We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter describes how the question of how animals perceive their world led to developments in discrimination training. These studies included ones that, for example, tested whether a dog, cat, or rat could learn to discriminate between two stimuli that differed only in color. Developments in the study of discrimination learning became increasingly theoretical. For example, one important issue had to do with the possible role of attention in discrimination learning. Rejection of this possibility by the highly influential behaviorist, Kenneth Spence, led to his important continuity theory. In turn, studies of phenomena such as transfer-along-a continuum and the overtraining-reversal-effect in the 1950s and 1960s by a series of researchers, including Stuart Sutherland and Nick Mackintosh in the UK, led to a revival of interest in selective attention in discrimination learning. The final section describes studies of stimulus generalization and behavioral contrast.
All the conspirators could read, and most could write, more or less. Radical newspapers and tavern trade clubs and societies provided their political education. ’Low’ radicals in regency London were as deeply influenced by the agrarian socialist Thomas Spence as by Tom Paine, but, either way, their values drew on Enlightenment. They believed in the people’s right to resist oppression, and some hoped for the redistribution of landed property throughout the kingdom.Spence propagated his ideas through slogans, songs, graffiti, and tokens as well as pamphlets and books; and after his death in 1814 they were propagated through the Society of Spencean Philanthropists and Wedderburn’s ‘chapel’ in Soho, to both of which key conspirators belonged.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.