Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-bmrcd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-03T15:22:22.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A multilevel puzzle: Migrants’ voting rights in national and local elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2026

Jean‐Thomas Arrighi  and
Rainer Bauböck
Jean‐Thomas Arrighi*
Affiliation:
NCCR on the move, Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland
Rainer Bauböck
Affiliation:
Department of Political and Social Sciences, European University Institute, Italy
*
Address for correspondence: Jean‐Thomas Arrighi, NCCR on the move, Université de Neuchâtel, Fg de l'hôpital 106, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland. E‐mail: Jean-thomas.arrighi@unine.ch
Get access

Abstract

How does international migration impact the composition of the demos? Constitutional doctrines and democratic theories suggest contrasting responses: an insular one excludes both non‐citizen immigrants and citizen‐emigrants; a deterritorialised one includes all citizens wherever they reside; a postnational one includes all residents and only these. This article argues that none of these predicted responses represents the dominant pattern of democratic adaptation, which is instead a level‐specific expansion of the national franchise to include non‐resident citizens and of the local franchise to include non‐citizen residents. This is demonstrated by analysing an original dataset on voting rights in 31 European and 22 American countries, and outlining a level‐sensitive normative theory of citizenship that provides support for this pattern as well as a critical benchmark for current franchise policies. The findings can be summarised in two inductive generalisations: (1) Voting rights today no longer depend on residence at the national level and on citizenship of the respective state at the local level; (2) Voting rights do, however, generally depend on citizenship of the respective state at the national level and on residence at the local level. In the article, these are called the patterns of franchise ‘expansion’ and ‘containment’. The former supports the idea of widespread level‐specific expansion of the franchise and refutes the insular view of the demos. The latter signals corresponding level‐specific restrictions, which defeats over‐generalised versions of deterritorialised or postnational conceptions of the demos. In order to test how robust this finding is, cases are analysed where the dominant patterns of expansion have been resisted and where unexpected expansion has occurred. With regard to the former, the article identifies constitutional and political obstacles to voting rights expansion in particular countries. With regard to the latter, the article shows that even where national voting rights have been extended to non‐citizen residents, containment remains strong through indirect links to citizenship.

Keywords

immigrantsemigrantsvoting rightsEurope: Latin America

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , August 2017 , pp. 619 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abizadeh, A. (2008). Democratic theory and border coercion: No right to unilaterally control your own borders. Political Theory 36(1): 37–65.10.1177/0090591707310090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta Arcarazo, D. & Freier, L.F. (2015). Turning the immigration policy paradox upside down? Populist liberalism and discursive gap in South America. International Migration Review 49(3): 659–696.10.1111/imre.12146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, H. (1967). The origins of totalitarianism. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Arrighi, J‐Th. (2014). Access to electoral rights in France. EUI Working Paper EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2014/1. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Arrighi, J‐Th., Hutcheson, D. & Piccoli, L. (2015). Conditions for electoral rights, 2015. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute. Available online at: http://eudo-citizenship.eu/electoral-rights/conditions-for-electoral-rights-2015Google Scholar
Arrighi, J.‐Th. et al. (2013). Franchise and electoral participation of third country citizens residing in EU and of EU citizens residing in third countries. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
Bale, T. (2008). Turning round the telescope: Centre‐right parties and immigration and integration policy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 15(3): 315–330.10.1080/13501760701847341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, F. & McMillan, K. (2014). Constituting the democratic public: New Zealand's extension of national voting rights to non‐citizens. New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law 12(1): 61–80.Google Scholar
Battiston, S. & Mascitelli, B. (2008). The challenges to democracy and citizenship surrounding the vote to Italians overseas. Modern Italy 13(3): 261–280.10.1080/13532940802069572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2007). Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: A normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham Law Review 75(5): 2393–2447.Google Scholar
Bauböck, R. (2015). Morphing the demos into the right shape: Normative principles for enfranchising resident aliens and expatriate citizens. Democratization 22(5): 820–839.10.1080/13510347.2014.988146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, L. (2009). The frontiers of democracy: The right to vote and its limits. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230244962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents and citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cianetti, L. (2014). Granting local voting rights to non‐citizens in Estonia and Latvia: The conundrum of minority representation in two divided democracies. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13(1): 86–112.Google Scholar
Caramani, D. & Strijbis, O. (2013). Discrepant electorates: The inclusiveness of electorates and its impact on the representation of citizens. Parliamentary Affairs 66(2): 384–404.10.1093/pa/gsr069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carens, J.H. (1996). Realistic and idealistic approaches to the ethics of migration. International Migration Review 30(1): 156–170.Google Scholar
Chaudhary, A.R. (2016). Transnational politics and immigrant political participation in Europe. IMI Working Paper 127. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Christopoulos, D. (2013). Access to electoral rights in Greece. EUI Working Paper EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2013/6. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dancygier, R. & Saunders, E.N. (2006). A new electorate? Comparing preferences and partisanship between immigrants and natives. American Journal of Political Science 50(4): 962–981.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00227.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbrava, C. & Bauböck, R. (2015). Bloodlines and belonging: Time to abandon jus sanguinis? EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/80. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Earnest, D.C. (2006). Neither citizen nor stranger: Why states enfranchise resident aliens. World Politics 58(2): 242–275.10.1353/wp.2006.0024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Echeverría, G. (2015). Access to electoral rights in Ecuador. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2015/12. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Escobar, C. (2007). Extraterritorial political rights and dual citizenship in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 42(3): 43–75.10.1353/lar.2007.0046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, C. (2015). Immigrant enfranchisement in Latin America: From strong men to universal citizenship. Democratization 22(5): 927–950.10.1080/13510347.2014.979322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EUDO Citizenship Observatory (2015). ELECLAW indicators. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute. Available online at: http://eudo-citizenship.eu/indicators/electoral-law-indicatorsGoogle Scholar
Hollifield, J.F. (2004). The emerging migration state. International Migration Review 38(3): 885–912.10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00223.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, D.S. & Arrighi, J‐Th. (2015). Keeping Pandora's (ballot) box half‐shut: A comparative inquiry into the institutional limits of external voting in EU Member States. Democratization 22(5): 884–905.10.1080/13510347.2014.979161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) (2012). Padrón de Españoles Residentes en el Extranjero (PERE). Available online at: www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?L=0&type=pcaxis&path=%2Ft20%2Fp85001&file=inebaseGoogle Scholar
Ireland, P.R. (1994). The policy challenge of ethnic diversity: Immigrant politics in France and Switzerland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674498839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, D. (2000). Giving foreigners the vote: Ethnocentrism in Dutch and Belgian political debates. In Ter Wal, J. & Verkuyten, M. (eds), Comparative perspectives on racism. Aldershot; Ashgate.Google Scholar
Jacobson, D. (1996). Rights across borders: Immigration and the decline of citizenship. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the nation‐state: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. London: Routledge.10.1093/0198295405.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, C. (2003). Citizenship between de‐ and re‐ethnicisation. European Journal of Sociology 44(3): 429–458.10.1017/S0003975603001346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadar, L. (2013). Access to electoral rights in the United Kingdom. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2013/10. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Lafleur, J.M. (2015). The enfranchisement of citizens abroad: Variations and explanations. Democratization 22(5): 840–860.10.1080/13510347.2014.979163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafleur, J.M. & Sánchez‐Domínguez, M. (2015). The political choices of emigrants voting in home country elections: A socio‐political analysis of the electoral behaviour of Bolivian external voters. Migration Studies 3(2): 155–181.10.1093/migration/mnu030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, A. & Macdonald, T. (2015). Introduction to special issue: Real‐world justice and international migration. European Journal of Political Theory 14(4): 381–390.10.1177/1474885115584832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López‐Guerra, C. (2005). Should expatriates vote? Journal of Political Philosophy 1(1): 216–234.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00221.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margheritis, A. (2015). Access to electoral rights in Uruguay. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2015/4. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Mosler, H.B. & Pedroza, L. (2016). An unexpected pioneer in Asia: The enfranchisement of foreign residents in South Korea. Ethnopolitics 15(2): 187–210.10.1080/17449057.2014.954318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, D. (2012). Constituting the polity, constituting the demos: On the place of the all affected interests principle in democratic theory and in resolving the democratic boundary problem. Ethics and Global Affairs 5(3): 129–152.Google Scholar
Pedroza, L. (2015). Access to electoral rights in Mexico. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2015/13. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Portes, A. & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology 108 (6): 1211–1248.Google Scholar
Rhodes, S. & Harutyunyan, A. (2010). Extending citizenship to emigrants: Democratic contestation and a new global norm. International Political Science Review 31(4): 470–493.10.1177/0192512110374044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubio Marin, R. et al. (2015). Citizenship law in Spain. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐CR 2015/4. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1976 [1942]). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Shaw, J. (2007). The transformation of citizenship in the European Union: Electoral rights and the restructuring of political space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. (2009). Citizenship and electoral rights in the multi‐level ‘Euro‐polity’: The case of the United Kingdom. School of Law Working Paper 2009/02. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Soysal, Y.N. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stern, J. & Valchars, G. (2013). Access to electoral rights in Austria. EUI Working Paper RSCAS/EUDO‐CIT‐ER 2013/6. San Domenico di Fiesole: European University Institute.Google Scholar
Triandafyllidou, A. (2014). Reform, counter‐reform and the politics of citizenship: Local voting rights for third‐country nationals in Greece. Journal of International Migration and Integration 16(1): 43–60.10.1007/s12134-014-0343-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turcu, A. & Urbatsch, R. (2015). Diffusion of diaspora enfranchisement norms: A multinational study. Comparative Political Studies 48(4): 407–437.10.1177/0010414014546331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldinger, R. (2015). The cross‐border connection: Immigrants, emigrants and their homelands. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736283CrossRefGoogle Scholar