We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This paper is concerned with the presence of early Latin linguistic and stylistic elements in a first-century BC text, Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. The poem notoriously features a variety of optional archaic forms, such as the terminations -ai for the genitive singular of the first declension, and -ier for the passive infinitive. These are found alongside their more standard equivalents -ae and -i, resulting in a mixed style that combines archaisms and non-archaisms. This study offers 1) a full reconsideration of these optional archaisms, providing richer data on their distribution both in the poem and in the hexameter line, and methodological consideration of ‘metrical convenience’, an explanatory concept which is often invoked when dealing with such forms but rarely explored in detail or depth; and 2) a new analysis of features of vocabulary and phraseology that are shared by Lucretius and early Latin authors. A particular concern will be distinguishing, where possible, between the influence of Latin and Greek: Lucretius’ use of compounds is demonstrably influenced by Empedocles, but also by Ennius; his use of tmesis finds some parallels in Homer, and some in Early Latin.
This chapter reverses the usual direction of travel in this question, and examines Genesis 6:1–4, a difficult passage in which divine beings are said to have taken mortal wives, who bore them offspring described as ‘the heroes of old, the men with a name’. The author supports the view that this reflects Greek influence on the Old Testament, and offers thoughts on the ways in which the Greek material was transmitted, and how the comparison can enhance our understanding of both the Greek and the Biblical narratives.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.