To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article aims to help clinicians better assess and manage patients who show ‘problematic detachment’: interpersonal distancing that is resulting in functional impairment or distress. It considers both the possible relevant social contextual factors and the wide range of possible underlying psychopathologies that can result in problematic detachment, including mental illnesses, neurodevelopmental disorders and personality pathology. After giving a practical framework for diagnostic formulation, it summarises key aspects of best practice when working with such individuals. The article covers four key questions that the clinician must address. Is problematic detachment present? If so, what specific challenges underlie and maintain it in this person? Based on that, what diagnostic formulation makes sense for this individual? Finally, using this understanding, how can they best treat this individual?
Patients find the term ‘borderline personality disorder’ offensive and, from a list of alternative labels, prefer ‘emotional intensity disorder’. It is suggested that any term will take on a pejorative connotation if professional attitudes do not change as well; and that this requires an alteration in the environment in which professionals operate. This should not look so strongly to compulsion to prevent suicide, but should allow therapeutic relationships to flourish. Blaming clinicians for incidents when they have few choices is counterproductive. The problem reflects a systemic impatience with patients who get better slowly or not at all.
This study evaluated whether brief teaching sessions on transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP) could improve psychiatric trainees’ attitudes and clinical confidence in managing patients with personality disorders. A mixed-methods design was used, combining pre- and post-training validated questionnaires with a focus group discussion. Two 4-h workshops covered TFP theory and techniques, and case discussions.
Results
Twenty-six participants completed paired questionnaires. Statistically significant improvements were observed in overall attitudes (Attitudes to Personality Disorder Questionnaire total score, P = 0.022) and enthusiasm towards patients with personality disorders (P = 0.003). Clinical confidence (Clinical Confidence with Personality Disorder Questionnaire) improved markedly (P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis identified high acceptability, valuing TFP concepts and enhanced emotional awareness, although participants desired more practical components.
Clinical implications
Even brief TFP training can positively influence trainees’ attitudes and confidence in treating personality disorders. Incorporating TFP-informed training into psychiatric education may reduce clinician frustration and improve therapeutic engagement with this complex patient group.
Despite overlapping diagnostic criteria and aetiology, the frequency of complex post-traumatic stress disorder (C-PTSD) in people being treated for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is unknown.
Aims
To establish the frequency and correlates of probable C-PTSD in people meeting the diagnostic criteria and being treated for BPD.
Method
C-PTSD was assessed in 87 patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for BPD and initiating treatment in out-patient personality disorder services in the UK, using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis II Personality Disorders diagnostic interview, items from the Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress – Self Report and other measures. The cross-sectional association between C-PTSD and demographics, trauma and clinical variables was evaluated with logistic, ordinal and linear regression.
Results
A total of 93% of participants reported a trauma history (95% CI 88–98%), and 57% met the criteria for probable C-PTSD (95% CI 47–67%). Previous sexual trauma increased the odds of probable C-PTSD (odds ratio 6.22, 95% CI 2.21–17.54, P < 0.001). Probable C-PTSD was associated with an increased odds of self-harm in the past 12 months (odds ratio 9.41, 95% CI 1.87–47.27, P = 0.01) and higher levels of abandonment fears (odds ratio 2.78, 95% CI 1.17–6.55, P = 0.02), abandonment–avoidant behaviour (odds ratio 4.25, 95% CI 1.30–13.91, P = 0.02) and identity instability (odds ratio 4.39, 95% CI 1.79–10.78, P < 0.01).
Conclusions
C-PTSD symptoms are likely to be common in people diagnosed with BPD, and are associated with higher overall psychiatric severity, with potential implications for formulation and treatment.
The effects of pandemic-related restrictions on people in prisons who tend to have multiple complex health needs are not well understood.
Aims
We aimed to measure changes in adjudications and self-harm among people in prisons before and during the pandemic.
Method
We examined effects of time and demographic characteristics on odds and counts of adjudications and self-harm over a three-year period, starting one year before the COVID-19 pandemic, in 861 individuals from 21 Offender Personality Disorder Pathway prison sites.
Results
The odds of adjudicating were lower in people of older age (odds ratio 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99)), and during COVID-19 year one (odds ratio 0.37 (95% CI: 0.23–0.60)) and year two (odds ratio 0.40 (95% CI: 0.25–0.65)) compared to pre-COVID-19. Being of White ethnicity was associated with increased odds (odds ratio 4.42 (95% CI: 2.06–9.47)) and being older was associated with reduced odds (odds ratio 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.99)) of self-harm. The odds of self-harm were significantly reduced during COVID-19 year two (odds ratio 0.45 (95% CI: 0.26–0.78)), but not during COVID-19 year one (odds ratio 0.68 (95% CI: 0.40–1.14)), compared with the 12 months before COVID-19.
Conclusions
Although adjudications and self-harm were generally lower during the pandemic, younger people showed increased odds of adjudications and self-harm compared with older people, while White people showed increased odds of self-harm compared with people of the global majority. Our findings highlight the importance of considering potential health inequities and environmental effects of lockdowns for people in prisons.
Little has been written regarding the experience of training in medicine with a diagnosis of a personality disorder. The stigma of personality disorders, evidenced even within psychiatry, potentially marginalises affected students and resident doctors. This article provides a first-hand account of the lead author’s (E.M.) lived experience of being a medical student with a diagnosis of emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD). Challenges that have been faced include a lack of understanding, limited literature about medical students and doctors with personality disorders, and derogatory attitudes. Despite this, the positive aspects of the diagnosis are recognised, through enhanced resilience and heightened emotional sensitivity, which can benefit patients.
Evolutionary psychopathology is concerned with understanding physical and mental health-related disorders through evolutionary principles. The symptoms caused by microbial parasites such as viruses, bacteria, fungi and protozoa can be viewed as adaptations either of the pathogen to aid its multiplication or of the host in order to kill off or expel it. Evolutionary explanations for current-day physical and mental symptoms include the notion that our bodies and minds are adapted to the pressures of a stone-age existence but are living under modern-day conditions – the mismatch or time lag argument. Other explanations include the idea that genes which cause illness might also have positive facets associated with them – the pleiotropy argument; that selection pressures act on increasing inclusive fitness, not on perfecting systems – the compromise argument; and that disorders might be viewed as the extremes of normal variation – the trait variation argument.
In this clinical reflection, we report on stigma and ageism and their impact on those experiencing signs and symptoms of borderline personality disorder (BPD). We highlight the need for increased collaboration between those with lived experience of the disorder and healthcare providers. This is an important issue in BPD as the impact of structural stigma is significantly affecting the quality of life and short- and long-term trajectories of those with BPD, especially during adolescence.
Providing psychotherapy at 50 sessions in a year (starting twice weekly) led to faster and greater improvements in depression and personality functioning compared to 25 sessions, starting weekly for patients with depression and personality disorder (PD). This study reports long-term dosage effects at 18 and 24 months.
Methods
In a pragmatic, double-randomized clinical trial, 246 outpatients with depression and PD were assigned to (1) 25 or 50 sessions and (2) Short-term Psychodynamic Supportive Psychotherapy (SPSP) or Schema Therapy (ST). Depression severity was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Secondary outcomes included diagnostic remission of depression (MINI-plus), PD (SCID-II/SCID-5-P), and treatment-specific measures. Intention-to-treat analyses were conducted.
Results
At 18 and 24 months, BDI-II means did not differ between dosage groups (19.0 for 25 sessions versus 19.1 for 50 sessions; d = −0.01; 95% CI = −0.35-0.37, p = 0.96). The lower-dosage group improved during follow-up (−2.6 BDI points, p = 0.031), which may be partly attributed to additional therapy received by a subgroup. Remission rates at 24 months were 66% for depression and 76% for PD, with no differences between conditions.
Conclusions
Higher psychotherapy dosage led to faster initial improvements, but long-term outcomes were not superior to those achieved with a lower dosage. These results should be interpreted with caution, as unregulated treatment during follow-up reduced the power to detect significant dosage effects. Both SPSP and ST provide viable alternatives to treatments focused solely on depression.
In this chapter we outline a theoretical perspective in which personality (relatively normal or dysfunctional) is the ultimate outcome (i.e. equilibrium state) of a mutualistic, dynamical system in which the building blocks of personality (i.e. components) interact with one another over time. These interactions give rise to dynamical couplings between thoughts, feelings, behaviours and environment. These couplings arise through multiple potential mechanisms, for example resource competition and a drive for consistency. As a result of particular architectures of the dynamical system, dysfunctional states can become stable features of the system, and we recognize these states as personality disorders. By means of a toy simulation dynamical model, we show some of the, potentially many, roads to developing personality disorders. Finally, we highlight four implications of our systems perspective on personality disorders on future research.
This chapter sheds light on phenomenological aspects of personality disorders. Although research on personality disorders has increased in the last decades, it remains relatively underexamined compared to other mental health conditions. This discrepancy is even more evident in phenomenological psychopathology. To fill this lacuna, this chapter offers an analysis of the implicit, temporal foundation of self-experience in personality disorders. It is argued that personality disorders can be understood in terms of a temporal inflexibility of the self. Important aspects of lived inflexibility are described across five topoi: repetitiveness of interpersonal patterns, affective rigidity, reification of self-experience, lack of future openness, and the feeling of being stuck.
There is an unresolved debate about whether the ways of being currently identified by the DSM-5-TR as Cluster B personality disorders (henceforth PDs) should be considered genuine mental disorders or normal (if often serious) problems of living. This issue is a microcosm of a larger debate about whether psychiatry is overextending itself and overmedicalizing many of life’s hardships. We show that the resolution of the first debate can inform the second, larger, question. To this end, we examine Louis Charland’s influential arguments that Cluster B PDs are moral, not medical, conditions. Although Charland’s arguments fail to support this conclusion, Charland’s focus on mental healing to inform what ways of being are properly considered “mental disorders” is promising. We argue that skilled metacognitive self-regulation is necessary for mental healing and show that a focus on the role played by self-regulation in healing partially vindicates Charland’s argument: Cluster B PDs are not necessarily “moral conditions,” although some instantiations will be. We also show that current definitions of PDs are both overly inclusive and overly exclusive, allowing moral judgments to drive diagnosis. We conclude by showing that a focus on self-regulatory skill can help distinguish between mental disorders and normal problems of living.
The Mental Health Act perpetuates the harmful and misguided detention of individuals with personality disorders. The outdated practice lacks ethical, legal or clinical justification. Coercion is mistaken for care, and detention often exacerbates distress, retraumatises patients and increases suicide risk. Despite its promises, the new Mental Health Bill fails to address these systemic failures, continuing the cycle of risk-driven, defensive psychiatry. It is time to abandon compulsory detention for this patient group, redirect resources toward evidence-based, relational interventions, and move toward a capacity-based, trauma-informed legal framework that aligns with contemporary psychiatric understanding of these conditions and fundamental human rights.
Despite being the most prevalent personality disorder, borderline personality disorder remains a diagnosis with many unanswered questions, particularly concerning pharmacological management. Although many clinical practice guidelines suggest not prescribing medication unless there are significant clinical comorbidities, it is one of the psychiatric diagnoses with the highest rates of polypharmacy. This commentary on a BJPsych Advances article aims to raise clinical questions regarding the voids of knowledge and the appropriateness of medicating and, perhaps, overmedicating in this particular group.
‘Complex emotional needs’ has emerged in the UK as a label to refer to individuals given a diagnosis of a personality disorder. We argue that this name change is insufficient to address the harms associated with the personality disorder construct; rather, it risks broadening its scope, and thereby the construct’s harms.
Despite uncertain benefits, antidepressants are used in the management of personality disorders (PDs). We investigated the association between antidepressants and two adverse outcomes - suicidal behaviour and violent crimes - in individuals with PDs.
Methods
We used nationwide Danish healthcare registries to identify all individuals with a diagnosed PD aged 18–64 years from 2007 to 2016. Antidepressant use was identified using dispensed prescriptions. Individuals were followed up for healthcare presentations of suicidal behaviour and separately for police-recorded charges of violent crimes. We applied a within-individual design comparing rates of suicidal behaviour and violent crimes during time periods of antidepressant treatment with periods without treatment. Subgroup analyses were performed according to PD clusters, individual antidepressants, specific PDs, psychiatric comorbidities, and history of suicidal behaviour and violent crime.
Results
The cohort included 167,319 individuals with a diagnosed PD, 19,519 (12%) of whom were prescribed antidepressants and presented at least one outcome event during follow-up, making them eligible for within-individual analyses. Overall, we found an association with lower rates of suicidal behavior during periods of antidepressant treatment, compared with periods when individuals were not on antidepressants (incidence rate ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.84–0.89). However, this association was modified by specific PDs, individual antidepressants, comorbidities, and past history. For violent crimes, we did not observe consistent associations in any direction.
Conclusions
Antidepressants were associated with lower rates of suicidal behaviour, but less clearly in violent crimes. Types of PDs, individual antidepressants, and comorbidities modified these associations.
Personality disorders play a major role in psychiatric clinical practice. Usually evident by adolescence, they arise when emotions, thoughts, impulsivity, and especially interpersonal behavior deviate markedly from the expectations of the individual’s culture. These disorders comprise a group of diverse and complex conditions that still warrant better understanding across multiple dimensions: genetic, neurobiological, pharmacological, and psychodynamic. This chapter addresses the definitions of both personality and personality disorder and outlines the two sets of diagnostic criteria: primary characteristics of personality disorder and the three main categories/clusters of personality disorder. It also discusses incidence of the specific disorders and relevant treatment modalities. Treatments plans should include psychotherapy, psychopharmacology, and psychoeducation, as well as treatment of comorbidities and crises. Psychotherapy has been the intervention of choice for most personality disorders, with pharmacological treatment usually auxiliary and focused on symptoms. Clinician skill is a key element of diagnosis and treatment. An experienced clinician should be able to differentiate between personality traits or styles and actual personality disorders, a particularly challenging task when a patient presents in crisis. Individuals with personality disorders can manifest a disturbed pattern in interpersonal relationships that can be deleterious in the therapeutic relationship if not approached with skill.
There is no clear evidence about how to support people with borderline personality disorder (BPD) during the perinatal period. Perinatal emotional skills groups (ESGs) may be helpful, but their efficacy has not been tested.
Aims
To test the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of perinatal ESGs for women and birthing people with BPD.
Method
Two-arm parallel-group feasibility RCT. We recruited people from two centres, aged over 18 years, meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for BPD, who were pregnant or within 12 months of a live birth. Eligible individuals were randomly allocated on a 1:1 ratio to ESGs + treatment as usual (TAU), or to TAU. Outcomes were assessed at 4 months post randomisation.
Results
A total of 100% of the pre-specified sample (n = 48) was recruited over 6 months, and we obtained 4-month outcome data on 92% of randomised participants. In all, 54% of participants allocated to perinatal ESGs attended 75% of the full group treatment (median number of sessions: 9 (interquartile range 6–11). At 4 months, levels of BPD symptoms (adjusted coefficient −2.0, 95% CI −6.2 to 2.1) and emotional distress (−2.4, 95% CI −6.2 to 1.5) were lower among those allocated to perinatal ESGs. The directionality of effect on well-being and social functioning also favoured the intervention. The cost of delivering perinatal ESGs was estimated to be £918 per person.
Conclusions
Perinatal ESGs may represent an effective intervention for perinatal women and birthing people with BPD. Their efficacy should be tested in a fully powered RCT, and this is a feasible undertaking.