3.1 Introduction

The automotive industry represents an ideal sector to study the effects of FDI in less developed countries and peripheral regions because it has experienced large FDI flows since 1990 and has become one of the most globalized industries (Reference Sturgeon, Van Biesebroeck and GereffiSturgeon et al., 2008). Between 2003 and 2022, the total value of announced greenfield FDI projects in the automotive industry reached USD1.3 trillion, the highest of all manufacturing sectors (UNCTAD, 2023). Particular groups of less developed countries have been targeted by automotive FDI either because of their large markets (e.g., China, India and Brazil) or the combination of low production costs, geographic proximity to affluent markets and membership in regional trade agreements in what I call integrated peripheries (e.g., Eastern Europe, Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Morocco and Mexico) (Reference Humphrey, Lecler and SalernoHumphrey et al., 2000; Reference Carrillo, Lung and van TulderCarrillo et al., 2004).

This chapter draws on the GPN perspective (Reference Henderson, Dicken, Hess, Coe and YeungHenderson et al., 2002; Reference Coe, Hess, Yeung, Dicken and HendersonCoe et al., 2004; Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015) and Reference HarveyHarvey’s (1982; Reference Harvey2005b) work on uneven development to conceptualize the growth and regional development effects of automotive FDI in integrated peripheries by analyzing supplier linkages with a particular focus on linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms. Linkages are considered to be extremely important for stimulating production and job creation, stabilizing investments by embedding investors in host economies, and as a precondition for the transfer of knowledge and technology into host economies (Reference Blomström and KokkoBlomström and Kokko, 1998; UNCTAD, 2001; Reference Giroud and Scott-KennelGiroud and Scott-Kennel, 2009). However, there is a paucity of in-depth firm-level analyses of FDI linkages in integrated peripheries. Empirically, this chapter focuses on Slovakia, which exemplifies the rapid growth of the automotive industry in integrated peripheries since the 1990s, and thus represents an opportunity to study the effects of large automotive FDI on regional economic development through the formation of linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms.

This chapter uses original qualitative data I collected through a survey of 299 Slovakia-based foreign and domestic automotive firms, and fifty face-to-face interviews with managers of automotive firms in Slovakia. In particular, I will address three research questions. First, how can we conceptualize the growth and regional development effects of FDI in integrated peripheries? Second, how is the nature of automotive FDI in integrated peripheries reflected in the extent (quantity) of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms? Third, how can we evaluate the mode of articulation of domestic firms into automotive GPNs and its potential regional development effects in integrated peripheries by measuring the quality of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms?

This chapter is innovative for four reasons. First, it advances the spatial concept of integrated peripheries as distinct production areas of the contemporary automotive industry. Second, it builds on Reference HarveyHarvey’s (2014) spatiotemporal fix and the GPN perspective to conceptualize the growth and regional development effects of the foreign-controlled automotive industry in integrated peripheries. Third, it develops methodology designed to evaluate the quality of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms. Fourth, to the best of my knowledge, it represents the first in-depth analysis of supplier linkages in the automotive industry of Slovakia based on original firm-level data. The empirical analysis uncovered weak and dependent linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms that limit the potential for technology transfer from foreign firms to the Slovak economy, a situation that is typical of peripheral and FDI-dependent regional economic development. As such, underdeveloped linkages constitute a major barrier for the development of a stronger domestic supplier industry and for the weakening of the overwhelming capital and technological dependence of the Slovak automotive industry on foreign capital.

The chapter is organized as follows. I begin with a characterization of the integrated peripheries of the automotive industry and conceptualize their development in contemporary capitalism. Second, I discuss the nature of strategic coupling in integrated peripheries in order to understand their mode of articulation into GPNs. Third, I explain the importance of FDI linkages for regional economic development in integrated peripheries. Fourth, I briefly characterize the Slovak automotive industry and summarize data collection. Fifth, I analyze the quantity of supplier linkages in the Slovak automotive industry. Sixth, I evaluate the quality of linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms. Finally, I summarize the results in the conclusion.

3.2 The Integrated Peripheries of Core-Based Macro-Regional Production Networks

I start by developing the spatial concept of integrated peripheries, which helps us not only understand the ever-changing geography of the global automotive industry but also allows us to highlight the ways in which particular areas of automotive production are articulated in GPNs and the regional development effects of this articulation. Here, although my thinking is influenced by earlier conceptualizations of the international division of labor, such as the “new international division of labor thesis” (Reference Fröbel, Heinrichs and KreyeFröbel et al., 1980) and its critique (Reference SchoenbergerSchoenberger, 1988; Reference HendersonHenderson, 1989), or the “Law on uneven development” (Reference Hymer and BhagwatiHymer, 1972), I draw on more recent dynamic notions of international division of labor and uneven development proposed by Reference HarveyHarvey (1982) and the GPN perspective.

At a general-system level, the spatial patterns of capitalist economic development are driven by profit-seeking behavior. Capitalist firms can achieve excess profits by employing superior technologies or by investing in more profitable locations. The investment of surplus capital in such superior locations provides a “spatiotemporal fix” for declining profitability in existing locations due to increasing production costs and decreasing growth (Reference HarveyHarvey, 1982). In the words of Reference HarveyHarvey (2014: 152): “The organisation of new territorial divisions of labour, of new resource complexes and of new regions as dynamic spaces of capital accumulation all provide new opportunities to generate profits and to absorb surpluses of capital and labour.” Integrated peripheries thus represent a particular form of the spatiotemporal fix that allows core-based automotive firms to maintain or increase the rate of profit by developing production in lower-cost areas that are geographically adjacent to core regions of production and consumption. However, these spatiotemporal fixes are only a temporary solution to the profitability of individual firms because their excess profits diminish as other firms invest in similar superior locations (Reference HarveyHarvey, 1982) and because regional growth does not last since its sources are depleted over time. Consequently, production costs start to rise, and the rate of profit begins to decline, eventually forcing firms to seek new, more profitable locations. However, Harvey does not systematically identify different forms of spatiotemporal fixes that develop based on different sources of economic growth and profit opportunities that make particular regions attractive for capital investment and accumulation. These can include surpluses of low-cost labor, particular labor skills, rapid technological development, rapidly growing markets, high-quality infrastructure and the existence of particular natural resources. Therefore, I need to turn to a meso-level explanation provided by the GPN perspective and its concept of strategic coupling for the understanding of how different spatiotemporal fixes operate and articulate different firms and regions into GPNs.

The GPN perspective has argued that successful regional economic development is attainable through the articulation of peripheral regions and less developed countries into transnational production networks (Reference Henderson, Dicken, Hess, Coe and YeungHenderson et al., 2002; Reference Coe, Hess, Yeung, Dicken and HendersonCoe et al., 2004). Despite its primary focus on the subnational region for the understanding of economic development (Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015), the GPN analysis thus recognizes that the patterns of economic development are strongly affected by the processes of global capital accumulation (Reference HarveyHarvey, 1982) and by the existing spatial division of labor at different geographic scales (Reference MasseyMassey, 1995 [1984]). Regional economic development is conceptualized as the outcome of the strategic coupling between regional assets and the needs of GPNs (Reference Coe, Hess, Yeung, Dicken and HendersonCoe et al., 2004; Reference YeungYeung, 2009; Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015), which means that it is very much dependent on the existence of surplus capital looking for investment opportunities abroad and “spatiotemporal fixes” around the world in order to increase or at least maintain the rate of profit (Reference HarveyHarvey, 1982; Reference Harvey2014). The nature and outcome of strategic coupling and regional development are thus affected by the position of that particular place or region in the international division of labor.

It is in this context, I identify the core-based macro-regional organization of GPNs in the automotive industry, while aiming to analyze the regional development effects of this network organization. By focusing on these two spatial scales, I am aiming at a better understanding of the growth and regional development outcomes of the contemporary automotive industry in integrated peripheries than what is offered by traditional national-level analyses (Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015).

An integrated periphery refers to a dynamic area of relatively low-cost (industrial) production that is geographically adjacent to a large market and has been integrated within a core-based macro-regional production network through FDI. In an integrated periphery, production, organization and strategic functions are externally controlled through foreign ownership (Table 3.1). In the world-systems perspective, these integrated peripheries are typically classified as being part of the global semiperiphery but parts of them can also be classified as core (e.g., Spain) or periphery (e.g., Morocco) (Reference Van Hamme and PionVan Hamme and Pion, 2012). Integrated peripheries represent one of the numerous examples of the uneven development dynamics of contemporary capitalism, in which capital is searching for growth and profit opportunities in new geographic areas. Spatiotemporal fix in integrated peripheries is the outcome of the voluntary opening of these new and potentially more profitable territories for penetration by foreign capital (e.g., Mexico after 1965, Spain after 1972, Eastern Europe after 1989) to take advantage of surplus capital from the core areas of the global automotive industry, while offering surplus labor in integrated peripheries (Reference HarveyHarvey, 2005b). This spatiotemporal fix is based on the contemporaneous existence of four regional assets in integrated peripheries: low-cost labor, geographic proximity to large markets, membership in regional trade agreements and investment incentives. Spatiotemporal fix in the form of FDI in particular locations and regions of integrated peripheries has thus been made possible not only by the mobility of surplus capital but also by technological and organizational fixes (Reference YeungYeung, 2009; Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015) in the contemporary automotive industry (e.g., Reference Sturgeon, Van Biesebroeck and GereffiSturgeon et al., 2008). Although I focus on the automotive industry in this chapter, integrated peripheries also provide the spatiotemporal fix for other globally integrated industries, such as apparel (Reference Pickles and SmithPickles and Smith, 2016) and electronics (Reference StarostaStarosta, 2010).

Decreases in the cost of production and increased product variety are at the heart of the competitive strategies of vehicle manufacturers attainable through the internationalization of production (Reference Lung, Humphrey, Lecler and SalernoFreyssenet and Lung, 2000). Curbing wage costs (7–10 percent of the value of the car) and the price of components (almost 70 percent), although maintaining or not significantly increasing marketing and distribution costs, can be achieved by locating the production of components, assembly of the most cost-sensitive models and the labor-intensive assembly of niche market vehicles to low-cost areas situated in the proximity of large automobile markets. Such areas are woven into transnational automotive production networks through investment by core-based assembly firms and component suppliers. Integrated peripheries therefore include countries that are located close to Western Europe and the USA but have significantly lower production costs, and participate in regional trade agreements that provide tariff-free access to macro-regional markets (Reference Humphrey, Oeter, Humphrey, Lecler and SalernoHumphrey and Oeter, 2000). These countries are peripheral in the context of automotive industry macro-regional production networks by producing entry-level vehicles, generic and labor-intensive components, and lacking strategic functions such as R&D, strategic decision-making and finance (Reference LungLayan and Lung, 2004) (Table 3.1).

The first integrated peripheries of the automotive industry were developed in Mexico, Spain and Portugal in the 1980s (Reference Carrillo, Lung and van TulderCarrillo et al., 2004; Reference Charnock, Purcell, Ribera-Fumaz, Charnock and StarostaCharnock et al., 2016). Turkey followed in the late 1980s and early 1990s (Reference Wasti and WastiWasti and Wasti, 2008) and Eastern Europe in the 1990s and 2000s (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2002d; Reference Pavlínek2002b). More recently, Serbia and Morocco were integrated on the periphery of the European automotive production system (Reference Benabdejlil, Bounya, Layan, Lung and PiveteauBenabdejlil et al., 2015; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2017a) (Table 3.2). The integration of new peripheries and the related spatial shifts in the European and North American automotive industries are the outcome of gradual wage convergence with core areas in older integrated peripheries, and constant efforts of automotive firms to curb wage costs by shifting parts of production to lower-cost countries, while also using lower-cost locations to limit wage increases in the entire production network through inter-plant competition and threats of relocation of production (Reference Phelps and FullerPhelps and Fuller, 2000; Reference Aláez-Aller, Gil, Ullibarri, Galgóczi, Drahokoupil and BernaciakAláez et al., 2015).

Although this is a varied group of countries, the automotive industry in integrated peripheries shares the following basic features (Table 3.1). (1) predominantly export-oriented production (Table 3.2); (2) a high degree of foreign ownership and control (Reference Contreras, Carrillo and AlonsoContreras et al., 2012; Eurostat, 2016b); (3) significantly lower wages than in the automotive industry core countries (CB, 2016); (4) specialization in the mass production of entry-level vehicles, low-volume production of special models and labor-intensive production of components (Reference Layan, Humphrey, Lecler and SalernoLayan, 2000; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2002d); (5) underdevelopment of automotive R&D and other higher-value-added functions (Reference Layan, Humphrey, Lecler and SalernoLayan, 2000; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2012); (6) more flexible labor practices than in the automotive industry core countries (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2002d; Reference Aláez-Aller, Gil, Ullibarri, Galgóczi, Drahokoupil and BernaciakAláez et al., 2015); and (7) FDI-friendly automotive industry state policies and intense state competition over automotive FDI (Reference DrahokoupilDrahokoupil, 2009; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016).

The export-oriented automotive industry has grown rapidly in integrated peripheries since the early 1990s (Table 3.2). All high-volume assembly plants in integrated peripheries are foreign-owned, and foreign ownership also dominates the supplier sector, reflecting the rapid internationalization of the supplier industry since the early 1990s (Reference Sturgeon, Lester, Yusuf, Altaf and NabeshimaSturgeon and Lester, 2004). Although the automotive industry in integrated peripheries is based on state-of-the-art factories and technologies, it is almost totally dependent on the import of capital, technologies and operational skills directly related to production from abroad. The majority of parts and components is also imported directly or manufactured in foreign subsidiaries. At the same time, the majority of strategic functions is conducted abroad (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016; Reference Pavlínek and ŽenkaPavlínek and Ženka, 2016), which, along with the outflow of profits and the weak linkages of foreign subsidiaries with host economies, is likely to limit the long-term benefits of this growth and contribute to the technological underdevelopment of integrated peripheries (Reference BrittonBritton, 1980; Reference Grabher, Grabher and StarkGrabher, 1997). In the next section, I draw on the GPN perspective in order to consider the mode of articulation of integrated peripheries in automotive GPNs by focusing on the concept of strategic coupling.

3.3 The Nature of Strategic Coupling in Integrated Peripheries

The mode of articulation of regions into GPNs is based on the particular form of time and space contingent strategic coupling, with different forms of coupling leading to different regional development outcomes (Reference Coe, Hess, Yeung, Dicken and HendersonCoe et al., 2004; Reference YeungYeung, 2009; Reference Yeung2016; Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015). Following Reference YeungCoe and Yeung’s (2015) classification, I argue that integrated peripheries are articulated into GPNs through structural coupling, which represents the least favorable mode for integrated regions and places. Structural coupling is based on generic regional assets (Reference MacKinnonMacKinnon, 2012), such as surpluses of relatively cheap labor, industrial parks and transportation infrastructure, allowing TNCs to strongly exercise their structural power. The assembly platforms type of structural coupling, which is relevant in the automotive industry, is best illustrated by the FDI-driven export-oriented standardized assembly of goods and services in globally integrated industries and is exemplified by high levels of external dependency and control. This translates into greater value transfer and the greater likelihood of decoupling and cost-driven relocations, especially in the labor-intensive supplier sector. Although significant value creation takes place in foreign subsidiaries, integrated peripheries capture only a low share of the value created because of high shares of low-wage assembly jobs, low shares of nonproduction and strategic functions, the repatriation of profits, and low corporate taxes (Reference Smith, Rainnie and DunfordSmith et al., 2002; Reference Pavlínek and ŽenkaPavlínek and Ženka, 2016; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016). Integrated peripheries thus represent an example of the less favorable articulation of regions into GPNs through FDI.

Spatiotemporal fix in integrated peripheries has been made possible by technological and organizational fixes. The organizational fix is based on the reorganization of the automotive supplier industry since the 1980s, which significantly reduced the number of suppliers and organized the remaining ones into tiers (Reference Humphrey and MemedovicHumphrey and Memedovic, 2003). The requirements of just-in-time production, along with local content and follow sourcing requirements, led to the increased clustering of especially tier-one suppliers around assembly plants (Reference Sturgeon, Van Biesebroeck and GereffiSturgeon et al., 2008). However, due to the rapid internationalization of the supplier industry (Reference Sturgeon, Lester, Yusuf, Altaf and NabeshimaSturgeon and Lester, 2004) and global sourcing, the vast majority of these suppliers in integrated peripheries are foreign subsidiaries that tend to assemble components or modules from imported parts or those supplied by other foreign subsidiaries rather than from those supplied by the domestic industry. Consequently, the existence of domestic suppliers and their capabilities are no longer important factors in the location decisions of foreign assembly firms since components that need to be supplied just in time are sourced through follow sourcing and the remaining components can be imported. The technological fix is based on new transportation technologies, logistical systems and the modern transportation infrastructure in integrated peripheries that allow for global sourcing, the just-in-time delivery of preassembled modules and exports of finished vehicles and components (Reference Kaneko and NojiriKaneko and Nojiri, 2008; Reference CoeCoe, 2014).

It is in this context, I will focus on linkages between foreign subsidiaries and host country firms (henceforth domestic firms) in the automotive industry of integrated peripheries. There has been little research on these linkages despite being considered the most important mechanism of technology transfer from core to peripheral regions (Reference Blomström and KokkoBlomström and Kokko, 1998; UNCTAD, 2001; Reference Giroud and Scott-KennelGiroud and Scott-Kennel, 2009; Reference SantangeloSantangelo, 2009). The quantity and quality of linkages thus strongly affect the nature of strategic couplings with automotive GPNs and, consequently, the long-term regional developmental consequences of FDI in integrated peripheries.

3.4 FDI Linkages in Integrated Peripheries

Supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms represent an important mechanism through which domestic firms become articulated into GPNs. This is especially the case in the automotive industry, which relies on extensive networks of component suppliers. Although the GPN approach recognizes the importance of linkages between foreign and domestic firms (e.g., Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015), to the best of my knowledge, GPN scholars have not developed a systematic approach to evaluate these linkages. Therefore, I will draw on economic geography and international business literature to categorize supplier linkages from the perspective of their regional development potential, and will link these categories to different modes of strategic couplings developed by the GPN approach. This approach will allow me to evaluate the nature of strategic coupling in the automotive industry in integrated peripheries through analyzing supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms.

FDI linkages are repeated transactions between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms, including linkages between foreign subsidiaries and various host-country institutions (Reference Hansen, Pedersen and PetersenHansen et al., 2009). FDI linkages can be classified into three basic categories (Reference Giroud and Scott-KennelGiroud and Scott-Kennel, 2009): vertical (supplier), horizontal (collaborative or relational) and institutional linkages. Vertical linkages can be either backward (i.e., with suppliers, such as foreign subsidiaries buying supplies from domestic firm), or forward (i.e., with customers, such as foreign subsidiaries supplying domestic firms). Horizontal linkages are formed through strategic alliances with other firms. Institutional linkages are linkages with host-country institutions, such as R&D institutes and universities, producing knowledge (Reference SantangeloSantangelo, 2009). Backward supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms are considered the most important for the potential upgrading of domestic firms and a crucial precondition for spillovers (Reference Blomström and KokkoBlomström and Kokko, 1998; UNCTAD, 2001; Reference SantangeloSantangelo, 2009). The formation of such linkages therefore constitutes an important mechanism through which the development potential of FDI in less developed countries and regions can be realized (Reference Giroud and Scott-KennelGiroud and Scott-Kennel, 2009).

Although the number of linkages is important, it is the nature of these linkages that indicates the mode of strategic coupling with GPNs and ultimately determines the long-term developmental effects of FDI in host economies. Reference TurokTurok (1993) categorized linkages into two basic types, “developmental” and “dependent,” in order to distinguish between the different developmental potential of different linkages for domestic firms. Developmental linkages are based on long-term collaboration between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms, which is typical of the international partnership type of functional couplings with GPNs (Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015). Developmental linkages increase the likelihood of technology and knowledge transfer from foreign subsidiaries, which encourages the upgrading of domestic firms, including functional upgrading and the development of higher-value-added functions such as R&D.

In contrast, dependent linkages are typical of the assembly platforms type of structural couplings with GPNs which are characterized by the dependency of firms and regions on external actors (Reference YeungCoe and Yeung, 2015). Dependent linkages are based on shorter-term, price-based and often adversarial relationships between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms, in which cost-cutting is the main reason for establishing linkages by foreign subsidiaries (Reference TurokTurok, 1993), and the exchange of information and knowledge with domestic firms is limited (UNCTAD, 2001). Domestic firms tend to supply simple standard components, do not engage in product development (Reference TurokTurok, 1993) and are contractually highly dependent on foreign firms in captive production networks which may lock domestic firms into simple, low-value-added activities and undermine the potential of domestic suppliers to benefit from supplier linkages (UNCTAD, 2001; Reference Gereffi, Humphrey and SturgeonGereffi et al., 2005; Reference Pavlínek and ŽenkaPavlínek and Ženka, 2011; Reference Pavlínek and ŽížalováPavlínek and Žížalová, 2016).

Developmental linkages thus have a greater positive long-term regional development potential for host economies than dependent linkages by encouraging the functional upgrading and development of domestic firms (Reference TurokTurok, 1993) and by increasing the locational stability of foreign investors in host economies (UNCTAD, 2001). Additionally, I will also consider the possibility of negative effects of foreign subsidiaries on domestic firms (Reference Hymer and BhagwatiHymer, 1972; Reference BellakBellak, 2004) in the assembly platforms type of structural couplings through what I call detrimental linkages relating to employment and labor market effects of FDI such as employee poaching (Reference Pavlínek and ŽížalováPavlínek and Žížalová, 2016).

Firm-level data from less developed host regions typically suggest weak supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms, indicating a weak potential for spillovers and, therefore, limited development potential of FDI (Reference PhelpsPhelps, 1993a; Reference TurokTurok, 1993). The potential for local linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms has further decreased in the contemporary economy mainly because of the increased use of global sourcing by TNCs (Reference HumphreyHumphrey, 2000; Reference Tavares and YoungTavares and Young, 2006; Reference Williams, McDonald, Tuselmann and TurnerWilliams et al., 2008). Furthermore, in the automotive industry, modular production has become a norm in which preassembled modules and the most important components are delivered sequentially just in time from dedicated suppliers located in supplier parks close to car assembly plants. These supplier parks typically have few linkages, if any, to the surrounding region (Reference LarssonLarsson, 2002). It should not therefore be surprising that the evidence from integrated peripheries suggests that foreign subsidiaries usually fail to develop supplier linkages with domestic firms (Reference LagendijkLagendijk, 1995b; Reference CarrilloCarrillo, 2004; Reference Pavlínek and ŽížalováPavlínek and Žížalová, 2016). If domestic firms are integrated in captive production networks organized and controlled by foreign TNCs at all, they supply simple, standardized, slow-changing and low-value-added components through dependent linkages and are squeezed by larger and more powerful foreign buyers.

This situation suggests that while FDI in integrated peripheries increased rapidly since the early 1990s (UNCTAD, 2016), FDI’s regional development potential has been decreasing because its effects have mainly been short-term, such as job creation, capital formation, trade, and the balance of payment effects, while the limited development of predominantly dependent linkages with domestic firms weakened the potential long-term positive effects of FDI (Reference Young, Hood and PetersYoung et al., 1994; Reference HataniHatani, 2009). We might therefore expect a limited development of linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms and the existence of predominantly dependent linkages in the automotive industry of integrated peripheries. The limited and dependent linkages of domestic firms with foreign subsidiaries would therefore suggest the articulation of integrated peripheries into GPNs through predominantly structural couplings. The validity of these assumptions will be examined in the empirical part of this chapter.

3.5 The Case Study Area and Data Collection

Slovakia represents a typical example of the integrated periphery of the automotive industry. FDI-driven export-oriented growth started in the 1990s, following an investment by German Volkswagen. But the most rapid development took place in the early 2000s prior to the 2008–2009 economic crisis and was related to Slovakia’s entry into the European Union in 2004, the development of an aggressive foreign investment promotion regime by the Slovak state, and a large surplus of cheap labor indicated by the 19.5-percent unemployment rate in 2001 (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016). In the early 2000s, Kia and Peugeot Société Anonyme Peugeot Citroën (henceforth PSA) set up assembly operations and Volkswagen was rapidly expanding production in Slovakia. Foreign component suppliers built 128 new factories between 1997 and 2015 (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2017a). By 2014, foreign capital almost completely controlled the automotive industry in Slovakia, accounting for 98 percent of production value, 97 percent of gross investment in tangible goods, 93 percent of persons employed and 96 percent of value added at factor cost, which represented the highest level of foreign control of the automotive industry in Eastern Europe (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2017a). Average personnel costs per employee in the automotive industry were 74 percent lower in Slovakia than in Germany in 2014 (86 percent lower in 2001) (Eurostat, 2016b). Wages increased as the surplus of cheap labor diminished especially in western Slovakia, which has been most targeted by automotive FDI (Figure 3.1), but the average gross monthly salary for production workers continued to be very low, at €590 in 2015 (Sario, 2016). The majority of assembled cars are entry-level models or compact cars, although Volkswagen also established the labor-intensive low-volume assembly of luxury models in Slovakia, which is another typical specialization of integrated peripheries (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2002d). The development of automotive R&D and other higher-value-added functions has been very limited (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2012; Reference Pavlínek2016).

Figure 3.1 Spatial distribution of the surveyed and interviewed foreign subsidiaries and domestic automotive firms in Slovakia based on their number of employees

Source: author.

I collected the data through a firm-level questionnaire and on-site face-to-face interviews with directors or top managers of automotive firms (Figure 3.1). The goal of the questionnaire and interviews was to collect information about the position, competencies and linkages of foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms in the Slovak automotive industry. The questionnaire was conducted in 2010 and included 299 firms with more than twenty workers in the broadly defined automotive industry, which includes not only firms classified in the automotive industry (NACE 29) but also firms that supply the automotive industry but are classified in different industries, such as rubber, plastic, and iron and steel industries. I received answers from 133 firms (68 foreign subsidiaries and 65 domestic firms), a response rate of 60 percent. The survey data included information about the technological complexity of production, competencies and activities conducted, R&D and supplier linkages.

The interviews were conducted in Slovakia between 2011 and 2015 and involved fifty firms, twenty-two domestic firms and twenty-eight foreign subsidiaries. The interview questions were different from the survey, were tailored differently to foreign and domestic firms and collected more detailed information about individual firms than the survey.

3.6 The Quantity of Supplier Linkages

The quantity of supplier linkages of foreign subsidiaries indicates the form of the spatiotemporal fix in integrated peripheries and the mode of coupling of integrated peripheries into automotive GPNs. The survey and interview data point to weak backward and forward supplier linkages between domestic firms and foreign subsidiaries and high dependence of both on imports of parts and components. Foreign subsidiaries have developed strong forward supplier linkages with assembly firms because of just-in-time delivery and local content requirements but their backward and forward linkages with domestic firms and especially other foreign subsidiaries in Slovakia are weakly developed. Instead, foreign subsidiaries are strongly integrated into transnational production networks and heavily depend on supplies from abroad and on sales of their products abroad, with the exception of tier-one suppliers, which supply assembly operations in Slovakia.

In terms of forward linkages, foreign subsidiaries supply either assembly firms in Slovakia or export their products abroad but do not supply other foreign subsidiaries in Slovakia (Tables 3.3 and 3.4). In terms of backward linkages, foreign subsidiaries buy a very low share of supplies in Slovakia, while being heavily dependent on imports (Table 3.4), with the vast majority buying less than 10 percent and buying mostly various services rather than components, as revealed by the interviews (cf. Reference Contreras, Carrillo and AlonsoContreras et al., 2012). This first suggests that foreign subsidiaries mainly source their supplies from abroad rather than from Slovakia-based firms (both foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms). Second, linkages among foreign suppliers operating in Slovakia are weakly developed. Third, supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms are also weakly developed.

Domestic firms, as expected, have stronger linkages with other domestic firms than foreign subsidiaries, have weak supply linkages with foreign subsidiaries, and are highly dependent on imports (Table 3.4). These very limited supply linkages between domestic firms and foreign subsidiaries mean that the vast majority of domestic firms cannot benefit from the possibility of direct spillovers from foreign subsidiaries. The actual share of domestic firms not benefiting from spillovers is even higher, since linkages (and dependent linkages in particular) do not automatically translate into spillovers (Reference SaggiSaggi, 2002). This suggests a weak long-term potential for the positive firm-level effects of automotive FDI in the Slovak economy.

Interviews with foreign subsidiaries confirmed the survey results (Table 3.5) and identified the underlying reasons for weak supplier linkages of foreign subsidiaries in Slovakia. These include the system of centralized purchasing (79 percent of interviewed subsidiaries), which is a standard practice allowing TNCs to capture large economies of scale (Reference PhelpsPhelps, 1993b), and the fact that some of the sourced components and materials are not available in Slovakia (46 percent). It is also common that buyers dictate to component makers where they have to buy parts and materials, which is almost invariably abroad. The low share of supplies bought in Slovakia by foreign subsidiaries could be further explained by two additional factors. The first is the short time since the original investment because the majority of foreign subsidiaries were established in Slovakia in the early 2000s. Supplier linkages might develop over time (UNCTAD, 2001), although the experience from older integrated peripheries, such as Portugal and Mexico, suggests that it is difficult to achieve (Reference 236Veloso, Henry, Roth and ClarkVeloso et al., 2000; Reference CarrilloCarrillo, 2004). Indeed, 63 percent of interviewed foreign subsidiaries argued that the volume and value of supplies from Slovakia slightly increased since the beginning of their production in Slovakia but almost invariably from other foreign subsidiaries and not from domestic firms. The second factor was related to the low competency of domestic suppliers, who were often unable to meet the quality and delivery requirements of foreign subsidiaries. An interview quote from a German supplier illustrates this point: “We were actively looking for domestic suppliers in Slovakia, but we could not find anybody. I don’t honestly know why but I think it is because of no previous industrial history here” (interview, June 14, 2011).

Low or nonexistent capabilities of domestic firms in the particular supplier sector thus make it difficult for foreign subsidiaries to establish supplier linkages with domestic firms. A Spanish supplier has reiterated this situation in Slovakia: “If you have no experience in the sector, you are in a difficult position. We use plastic injected items, metallic clamps, items that are common in Western Europe but not here. There is no previous tradition here. We are actively looking for suppliers” (interview, June 20, 2011).

The overall low quantity of supplier linkages suggests that the spatiotemporal fix in the Slovak automotive industry generates excess profits mainly through cost minimization in foreign subsidiaries rather than through accessing and exploiting local capabilities. Low production costs are made possible not only because of low labor costs but also because of organizational and technological fixes, in which local capabilities and linkages with domestic firms are considered unimportant for profit generation by foreign investors. For example, follow sourcing makes it possible for the Slovakia-based car assembly factories of Volkswagen, Kia and PSA not to buy any supplies directly from domestic firms (interviews at Kia, Volkswagen and PSA Slovakia, June 14, 16, 20, 2011), which also saves the costs of establishing and maintaining supplier relationships with domestic suppliers. Modern logistical systems and transportation infrastructure allow for the cost-efficient imports of components from abroad to foreign subsidiaries clustered around assembly plants, exports of components assembled from imported materials in foreign subsidiaries and supplying just in time from custom-built supplier parks (Reference LarssonLarsson, 2002; Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016). The high dependence on imports and very limited linkages among foreign subsidiaries in Slovakia that are primarily integrated in externally organized GPNs (Table 3.4) are all signs of strong dependency on external TNCs, which points toward the assembly platforms type of the structural mode of coupling with GPNs.

In the next step, I will concentrate on the mode of strategic coupling of domestic firms with automotive GPNs by analyzing the quality of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms based on the original data collected by my 2010 firm-level survey and 2011–2015 face-to-face interviews with company directors and managers in Slovakia.

3.7 The Quality of Supplier Linkages

Integrated peripheries represent an example of spatiotemporal fix that allows automotive firms to acquire relative surplus value by locating in superior locations. Excess profits are acquired through significantly lower production costs that are mainly based on lower labor costs compared to the established locations in core regions. The quality of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms reflects the nature of spatiotemporal fix in integrated peripheries and the mode of strategic coupling of domestic firms into GPNs. It was evaluated by classifying linkages into developmental, dependent and detrimental, based on three criteria: the main reason for FDI and continuing production in Slovakia, R&D activities in domestic firms and foreign subsidiaries, and the nature of supplied components. Cost-cutting reasons for the investment and continuing production, such as low production costs or investment incentives, the absence of R&D in domestic firms and foreign subsidiaries, and the supply of simple standard components indicate the potential for the development of dependent linkages with domestic firms and their integration into GPNs as assembly platforms. Alternatively, the search for a skilled labor force and innovation capabilities of domestic firms, the existence of R&D activities, and the supply of complex components indicate the potential for developmental linkages and the integration of domestic firms into GPNs through international partnerships.

3.8 Conclusion

In this chapter, I first developed the spatial concept of integrated peripheries of core-based macro-regional production networks and then set out to analyze the regional development effects of the rapid growth of the automotive industry in these integrated peripheries. I conceptualized this growth by drawing on Reference HarveyHarvey’s (2014) notion of spatiotemporal fix in the context of the dynamics of capitalist uneven development. Faced with rising production costs and declining profitability in Western Europe and the USA, core-based automotive firms have developed automotive production in cheaper and, therefore, more profitable areas in integrated peripheries. At the regional scale, I employed the GPN approach and its concept of strategic coupling in order to conceptualize the mode of articulation of integrated peripheries into transnational production networks and its regional development outcomes. I showed that integrated peripheries were articulated into automotive industry GPNs through structural couplings, the least advantageous and dependent mode of integration into GPNs for countries and regions. The empirical analysis of this mode of integration focused on supplier linkages in Slovakia, which allowed me to examine the implications of the assembly platform type of structural couplings for long-term regional economic development in integrated peripheries because the quality and quantity FDI linkages are crucial for the potential diffusion of technology and knowledge in host regions through FDI. For this purpose, I have developed a methodology to evaluate the quality of supplier linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms.

The case study of Slovakia revealed only tenuous and predominantly dependent linkages of foreign subsidiaries with domestic firms and weakly developed linkages among foreign subsidiaries, with the exception of backward supplier linkages of assembly firms with their most important foreign-owned suppliers. It shows that Slovakia has been integrated into automotive GPNs mainly through sets of mostly unconnected foreign subsidiaries that operate as assembly platforms vertically integrated into externally organized GPNs and are weakly embedded in the Slovak economy. The nature of this spatiotemporal fix reflects the contemporary spatial organization and operation of the automotive industry, which is based on follow and global sourcing. My analysis, together with other existing evidence, strongly suggests that predominantly dependent (if any) linkages between foreign subsidiaries and domestic firms tend to develop in integrated peripheries (Reference EllingstadEllingstad, 1997; Reference CarrilloCarrillo, 2004; Reference Contreras, Carrillo and AlonsoContreras et al., 2012; Reference Pavlínek and ŽížalováPavlínek and Žížalová, 2016; Reference Castillo and de VriesCastillo and de Vries, 2018), which is typical of the assembly platform type of structural couplings with GPNs. Along with the weak development of higher-value-added functions in foreign subsidiaries (Reference PavlínekPavlínek, 2016; Reference Pavlínek and ŽenkaPavlínek and Ženka, 2016), the weak, dependent and also detrimental linkages contribute to limited knowledge transfer from FDI to domestic economies and the truncated nature of automotive FDI in integrated peripheries.

Together with capital, technological, know-how and strategic decision-making dependency, the results of this study thus highlight the dependent nature of the automotive industry development in integrated peripheries based on their structural couplings with GPNs. This suggests that the overwhelming dependency on foreign capital is the underlying structural feature of the automotive industry in integrated peripheries. The similarity of my findings with the conclusions of earlier truncation (Reference BrittonBritton, 1980) and branch plant literature (Reference WattsWatts, 1981) indicates that the underlying structural features and effects of industrial FDI in peripheral regions remain little changed despite the changing technological and organizational nature of capitalism. The high degree of dependency on foreign capital, technology and know-how, along with low domestic capabilities and limited value that is captured from the automotive industry in integrated peripheries, thus represent major threats to future successful economic development in these regions. Since spatiotemporal fixes and strategic couplings are space- and time-contingent, the rapidly growing output, exports and, in some cases, GDP will not last in integrated peripheries. More importantly, the overall benefits of the articulation into automotive industry GPNs through structural couplings have been limited, if not negative, for workers in integrated peripheries. These conclusions undermine the optimistic expectations of sustainable regional development outcomes based on the articulation of regions and countries in global value chains (UNCTAD, 2013) and call for more research into how the integration of countries and regions into externally organized GPNs through FDI might contribute to the perpetuation of uneven development, one of the potential dark sides of strategic coupling (Reference Coe, Hess, Pike, Rodríguez-Pose and TomaneyCoe and Hess, 2011).

With power and control concentrated in the hands of core-based assemblers and global suppliers that relegate the vast majority of domestic suppliers in integrated peripheries to an inferior and unfavorable position (Reference 236Veloso, Henry, Roth and ClarkVeloso et al., 2000; Reference Pavlínek and ŽížalováPavlínek and Žížalová, 2016), the quantity and quality of supplier linkages will likely continue to be low in the foreseeable future. This situation will limit the long-term regional development potential of FDI-driven integration into GPNs and cement the peripheral and dependent position of integrated peripheries in the automotive industry’s international division of labor for years to come.