Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-gnk9b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-01T01:38:51.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recursion across domains. Ed. by Luiz Amaral, Marcus Maia, Andrew Nevins, and Tom Roeper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. 404. ISBN 9781108418065. $125 (Hb).

Review products

Recursion across domains. Ed. by Luiz Amaral, Marcus Maia, Andrew Nevins, and Tom Roeper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Pp. 404. ISBN 9781108418065. $125 (Hb).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Daniel L. Everett  and
Edward Gibson
Daniel L. Everett*
Affiliation:
Bentley University
Edward Gibson*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*
danleverett43@gmail.com
egibson@mit.edu
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Language , Volume 95 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 777 - 790
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2014. The minimalist program. Anniversary edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262527347.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinder, Björn. 1960. Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. 1979. Hixkaryána. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond. 1985. Hixkaryána and linguistic typology. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, Desmond, and Pullum, Geoffrey K.. 2010. Handbook of Amazonian languages, vols. 1–4. Reprint edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139084987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1979. Aspectos da Fonologia do Pirahã. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas master's thesis.Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 1983. A lingua Pirahã e a teoria da sintaxe. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas dissertation. [Published by Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1990.].Google Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46(4). 621–46. DOI: 10.1086/431525.10.1086/431525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2012. What does Pirahã grammar have to teach us about human language and the mind? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3. 555–63. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1195.Google ScholarPubMed
Everett, Daniel L. 2016. Dark matter of the mind: The culturally articulated unconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226401430.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel L. 2019. The American Aristotle. Aeon, 15 August 2019. Online: https://aeon.co/essays/charles-sanders-peirce-was-americas-greatest-thinker.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 100. 25–50. [Translated as: On sense and reference. Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. by Geach, Peter T. and Black, Max, 56–78. Oxford: Blackwell, 1952.].Google Scholar
Futrell, Richard, Stearns, Laura, Everett, Daniel L., Piantadosi, Steven T.; and Gibson, Edward. 2016. A corpus investigation of syntactic embedding in Pirahã. PLoS ONE 11(3):e0145289. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145289.10.1371/journal.pone.0145289CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983. Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. (Typological studies in language 3.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Marc D., Chomsky, Noam; and Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–97. DOI: 10.1126/science.298.5598.1569.10.1126/science.298.5598.1569CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langendoen, D. Terence. 2010. Just how big are natural languages? Recursion and human language (Studies in generative grammar 104), ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der, 139–46. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13(1). 91–106. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178261.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, Pesetsky, David; and Rodrigues, Cilene. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85(2). 355–404. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0107.10.1353/lan.0.0107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1982 [1865]. Lecture I. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition. Vol. 1: 1857–1866, ed. by Fisch, Max, 162–75. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K., and Scholz, Barbara C.. 2010. Recursion and the infinitude claim. Recursion and human language (Studies in generative grammar 104), ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der, 113–38. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106(6). 467–82. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/985254.Google Scholar

A correction has been issued for this article:

Clarification