We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The euro crisis has brought about remarkable changes in the economic governance of the European Union (EU) and consequently in the ways the executives can be held to account. By focusing on the interactions between national parliament and government in Poland, the fifth-largest EU member state by population, this chapter discusses debates concerning the EU annual cycle of fiscal and economic surveillance - the European Semester, related in particular to its most important element – the Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs). The goal of this paper is to assess how parliamentary scrutiny affects the level of implementation of CSRs. The positions of Members of Parliament (MPs) towards CSRs and connected arguments expressed in parliamentary discussions are explained by applying an analytical framework of justification and contestation as two basic forms of accountability. On accountability dimension, most questions, which were asked by both majority and opposition MPs, fall within the justification category in which the demands for explanation or information from the representatives from two ministries responsible for finance and development were made. On the efficiency dimension, one can hardly see any link at all as the scrutiny of the CSRs has a limited impact on their implementation.
This chapter introduces the historical and political context for the analysis of the Polish republican discourse, including the constitutional arrangements of the Polish Kingdom and the rise of humanism in the fifteenth century. It presents the institutional background for the republican discourse that was provided by the rise of parliamentarism and several charters of rights and privileges issued by Polish kings in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. These developments greatly contributed to the growing role of active citizenship and the vision of a free commonwealth. Not only was the Polish Kingdom in the fifteenth century not becoming more centralised and absolutist, but it was heading towards an elective parliamentary monarchy within the Jagiellonian dynasty, with a growing role for the representative body of the Sejm. This alone was a fertile ground for the emergence of a republican discourse of liberty and res publica. The chapter also discusses how Renaissance humanism and its studia humanitatis opened up the Polish culture to the influence of Platonism, Aristotelianism, rhetoric and the interpretation of the works of Cicero, often mixed with elements of the scholastic tradition.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.