Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 1 - Previous Research on Language Readability

  • Meng Ji, University of Sydney, Michael Oakes, University of Birmingham
  • Book:
    Multilingual Environmental Communications
    Published online:
    16 May 2025
    Print publication:
    05 June 2025, pp 1-22

  • Summary

    Readability assessment has been a key research area for the past 80 years, and still attracts researchers today. The most common measures currently (2011) in use are Flesch-Kincaid and Dale-Chall. Traditional models were parsimonious, incorporating as few linguistic features as possible, and used linear regression to combine two or three surface features. Later models used psychological theory, measuring such things as coherence, density, and inference load. A variety of machine learning models were used and one neural network. Key surface linguistic features were average syllables per word and sentence length. The Machine Learning methods performed well. Machine Learning methods can improve readability estimation. The process is data-driven, requiring less manual labour, and avoiding human bias. Current research seems to focus on deep learning methods, which show great promise.