We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
In this chapter, we discuss late-life psychiatric disorders highlighting their unique biological, clinical, and therapeutic features compared to presentations earlier in life. They are frequently overlapping and associated with dementia and other neurodegenerative diseases. The three D’s – delirium, dementia, and depression – represent common geriatric psychiatry syndromes that can pose diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Clinical suspicion of delirium must prompt careful investigation of the underlying cause. Dementia is an umbrella term that describes progressive cognitive decline and related behavioral and functional impairments. Behavioral symptoms of dementia are a frequent reason for psychiatry referral. They have a more irregular course than the cognitive decline, and can be categorized in distinct dimensions. Late-life depression has unique features, such as the focus on somatic complaints instead of mood changes.
Delirium or acute brain dysfunction is the most common psychiatric condition. In the medical hospital. It is often not recognized and minimized by staff and predisposes patients to accelerated cognitive decline, depression, and PTSD. Treatment of the underlying medical conditions is essential. Keeping the patient safe and education of family members are equally important. There are no FDA approved medications to treat delirium, but Dexmedetomidine (alpha-2 agonist) has been beneficial in controlling agitation.
Agitation is an umbrella term for a spectrum of behaviors characterized by increased motor activity, restlessness, and emotional tension. Agitation is a cause of morbidity and complications during emergency center or hospital stays. The etiology of agitation states can be medical, psychiatric, substance or medication related, or as a result of delirium, and can be exacerbated by environmental factors. The goals of agitation assessment and management are (1) to ensure the safety of the patient and other individuals present, (2) the identification of risk factors (and cause, if possible) for psychomotor agitation, and (3) the implementation of the appropriate treatment in a timely and efficient manner. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological management strategies are needed for proper management, and teams should always start with verbal de-escalation and environmental modifications, followed by least-invasive means of administration of pharmacological agents, and potentially advancing to seclusion and restraints. Special considerations should be assessed in children, elderly, pregnant women, and those with medically unstable pictures who present with agitation, keeping in mind that delirium is underdiagnosed and goals of treatment must be customized.
The association between heatwave and heat-related outcomes in people with mental health conditions with and without psychotropics was unclear.
Methods
We identified people with severe mental illness (SMI) and depression, respectively, using Japanese claim data of Ibaraki prefecture during 1/1/2014–31/12/2021. We conducted self-controlled case series to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of heat-related illness, myocardial infarction and delirium, respectively, during 5-day pre-heatwave, heatwave, and 5-day post-heatwave periods v. all other periods (baseline) within an individual, stratified by periods prescribed psychotropics and periods not prescribed psychotropics, respectively.
Results
Among people with SMI, heatwave was associated with an increased rate of heat-related illness v. baseline, with no evidence of a difference in the IRRs between those prescribed v. not prescribed antipsychotics (IRR: 1.48 [95% CI 1.40–1.56]; 1.45 [95% CI 1.35–1.56] respectively, p interaction: 0.53). Among people with depression, heatwave was similarly associated with heat-related illness, with no evidence of a difference in the IRRs between those prescribed v. not prescribed antidepressants (IRR: 1.54 [95% CI 1.46–1.64]; 1.64 [95% CI 1.57–1.71] respectively, p interaction: 0.33). Smaller increased rates of heat-related illness were also observed in pre- and post-heatwave periods, v. baseline in both cohorts. There was weak evidence of an increased risk of MI and delirium associated with heatwave v. baseline.
Conclusions
We showed an increased risk of heat-related illness, myocardial infarction and delirium associated with heatwave in people with mental health conditions regardless of whether being prescribed psychotropics. Risks of heat-related illness, myocardial infarction and delirium associated with heatwave might not be factors to influence decisions about the routine use of psychotropics.
Delirium is more common in older adults, especially those with major neurocognitive disorders. Always do a thorough review of medications when considering any mental status changes in older adults. Medications and infections are the most common causes of delirium in older adults. Delirium is a medical emergency and warrants immediate medical evaluation and treatment.
Delirium as a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by disturbances in attention, awareness, and cognition that are not explained by a pre-existing neurocognitive disorder. The causes of delirium are varied. The most common causes of delirium in the long-term care setting are likely urinary tract infections, untreated pain, and medication side effects. The initial steps recommended in managing delirium involve identifying and addressing underlying medical conditions, reducing environmental triggers, and minimizing exposure to drugs. Besides treatment of the cause, management of delirium primarily involves psychosocial interventions. These can include environmental modifications such as addressing poor lighting, excessive noise, or lack of orientation cues.
Delirium frequently occurs among hospital in-patients, with significant attributable healthcare costs. It is associated with long-term adverse outcomes, including an eightfold increased risk of subsequent dementia. The purpose of this article is to inform clinicians of the best practices for spotting, stopping and treating delirium and provide guidance on common challenging clinical dilemmas. For spotting delirium, suggested screening tools are the 4 ‘A's Test (in general medical settings) and the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Prevention is best achieved with multicomponent interventions and targeted strategies focusing on: (a) avoiding iatrogenic causes; (b) brain optimisation by ensuring smooth bodily functioning; (c) maintaining social interactions and normality. Non-pharmacological approaches are the first line for treatment; they largely mirror prevention strategies, but the focus of empirical evidence is on prevention. Although sufficient evidence is lacking for most pharmacological approaches, an antipsychotic at low doses for short durations may be of utility for highly distressing or high-risk situations, particularly in hyperactive delirium, but only as a last resort.
Delirium is a severe neuropsychiatric syndrome caused by physical illness, associated with high mortality. Understanding risk factors for delirium is key to targeting prevention and screening. Whether severe mental illness (SMI) predisposes people to delirium is not known. We aimed to establish whether pre-existing SMI diagnosis is associated with higher risk of delirium diagnosis and mortality following delirium diagnosis.
Methods
A retrospective cohort and nested case–control study using linked primary and secondary healthcare databases from 2000–2017. We identified people diagnosed with SMI, matched to non-SMI comparators. We compared incidence of delirium diagnoses between people with SMI diagnoses and comparators, and between SMI subtypes; schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and ‘other psychosis’. We compared 30-day mortality following a hospitalisation involving delirium between people with SMI diagnoses and comparators, and between SMI subtypes.
Results
We identified 20 566 people with SMI diagnoses, matched to 71 374 comparators. Risk of delirium diagnosis was higher for all SMI subtypes, with a higher risk conferred by SMI in the under 65-year group, (aHR:7.65, 95% CI 5.45–10.7, ⩾65-year group: aHR:3.35, 95% CI 2.77–4.05). Compared to people without SMI, people with an SMI diagnosis overall had no difference in 30-day mortality following a hospitalisation involving delirium (OR:0.66, 95% CI 0.38–1.14).
Conclusions
We found an association between SMI and delirium diagnoses. People with SMI may be more vulnerable to delirium when in hospital than people without SMI. There are limitations to using electronic healthcare records and further prospective study is needed to confirm these findings.
Gloria HY Wong, The University of Hong Kong,Bosco HM Ma, Hong Kong Alzheimer's Disease Association,Maggie NY Lee, Hong Kong Alzheimer's Disease Association,David LK Dai, Hong Kong Alzheimer's Disease Association
Readers are presented with 19 case examples of atypical Alzheimer’s disease, other dementias, and conditions resembling dementia. Each case comes with a summary of cognitive and functional assessment results, complaints by informants, clinical history, laboratory examinations indicated, diagnosis, and management, followed by insights from both medical and psychosocial perspectives. These are organised around the following themes: cases illustrative of when imaging and further observation are needed; cases that may be referred to as ‘pseudodementia’, and cases where a decision to refer on may be needed.
Children with prolonged hospital admissions for CHD often develop delirium. Antipsychotic medications (APMs) have been used to treat delirium but are known to prolong the QTc duration. There is concern for prolongation of the QTc interval in cardiac patients who may be more vulnerable to electrocardiogram (ECG) changes and may have postoperative QTc prolongation already. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of APM on QTc duration in postoperative paediatric cardiac patients and determine the effect of quetiapine and risperidone in treating delirium and QTc prolongation.
Design:
Retrospective study, July 1, 2017–May 31, 2022.
Setting:
Tertiary children’s hospital.
Patients:
Included were patients admitted to the paediatric cardiac ICU at Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements and Main Results:
ECGs, delirium scores, and drug information were collected. Delirium was defined as Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) score >9. Mixed effect models were performed to evaluate the effect of surgery on QTc change and the effect of antipsychotics on QTc and CAPD changes. There were 139 children, 55% male and 67% surgical admissions. Median age was 5.9 months. Mean QTc increased after cardiac surgery by 18 ms (p = 0.014, 95% CI 3.65–32.4). There was no significant change in QTc after antipsychotic administration (p = 0.064). The mean CAPD score decreased (12.5–7.2; p < 0.001). Quetiapine had the most improvement in delirium, and risperidone had the least improvement (77.8%, n = 14; 37.8%, n = 34, respectively; p = 0.002).
Conclusions:
The QTc interval did not have a statistically significant change after the administration of antipsychotics, while there was improvement in the CAPD score. APMs may be administered safely without significant prolongation of the QTc and are an effective treatment for delirium.
Edited by
Nevena V. Radonjić, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Thomas L. Schwartz, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Stephen M. Stahl, University of California, San Diego
Edited by
Nevena V. Radonjić, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Thomas L. Schwartz, State University of New York Upstate Medical University,Stephen M. Stahl, University of California, San Diego
Edited by
David Kingdon, University of Southampton,Paul Rowlands, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS foundation Trust,George Stein, Emeritus of the Princess Royal University Hospital
Neuropsychiatry has a long and fascinating history as a discipline at the interface between neurology and psychiatry that combines clinical observations with modern investigational techniques. Historically, organic psychiatry has focused on clinical syndromes with regional connections affecting the four cortical lobes and the corpus callosum. Behavioural neurology has developed from early observations of classical neurocognitive syndromes, including aphasia, alexia, apraxia, agnosia and Gerstmann syndrome. A number of common neurological conditions often present with specific psychiatric symptoms: traumatic brain injury, cerebrovascular disease, brain tumours, epilepsy, movement disorders, infectious diseases and autoimmune neurological disorders such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus and autoimmune encephalopathies. The differential diagnosis between delirium, dementia and pseudodementia can pose significant challenges. Finally, several toxic, metabolic and endocrine disorders can have clinically relevant neuropsychiatric manifestations.
Older people are one of the biggest populations requiring hospital care, and the demand is expected to rise. There is a compelling need to transform hospital environments to meet older-people physical, psychological, and emotional needs. In the UK, certain hospital circumstances such as ward configuration, mealtimes, noise levels, and visiting hours can be detrimental to patients admitted with delirium and to those living with dementia. In rehabilitation settings, lack of meaningful activities, isolation, and boredom are additional key challenges.
Models of good hospital practice catering for old people exist, both in the UK and internationally, and there is strong evidence for their clinical effectiveness. Environmental strategies to maintain orientation and enhance safety in hospital are crucial for a positive experience. Arts-based programmes in acute care settinsg can improve the experience of a hospital admission.
A cultural shift is warranted to champion the delivery an elderly-friendly service. Creating the right environment requires a hospital-wide system, a ward-based service, and a specially trained clinical team. In this chapter we will present examples of essential ingredients for hospitals and wards, and desirable qualities in clinicians who work in collaboration to deliver the best outcomes for an older population.
Edited by
Roland Dix, Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester,Stephen Dye, Norfolk and Suffolk Foundation Trust, Ipswich,Stephen M. Pereira, Keats House, London
This chapter describes clinical situations that arise in the general hospital requiring intensive psychiatric care, the use of rapid tranquilisation (RT) and the legal aspects of management. It discusses challenges of delivering psychiatric care in general hospitals, including organisational barriers, environmental difficulties, lack of access to occupational/psychological interventions and managing psychiatric conditions alongside complex medical care, including in the critical care setting. It highlights staff factors affecting good psychiatric treatment, including lack of knowledge about psychiatric conditions and low confidence in providing treatment to mental health patients. The chapter also describes how mental health liaison teams work in the general hospitals.
There is concern that hydroxyzine exacerbates delirium, but a recent preliminary study suggested that the combination of haloperidol and hydroxyzine was effective against delirium. This study examined whether the concomitant use of hydroxyzine and haloperidol worsened delirium in patients with cancer.
Methods
This retrospective, observational study was conducted at 2 general hospitals in Japan. The medical records of patients with cancer who received haloperidol for delirium from July to December 2020 were reviewed. The treatments for delirium included haloperidol alone or haloperidol combined with hydroxyzine. The primary outcome was the duration from the first day of haloperidol administration to the resolution of delirium, defined as its absence for 2 consecutive days. The time to delirium resolution was analyzed to compare the haloperidol group and hydroxyzine combination group using the log-rank test with the Kaplan–Meier method. Secondary outcomes were (1) the total dose of antipsychotic medications, including those other than haloperidol (measured in chlorpromazine-equivalent doses), and (2) the frequencies of detrimental incidents during delirium, specifically falls and self-removal of drip infusion lines. The unpaired t-test and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze secondary outcomes.
Results
Of 497 patients who received haloperidol, 118 (23.7%) also received hydroxyzine. No significant difference in time to delirium resolution was found between the haloperidol group and the hydroxyzine combination group (log-rank test, P = 0.631). No significant difference between groups was found in either chlorpromazine-equivalent doses or the frequency of detrimental incidents.
Significance of results
This study showed that the concomitant use of hydroxyzine and haloperidol did not worsen delirium in patients with cancer.
Due to their immunocompromised state, recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCTs) are at a higher risk of opportunistic infections, such as that of toxoplasmosis. Toxoplasmosis is a rare but mortal infection that can cause severe neurological symptoms, including confusion. In immunosuppressed individuals, such as those with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), toxoplasmosis can cause movement disorders, including hemichorea–hemiballismus. We present the case of a 54-year-old Caucasian male with a history of hypertension and JAK-2-negative primary myelofibrosis who underwent an allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplant from a related donor. After the development of acute changes in mental status, left-sided weakness, and left-sided hemichorea–hemiballismus post-transplant, the patient was readmitted to the hospital. Subsequent testing included an magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, which revealed multiple ring-enhancing lesions around the thalami and basal ganglia, as well as a cerebrospinal fluid tap that tested positive for toxoplasmosis. The patient was initially treated with intravenous clindamycin and oral pyrimethamine with leucovorin. The completion of treatment improved the patient’s mental status but did not improve his hemichorea–hemiballismus. This case illustrates an uncommon complication associated with central nervous system (CNS) toxoplasmosis in stem cell transplant recipients. Due to its rarity, cerebral toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients often remains undetected, particularly in HSCT patients who are immunosuppressed to improve engraftment. Neurological and neuropsychiatric symptoms due to toxoplasmosis may be misidentified as psychiatric morbidities, delaying appropriate treatment. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays offer methods that are sensitive and specific to detecting toxoplasmosis and provide opportunities for early intervention.
Cognitive Reserve (CR) developed from observation that several individuals show fewer cognitive impairment compared to others with the same brain injuries or neuropathology. Cognitive reserve is a potentially modifiable characteristic. Most of studies on cognitive reserve were conducted on chronic progressive diseases such as dementia. This study aims to define the role of cognitive reserve in geriatric delirium cases.
Methods:
This case-control study was conducted in the acute geriatric inpatient of Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia on June to September 2019 that consisted of 33 subjects with delirium and 33 controls. The measurement of cognitive reserve was done using the Indonesian adaptation of Cognitive Reserve Index questionnaire (CRIq) with 3 subscales, i.e. Education, Work Activity and Leisure Time.
Results:
We found that the CRIq scores of delirium patients were lower compared to the non-delirium controls both on total and each subscores, with a statistically significant mean difference (p<0,01). Patients with low-medium cognitive reserve also more likely to develop delirium compared to those with medium-high cognitive reserve (OR 9; 95% CI 2.86 to 28.22).
Conclusion:
Low cognitive reserve may serve as a risk factor for delirium in the elderly. The measure of CRI in the geriatric inpatients unit can be used to determine those at risk of developing delirium. Further research are warranted to elaborate potentially modifiable variables of cognitive reserve to minimize the risk of delirium.
Recent decades have seen a considerable renaissance of scienti?c interest in the study of human consciousness. For the purposes of descriptive clinical psychopathology, consciousness can be simply de?ned as a state of awareness of the self and the environment. Disorders of consciousness are associated with disorders of perception, attention, attitudes, thinking, registration, and orientation. Consciousness can be changed in three basic ways: it may be dream-like, depressed, or restricted. This chapter outlines these different types of disturbance of consciousness, including delirium, twilight states, and dissociative fugue, among other conditions. The chapter concludes with suggested questions for eliciting specific symptoms in clinical practice, in addition to standard history-taking and mental state examination.
Postoperative neurocognitive disorder is common after all forms of surgery in older adults. The mechanisms are multifactorial, and probably require pre-existing neuropathology, whether the patient is symptomatic or not. In Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other tauopathies, the microtubule-associated protein tau can undergo aberrant hyperphosphorylation potentially leading to the development of neurofibrillary pathology, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of the disease. Preclinical and human CSF studies suggest that anesthesia and surgery elicits an increment in CNS tauopathy, which may accelerate any preexisting neuropathology and produce a risk of delirium and the commonly reported changes in cognition.
Participants and Methods:
In this session, the author will present a bench to beside review of how tau protein is altered by perioperative factors and its potential relationship to the impairment of cognition after surgery and anesthesia. Published and ongoing studies will be reviewed to result in a discussion as to why changes in tau protein are concerning in perioperative disorders of cognition.
Results:
The presenter will initially review pre-clinical studies focusing on the impact of anesthetics and surgery-induced inflammation on tau pathology and how the impairment of resolution of surgery-induced inflammation, notably decreased lipoxin A4 signaling, is altered by aging, gender, or an increase in the tau pathology burden. These preclinical studies have partially informed a multi-center federally funded observational clinical study, currently in progress, involving neuroimaging to determine whether pre-operative CNS tauopathy, as reflected by PET imaging, predicts delirium and other cognitive and functional outcomes. This translational study will also examine whether anesthesia and spine surgery produces a longitudinal change in the brain tau burden in older adults, as compared to control, nonoperative patients.
Conclusions:
Bench to bedside research is needed in order to promote evidence-based care for patients at risk for ADRD.