In England, psychological therapies provided in primary care are recommended as first-line treatment for people living with mild-to-moderate dementia experiencing depression or anxiety. It is known that people living with dementia experience more barriers to accessing therapy than people without dementia, but such inequalities in terms of rates of access to primary care services are yet to be characterised.

In this retrospective, observational study of linked electronic healthcare records, the national database of the National Health Service (NHS) Talking Therapies for anxiety and depression programme was used to compare pathways to accessing therapy between 6623 people living with dementia and 4 825 489 without dementia between 2012 and 2019. Outcomes included access to an assessment, to therapy and reasons for discharge. Primary analyses used a propensity-score matched cohort to compare outcomes. Exact matching was used for the NHS service entity.

The prevalence of dementia in the study cohort was lower than the prevalence of dementia in a representative population, based on an estimation of prevalence in people with mild-to-moderate age over 35 (0.23% in our study vs 3.82% in previous research). Compared to people without dementia, people living with dementia were less likely to access an assessment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55–0.65), to subsequently receive therapy (OR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.61–0.73) and more likely to be discharged because services were deemed not suitable before having an assessment (relative rate ratio [RRR] = 4.90; 95% CI: 4.20–5.72) and starting therapy (RRR = 2.74; 95% CI: 2.24–3.35). Female gender, social deprivation, Asian ethnicity and less common dementia subtypes (such as frontotemporal dementia) were also associated with poorer access rates and a higher likelihood of services being deemed not suitable. Involvement of care partners in the referral process was associated with better access rates.

Pathways to accessing primary care psychological therapy services must be made more accessible for people living with dementia. Better access could be achieved by increasing referrer awareness and training for staff within services to promote access for people living with dementia (especially for groups under-represented in services), better understanding how to involve care partners in the process, as well as when specialist support might be more suited in secondary care. More granularity in the medical coding of rarer dementia diagnoses in electronic health records would also allow for better statistically powered research for these groups.

This study evaluated whether brief teaching sessions on transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) could improve psychiatric trainees’ attitudes and clinical confidence in managing patients with personality disorders. A mixed-methods design was used, combining pre- and post-training validated questionnaires with a focus group discussion. Two 4-h workshops covered TFP theory and techniques, and case discussions.

Twenty-six participants completed paired questionnaires. Statistically significant improvements were observed in overall attitudes (Attitudes to Personality Disorder Questionnaire total score, P = 0.022) and enthusiasm towards patients with personality disorders (P = 0.003). Clinical confidence (Clinical Confidence with Personality Disorder Questionnaire) improved markedly (P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis identified high acceptability, valuing TFP concepts and enhanced emotional awareness, although participants desired more practical components.

Even brief TFP training can positively influence trainees’ attitudes and confidence in treating personality disorders. Incorporating TFP-informed training into psychiatric education may reduce clinician frustration and improve therapeutic engagement with this complex patient group.

Accommodation of treatment preferences is known to improve treatment outcomes and increase patient satisfaction, and is further advised in several national guidelines.

The aim of this study was to systematically review studies that elicited treatment preferences and related determinants among adults with depressive or anxiety disorder for out-patient mental healthcare.

The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024546311). Studies were retrieved from Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL and PsycINFO. We included studies of all types that assessed treatment preferences of adults with depressive or anxiety disorder for out-patient care. Extracted data on preferences and determinants were summarised and categorised. Preferences were categorised into treatment approaches, psychotherapy delivery and setting, and psychotherapy parameters. Study quality was assessed with the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool.

Nineteen studies were included in the review. Preferences examined related to treatment approaches (n = 13), psychotherapy delivery and setting (n = 10), and psychotherapy parameters (n = 7). High heterogeneity in statistical methods and preference types restricted the derivation of robust conclusions, but tendencies toward a preference for psychotherapy (compared with medication), and particularly individual and face-to-face therapy, were observed. Regarding determinants, results were highly diverse and many findings were derived from single studies.

Our review synthesised evidence on treatment preferences and related determinants in out-patient mental healthcare. Results showed considerable heterogeneity regarding preference types, determinants and statistical methods. We highly recommend to develop and use standardised instruments to assess treatment preferences. Care providers should consider preference variance among patients, and provide individualised care.

Late-life depression (LLD) is prevalent in older adults and linked to increased disability, mortality, and suicide risk. Insomnia symptoms are considered common remaining symptoms of LLD following treatment. However, the multivariate relationship between insomnia and depressive symptoms and the impact of psychotherapy on their interrelationship is insufficiently assessed.

We conducted a secondary analysis of data from 185 patients with LLD, recruited from seven university hospitals in Germany as part of a larger original cohort study. Participants had undergone eight-week psychotherapy interventions (cognitive behavioral therapy or supportive unspecific intervention). Three regularized canonical correlation analyses (rCCA) assessed the multivariate association between insomnia and depressive symptoms at baseline, post-treatment, and six-month follow-up. rCCA was conducted within a machine learning framework with 100 repeated hold-out splits and permutation tests to ensure robust findings. Canonical loadings and cross-loading difference scores were calculated to examine symptom changes before/after psychotherapy (Holm-Bonferroni corrected p-value <0.05).

At baseline, a moderate association was observed between insomnia and depressive symptoms (r = 0.24). Interestingly, this association slightly increased after the eight-week treatment period (r = 0.42, pcorrected = 0.064) and remained significantly elevated at the follow-up session (r = 0.48, pcorrected = 0.018). At baseline, anxiety-related depressive symptoms were mainly associated with insomnia, while at post-treatment and follow-up sessions, somatic and negative affective symptoms showed the strongest correlation with insomnia symptoms. While the relative relationship of depressive symptoms with insomnia altered after psychotherapy, the pattern of insomnia symptoms remained stable.

The observed changes in the association between insomnia and depressive symptoms after psychotherapy highlight the necessity to consider targeting insomnia for effective LLD treatment.

We aimed to identify therapeutic approaches for managing schizophrenia in different phases and clinical situations – the prodromal phase, first-episode psychosis, cognitive and negative symptoms, pregnancy, treatment resistance, and antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects – while assessing clinicians’ adherence to guidelines.

A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in 2023 as part of the Ambassador project among psychiatrists and trainees from 35 European countries, based on a questionnaire that included six clinical vignettes (cases A–F). Additionally, a review of multiple guidelines/guidance papers was performed.

The final analysis included 454 participants. Our findings revealed a moderate to high level of agreement among European psychiatrists regarding pharmacological treatment preferences for first-episode psychosis and cognitive and negative symptoms, prodromal symptoms and pregnancy, with moderate adherence to clinical guidelines. There was substantial similarity in treatment preferences for antipsychotic-induced metabolic side effects and treatment resistance; however, adherence to guidelines in these areas was only partial. Despite guideline recommendations, non-pharmacological treatments, including psychotherapy and recovery-oriented care, were generally underutilized, except for psychoeducation and lifestyle recommendations, and cognitive behavioural therapy for treatment of the prodromal phase. Contrary to guidelines, cognitive remediation and physical exercise for cognitive symptoms were significantly neglected.

These discrepancies highlight the need for effective implementation strategies to bridge the gap between research evidence, clinical guidelines/guidance papers, and real-world clinical practice. Clinicians’ unique combination of knowledge and experience positions them to shape future guidelines, especially where real-world practice diverges from recommendations, reinforcing the need to integrate both research evidence and clinical consensus.