Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-c8zdz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T04:46:03.726Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue true
  • English
  • Français

UNDER THE IMPRESSION: MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING OF LORD FREDERICK CAMPBELL CHARTER XXI 5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2022

Alison Hudson  and
Christina Duffy
Alison Hudson
Affiliation:
Office of Undergraduate Research, University of Central Florida, 12796 Aquarius Agora Drive, Bldg. 123 Orlando, FL 32816, USA. Email: alison.hudson@ucf.edu
Christina Duffy
Affiliation:
Collection Care, The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London NW1 2DB, UK. Email: Christina.Duffy@bl.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Lord Frederick Campbell Charter xxi 5 is the only surviving English document that still has an authentic, legible, pre-Conquest seal attached to it. The text purports to be a writ of Edward the Confessor (1003x5–1066) granting a slew of rights to Christ Church Cathedral, Canterbury. We examined the writ using multispectral imaging to recover layers of erased text.

Many scholars have noted that the text of the writ was altered on at least one occasion. Now, multispectral imaging confirms that there were multiple layers of erasures, even more than previously anticipated. The original writ may have been inscribed on reused parchment. This can be used as evidence for the conditions (and even the immense quantity) in which writs were produced during Edward’s reign. Alternatively – or additionally – the writ’s multiple alterations could suggest that it was rewritten repeatedly after the Conquest, during various phases of Canterbury’s post-Conquest property disputes. The results confirm Nicholas Brooks’ hypothesis that at one stage the text was altered from referring to the rights to the archbishop alone (in the singular), to instead refer to the whole community at Christ Church (in the plural). Taken together, these results reveal shifts in legal thinking in Canterbury between 1066 and 1100, while demonstrating the enduring authority of Edward the Confessor’s seal. These results also show the potential for using multispectral imaging to illuminate – literally – the history of manuscript production.

Keywords

early medieval historyNorman Conquestwritssealsmultispectral imagingconservationdigital humanities

Information

Type
Research paper
Information
The Antiquaries Journal , Volume 102 , September 2022 , pp. 111 - 133
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Antiquaries of London

References

Manuscript and archaeological sources

Archives nationales, Paris, Cartons de roi, K 19 no. 6Google Scholar
Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, AN1836p.135.371Google Scholar
BL, Add Ch 19802Google Scholar
BL, Cotton Ch x 11Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Augustus ii 49Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Augustus ii 80Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Augustus ii 90Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Claudius A iii Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Domitian A viii Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Tiberius A ii Google Scholar
BL, Cotton ms Vespasian A xxii Google Scholar
BL, Doubleday Cast liv.15Google Scholar
BL, Doubleday Cast lxii.4Google Scholar
BL, Doubleday Cast lxxvii.6Google Scholar
BL, Doubleday Cast lxxix.51Google Scholar
BL, Egerton Ch 523Google Scholar
BL, Harley Ch 45 A 36Google Scholar
BL, LFC xxi 5Google Scholar
BL, LFC xxii 2Google Scholar
BL, Royal ms 1 D ix Google Scholar
BL, Sloane Ch xxxiv 1Google Scholar
BM, BEP 1822,1214.1Google Scholar
BM, BEP 1829,1114.1Google Scholar
BM, BEP 1832,0512.2Google Scholar
BM, BEP 1847,0804.1Google Scholar
BM, BEP 1881,0404.1Google Scholar
BM, BEP 2019,8032.1Google Scholar
BM, BEP AF.458Google Scholar
Corpus Christi, Cambridge, ms 173Google Scholar
CC Chart Ant, C 3Google Scholar
CC Chart Ant, C 4Google Scholar
CC Chart Ant, C 1279Google Scholar
CC Chart Ant, E 28Google Scholar
CC Chart Ant, Reg. AGoogle Scholar
Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge, CM.88-2013Google Scholar
John Rylands Library, Manchester, ms 109Google Scholar
LPL, ms 1212Google Scholar
LPL, ms 1370Google Scholar
Norwich Castle Museum, Norwich, NWHCM: 2000.42Google Scholar
Rochester Cathedral, Rochester, ms A. 3. 5Google Scholar
The National Archives, Kew, E 31/2/1/144Google Scholar
Westminster Abbey, London, WAM xii Google Scholar
Westminster Abbey, London, WAM xv Google Scholar
Westminster Abbey, London, WAM xix Google Scholar

Printed editions of primary sources

Baker, P 2000. The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: a collaborative edition 8, MS F, Boydell & Brewer, Cambridge Google Scholar
Bates, D 1998. Regesta Regum Anglo-Normannorum: the Acta of William I, 1066–1087, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Brooks, N and Kelly, S 2013. Charters of Christ Church, Canterbury, 2 vols, Oxford University Press for the British Academy, Oxford Google Scholar
Douglas, D C 1944. The Domesday Monachorum, Royal Historical Society, London Google Scholar
Harmer, F 1952. Anglo-Saxon Writs, Manchester University Press, Manchester Google Scholar
Kelly, S 1995. Charters of St Augustine’s Abbey, Canterbury, and Minster-in-Thanet, Oxford University Press for the British Academy, Oxford Google Scholar
Mason, E 1988. Westminster Abbey Charters, 1066–c 1214, Record Society Publications, London Google Scholar
Schmitt, F S 1938. S. Anselmi cantuariensis archiepiscopi opera omnia, 6 vols, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London Google Scholar
van Caenegem, R C 1990. English Lawsuits from William I to Richard I, 2 vols, Selden Society, London Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Bates, D 1978. ‘Land pleas of William I’s reign: Penenden Heath revisited’, Bull Inst Hist Res, 51, 1–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkhofer, R 2006. ‘The Canterbury forgeries revisited’, Haskins Soc J, 18, 36–50 Google Scholar
Bishop, T A M and Chaplais, P, 1957. Facsimiles of English Royal Writs to AD 1100, Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Brooks, N 2011. ‘The archbishopric of Canterbury and the so-called introduction of knight-service into England’, Anglo-Norman Stud, 34, 41–62 Google Scholar
Campbell, J 2000. The Anglo-Saxon State, Hambledon, London Google Scholar
Cooper, A 2001. ‘Extraordinary privilege: the trial of Penenden Heath and the Domesday Inquest’, Eng Hist Rev, 116, 1167–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doane, A N 2019. ‘Documenting the demise of Old English: the legacy of a royal writ from Cnut to Henry II’, J Eng and Germanic Philol, 118, 439–67Google Scholar
Fleming, R 1997. ‘Christ Church Canterbury’s Anglo-Norman cartulary’, in Hollister, C Warren (ed), Anglo-Norman Political Culture and the Twelfth-Century Renaissance, 83–155, Boydell, Woodbridge Google Scholar
Fleming, R 1998. Domesday Book and the Law, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Garnett, G 2007. Conquered England: kingship, succession and tenure 1066–1166, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Heslop, T A 1980. ‘English seals from the mid-ninth century to 1100’, J Brit Archaeol Ass, 133, 1–16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, A 2022. Bishop Æthelwold, His Followers, and Saints’ Cults in Early Medieval England: power, belief and religious reform, Boydell, Woodbridge Google Scholar
Jorgensen, A 2010. ‘Rewriting the Æthelredian chronicle: narrative style and identity in Anglo-Saxon Chronicle MS F’, in Jorgensen, A (ed), Reading the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: language, literature, history, 113–38, Brepols, Turnhout Google Scholar
Karkov, C 2004. The Ruler Portraits of Anglo-Saxon England, Boydell, Woodbridge Google Scholar
Kelly, S 1988. ‘Some forgeries in the archive of St Augustine’s, Canterbury’, in Fälschungen im Mittelalter, IV: diplomatische Fälschungen (II), 347–69, MGH Schriften 33.4, HannoverGoogle Scholar
Keynes, S 1988. ‘Regenbald the chancellor (sic)’, Anglo-Norman Stud, 10, 185–222 Google Scholar
Lambert, T 2007. Law and Order in Anglo-Saxon England, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Le Patourel, J 1948. ‘The reports on the trial on Penenden Heath’, in Hunt, R W, Pantin, W A and Southern, R W (eds), Studies in Medieval History Presented to Frederick Maurice Powicke, 15–26, Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
McKitterick, R 2007. ‘Palimpsests: concluding remarks’, in Declercq, G (ed), Early Medieval Palimpsests, 145–52, Brepols, Turnhout Google Scholar
Roach, L 2021. Forgery and Memory at the End of the First Millennium, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey Google Scholar
Sawyer, P H 1968. Anglo-Saxon Charters: an annotated list and bibliography, Royal Historical Society, London Google Scholar
Sharpe, R 2003. ‘The use of writs in the eleventh century’, Anglo-Saxon Eng, 32, 247–91Google Scholar
Treharne, E 2012. Living Through Conquest: the politics of early English, 1020–1220, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Winkler, E 2017. Royal Responsibility in Anglo-Norman Historical Writing, Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hudson and Duffy supplementary material

Hudson and Duffy supplementary material

Download Hudson and Duffy supplementary material(File)
File 17.4 KB