We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Definitions such as art theatres, exceptional theatres, little theatres, or independent theatres between the nineteenth and twentieth centuries refer to non-commercial experiments, especially in the European theatre. In Italy, their season was short-lived: The first was Anton Giulio Bragaglia’s Teatro degli Indipendenti, while the most famous was Pirandello’s Teatro degli Odescalchi. Often small, organized as private clubs to avoid censorship, they all had economic difficulties and generally brief lifespans. In Europe, however, they marked a significant phenomenon, privileging a repertoire that was often not only intellectually but also “politically” engaging: plays that spoke of new ways of being men and women, of new relationships between human beings. They corresponded with demands for change that were not only theatrical. In Italy, however, this chapter argues, the rise of the little theaters took place during the years of Fascism, so their innovations were cultural rather than political and lacked the extra-theatrical values that had been fundamental to other European art theatres.
“Mussolini the Impresario, I: Fascism and the Art Theatre” retraces Mussolini's first incursions into the world of theatrical sponsorship with two Roman playhouses: Luigi Pirandello’s Teatro d’Arte di Roma and Anton Giulio Bragaglia’s Teatro Sperimentale degli Indipendenti. Casting these early endeavors as exploratory missions to determine what kinds of artistic partnerships – and what kinds of plays – could benefit the fascist “revolution,” Gaborik uses performance analysis, official and private correspondence, and journalistic reporting to reconstruct developments in the regime’s patronage schemes and Mussolini's collaboration strategies. These case studies reveal complex negotiations, agreements between intellectual courtiers and their king, rather than a simplistic wielding of the authoritarian’s carrot or stick. Further, through a focus on Pirandello’s and Bragaglia’s revolutionary methods, particularly their championing of the theatre director (a figure then unfamiliar in Italy), the chapter highlights il Duce’s desire for innovation and his optimism that high art could help achieve his political ends.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.