We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Tongue base mucosectomy identified cancer in 78 per cent of cancers of unknown primary in a recent meta-analysis. The carbon dioxide laser is an alternative technique if there is no access to a robot. This study aimed to describe the steps for undertaking tongue base mucosectomy using the carbon dioxide laser and its diagnostic utility in cancers of unknown primary.
Method
This was a prospective feasibility study utilising carbon dioxide laser for tongue base mucosectomy in cancers of unknown primary. Data collected included demographic data and p16 status.
Results
There were 14 cancers of unknown primary with 86 per cent p16 positivity on immunohistochemistry. Laser tongue base mucosectomy alone identified the cancer primary in 7 of 12 (58 per cent) cancers of unknown primary among p16 positive tumours and 0 of 2 (0 per cent) among p16 negative tumours. Combining bilateral tonsillectomy with laser tongue base mucosectomy resulted in identification of the primary cancer in 8 of 12 (67 per cent) p16 positive tumours.
Conclusion
In centres without a robot, tongue base mucosectomy using the carbon dioxide laser is a viable alternative, especially in combination with bilateral tonsillectomy in p16 positive cases.
Cervical metastasis from an unknown primary site invariably results in pan-mucosal irradiation if a primary tumour is not identified. Transoral robotic and laser-assisted mucosectomy are valid techniques to increase diagnostic rates, but these remain restricted to certain centres. This paper describes, in detail, a technique in which mucosectomy is performed via endoscopic electrocautery.
Methods
Patients were prospectively recruited between May 2017 and June 2018. Inclusion criteria stipulated biopsy-proven metastatic cervical squamous cell carcinoma, with negative findings on magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography, in addition to examination under anaesthetic, tonsillectomy and ‘blind’ tongue base biopsies without tumour identification, prior to mucosectomy.
Results
Of nine patients, a mucosal primary was identified in four (44.4 per cent), for which ipsilateral intensity-modulated radiotherapy was advocated in three and completion tongue base resection in the fourth. Dysplasia was demonstrated in two further patients, which provided information relevant to radiotherapy fields and post-treatment surveillance. No surgical complications were identified.
Conclusion
Tongue base mucosectomy using electrocautery and conventional tonsillectomy equipment is a safe, effective technique in the identification of cervical metastasis from an unknown primary site. It expands the potential breadth of use, quickens prolonged diagnostic pathways and obviates the necessity for pan-mucosal irradiation.
Adenosquamous carcinoma is a rare variant of semicircular canal that can affect various regions, including the head and neck. Adenosquamous carcinoma is characterised pathologically by the simultaneous presence of distinct areas of semicircular canal and adenocarcinoma, and usually takes an aggressive course with local recurrences, early lymph node metastases and distant disseminations.
Case:
We report a rare case of neck adenosquamous carcinoma of unknown primary origin, which was well-controlled by thorough resection without any other additional therapy.
Conclusion:
We discuss the diagnosis and treatment of adenosquamous carcinoma along with a review of pertinent literature. We also consider the potential differential diagnosis of branchiogenic carcinoma.
Follow-up surveillance of head and neck cancer patients varies throughout the UK. The heterogeneity of these patients limits the applicability of a standardised protocol. Improvements in our understanding of the natural history of the disease may assist in the tailoring of resources to patients.
Method:
Prospective data collected at the Cumberland Infirmary over a 13-year period were analysed, primarily focusing upon recurrence rates and time to recurrence.
Results:
In keeping with other studies, recurrence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma was found to be maximal within the first three years of treatment, regardless of subsite.
Conclusion:
Hospital-based surveillance may be safely discontinued after three years for some patients. Laryngeal carcinoma may require further surveillance due to possible delayed recurrence of a second primary formation. Emphasis must be placed on patient education, accessibility to head and neck services, and the existence of a robust system to facilitate urgent referrals.
This paper presents a quite unique case report of a patient presenting with the combination of cervical metastatic lymphadenopathy and a hyoid bone tumour mass. The differential diagnosis and treatment is discussed, with emphasis on the importance of immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy in the management of such a case.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.