To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This article explores the narrative dimension of foreign policy, using the resurgence of anti-colonial rhetoric in Russian political discourse since the invasion of Ukraine as a case study. Engaging with the ‘narrative turn’ in IR and the strategic narratives framework, it proposes to use strategic narratives as a methodological tool to identify the intended effect behind Russian actors’ discursive strategies. This approach may facilitate inferences about their foreign policy preferences, in the context of Moscow’s aggression, proclaimed efforts to ‘de-Westernise’ the international order, and reorientation towards the ‘Global South’.
Empirically, the article draws on content analysis of multiple Russia-related multilingual textual and audiovisual corpora, employing a three-step approach. It first identifies the ‘narrators’ of Russia’s anti-(neo)colonial strategic narrative and its circulation among Russian elites. It then examines how this narrative is widely projected abroad by Russia’s ecosystem of information influence, focusing on sub-Saharan Africa. Finally, the analysis identifies three foreign policy motivations suggested by this narrative resurgence: rehabilitating Russia’s status by framing its contemporary foreign policy as a continuation of Soviet support for decolonisation; advocating for a ‘multipolar’, ‘post-Western’ international order aligned with Russian interests in the ‘Global South’ countries; and undermining Western norms and policies with a whataboutist perspective.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.