Begin with: The Igbo and Yoruba Nigerian apprenticeship systems have operated as traditional social structures while simultaneously functioning as economic frameworks. Youth socialization and personal development require these services as a necessary part of technical skill training. Two Nigerian films—Mókálík (2019) by Kunle Afolayan and Áfáméfúná: An Nwa-boi Story (2023) by Kayode Kasum—summon different cinematic techniques to show traditional apprentice systems in Nigeria in modern contexts. The films’ narrative structures allow viewers to explore how apprenticeship shapes identity development while questioning societal status and human existence, as well as cultural clashes and their resulting challenges. This review examines how Áfáméfúná and Mókálík present apprenticeship systems while evaluating their unique approaches to display concepts about apprenticeship as peculiar to cultural settings, built upon traditional status quo even in contemporary times.
The Igbo Apprenticeship System in Áfáméfúná: An Nwa-boi Story (2023)
Áfáméfúná: An Nwa-boi Story (2023) revolves around the Igbo Nwa Boi apprenticeship system, which is regarded by many (including Harvard Business Review) as the world’s best business model. The film sets out to explain the Nwa Boi system as a tradition where men serve a master who teaches them a trade. The narrative follows the life of Áfáméfúná, a young man from Onitsha who is sent to Lagos to work as an apprentice for Chief Odogwu, a prosperous businessman. Odogwu sets three basic rules of the apprenticeship: Seller is king, buyer is king; do not steal from your master; and avoid women (premarital sex to avoid unplanned pregnancy).
Over time, the master comes to trust his apprentices, leaving them to run the business in his absence while he oversees other things. The newest apprentice is left in the care of the oldest or most experienced apprentice, oftentimes the one who directly reports to the master. The master provides shelter for the apprentices and feeds them but pays them no wage. However, the apprentice is free to earn some wage for himself when he trades for his master by inflating the asking price of the goods or services and giving the due returns to the master. When the master is convinced that the apprentice has been adequately trained to become a master in his own right, he rewards him for his years of service by providing him with a store and initial goods for retail, while requiring him to remit the agreed percentage until he is able to purchase his inventory independently. Thus, the Nwa Boi turns the master into a father for his apprentices who makes it a point of duty to give them holistic learnings beyond the trade they have come to learn.
The Igbo view this paradigm as a process of survival and aspiration, in which information and culture are passed along, rather than a mere commercial exchange. It is a business empire built on the virtues of brotherhood and hard work, training boys into men who will keep the chain going. The film Áfáméfúná reveals the internal psychological and ethical difficulties of the Nwa Boi system’s members, a distinctive examination of the emotional and personal stakes involved beyond being a means of achieving material success. The pursuit of self-discovery by Áfáméfúná is intertwined with his growing consciousness of moral integrity, loyalty, and treachery. Odogwu, who is also a symbol of the traditional virtues of integrity and hard labor, gives him advice. Being a young apprentice, Áfáméfúná is exposed to the turbulent dynamics of Odogwu’s workplace, where business dealings and personal relationships are highly valued.
Áfáméfúná’s evolving friendship with Paulo, another apprentice, and their battle for Odogwu’s favor are the main sources of tension throughout the film. The narrative captures the ambiguity of their fraternity, where devotion, trust, and competitiveness converge. Odogwu’s preference for Áfáméfúná over Paulo resulted in the breakdown of their friendship, which emphasizes the power dynamics in the apprenticeship system. Paulo’s corruption contrasts with Áfáméfúná’s distaste of dishonesty and greed, and greed, underscoring the moral dilemmas surrounding mentorship arrangements.
Another unique aspect of Áfáméfúná is its probing of gender roles within the Igbo world of apprenticeship. While women are a concern of the narrative in a specific way, they are otherwise relegated to secondary, passive roles. Amaka, Odogwu’s daughter, is a romantic interest and nothing more. The film also addresses the absence of women in Odogwu’s workshop, raising the issue of gender disparity in the Nwa Boi system. When Odogwu’s niece, Nneka, draws attention to this exclusion, Odogwu’s response—that women are not to serve a master—attests to the entrenched patriarchal attitudes that underpin the apprenticeship system. The film does not provide easy answers to these gendered questions, but it does leave room for the audience to think about how such traditions would change in modern contexts.
Overall, Áfáméfúná highlights the complex Igbo apprenticeship system. The film examines how apprenticeship impacts loyalty, identity, and personal growth. Instead of focusing solely on its economic soundness, the film pushes viewers to explore the Nwa Boi system beyond its economic value to how it affects interpersonal relationships, moral values, and judgments of those participating in it.
The Yoruba Apprenticeship System in Mókálík (2019)
Mókálík offers a more introspective and contemplative exploration of the Yoruba apprenticeship system, diverging from Áfáméfúná, which primarily centers on trade and commerce. The film’s title itself is a linguistic innovation derived from the English word “mechanic” and adapted into Yoruba phonetics and structure. This coinage exemplifies how language evolves through cultural exchange. The transformation of mechanic to Mókálík not only localizes the term but also embeds it within a distinctly Yoruba sociocultural context, reinforcing the film’s thematic focus on skill acquisition, identity, and the elements of informal education.
The film follows Ponmile, a twelve-year-old boy whose father sends him to work as an apprentice at a mechanic’s garage in Lagos. His father believes that the demanding labor and “dirty” environment will instill discipline, drive him toward academic excellence, and make him appreciate the privileges of his upbringing. However, in just a single day, Ponmile’s worldview shifts dramatically, prompting him to question both societal expectations and his privileged background.
Set entirely within the garage, Mókálík portrays Yoruba apprenticeship as a structured system of informal education, where boys learn through hands-on experience rather than theoretical instruction. Unlike formal schooling, where progression is measured by academic performance, apprenticeship relies on direct skill acquisition. A master does not guide an apprentice beyond the specific craft being taught, nor does he interfere in personal matters. The primary focus is on mastery of service, and if an apprentice fails to meet the required standards, their training is extended rather than prematurely concluded. The “graduation” from apprenticeship mirrors formal academic ceremonies but takes place in an informal, spiritual, and celebratory manner.
Afolayan’s decision to confine the story to a single day and location aligns with Aristotelian principles of unity, using the workshop as a microcosm of broader societal issues. As Ponmile interacts with the mechanics, his perspective on work, education, and class evolves. His engagement with Kamoru, a fellow apprentice with an encyclopedic knowledge of aircraft, is pivotal. Kamoru’s intelligence, often dismissed as trivial, challenges Ponmile’s conventional understanding of learning, highlighting the value of experiential knowledge.
A central theme of the film is the questioning of social norms. When Ponmile expresses a desire to continue his apprenticeship, his father is shocked, having assumed that the physical demands of manual labor would deter him. This moment critiques the class divide in Nigeria, where office jobs are prized over blue-collar work. Mókálík challenges viewers to reconsider societal biases by suggesting that true fulfillment and success lie not in status or wealth but in the integrity of honest, skillful labor.
The film also explores the dynamic nature of knowledge. Over the day, Ponmile realizes that formal education provides an advantage over apprenticeship. Nevertheless, the informal learning he gains in the garage, especially through social interactions and instruction in his mother tongue, is invaluable. The distinction between a classroom teacher and an oga (master) is made clear: the master is neither a father figure nor a school instructor but a craftsman whose expertise commands respect. Through this contrast, Afolayan subtly critiques society’s tendency to limit knowledge to the four walls of a classroom, emphasizing that learning exists beyond conventional academia. By weighing both forms of education, Mókálík ultimately suggests that neither is superior to the other; each holds its indispensable value.
Comparative Analysis of the Two Systems
When Áfáméfúná and Mókálík are compared, it is evident that both films deal with the theme of apprenticeship, but do so in ways that are relevant to the social and cultural realities of their respective contexts. Áfáméfúná provides a transactional view of the apprenticeship system, emphasizing the financial and personal interests in the Igbo Nwa Boi practice. The system is portrayed as one of upholding brotherhood and seeking opportunities for life’s progress, placing significant importance on having a ’father-figure’ with disciples to follow in his steps.
Mókálík provides a deeper philosophical viewpoint on the Yoruba apprenticeship system. As Ponmile challenges his class presumptions, learns the value of manual labor, and develops a pragmatic interaction-based perspective, his inward transformation takes precedence over the financial gain of apprenticeship. The film questions whether pursuing honest and skillful labor is the sole path to personal progress and fulfillment, challenging the notion that intellectual achievement is the only acceptable kind of success.
Despite their differences, both films address the problem of class. Áfáméfúná explores the divide between the top and lower classes by focusing on the protagonist’s upward mobility through apprenticeship. In Mókálík, class distinctions are less evident but not less important. Ponmile’s difficulty reconciling his privileged upbringing with the mechanic shop lifestyle exemplifies the contradiction between personal identity and social expectations. The two films challenge the reconsideration of the value of education and hard effort, as well as the assumptions that underpin how success is defined.
Conclusion
Mókálík and Áfáméfúná offer comprehensive evaluations of both societies’ apprenticeship paradigms. The films depict Áfáméfúná’s and Ponmile’s experiences, which highlight the significance of self-discovery, social classism, and mentoring. They challenge the value of knowledge and labor in modern Nigerian culture, highlighting the difficulties that arise when individual desires and social expectations intersect and conflict. By doing so, they give a useful assessment of the complex links between class, tradition, and identity in contemporary Africa. These films encourage critical examination of the mechanisms that create the notions of labor, success, and personal fulfillment.