Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-bkbbk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-23T22:31:44.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

First supralittoral gastropod (Eupulmonata: Ellobiidae) preserved in uppermost Albian-lowermost Cenomanian opaque amber of Charente-Maritime (France)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2025

Didier Merle*
Affiliation:
Sorbonne Université, UMR 7207 (CR2P, MNHN, CNRS), 57 rue Cuvier, Paris, France
Didier Néraudeau
Affiliation:
Université Rennes, Géosciences Rennes, Bât.15 campus Beaulieu, Rennes, France
Paul Tafforeau
Affiliation:
European Synchrotron Radiation Facilities (ESRF), 6, rue Jules-Horowitz, 38043, Grenoble, France
*
Corresponding author: Didier Merle; Email: didier.merle@mnhn.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marine molluscs are exceptional in Cretaceous ambers. Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. is the first gastropod ever preserved in French uppermost Albian-lowermost Cenomanian opaque amber. It belongs to the Ellobiidae that are distributed in the Cenozoic supralittoral zones in close vicinity of the mangroves. It has been discovered by non-destructive X-ray phase-contrast imaging. The forest of conifers that produced the amber embedding this gastropod did not form its habitat, and it may have been transported to the foreshore detritus. Palaeoellobium decampsi contributes to the understanding of the ellobiid early adaptive radiation known by few taxa, compared with the significant Cenozoic diversification.

Information

Type
Rapid Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Finding marine or brackish organisms in fossil resin seems a priori unlikely. However, several discoveries in the last 20 years, in the mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, have demonstrated the possibility for aquatic animals, including marine ones, to be exceptionally preserved in Cenomanian resin (Mao et al., Reference Mao, Liang, Su, Li, Rao, Zhang, Xia, Fu, Cai and Huang2018; Xing et al., Reference Xing, Sames, McKellar, Xi, Bai and Wan2018; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Wang and Jarzembowski2019a, b; Bolotov et al., Reference Bolotov, Aksenova, Vikhrev, Konopleva, Chapurina and Kondakov2021). As far as microorganisms are concerned, Girard et al. (Reference Girard, Schmidt, Saint Martin, Struwe, Perrichot, Saint Martin, Grosheny, Breton and Néraudeau2008) have also described different microfossils included in the mid-Cretaceous Charentese amber, such as foraminifers, radiolarians, amoebae, larval spines of sea urchins, diatoms and demosponges. The gastropod discovered in Charente-Maritime is the first gastropod reported from European Cretaceous amber and is one of the exceptional marine invertebrates discovered there. Gastropods previously discovered in Cretaceous amber come mainly from Cenomanian Burmese amber and are freshwater or terrestrial species (Hirano et al., Reference Hirano, Asato, Yamamoto, Takahashi and Chiba2019; Neubauer et al., Reference Neubauer, Xing and Jochum2019a; Xing et al., Reference Xing, Ross, Stilwell, Fang and McKellar2019; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Wang and Jarzembowski2019a, revised by Neubauer et al., Reference Neubauer, Páll-Gergely, Jochum and Harzhauser2019b; Yu & Neubauer, Reference Yu and Neubauer2021; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Neubauer and Jochum2021; Balashov & Anistratenko, Reference Balashov and Anistratenko2024). Yu et al. (Reference Yu, Wang and Jarzembowski2019a) described two new species of gastropods and identified them as marine Epitoniidae, but, on revision, Neubauer et al. (Reference Neubauer, Páll-Gergely, Jochum and Harzhauser2019b) considered them terrestrial cyclophoroids. However, in association with an ammonite found in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber, several specimens of gastropods have been attributed to the genus Mathilda (family Mathildae) (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Kelly, Mu, Ross, Kennedy, Broly, Xia, Zhang, Wang and Dilcher2019b). But, it is certainly not a Mathilda and not even a marine gastropod. Mathilda would have a heterostrophic protoconch, while this one’s protoconch is large, normally coiled and has few whorls – clearly a direct developer. This is a terrestrial species, probably Pseudopomatias or another Pupinidae (T. A. Neubauer, personal communication). Finally, the discovery of an Ellobiidae, a supralittoral gastropod, in European Cretaceous amber is an extremely rare occurrence.

2. Material and methods

2.a. Geographical and geological settings

The amber containing the gastropod described herein was collected from the quarry of Archingeay–Les Nouillers (Fig. 1), in the Charente-Maritime region (SW France) (Néraudeau et al., Reference Néraudeau, Perrichot, Dejax, Masure, Nel, Philippe, Moreau, Guillocheau and Guyot2002). The sandy base of the section, which yields lignitic clay with amber (Néraudeau et al., Reference Néraudeau, Perrichot, Dejax, Masure, Nel, Philippe, Moreau, Guillocheau and Guyot2002, fig. 2, facies A1sl), has provided fossil plants (Moreau et al., Reference Moreau, Néraudeau, Philippe and Dépré2017) and a few pyritized brackish oysters (Videt & Platel, Reference Videt and Platel2005). It was dated first as possibly uppermost Albian (100 Ma) based on palynological studies (Néraudeau et al., Reference Néraudeau, Perrichot, Dejax, Masure, Nel, Philippe, Moreau, Guillocheau and Guyot2002; Dejax & Masure, Reference Dejax and Masure2005; Peyrot et al., Reference Peyrot, Jolly and Barron2005), but more likely to be lowermost Cenomanian according to the following works (Batten et al., Reference Batten, Colin and Néraudeau2010; Peyrot et al., Reference Peyrot, Barron, Polette, Batten and Néraudeau2019). Since the first publication about the amber deposit, in 2002 (Néraudeau et al., Reference Néraudeau, Perrichot, Dejax, Masure, Nel, Philippe, Moreau, Guillocheau and Guyot2002), the Lagerstätte of Archingeay–Les Nouillers has provided hundreds of terrestrial arthropod inclusions (mainly insects, but also arachnids and myriapods) and abundant forest microorganisms (fungi), but only a few specimens of organisms linked to aquatic or foreshore environments (Perrichot et al., Reference Perrichot, Néraudeau, Tafforeau and Penney2010). Moreover, a few unpublished coastal isopods have been found, including a specimen associated with a gastropod in the same piece of amber.

Figure 1. Geographical and geological location of the amber deposit of Archingeay–Les Nouillers (white star) where Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. has been discovered. Dark grey areas correspond to Cenomanian outcrops.

2.b. The fossiliferous content of the amber drop including the gastropod

The piece of amber is of milky caramel colour and totally opaque (Fig. 2). Its maximum length measures 35 mm, and its diameter is ca. 23 mm. It also contains a complete specimen and an isolated leg of a Blattodea, a species of Dermaptera, a species of Opiliones, and a coastal isopod.

Figure 2. Piece of amber (maximum length 35 mm) containing Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. Before scanning in microtomography, the hardly fractured amber piece was set in a protective epoxy block for conservation purposes. Scale bar: 10 mm. Photo: P. Tafforeau, ESRF.

The fossiliferous amber sample is housed at the University of Rennes, in the collections of the Geological Institute, with the catalogue number ARC-423.

2.c. The imaging by microtomography

Propagation phase-contrast X-ray synchrotron microtomography (afterwards PPC-SrμCT) was used to image the specimen and its morphological features (Tafforeau et al., Reference Tafforeau, Boistel, Boller, Bravin, Brunet, Chaimanee, Cloetens, Feist, Hoszowska, Jaeger, Kay, Lazzari, Marivaux, Nel, Nemoz, Thibault, Vignaud and Zabler2006). The specimen was scanned following the protocols described in Lak et al. (Reference Lak, Néraudeau, Nel, Cloetens, Perrichot and Tafforeau2008) with a set energy of 30 keV (using a double Si 111 Bragg monochromator) and a 960 mm distance between the camera and the sample. Scan acquisition consisted of 1,999 images over 180 degrees, with 0.7 s of exposure time and 5.06 μ of voxel size. After the scan, the slices were reconstructed using a filtered back-projection algorithm adapted for local tomography applications (PyHST software, ESRF). The later three-dimensional processing was made using VGStudiomax 2.1 software (Volume Graphics, Heidelberg, Germany). Before scanning, the hardly fractured amber piece was set in a protective epoxy block for conservation purposes (Fig. 2).

3. Systematic palaeontology

Class GASTROPODA Cuvier, Reference Cuvier1795

Subclass HETEROBRANCHIA Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1837

Superorder EUPULMONATA Haszprunar & Huber, Reference Haszprunar and Huber1990

Order ELLOBIIDA Van Mol, Reference Van Mol1967

Family ELLOBIIDAE L. Pfeiffer, Reference Pfeiffer1854

Subfamily ELLOBIINAE L. Pfeiffer, Reference Pfeiffer1854

Genus Palaeoellobium gen. nov.

LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:317DE264-5560-407C-B053-

61DF1EE07E3D.

Type species. Palaeoellobium decampsi sp. nov.

Etymology. A combination of palaiós (in Greek) and Ellobium, type genus of the family Ellobiidae.

Diagnosis. Medium-sized, ovate shell with conical spire. Heterostrophic protoconch. Fine non-lamellar undulating ribs more prominent adapically than abapically; no spiral sculpture. Aperture moderately wide. Columellar callus moderately delimited. Columellar fold obsolete; parietal fold prominent. Outer lip sharp without marked palatal swelling. Umbilical zone puckered.

Description. As for type species.

Stratigraphic and geographic range. Uppermost Albian to lowermost Cenomanian, Charente-Maritime, SW France.

Included species. Type species only.

Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov.

(Fig. 3)

Figure 3. Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. Holotype Arc-423.5, microtomographic reconstruction. (a–b) Dorsal views, (c) profile view, (d) apertural view, (e) apical view and (f) abapical view. Abbreviations: si – subsutural inflection; il – inner lip; pf – parietal fold; cc – columellar callus; cf – columellar fold. Scale bar: 1 mm.

LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:53B4D03D-BC81-4853-B870-13B2B718ACB6.

Derivation of name. Dedicated to Christian Décamps, the lead singer of the pop music group Ange.

Holotype. Arc-423.5 (Geological Institute of the University of Rennes, France), shell height: 10 mm, greatest width of a shell perpendicular to height: 4.9 mm (Fig. 3). The holotype corresponds to an external imprint of a shell. Within the aperture (Fig. 3d, f), some structures can be seen that could be the remains of soft anatomical parts. However, it is impossible to identify any organs.

Type locality. Archingeay–Les Nouillers area, quarry located in the village of Les Nouillers, Charente-Maritime, SW France.

Type stratum. Uppermost Albian to lowermost Cenomanian.

Shell description. Middle-sized, elongate ovate shells with conical spire; apical angle 47° (based on Fig. 3d). Heterostrophic protoconch, slightly deviated to the right in ventral view. Moderately high spire of eight weakly convex whorls. Suture narrowly incised with narrow subsutural inflexion. Last whorl convex with the convex base, representing 63% of the total height. Axial sculpture displaying approximately 15–20 ribs on the first teleoconch whorls and 25–30 ribs on the penultimate and last whorl. Fine non-lamellar undulating ribs more prominent adapically and tending to fade gradually abapically. Aperture moderately wide, posteriorly angulated, with a faintly incised basal margin and representing 53% of total height. Columellar callus moderately delimited, very weakly thickened callus rim in abapical half of aperture and poorly distinct adapically. Columellar fold obsolete. Parietal fold prominent, equally positioned centrally. Outer lip sharp without marked palatal swelling. Dense growth lines immediately behind the outer lip (Fig 2b). Umbilical zone puckered (Fig. 3f).

Discussion. The shell shape, the aperture and the heterostrophic protoconch of Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. are reminiscent of members of the family Ellobiidae represented by a few Cretaceous genera. Proauricula (Huckriede, Reference Huckriede1967) (type species: Auricula jaccardi, de Loriol & Jaccard, Reference Loriol and Jaccard1865) from the Early Cretaceous of Eurasia differs from Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. by having inflated, rounded teleoconch whorls and a dense network of very low lamellar ribs that do not tend to fade gradually abapically (see Huckriede, Reference Huckriede1967, pl. 16, figs 9-1; Pan & Zhu, Reference Pan and Zhu2007, fig. 4a-b). Zaptychius (Walcott, Reference Walcott1883) (type species: Zaptychius carbonaria, Walcott, Reference Walcott1883; Zaptychinae) is mainly known from the Paleozoic. However, Pan & Zhu, Reference Pan and Zhu2007 (p. 221, fig. 4a–b) described Zaptychius costatus from the Early Cretaceous of North China. This species has a sculpture of finely lamellar and flexuous axial ribs, incised spiral lines and a prominent columellar fold within the aperture. Among the rare Ellobiidae known from the European Late Cretaceous deposits, Palaeoellobium gen. nov. can be compared to two monotypic genera coming from the Santonian of Ajka (Hungary): Leopoldium (Bandel & Riedel, Reference Bandel and Riedel1994) (type species: Auricula balatonica, Tausch, Reference Tausch1886; Ellobiinae) and Auriculinella (Tausch, Reference Tausch1886) (type species: Auriculinella whitei, Tausch, Reference Tausch1886; Ellobiinae). Leopoldium balatonicum (Tausch, Reference Tausch1886) has a junior synonym, Auricula hungarica (Tausch, Reference Tausch1886) (see Bandel & Riedel, Reference Bandel and Riedel1994), and is devoid of sculpture and displays a prominent columellar fold, lacking in Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. (see Tausch, Reference Tausch1886, pl. 2, fig. 25; Bandel & Riedel, Reference Bandel and Riedel1994, pl. 15, figs 1-2). Auriculinella whitei (Tausch, Reference Tausch1886) bears a very strong axial sculpture appearing on the early teleoconch whorls (see Bandel & Riedel, Reference Bandel and Riedel1994, pl. 15, figs 5-7) and a prominent columellar fold (see Tausch, Reference Tausch1886, pl. 2, fig. 26). Among Cenozoic and present-day taxa, Ellobium (Röding, Reference Röding1798) (type species: Ellobium aurismidae, Linnaeus, Reference Linnaeus1758; Ellobiinae) can display numerous very close-set and low axial ribs often crossed by spiral lines more developed adapically, whereas Palaeoellobium decampsi nov. gen., nov. sp., lacks spiral sculpture and has fewer but prominent ribs. Eoellobium (Harzhauser, Pacaud & Landau, Reference Harzhauser, Pacaud and Landau2023) (type species: Auricula heberti, Vasseur, Reference Vasseur1881; Ellobiinae) has a strong subsutural cord lacking in Palaeoellobium decampsi nov. gen., nov. sp. Its rugose sculpture of close-set and numerous axial ribs crossed by weak spiral threads recalls more that of Zaptychius or some Ellobium than that of Palaeoellobium. In addition, Paleoellobium n. gen. bears sparser ribs appearing earlier during the ontogeny than in Eoellobium. Although their shell shape is very different, species of Zospeum (Bourguignat, Reference Bourguignat1856) (type species: Z. spelaeum, Rossmässler, Reference Rossmässler1839; Carychinae) can have a similarly puckered umbilical zone as well as the densely aligned ribbing behind the apertural lip (Jochum et al., Reference Jochum, Michalik, Inäbnit, Kneubühler, Slapnik, Vrabec, Schilthuizen and Ruthensteiner2024). Myosotella (Monterosato, Reference Monterosato1906) (type species Myosotella myosotis, Draparnaud, Reference Draparnaud1801; Pythinae) is reminiscent of Palaeoellobium gen. nov. in its general size, teleoconch shape and sharp apertural lip with the parietal fold equally positioned centrally. However, Myosotella usually displays a stronger columellar fold with one or two additional parietal folds. Moreover, when Myosotella bears an axial sculpture, it resembles more growing striae than true ribs. They are much weaker, more numerous and more ‘close-set’ than those of Palaeoellobium n. gen. The protoconch of Myosotella is more bulbous or slightly turned more to the left (see Martins, Reference Martins1996, figs 41-60), whereas it is narrower and turned right in Palaeoellobium n. gen. Finally, although this gastropod from the Charente-Maritime amber shares characters with other Ellobiidae, clearly demonstrating its membership to this family, its particular combination of characters associating fine non-lamellar undulating ribs tending to fade abapically, a subsutural inflection, a lack of spiral sculpture and an umbilical zone puckered by growth lines is unique and easily justifies the creation of a new genus.

4. Amber source, ecology of Ellobiidae and palaeoenvironmental discussion

4.a. Amber source and taphonomic considerations

The botanical source of the amber from Archingeay–Les Nouillers is thought to be araucarian (Agathoxylon), based on the analysis of the fossil wood remains (Perrichot, Reference Perrichot2003). However, other conifers of the fossil family Cheirolepidiaceae (Brachyoxylon and Protopodocarpoxylon) could also have contributed to the resin production (Perrichot, Reference Perrichot2003). These different kinds of conifers constituted the coastal forest that produced the fossil resin that embedded the gastropod. The external imprint of the shell, associated with probable imprints of ‘remains of soft parts together with the crack’ linked to the putrefaction gases, suggests that the whole animal was trapped in the amber and not only its shell. The small size of the shell made it easy to transport (dead or alive) during strong winds or floods.

4.b. Ecology of present-day and fossil Ellobiidae

Ellobiidae are pulmonate gastropods typical of the upper and supralittoral zones of the mangroves of tropical regions (Martins, Reference Martins1980, Reference Martins1996; Harzhauser et al., Reference Harzhauser, Pacaud and Landau2023). The various genera of Ellobiinae live in somewhat different habitats. Blauneria (Shuttleworth, Reference Shuttleworth1854) lives buried in the black sediment and under rocks and rotting plant material at the high-tide mark (Marcus & Marcus, Reference Marcus and Marcus1965; Martins, Reference Martins1996). Leucophytia (Winckworth, Reference Winckworth1949) lives closer to the low-tide mark than Blauneria and Ellobium (Martins, Reference Martins1996). In the Azores, it lives under rocks buried in gravel and sometimes in the intertidal zone (Martins, Reference Martins1980). Ellobium is common on the muddy surfaces of Indo-Pacific mangroves, just below the high-tide mark, around roots and decaying wood (Berry et al., Reference Berry, Loog and Thum1967). It is also found on mangrove trunks (Piamklad et al., Reference Piamklad, Tuntiwaranurak and Dumrongrojwattana2014) or between long grass (Raven & Vermeulen, Reference Raven and Vermeulen2007). Ellison et al. (Reference Ellison, Farnsworth and Merkt1999) and Groh (Reference Groh and Poppe2010) discussed Ellobium as a mangrove-associated gastropod genus. They concluded that while a general affinity to the mangrove ecosystem can be stated for the genus, an obligate relationship with mangrove trees is not obvious for most of the species. Harzhauser et al. (Reference Harzhauser, Pacaud and Landau2023) also suggest that the lowest common denominator for the Indo-West-Pacific species of Ellobium in terms of habitat is an occurrence in the saltmarshes above the high-tide line in close vicinity of the mangroves. There are few data on the ecology of fossil Ellobiidae. However, in the Paleogene of the Paris Basin, they are found in coastal marine sediments from the Ypresian onwards (DM personal observations). From the European Early Cretaceous, Huckriede (Reference Huckriede1967: 204) found Proauricula in freshwater and brackish facies. The palaeoenvironment of the Santonian of Aijka coal swamps is well characterized by its gastropod fauna, indicating freshwater and more or less brackish influence (Bandel & Riedel, Reference Bandel and Riedel1994).

4.c. Palaeoenvironmental discussion

The coastal forest of conifers that produced the fossil resin embedding the gastropod does not correspond to the habitat of the ellobiids. Another coastal macroorganism has been found associated with the ellobiid in the same amber piece, a ligiid crustacean, typical of rocky foreshore environments. Thus, the amberiferous forest was probably bordering the foreshore, and some coastal organisms got stuck in resin flow coming from the tree roots or falling from the branches. A few other terrestrial arthropods are also present in the same amber drop and highlight the trapping by the same resin flow of both coastal species from the foreshore and crawling insects from the forest margin. It can be noticed that there is no direct fossil evidence of mangrove trees with coastal angiosperms in Cretaceous times, since typical modern mangrove flora appears to have originated during Paleocene times and was pantropic in the Eocene (Plaziat et al., Reference Plaziat, Cavagnetto, Koeniguer and Baltzer2001). However, other kinds of interfaces between marine biotopes and conifer forests were probably developed on the coastline of Western Europe.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank Vincent Perrichot for the entomological information about the amber drop containing the ellobiid, Malvina Lak for her contribution to the discovery on survey and microtomographical imaging of the specimen, Carmen Soriano for her contribution to the new 3D rendering of the specimen and the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility of Grenoble for the technical support of the microtomography, Ninon Robin (University of Rennes) for her technical help, Quentin Wackenheim (MNHN) for the information about ellobiids and Bernard Landau (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden) for English proofreading the manuscript. The authors are greatly indebted to the reviewers Thomas A. Neubauer (Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, München, Germany), Adrienne Jochum (Natural History Museum Bern, Switzerland) and the editor for their useful corrections and suggestions improving the original manuscript. This work was supported by the ANR Project AMBRACE (coord. D. Néraudeau).

Competing interests

None.

References

Balashov, I and Anistratenko, V (2024) A new record of the pond snail Galba prima Yu, Neubauer & Jochum, 2021 (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Folia Malacologica 32, 136–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandel, K and Riedel, F (1994) The Late Cretaceous gastropod fauna from Ajka (Bakony Mountains, Hungary): a revision. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 96A, 165.Google Scholar
Batten, DJ, Colin, JP and Néraudeau, D (2010) Megaspores from mid Cretaceous deposits in western France and their biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental significance. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 161, 151–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, AJ, Loog, SC and Thum, НH (1967) Genital systems of Pythia, Cassidula and Auricula (Ellobiidae, Pulmonata) from Malayan mangrove swamps. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London 37, 325–37.Google Scholar
Bolotov, IN, Aksenova, OV, Vikhrev, IV, Konopleva, ES, Chapurina, YE and Kondakov, AV (2021) A new fossil piddock (Bivalvia: Pholadidae) may indicate estuarine to freshwater environments near Cretaceous amber-producing forests in Myanmar. Scientific Reports 11, 6646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86241-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourguignat, J-R (1856). Aménités malacologiques. LI. Du genre Zospeum. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie 8, 499516.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H (1837) Handbuch der Naturgeschichte, vol. 2. Zoologie. 369858. Enslin.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G (1795) Second Mémoire sur l’organisation et les rapports des animaux à sang blanc, dans lequel on traite de la structure des Mollusques et de leur division en ordre, lu à la société d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris, le 11 prairial an troisième. Magasin Encyclopédique, ou Journal des Sciences, des Lettres et des Arts 2, 433–49.Google Scholar
Dejax, J and Masure, E (2005) Analyse palynologique de l’argile lignitifère à ambre de l’Albien terminal d’Archingeay (Charente-Maritime, France). Comptes Rendus Palevol 4, 5365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2004.12.00.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draparnaud, JPR (1801). Tableau des mollusques terrestres et fluviatiles de la France. Masson & Besson, 116.Google Scholar
Ellison, AM, Farnsworth, EJ. and Merkt, RE (1999) Origins of mangrove ecosystems and the mangrove biodiversity anomaly. Global Ecology Biogeography 8, 95115. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.1999.00126.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, V, Schmidt, AR, Saint Martin, S, Struwe, S, Perrichot, V, Saint Martin, J-P, Grosheny, D, Breton, G and Néraudeau, D (2008) Evidence for marine microfossils from amber. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(45), 17426–29. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804980105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groh, K (2010) Ellobiidae. In Philippine Marine Mollusks , volume 3 (ed Poppe, GT), pp. 446–57. ConchBooks.Google Scholar
Harzhauser, M, Pacaud, J-M and Landau, BM (2023) The origin of the mangrove and saltmarsh snail Ellobium (Eupulmonata, Ellobiidae). Taxonomy 3, 6884. https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3010007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haszprunar, G and Huber, G (1990) On the central nervous system of Smeagolidae and Rhodopidae, two families questionably allied with the Gymnomorpha (Gastropoda: Euthyneura). Journal of Zoology 220, 185–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04302.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, T, Asato, K, Yamamoto, S, Takahashi, Y and Chiba, S (2019) Cretaceous amber fossils highlight the evolutionary history and morphological conservatism of land snails. Scientific Reports 9, 15886. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51840-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huckriede, R (1967) Molluskenfaunen mit limnischen und brackischen Elementen aus Jura, serpulit und wealden NW-Deutschlands und ihre palaeogeographische Bedeutung. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch 67, 1263.Google Scholar
Jochum, A, Michalik, P, Inäbnit, T, Kneubühler, J, Slapnik, R, Vrabec, M, Schilthuizen, M and Ruthensteiner, M (2024) 3D X-ray microscopy (Micro-CT) and SEM reveal Zospeum troglobalcanicum Absolon, 1916 and allied species from the Western Balkans (Ellobioidea: Carychiidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 926, 162. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2024.926.2469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lak, M, Néraudeau, D, Nel, A, Cloetens, P, Perrichot, V and Tafforeau, P (2008) Phase contrast X-ray synchrotron imaging: opening access to fossil inclusions in opaque amber. Microscopy and Microanalysis 14, 251–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927608080264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linnaeus, C (1758) Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Laurentii Salvii, 824.Google Scholar
Loriol, P (de) and Jaccard, A (1865) Étude géologique et paléontologique de la formation d’eau douce infracrétacée du Jura et en particulier de Villers-le-Lac. Mémoires de la Société de physique et d’histoire naturelle de Genève 18, 63128.Google Scholar
Mao, Y, Liang, K, Su, Y, Li, J, Rao, X, Zhang, H, Xia, F, Fu, Y, Cai, C and Huang, D (2018) Various amberground marine animals on Burmese amber with discussions on its age. Palaeoentomology 1, 91103. https://doi.org/10.11646/palaeoentomology.1.1.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, E and Marcus, E (1965) On Brazilian supratidal and estuarine snails. Boletim da Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciéncias e Letras de Sáo Paulo 287, Zoologia 25, 1982. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2526-3382.bffclzoologia.1965.120679.Google Scholar
Martins, AMF (1980) Notes on the Habitat of Five Halophile Ellobiidae in the Azores. Museu Carlos Machado, 23.Google Scholar
Martins, AMF (1996) Anatomy and Systematics of the Western Atlantic Ellobiidae (Gastropoda: Pulmonata). Malacologia 37, 163356.Google Scholar
Monterosato, T A. (di) (1906) Articolo sulle Auriculidae, Assiminidae e Truncatellidae dei mari d’Europa. Il Naturalista Siciliano. New Series 18, 125–30.Google Scholar
Moreau, J-D, Néraudeau, D, Philippe, M and Dépré, E (2017) Albian flora from Archingeay-Les Nouillers (Charente-Maritime) : comparison and synthesis of Cretaceous méso- and macro-remains from the Aquitaine Basin (southwestern France). Geodiversitas 39, 4, 729–40. https://doi.org/10.5252/g2017n4a5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Néraudeau, D, Perrichot, V, Dejax, J, Masure, E, Nel, A, Philippe, M, Moreau, P, Guillocheau, F and Guyot, T (2002) Un nouveau gisement à ambre insectifèrebet à végétaux (Albien terminal probable) : Archingeay (Charente-Maritime, France). Geobios 35, 233–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-6995(02)00024-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neubauer, TA, Xing, L and Jochum, A (2019a) Land Snail with Periostracal Hairs Preserved in Burmese Amber. iScience 20, 567–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2019.09.034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neubauer, TA, Páll-Gergely, B, Jochum, A and Harzhauser, M (2019b) Striking case of convergence — Alleged marine gastropods in Cretaceous Burmese amber are terrestrial cyclophoroids. Comment on Yu et al. Palaeoworld 28, 572–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2019.05.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, H and Zhu, X (2007) Early Cretaceous non-marine gastropods from the Xiazhuang Formation in North China. Cretaceous Research 28, 215–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2006.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrichot, V (2003) Environnements paraliques à ambre et végétaux du Crétacé Nord-Aquitain (Charentes, Sud-Ouest de la France). Mémoire Géosciences Rennes 118, 1310.Google Scholar
Perrichot, V, Néraudeau, D and Tafforeau, P (2010) Charentese amber. In Biodiversity of Fossils in Amber from the Major World Deposits (ed Penney, D.), pp. 192207. Siri Scientific Press.Google Scholar
Peyrot, D, Jolly, D and Barron, E (2005) Apport de données palynologiques à la reconstruction paléoenvironnementale de l’Albo-Cénomanien des Charentes (Sud-Ouest de la France). Comptes Rendus Paleovol 4, 151–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2004.11.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyrot, D, Barron, E, Polette, F, Batten, DJ and Néraudeau, D (2019) Early Cenomanian palynofloras and inferred resiniferous forests and végétation types in Charentes (southwestern France). Cretaceous Research 94, 168–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.10.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, L (1854) Synopsis Auriculaceorum. Malakozoologische Blätter 1, 145–56.Google Scholar
Piamklad, S, Tuntiwaranurak, C and Dumrongrojwattana, P (2014) Malacofauna diversity and distribution (Mollusca: Gastropoda, Bivalvia) at Pak Nam Pran Mangrove Forest in Pran Buri District, Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Thailand. In Proceedings of the Burapha University International Conference, Pattaya 3-4 July 2014 (ed Burapha University), STP839-36, pp. 110. Burapha University.Google Scholar
Plaziat, J-C, Cavagnetto, C, Koeniguer, J-C and Baltzer, F (2001) History and biogeography of the mangrove ecosystem, based on a critical reassessment of the paleontological record. Wetlands Ecology and Management 9, 161–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raven, H and Vermeulen, JJ (2007) Notes on molluscs from NW Borneo and Singapore. 2. A synopsis of the Ellobiidae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata). Vita Malacologia 4, 2962.Google Scholar
Röding, PF (1798). Museum Boltenianum sive Catalogus cimeliorum e tribus regnis naturæ quæ olim collegerat Joa. Fried Bolten, M. D. p. d. per XL. annos proto physicus Hamburgensis. Pars secunda continens Conchylia sive Testacea univalvia, bivalvia & multivalvia. Trapp, 199 pp.Google Scholar
Rossmässler, EA (1839) Iconographie Der Land & Süßwasser Mollusken, Mit Vorzüglicher Berücksichtigung Der Europäischen Noch Nicht Abgebildeten Arten. Volume 3/4. Arnoldische Buchhandlung, 46.Google Scholar
Shuttleworth, RJ (1854). Beiträge zur näheren Kenntniss der Land- und Süsswasser-Mollusken der Insel Portorico. Mittheilungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Bern 314/316, 3356.Google Scholar
Tafforeau, P, Boistel, R, Boller, E, Bravin, A, Brunet, M, Chaimanee, Y, Cloetens, P, Feist, M, Hoszowska, J, Jaeger, J-J, Kay, RF, Lazzari, V, Marivaux, L, Nel, A, Nemoz, C, Thibault, X, Vignaud, P and Zabler, S (2006) Applications of X-ray synchrotron microtomography for non-destructive 3D studies of paleontological specimens. Applied Physics A: Materials Science and Processing 83, 195202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-006-3507-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tausch, L (1886) Ueber die Fauna der nicht marinen Ablagerungen der oberen Kreide des Csingerthales bei Ajka im Bakony (Veszprimer Comitat, Ungarn) und über einige Conchylien der Gosaumergel von Aigen bei Salzburg. Abhandlungen Der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt 12, 132.Google Scholar
Van Mol, JJ (1967) Étude morphologique et phylogénétique du ganglion cérébroïde des Gastéropodes Pulmonés (Mollusques). Académie Royale de Belgique, Classe des Sciences, Mémoires 37, 1168.Google Scholar
Vasseur, G (1881) Recherches géologiques sur les terrains tertiaires de la France occidentale. Annales des Sciences Géologiques, 13, 1432.Google Scholar
Videt, B and Platel, J-P (2005) Les ostréidés des faciès lignitifères du Crétacé moyen du Sud-Ouest de la France (Charentes et Sarladais). Comptes Rendus Palevol 4, 167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2004.11.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walcott, CD (1883) Fresh-water shells from the paleozoic rocks of Nevada. Science 2, 808.Google Scholar
Winckworth, R. (1949). A new name for Leuconia Gray. Journal of Conchology 23, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xing, L, Sames, B, McKellar, RC, Xi, D, Bai, M and Wan, X (2018) A gigantic marine ostracod (Crustacea: Myodocopa) trapped in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Scientific Reports 8, 1365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19877-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xing, L, Ross, AJ, Stilwell, JD, Fang, J and McKellar, RC (2019) Juvenile snail with preserved soft tissue in mid-Cretaceous amber from Myanmar suggests a cyclophoroidean (Gastropoda) ancestry. Cretaceous Research 93, 114–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2018.09.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T, Wang, B and Jarzembowski, E (2019a) First record of marine gastropods (wentletraps) from mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Palaeoworld 28, 508–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2018.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T, Kelly, R, Mu, L, Ross, A, Kennedy, J, Broly, P, Xia, F, Zhang, H, Wang, B and Dilcher, D (2019b) An ammonite trapped in Burmese amber. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 11345–50. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821292116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, T and Neubauer, TA (2021) The oldest fossil Hydrocenidae found in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber (Gastropoda : Cycloneritida). Cretaceous Research 122, 104765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104765.Google Scholar
Yu, T, Neubauer, TA and Jochum, A (2021) First freshwater gastropod preserved in amber suggests long-distance dispersal during the Cretaceous Period. Geological Magazine 158, 1327–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756821000285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Geographical and geological location of the amber deposit of Archingeay–Les Nouillers (white star) where Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. has been discovered. Dark grey areas correspond to Cenomanian outcrops.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Piece of amber (maximum length 35 mm) containing Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. Before scanning in microtomography, the hardly fractured amber piece was set in a protective epoxy block for conservation purposes. Scale bar: 10 mm. Photo: P. Tafforeau, ESRF.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Palaeoellobium decampsi gen. nov., sp. nov. Holotype Arc-423.5, microtomographic reconstruction. (a–b) Dorsal views, (c) profile view, (d) apertural view, (e) apical view and (f) abapical view. Abbreviations: si – subsutural inflection; il – inner lip; pf – parietal fold; cc – columellar callus; cf – columellar fold. Scale bar: 1 mm.