field of experimentation on the soldiers’ bodies and minds, the war led to the medicalisation not only of the army, but also of society. Medical specialisations appeared in Russia or were bolstered on the state level, and access to these cutting-edge therapies was rapidly made widely available. That made it possible to achieve decisive progress in treating veterans suffering from psychoneuroses: their institutionalisation, which became the norm, henceforth meant they would be cared for and not abandoned. The revolution in prosthetics likewise embodied efforts on the national level. The war prompted innovation and the organisation of nationwide production. It also made it imperative to guarantee that every amputee would receive an artificial limb. The prevalence of a utilitarian conception of the body and the quantification of its socio-economic contribution changed the perception of handicaps, which were now referred to in scientific rather than moral terms.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.