Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-dk7s8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-22T03:57:46.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Blockchain and its future in the supply and value chains of the dairy industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2025

Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez*
Affiliation:
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México Department of Animal Sciences, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, Reading, England
Oscar Rolando Espinoza Sandoval
Affiliation:
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México
Sandra Rodríguez-Piñeros
Affiliation:
Facultad de Zootecnia y Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua, Chihuahua, México
Navid Ghavipanje
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran South Khorasan Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Centre, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Birjand, Iran
*
Corresponding author: Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; Email: einar.vargasbelloperez@reading.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Blockchain, an emerging technology exhibiting swift growth, significantly bolsters transparency within a given supply chain, enabling secure traceability, backtracking, and info tracing. Blockchain technology holds substantial promise for the dairy sector, offering enhancements unnecessary market intermediaries, thereby broadening access to credit and insurance for farmers, particularly in developing economies Such advancements could lead to more sustainable, efficient, and resilient livestock practices. However, the technology faces challenges, including the need for sophisticated infrastructure, cross-platform software, and skilled personnel with advanced expertise. Divergence in technological capabilities between developed and developing nations may hinder trade and exacerbate disparities. Regulatory barriers could also restrict blockchain's application. Thus, it is imperative to enhance blockchain knowledge among trade authorities and policymakers to facilitate its broader adoption. The objective of this review is to discuss principles of blockchain and proposed future work pathways for its use in the dairy industry.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hannah Dairy Research Foundation.

Introduction

Today, the emergence of technologies such as computers, sensors, cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and blockchain are revolutionizing various sectors including the dairy industry (Rocha et al., Reference Rocha, de Oliveira and Talamini2021; El Amine and Lamia, Reference El Amine and Lamia2023). Blockchain, as a decentralized and distributed ledger system, offers robust solutions for enhancing transparency and security in supply chains (Tan and Ngan, Reference Tan and Ngan2020; Shingh et al., Reference Shingh, Kamalvanshi, Ghimire and Basyal2020). This technology is acknowledged to enhance agrifood systems by improving supply chain efficiency, enabling traceability, and automating processes through smart contracts. Its immutable nature is used to foster consumer trust and ensure compliance with quality standards, addressing major supply chain challenges (Mwewa et al., Reference Mwewa, Lungu, Turyasingura, Umer and Chavula2024; Saurabh and Dey, Reference Saurabh and Dey2021; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Brahmbhatt, Bariya, Nayak and Singh2023; Bosona and Gebresenbet, Reference Bosona and Gebresenbet2023).

The dairy sector, being a major agribusiness, provides a livelihood for millions of farmers and contributes to nations’ economies (FAO, 2023), however, major challenges are encountered in this industry, including environmental impacts, animal welfare concerns, and supply chain inefficiencies (Neethirajan, Reference Neethirajan2023). Climate-driven resource scarcity coupled with growing consumer concerns about the negative impacts of dairy farming urges producers to optimize output while adhering to sustainable practices (Peterson and Mitloehner, Reference Peterson and Mitloehner2021). Nowadays, cutting-edge technologies are catalyzing paradigm shifts in the traditional dairy industry, fostering humane, efficient, and sustainable practices that could reshape its future (Makkar and Costa, Reference Makkar and Costa2020; Malik et al., Reference Malik, Gahlawat, Mor, Dahiya and Yadav2022; Neethirajan, Reference Neethirajan2023; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Brahmbhatt, Bariya, Nayak and Singh2023).

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals presents the agricultural and food sector as the cornerstone of sustainable development, within this framework, the food supply chain, including the dairy industry, is fundamentally linked to sustainability imperatives since its output must meet future demands, all while navigating the inevitable escalation of competition for finite resources (Saha et al., Reference Saha, Raut, Yadav and Majumdar2022). The dairy supply chain stands out for its complexity, characterized by a diverse array of participants and numerous transformation stages (Varavallo et al., Reference Varavallo, Caragnano, Bertone, Vernetti-Prot and Terzo2022). The main drivers of the dairy supply chain include feed companies, dairy farmers, milk collection centres, logistics providers, and milk cooperatives (ISMEA, 2021).

Novel technologies like cloud computing infrastructures and the Internet of Things have advanced the capabilities for monitoring and managing data across various drivers of the food supply chain (Tanwar et al., Reference Tanwar, Parmar, Kumari, Jadav, Hong and Sharma2022). However, these technologies are mainly centralized, requiring all parties to rely on a singular data repository for storing food-related information. This centralization poses critical vulnerabilities, such as a single point of failure, security and privacy concerns, and rigid decision-making processes (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Wang, Duan, Zhang and Zhang2020).

Consequently, leveraging Blockchain Technology is poised to address these challenges, providing and robust and dependable management for supply and value chains in the dairy sector (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Gahlawat, Mor, Dahiya and Yadav2022; Varavallo et al., Reference Varavallo, Caragnano, Bertone, Vernetti-Prot and Terzo2022). The Blockchain operates as a distributed (shared) and decentralized ledger, representing the most fundamental concept that sets it apart from conventional databases or standard ledgers. In a shared ledger, data is dispersed across an extensive network of computers (nodes) globally, rather than being centralized. Widespread distribution enhances data security, as it is significantly more challenging to compromise a decentralized ledger with numerous copies worldwide than a centralized ledger with a single data repository (Di Pierro, Reference Di Pierro2017). At this moment, the majority of Blockchain applications within the food sector are dedicated to the domain of food traceability (Varavallo et al., Reference Varavallo, Caragnano, Bertone, Vernetti-Prot and Terzo2022). Nonetheless, it is increasingly apparent that Blockchain technology holds the capacity to not only enhance transparency in information exchange but also to empower the dairy supply and value chains more broadly (Tan and Ngan, Reference Tan and Ngan2020; Shingh et al., Reference Shingh, Kamalvanshi, Ghimire and Basyal2020; Casino et al., Reference Casino, Kanakaris, Dasaklis, Moschuris, Stachtiaris, Pagoni and Rachaniotis2021; Pakseresht et al., Reference Pakseresht, Ahmadi Kaliji and Xhakollari2022). Therefore, this review aimed to deepen understanding of blockchain technology and its applications in dairy industries and discuss its future importance.

Dairy supply and value chain

The food supply chain starts with the cultivating and/or harvesting of foodstuffs and ends with their consumption. This process involved pivotal elements such as preserving food, preventing spoilage during transportation, minimizing waste, and ensuring a variety of nutritional supplements throughout the year, as in the case of milk and dairy products that stand out as the most critical foods for human nutrition. Various milk types exist, contingent upon their processing methods, ranging from raw milk to standardized whole milk, non-standardized whole milk, semi-skimmed milk, and skimmed milk (Atmaca and Aydemir, Reference Atmaca and Aydemir2023). While the dairy supply chain may appear simpler compared to meat and bread supply chains, it consists of three main components: dairy farming, processing and packaging, and retailing. (Atmaca and Aydemir, Reference Atmaca and Aydemir2023). This group of stakeholders includes large multinational companies, small-scale producers, and on-farm ranchers. Wholesalers and retailers encompass supermarkets, independent stores, restaurants, and other food-related establishments (Rodríguez-Enríquez et al., Reference Rodríguez-Enríquez, Alor-Hernández, Sánchez-Ramírez and Córtes-Robles2015).

Blockchain technology

Timeline of Blockchain

Blockchain gained prominence in 2008 with Bitcoin's introduction, revolutionizing decentralized digital currency (Nakamoto, Reference Nakamoto2008). Its roots trace back to the 1980s with David Chaum's blind signatures (Chaum, Reference Chaum1983), followed by digital timestamping in 1991 (Haber and Stornetta, Reference Haber and Stornetta1991). Hal Finney's Reusable Proof of Work in 2004 laid groundwork for Blockchain mechanisms (RpoW, 2004). Bitcoin's first transaction occurred in 2009 and its first exchange in 2010 (AlShamsi et al., Reference AlShamsi, Al-Emran and Shaalan2022). Smart contracts were proposed in 2013 (Buterin, Reference Buterin2013), and Ethereum launched in 2015 (AlShamsi et al., Reference AlShamsi, Al-Emran and Shaalan2022). The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) hack in 2016 highlighted security concerns (Santana and Albareda, Reference Santana and Albareda2022). A detailed timeline is provided in Fig. 1. This evolution demonstrates blockchain's rapid growth and its ongoing impact on the world.

Figure 1. Timeline history of blockchain technology (created in BioRender).

An overview of Blockchain technology

Within the realm of distributed ledger technologies (DLT), blockchain constitutes a secure, sequential collection of data blocks, forming an unalterable and decentralized record that make unauthorized alteration or access nearly impossible (Namasudra et al., Reference Namasudra, Deka, Johri, Hosseinpour and Gandomi2021; Saurabh and Dey, Reference Saurabh and Dey2021; Demestichas et al., Reference Demestichas, Peppes, Alexakis and Adamopoulou2020; Gad et al., Reference Gad, Mosa, Abualigah and Abohany2022). This digital ledger is characterized by an ever-increasing compilation of validated transactional records, verified by the consensus of nodes within the peer-to-peer (P2P) network (AlShamsi et al., Reference AlShamsi, Al-Emran and Shaalan2022; Gad et al., Reference Gad, Mosa, Abualigah and Abohany2022) (Fig. 2). Data within the Blockchain is interconnected through a rigid structure, where each new entry is cryptographically linked to its predecessor, ensuring perpetual data integrity (Demestichas et al., Reference Demestichas, Peppes, Alexakis and Adamopoulou2020; Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023). Alterations to any block's contents are rendered impossible, as such tampering would invalidate the entire Blockchain's subsequent entries, effectively mitigating the threat of data manipulation. Unlike centralized architectures, Blockchain Technology operates without a single point of control, relying instead on a decentralized framework where consensus protocols govern transactional exchanges among participant nodes to enhance data reliability at the collection, storage, and validation stages (AlShamsi et al., Reference AlShamsi, Al-Emran and Shaalan2022; Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023). Information within the blockchain is organized in immutable blocks, Data within the P2P network is distributed, ensuring secure and resilient data exchange among clients (nodes) (Demestichas et al., Reference Demestichas, Peppes, Alexakis and Adamopoulou2020; Gad et al., Reference Gad, Mosa, Abualigah and Abohany2022; Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023), and the nature of these networks diminishes the likelihood of cyber-attacks and illicit activities (Namasudra et al., Reference Namasudra, Deka, Johri, Hosseinpour and Gandomi2021; Vern et al., Reference Vern, Panghal, Mor, Kumar and Sarwar2024). This intrinsic resistance to alteration positions Blockchain as a formidable solution to data integrity issues, particularly in applications where traditional record-keeping systems, such as food and dairy industries, are susceptible to fraudulent modifications of data like transportation histories, ingredient lists, and expiration dates (Gad et al., Reference Gad, Mosa, Abualigah and Abohany2022; Bosona and Gebresenbet, Reference Bosona and Gebresenbet2023). Blockchain technologies are categorized based on accessibility into three types: (1) public blockchains, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum, which are open to all users; (2) private blockchains, where access is limited to invited participants to protect sensitive data; and (3) hybrid permissioned blockchains, which offer a blend of public and private features, granting access after identity verification. These BCT types facilitate tailored traceability systems to meet specific access and privacy needs (Di Pierro, Reference Di Pierro2017; Bosona and Gebresenbet, Reference Bosona and Gebresenbet2023; Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023).

Figure 2. The creation process of a new data block in an existing Blockchain network (created in BioRender).

Type of consensus and classification of blockchain

Consensus mechanisms, fundamental to blockchain applications, establish rules for user agreement on system states, facilitated by the blockchain's decentralization (Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023). The first such algorithm, Proof of Work (PoW), was introduced in the Bitcoin blockchain, with subsequent variants addressing diverse blockchain demands (Santana and Albareda, Reference Santana and Albareda2022). The common consensus approaches in blockchain architecture include: 1- PoW (a consensus mechanism adopted by numerous blockchains, involves solving computationally intensive problems to create new nodes, verifying their solutions effectively), 2-Proof of Stake (PoS, requires ETH-staked validators, akin to PoW miners, who are randomly selected for block creation and validation, upholding the consensus), 3-Proof of Burn (PoB integrates PoW and PoS, utilizing PoW for mining and PoS for randomly selected validators to authenticate mined blocks), 4-Proof of Capacity (PoC assigns mining rights using miners’ pre-stored hard drive space, executing a two-step mining algorithm) (Tripathi et al., Reference Tripathi, Ahad and Casalino2023; Xiong et al., Reference Xiong, Chen, Wu, Zhao and Yi2022). In applied terms, blockchain technology offers a decentralized and immutable record system that enables transparent and secure transactions. In the dairy industry, blockchain can be used to track the journey of dairy products throughout the supply chain, ensuring authenticity, quality, and safety.

Blockchain technology in agri-food supply chain

The secure transmission of protected information is crucial across various sectors of the modern world. In the agricultural sector, stakeholders are particularly concerned with safeguarding their sensitive data against unauthorized access by third parties (Saurabh and Dey, Reference Saurabh and Dey2021). Blockchain technology addresses this need by ensuring data integrity and facilitating confidential data exchanges (Menon and Jain, Reference Menon and Jain2021). It has been well established that the blockchain has enormous potential to improve all aspects of agri-food systems including supply chain and market transparency (Commandré et al., Reference Commandré, Macombe and Mignon2021), traceability, quality, and food chain (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Wang, Duan, Zhang and Zhang2020), finance, payment, insurance, and e-commerce, smart agriculture (Antonucci et al., Reference Antonucci, Figorilli, Costa, Pallottino, Raso and Menesatti2019), and dispersal of subsidies and grants (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Zhang and Dong2022). The primary application of blockchain in the agri-food sector is in the supply chain traceability (Patel et al., Reference Patel, Brahmbhatt, Bariya, Nayak and Singh2023). Additionally, it serves as a valuable tool for detecting food fraud, authenticating food safety, and managing from farm to fork systems (Bosona and Gebresenbet, Reference Bosona and Gebresenbet2023).

Blockchain enhances food safety and consumer trust through instant, tamperproof data sharing, including product batch numbers, production locations, dates, and hygienic and sanitary condition reports (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Wang, Duan, Zhang and Zhang2020; Pakseresht et al., Reference Pakseresht, Ahmadi Kaliji and Xhakollari2022). However, barriers and challenges impede the widespread adoption of blockchain technology in agri-food systems including the complexity of these approaches and cost (Patelli and Mandrioli, Reference Patelli and Mandrioli2020). The first success story in the food industry was that of Walmart and IBM, which began their pilot studies in 2016 to evaluate the possibility of implementing this technology. By 2018 they were already tracking 25 products and by 2019 all lettuce suppliers should incorporate Blockchain systems. This is in response to a series of foodborne disease outbreaks, in this case, associated with romaine lettuce (Corkery and Popper, Reference Corkery and Popper2018). Same principles can be applied to the dairy industry and prevent outbreaks of pathogenic bacteria such as Salmonellosis or Listeriosis.

Blockchain technology in dairy industries

The dairy supply chain begins with milk production and ends with dairy consumption. Its criticality lies in preserving food integrity, preventing spoilage during transit from rural to urban centres, curtailing losses, and consistently supplying nutritional supplements throughout the year (Atmaca and Aydemir, Reference Atmaca and Aydemir2023). It has been demonstrated that blockchain technology within the dairy supply chain establishes transparent and secure production and distribution mechanisms, thereby improving this industry's efficiency and sustainability (Singh et al., Reference Singh, Tiwari and Chaturvedi2024). This innovative technology reduces losses and wastage in the supply chain, enabling the provision of high-quality products to consumers (Gehlot et al., Reference Gehlot, Malik, Singh, Akram and Alsuwian2022; Marchi et al., Reference Marchi, Bettoni and Zanoni2022).

Casino et al. (Reference Casino, Kanakaris, Dasaklis, Moschuris, Stachtiaris, Pagoni and Rachaniotis2020) introduced a blockchain-based model for enhancing the traceability of the dairy supply chain. The authors described the diverse traceability features associated with different stakeholders, processes, and products, as well as their interconnections. They proposed the application of blockchain technology as a decentralized, tamper-evident chain-of-custody system, and smart contracts as a means for automating stakeholder management, processes, and product definition and generation.

Misra and Das (Reference Misra and Das2019) introduced a conceptual framework utilizing blockchain technology to enhance the efficacy and feasibility of electronic governance. This framework comprises a service-oriented architecture for stakeholder data storage, blockchain-based authentication, and transactional capabilities on a ledger, alongside a digital identity framework for oversight. The study conceptualizes the application of this framework within the Indian dairy cooperative sector, highlighting participant benefits such as transactional gains and voting rights. Similarly, a blockchain model for improving milk delivery in Kenya's rural areas is proposed by RAMBIM and AWUOR (Reference RAMBIM and AWUOR2020), establishing the Milk Delivery Blockchain Manager (MDBM) as a decentralized system capturing milk delivery metrics on the blockchain, ensuring data integrity and farmer access to delivery details. The Naitiri Dairy Farmers’ Cooperative (NADAFA) oversees the MDBM, ensuring timely payments to farmers and leveraging a consortium-based network to enhance blockchain solutions for the agricultural community.

Longo et al. (Reference Misra and Das2020) evaluated blockchain technology within the context of the milk processing industry and its supply chain, encompassing dairy farms to retail. The findings indicate that the advantages of a blockchain-driven supply chain can be realized with negligible effects on consumer prices, while the expenses associated with the operation of blockchain, primarily transaction fees, escalate as one progresses through the supply chain's tiers. Regarding the cost of implementation, deploying blockchain technology across the supply chain's stakeholders does not necessitate significant investment. Automated transactions can be processed via mobile devices or computers, which gather data from IoT devices and sensors, structure the data into a transaction, digitally sign the content, and transmit the transaction on the blockchain.

Another study (Makarov et al., Reference Makarov, Polyansky, Makarov, Nikolaeva and Shubina2019) has outlined key trends in deploying blockchain for dairy quality management within logistics and demonstrated that implementing this technology safeguards data integrity, thwarts document breaches, and prevents information tampering in product development and transit. Blockchain mitigates fraud risks, enabling retailers and consumers to swiftly trace a product's origin, enhancing its perceived quality. Additionally, incorporating blockchain into the milk supply chain optimizes operations, curtails monitoring costs, accelerates material and product delivery and reduces transport expenses through minimized delays (Makarov et al., Reference Makarov, Polyansky, Makarov, Nikolaeva and Shubina2019).

Benefits and challenges of blockchain technology in dairy industries

Potential benefits of blockchain in the dairy sector

Blockchain technology empowers dairy producers to verify the integrity of purchased inputs and directly sell their products in the marketplace, eliminating intermediaries and ensuring equitable compensation (El Amine and Lamia, Reference El Amine and Lamia2023). Blockchain reduces transaction expenses and guarantees prompt remunerations. However, farmers currently utilize various information storage techniques, leading to inefficiency and challenges in exchanging data with partners. blockchain mitigates these issues by centralizing essential data, including cultivation practices, crop quality, and environmental factors, thereby saving time, energy, and costs (Shingh et al., Reference Shingh, Kamalvanshi, Ghimire and Basyal2020; Varavallo et al., Reference Varavallo, Caragnano, Bertone, Vernetti-Prot and Terzo2022; Nukapeyi et al., Reference Nukapeyi, Bommala, Kondreddy, Amalakanti, Ravi and Konuri2024)Fig. 3.

Figure 3. Benefits and challenges of blockchain in dairy industries (created in BioRender).

The widespread problem of milk adulteration, especially in densely populated presents serious health hazards. The Blockchain-based decentralized dairy supply chain platform could tackle malnutrition caused by adulterated dairy by establishing an open, unalterable, and eco-friendly dairy supply chain (Shingh et al., Reference Shingh, Kamalvanshi, Ghimire and Basyal2020; Nukapeyi et al., Reference Nukapeyi, Bommala, Kondreddy, Amalakanti, Ravi and Konuri2024). This platform transcends typical traceability, aiming to maintain nutritional content, detect contamination, support dairy farmers’ profitability, deter counterfeits, and boost total revenue (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Guo, Xie and Yan2020). In addition, Customers can readily access data on raw materials, including processing methods, batch details, factory information, and storage conditions, via their smartphones via blockchain technology. This transparency bolsters consumer trust and loyalty (Mohapatra et al., Reference Mohapatra, Sainath, Lal, K, Bhandari and Nyika2023).

Tracing the initial source of dairy food within a supply chain often requires significant time. For instance, the identification of Salmonella contamination took two months (Malik et al., Reference Malik, Kanhere and Jurdak2018). Previously, tracing the journey of agri-foods from the farm to the fork could take over a week using the Walmart System, whereas blockchain technology reduced this time to just 2.3 seconds (Mohapatra et al., Reference Mohapatra, Sainath, Lal, K, Bhandari and Nyika2023). Blockchain technology not only accelerates data tracing but also mitigates inefficiencies associated with heavy paperwork in the food supply chain (Kamilaris et al., Reference Kamilaris, Fonts and Prenafeta-Boldύ2019). An exemplary application of blockchain technology was demonstrated by the Louis Dreyfus Company, which conducted a trade of 60,000 tons of US soybeans to the Chinese government in a week, marking an impressive 80% reduction in transit time (Bogomolov et al., Reference Bogomolov, Popok, Savinskaya and Tyunin2019).

Blockchain technology offers fast and secure payment solutions with minimal expense. Transactions executed via blockchain can be completed in less than 10 minutes since there is no requirement of approval from the bank, which takes a 2–5 day duration of conventional payment methods (Sandeep et al., Reference Sandeep, Maheshwari, Prabhu, Prasanna and Jothikumar2021). Enhanced efficiency in financial transactions within the supply chain is poised to promote improved financial inclusivity in the agri-food sector. Moreover, blockchain's capacity to retain information permanently and securely allows it to serve as a reliable reference for validating recorded transactions. Consequently, the utilization of blockchain ledgers could potentially substitute traditional financial auditing reports, thereby reducing time and resource expenditure (Alkahtani et al., Reference Alkahtani, Khalid, Jalees, Omair, Hussain and Pruncu2021). Implementing blockchain in dairy supply and value chains could streamline the various stages of dairy distribution, underlining the technology's potential benefits for stakeholders within the food supply chain.

Challenges of blockchain in the dairy sector

Currently, blockchain infrastructure is not widely understood, which will delay its full adoption in the dairy sector (El Amine and Lamia, Reference El Amine and Lamia2023). Deficiencies in the necessary infrastructure to support comprehensive blockchain-based food supply chain systems suggest that extensive development is required to establish such systems (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Li, Zeng, Cao and Jiang2022). Blockchain technology must exhibit adequate scalability, speed, and security to fulfil recommended applications (Habib et al., Reference Habib, Sharma, Ibrahim, Ahmad, Qureshi and Ishfaq2022). The advent of 5 G technology promises enhanced data transmission, potentially mitigating blockchain's speed limitations. Despite high development costs, blockchains can offer cost reductions by eliminating intermediaries. While data validation and ledger storage costs represent additional expenses (Shrimali and Patel, Reference Shrimali and Patel2022), these hurdles can be overcome with strategic application design and deployment. Standardization and interoperability in blockchain systems across dairy industries are essential. Establishing blockchain architecture standards is crucial for facilitating secure, collaborative trust, and information exchange. Therefore, achieving compatibility and standardization among diverse blockchain systems presents an ongoing challenge (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Li, Zeng, Cao and Jiang2022).

The decentralized nature of blockchain renders it inherently trustless, as it operates without reliance on a central authority or intermediary (Dupuis et al., Reference Dupuis, Toohey, Grimstad, Follong and Bucher2021). In a trustless system, participants do not need to rely on each other or any single entity for validation; instead, the integrity of the system is maintained through consensus mechanisms and cryptographic proofs (Pandey and Litoriya, Reference Pandey and Litoriya2021). However, the accuracy of the data inscribed on the blockchain is crucial, as it is often entered manually and may lack robust validation measures, potentially leading to inaccuracies (Dupuis et al., Reference Dupuis, Toohey, Grimstad, Follong and Bucher2021). Blockchain data is not fully accessible to consumers; instead, it functions as a supplier's self-audit mechanism (Torky and Hassanein, Reference Torky and Hassanein2020). Thus, during outbreaks, suppliers can use this data to prove compliance to authorities. Utilizing blockchain, consumers can easily access product origin and transportation data without needing specialized devices. However, once data enters the blockchain, modification is not feasible. Transparency will depend on manufacturers’ willingness to share data. Security concerns persist, as there are currently no regulatory frameworks governing blockchain systems, necessitating further advancements to fortify the overall safety of blockchain transactions (Torky and Hassanein, Reference Torky and Hassanein2020; Islam et al., Reference Islam, Rahman, Mahmud, Rahman and Mohamad2021; Peng et al., Reference Peng, Zhao, Wang, Li, Xu and Zhang2023).

One of the primary obstacles confronting the adoption of blockchain technology within the dairy sector encompasses a range of legal and regulatory considerations. For instance, IoT applications often operate under the purview of national legislation, particularly concerning data privacy (Reyna et al., Reference Reyna, Martín, Chen, Soler and Díaz2018). Presently, blockchain technology lacks a definitive legal and regulatory framework, leaving ambiguity in its application. It is imperative to establish a robust legal and regulatory infrastructure that can effectively oversee blockchain utilization in the dairy supply and value chain, ensuring adherence to compliance standards (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Wang, Duan, Zhang and Zhang2020).

Conclusion and final remarks

Dairy cattle stand at the forefront of the agri-food industry, which significantly contributes to the fostering of the Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizing the enhancement of world health in an eco-friendly manner. The nutritional benefits derived from milk and dairy products are vital in supporting the physical and cognitive growth of both children and adults. Additionally, the adoption of cutting-edge technologies like blockchain is poised to revolutionize the productivity and sustainability frameworks within the dairy production sector.

Blockchain technology is not perceived as a replacement for current databases, but it forms a collective, secure ledger of data transactions, providing a unified chronicle of events across the supply chain network. This ledger facilitates streamlined resolution mechanisms when discrepancies or conflicts arise. Blockchain technology allows for the recording and accessibility of pertinent supply chain information for all stakeholders, encompassing all stages from dairy farms to end consumers. Each product alteration or transfer can be chronicled, thereby establishing an enduring product lineage, spanning production to sale. However, despite some early attempts, limited initiatives have been undertaken by the scientific community to investigate the effect of blockchain on the dairy processing sector and the entire supply chain, particularly regarding the enterprises within this sector. In general, the implementation of a technological system should be useful in the way to communicate information to the entire stakeholder in the dairy supply chain. Blockchain technology due to its technical and governance characteristics seems a suitable system to this end, as shown by the case studies analyzed. Implementing a system that can enhance both trust and transparency could be highly beneficial and, if the entire supply chain is covered, could lead to more benefits at a chain level.

To effectively implement blockchain technology in the dairy supply chain, it is crucial to identify who will be responsible for its deployment and maintenance. This could involve collaboration between dairy farms, processing facilities, logistics providers, and retailers. Each stakeholder would need to contribute to the system by providing accurate and timely data, ensuring that the entire supply chain is covered. For instance, dairy farms could input data on milk production and quality, while processing facilities could record processing steps and quality control measures. Logistics providers could track transportation conditions, and retailers could update product availability and sales data. Implementing such a system requires not only technical capabilities but also governance structures that ensure data integrity and accessibility. Therefore, despite the potential advantages of implementing blockchain technology for enhancing dairy supply chain transparency and trust, small-scale farms face considerable challenges in adopting such systems due to limited resources. Conversely, larger entities, including government bodies, multinational corporations, and international organizations, are better positioned to undertake sustainable initiatives. Consequently, the realization of blockchain applications in the dairy sector necessitates collaborative endeavours, involving a diverse array of stakeholders throughout the supply chain. Nonetheless, the maturity of blockchain technology is currently under scrutiny, with several technical concerns such as the lack of standardized terminology, scalability, interoperability, and privacy measures. Addressing these issues transcends mere technical hurdles; it requires a holistic approach that encompasses the socio-technical landscape, incorporating regulatory frameworks, food security and safety standards, economic factors, social implications, and potential technological vulnerabilities. Future research should explore the integration of blockchain with existing systems in dairy production, investigate the efficacy of mixed blockchain applications, assess stakeholder acceptance, standardize the lexicon, and study long-term performance and governance mechanisms within the dairy industry.

References

Alkahtani, M, Khalid, QS, Jalees, M, Omair, M, Hussain, G and Pruncu, CI (2021) E-agricultural supply chain management coupled with blockchain effect and cooperative strategies. Sustainability 13(2), 816.10.3390/su13020816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AlShamsi, M, Al-Emran, M and Shaalan, K (2022) A systematic review on blockchain adoption. Applied Sciences 12(9), 4245.10.3390/app12094245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonucci, F, Figorilli, S, Costa, C, Pallottino, F, Raso, L and Menesatti, P (2019) A review on blockchain applications in the agri‐food sector. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture 99(14), 61296138.10.1002/jsfa.9912CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atmaca, Ş and Aydemir, E (2023) Blockchain system design for supply chain management in dairy industry. In Emen FM (ed.), Multifaceted Academic Perspective: agriculture, Forestry and Engineering Sciences Research. Klaipeda: SRA Academic Publishing, pp. 4570.Google Scholar
Bogomolov, AE, Popok, LE, Savinskaya, DN and Tyunin, EB (2019) Blockchain technology as an efficiency improvement tool for the agricultural sector. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 71, 04012). EDP Sciences.10.1051/shsconf/20197104012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosona, T and Gebresenbet, G (2023) The role of blockchain technology in promoting traceability systems in agri-food production and supply chains. Sensors 23(11), 5342.10.3390/s23115342CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buterin, V (2013) Ethereum: the ultimate smart contract and decentralized application platform. Libro blanco de Ethereum. Consultado En. http://web.archive.org/web/20131228111141/http://vbuterin.com/ethereum.html.el,8 (Accessed 16 June 2024).Google Scholar
Casino, F, Kanakaris, V, Dasaklis, TK, Moschuris, S, Stachtiaris, S, Pagoni, M and Rachaniotis, NP (2020) Blockchain-based food supply chain traceability: A case study in the dairy sector. International Journal of Production Research 59(19), 57585770.10.1080/00207543.2020.1789238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casino, F, Kanakaris, V, Dasaklis, TK, Moschuris, S, Stachtiaris, S, Pagoni, M and Rachaniotis, NP (2021) Blockchain-based food supply chain traceability: A case study in the dairy sector. International Journal of Production Research 59(19), 57585770.10.1080/00207543.2020.1789238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaum, D (1983) Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Advances in Cryptology: Proceedings of Crypto 82 (pp. 199203). Boston, MA: Springer US.10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commandré, Y, Macombe, C and Mignon, S (2021) Implications for agricultural producers of using blockchain for food transparency, study of 4 food chains by cumulative approach. Sustainability 13(17), 9843.10.3390/su13179843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corkery, M and Popper, N (2018) From Farm to Blockchain: walmart Tracks Its Lettuce. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/walmart-blockchain-lettuce.html(Accessed 16 June 2024) .Google Scholar
Demestichas, K, Peppes, N, Alexakis, T and Adamopoulou, E (2020) Blockchain in agriculture traceability systems: A review. Applied Sciences 10(12), 4113.10.3390/app10124113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Pierro, M (2017) What is the blockchain? Computing in Science & Engineering 19(5), 9295.10.1109/MCSE.2017.3421554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, I, Toohey, L, Grimstad, S, Follong, B and Bucher, T (2021) Blockchain: The paradox of consumer trust in a trustless system-a systematic review. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) (pp. 505512). IEEE.10.1109/Blockchain53845.2021.00077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Amine, BM and Lamia, ST (2023) Blockchain adoption for a sustainable agricultural supply chain: Opportunities and challenges for the dairy industry. In 2023 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA) (pp. 331336). IEEE.10.1109/DASA59624.2023.10286692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2023) Dairy Market Review: Emerging Trends and Outlook 2023.Google Scholar
Feng, H, Wang, X, Duan, Y, Zhang, J and Zhang, X (2020) Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 260, 121031.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad, AG, Mosa, DT, Abualigah, L and Abohany, AA (2022) Emerging trends in blockchain technology and applications: A review and outlook. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 34(9), 67196742.10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.03.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlot, A, Malik, PK, Singh, R, Akram, SV and Alsuwian, T (2022) Dairy 4.0: Intelligent communication ecosystem for the cattle animal welfare with blockchain and IoT enabled technologies. Applied Sciences 12(14), 7316.10.3390/app12147316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haber, S and Stornetta, WS (1991) How to Time-stamp a Digital Document. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 437455.Google Scholar
Habib, G, Sharma, S, Ibrahim, S, Ahmad, I, Qureshi, S and Ishfaq, M (2022) Blockchain technology: benefits, challenges, applications, and integration of blockchain technology with cloud computing. Future Internet 14(11), 341.10.3390/fi14110341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, MR, Rahman, MM, Mahmud, M, Rahman, MA and Mohamad, MHS (2021) A review on blockchain security issues and challenges. In 2021 IEEE 12th control and system graduate research colloquium (ICSGRC) (pp. 227232). IEEE.10.1109/ICSGRC53186.2021.9515276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISMEA (2021) Istituto di Servizi per il Mercato Agricolo Alimentare. Available online: https://www.ismea.it/istituto-di-servizi-per-ilmercatoagricolo-alimentare (accessed 10 September, 2021).Google Scholar
Kamilaris, A, Fonts, A and Prenafeta-Boldύ, FX (2019) The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science and Technology 91, 640652.10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, P, Zhang, Z and Dong, F-Y (2022) Subsidy and pricing strategies of an agri-food supply chain considering the application of Big Data and blockchain. RAIRO - Operations Research 56(3), 19952014.10.1051/ro/2022070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longo, F, Nicoletti, L and Padovano, A (2020) Estimating the impact of blockchain adoption in the food processing industry and supply chain. International Journal of Food Engineering 16(5–6), 20190109.10.1515/ijfe-2019-0109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarov, EI, Polyansky, KK, Makarov, ME, Nikolaeva, YR and Shubina, EA (2019) Conceptual approaches to the quality system of dairy products based on the blockchain technology. Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 826. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Makkar, HP and Costa, C (2020) Potential blockchain applications in animal production and health sector. CABI Reviews (2020). 15(035)10.1079/PAVSNNR202015035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, M, Gahlawat, VK, Mor, RS, Dahiya, V and Yadav, M (2022) Application of optimization techniques in the dairy supply chain: A systematic review. Logistics 6(4), 74.10.3390/logistics6040074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, S, Kanhere, SS and Jurdak, R (2018) Productchain: Scalable blockchain framework to support provenance in supply chains. In 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) (pp. 110). IEEE.10.1109/NCA.2018.8548322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchi, B, Bettoni, L and Zanoni, S (2022) Assessment of energy efficiency measures in food cold supply chains: A dairy industry case study. Energies 15(19), 6901.10.3390/en15196901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, S and Jain, K (2021) Blockchain technology for transparency in agri-food supply chain: Use cases, limitations, and future directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 71, 106120.10.1109/TEM.2021.3110903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misra, H and Das, RK (2019) Citizen empowerment: Block chain supported e-governance in dairy cooperative sector. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 505507).10.1145/3326365.3326442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohapatra, S, Sainath, B, , KC A, Lal, H, K, NR, Bhandari, G and Nyika, J (2023) Application of blockchain technology in the agri-food system: A systematic bibliometric visualization analysis and policy imperatives. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies (pp. 133).Google Scholar
Mwewa, T, Lungu, G, Turyasingura, B, Umer, Y and Chavula, P (2024) Blockchain Technology: A Review Study on Improving Efficiency and Transparency in Agricultural Supply Chains. Jurnal Galaksi 1(3), 178190.10.70103/galaksi.v1i3.46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamoto, S (2008) Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, 2008, https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf. (Accessed 14 March 2021).Google Scholar
Namasudra, S, Deka, GC, Johri, P, Hosseinpour, M and Gandomi, AH (2021) The revolution of blockchain: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28, 14971515.10.1007/s11831-020-09426-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neethirajan, S (2023) Artificial intelligence and sensor technologies in dairy livestock export: Charting a digital transformation. Sensors 23(16), 7045.10.3390/s23167045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nukapeyi, S, Bommala, R, Kondreddy, DS, Amalakanti, C, Ravi, C and Konuri, TA (2024) Milk chain with ML & Blockchain: Revolutionizing Transparency for Ensuring Milk Purity in Dairy Industry. In 2024 10th International Conference on Communication and Signal Processing (ICCSP) (970975). IEEE.Google Scholar
Pakseresht, A, Ahmadi Kaliji, S and Xhakollari, V (2022) How blockchain facilitates the transition toward circular economy in the food chain? Sustainability 14(18), 11754.10.3390/su141811754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, P and Litoriya, R (2021) Promoting trustless computation through blockchain technology. National Academy Science Letters 44, 225231.10.1007/s40009-020-00978-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, AS, Brahmbhatt, MN, Bariya, AR, Nayak, JB and Singh, VK (2023) Blockchain technology in food safety and traceability concern to livestock products. Heliyon 9(6). doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patelli, N and Mandrioli, M (2020) Blockchain technology and traceability in the agrifood industry. Journal of Food Science 85(11), 36703678.Google ScholarPubMed
Peng, X, Zhao, Z, Wang, X, Li, H, Xu, J and Zhang, X (2023) A review on blockchain smart contracts in the agri-food industry: Current state, application challenges and future trends. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 208, 107776.10.1016/j.compag.2023.107776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, CB and Mitloehner, FM (2021) Sustainability of the dairy industry: Emissions and mitigation opportunities. Frontiers in Animal Science 2, 760310.10.3389/fanim.2021.760310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAMBIM, D and AWUOR, FM (2020) Blockchain based milk delivery platform for stallholder dairy farmers in Kenya: Enforcing transparency and fair payment. In 2020 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa) (pp. 16). IEEE.Google Scholar
Reyna, A, Martín, C, Chen, J, Soler, E and Díaz, M (2018) On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems 88, 173190.Google Scholar
Rocha, GDSR, de Oliveira, L and Talamini, E (2021) Blockchain applications in agribusiness: A systematic review. Future Internet 13(4), 95.10.3390/fi13040095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Enríquez, CA, Alor-Hernández, G, Sánchez-Ramírez, C and Córtes-Robles, G (2015) Supply chain knowledge management: A linked data-based approach using SKOS. Dyna 82(194), 2735.10.15446/dyna.v82n194.54463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RPOW - Reusable Proofs of Work (2004) https://nakamotoinstitute.org/finney/rpow/. (accessed 23 August, 2021).Google Scholar
Saha, AS, Raut, RD, Yadav, VS and Majumdar, A (2022) Blockchain changing the outlook of the sustainable food supply chain to achieve net zero?. Sustainability 14(24), 16916.10.3390/su142416916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandeep, KM, Maheshwari, V, Prabhu, J, Prasanna, M and Jothikumar, R (2021) “Applying blockchain in agriculture: a study on blockchain technology, benefits, and challenges”. In: Suresh, A., Paiva, S. (eds) Deep Learning and Edge Computing Solutions for High Performance Computing. EAI/Springer Innovations in Communication and Computing. Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
Santana, C and Albareda, L (2022) Blockchain and the emergence of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs): An integrative model and research Agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 182, 121806.10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saurabh, S and Dey, K (2021) Blockchain technology adoption, architecture, and sustainable agri-food supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 284, 124731.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shingh, S, Kamalvanshi, V, Ghimire, S and Basyal, S (2020) Dairy supply chain system based on blockchain technology. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 14, 1319.10.9734/ajeba/2020/v14i230189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimali, B and Patel, HB (2022) Blockchain state-of-the-art: Architecture, use cases, consensus, challenges and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences 34(9), 67936807.10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.08.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R, Tiwari, CK and Chaturvedi, AK (2024) A systematic review and bibliometric analysis on blockchain technology in sustainable Food Agro-Processing and dairy sector. Journal of Informatics Education and Research 4(2), 14161426.Google Scholar
Tan, A and Ngan, PT (2020) A proposed framework model for dairy supply chain traceability. Sustainable Futures 2, 100034.10.1016/j.sftr.2020.100034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanwar, S, Parmar, A, Kumari, A, Jadav, NK, Hong, WC and Sharma, R (2022) Blockchain adoption to secure the food industry: Opportunities and challenges. Sustainability 14(12), 7036.10.3390/su14127036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torky, M and Hassanein, AE (2020) Integrating blockchain and the internet of things in precision agriculture: Analysis, opportunities, and challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 178, 105476.10.1016/j.compag.2020.105476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, G, Ahad, MA and Casalino, G (2023) A comprehensive review of blockchain technology: Underlying principles and historical background with future challenges. Decision Analytics Journal, 9, 100344.10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varavallo, G, Caragnano, G, Bertone, F, Vernetti-Prot, L and Terzo, O (2022) Traceability platform based on green blockchain: An application case study in dairy supply chain. Sustainability 14(6), 3321.10.3390/su14063321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vern, P, Panghal, A, Mor, RS, Kumar, V and Sarwar, D (2024) Unlocking the potential: Leveraging blockchain technology for agri-food supply chain performance and sustainability. The International Journal of Logistics Management.36(2), 474-50010.1108/IJLM-09-2023-0364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiong, H, Chen, M, Wu, C, Zhao, Y and Yi, W (2022) Research on progress of blockchain consensus algorithm: A review on recent progress of blockchain consensus algorithms. Future Internet 14(2), 47.10.3390/fi14020047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J, Guo, S, Xie, D and Yan, Y (2020) Blockchain: A new safeguard for agri-foods. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture 4, 153161.10.1016/j.aiia.2020.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y, Li, X, Zeng, X, Cao, J and Jiang, W (2022) Application of blockchain technology in food safety control: Current trends and future prospects. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 62(10), 28002819.10.1080/10408398.2020.1858752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Timeline history of blockchain technology (created in BioRender).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The creation process of a new data block in an existing Blockchain network (created in BioRender).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Benefits and challenges of blockchain in dairy industries (created in BioRender).