Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-19T23:33:39.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Odor increases synchronization of brain activity when watching emotional movies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2025

Eloïse Gerardin
Affiliation:
Institute of NeuroScience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium Brain Impact Neuroscience, Rixensart, Belgium
Jérôme Delforge
Affiliation:
Brain Impact Neuroscience, Rixensart, Belgium
Océane Dousteyssier
Affiliation:
Brain Impact Neuroscience, Rixensart, Belgium
Céline Manetta
Affiliation:
International Flavors and Fragrances (IFF), Neuilly Sur Seine, France
Giuliano Gaeta
Affiliation:
International Flavors and Fragrances (IFF) BV, Hilversum, Netherlands
Arnaud Pêtre
Affiliation:
Brain Impact Neuroscience, Rixensart, Belgium
Laurence Dricot
Affiliation:
Institute of NeuroScience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
Armin Heinecke
Affiliation:
Brain Impact Neuroscience, Rixensart, Belgium NIRx Medizintechnik Gmbh, Berlin, Germany
Ron Kupers*
Affiliation:
Institute of NeuroScience (IoNS), UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium Department of Neuroscience, Panum Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Corresponding author: Ron Kupers; Email: ron.kupers@uclouvain.be
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown that interpersonal synchronization of brain activity can be measured between people sharing similar emotional, narrative, or attentional states. There is evidence that odors can modulate the activity of brain regions involved in memory, emotion and social cognition, suggesting a link between shared olfactory experiences and synchronized brain activity in social contexts.

Method:

We used fMRI to investigate the effects of a positively-valenced odor on inter-subject correlation (ISC) of brain activity in healthy volunteers watching movies. While being inside an MRI scanner, participants (N = 20) watched short movie clips to induce either positive (happiness, tenderness) or negative (sadness, fear) emotions. Two movie clips were presented for each emotional category. Participants were scanned in two separate randomized sessions, once while watching the movie clips in the presence of an odor, and once without.

Results:

When all emotional categories were combined, the odor condition showed significantly higher ISC compared to the control condition in bilateral superior temporal gyri (STG), right middle temporal gyrus, left calcarine, and lingual gyrus. When splitting the movies according to valence, odor-induced increases in ISC were stronger for the negative movies. For the negative movies, ISC in the supramarginal gyrus and STG was larger in the second compared to first movie clips, indicating a time-by odor interaction.

Conclusion:

These findings show that odor increases ISC and that its effects depend on emotional valence. Our results further emphasize the critical role of the STG in odor-based social communication.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Neuropsychological Society

Statement of Research Significance

Research Question

Odors can modulate the activity of brain regions involved in memory, emotion and social cognition, suggesting a link between shared olfactory experiences and synchronized brain activity in social contexts. Our main research question was whether exposure to a positive odor could enhance the synchronicity of brain activity in participants viewing emotional movie clips, using an fMRI pseudo-hyperscanning approach.

Main Finding

Watching emotional movie clips during odor exposure amplified synchronicity of brain activity among participants in superior and middle temporal gyri, and visual areas. The effect was dependent on the type of emotional content, with stronger effects for negative movie clips. The effects of odor for the negative movies increased over time, indicating a time-by odor interaction.

Study Contributions

These data offer a neurobiological perspective for the behavioral observations that odors may promote emotional contagion and enhance the similarity in how individuals perceive and experience the world.

Introduction

The ability to perceive, interpret, and engage in social interactions is a fundamental aspect of human behavior (Adolphs, Reference Adolphs2009; Brothers, Reference Brothers1990; Frith, Reference Frith2007). Trying to understand the behavior of others by attributing mental states to them helps us to recognizing and interpreting their beliefs, desires and emotions (Adolphs, Reference Adolphs2009; Preckel et al., Reference Preckel, Kanske and Singer2018), and is critical for living in a well-functioning social community. This social information can be conveyed through various means including eye gaze, body posture, facial expressions, voice tone, and body odors or fragrances (Ethofer et al., Reference Ethofer, Anders, Erb, Droll, Royen, Saur, Reiterer, Grodd and Wildgruber2006; Gobel et al., Reference Gobel, Kim and Richardson2015; Jack & Schyns, Reference Jack and Schyns2015; Li et al., Reference Li, Solanas, Marrazzo, Raman, Taubert, Giese, Vogels and de Gelder2023). These sensory cues are not just passive expressions but active conveyors of emotional states that facilitate emotional contagion (van Kleef & Cote, Reference van Kleef and Cote2022). Consequently, this “contagion” through verbal and non-verbal cues, including odors, aligns emotion-related neural and physiological states among individuals, enhancing their ability to ‘tune in’ to each other, thus facilitating communication and mutual understanding (Herrando & Constantinides, Reference Herrando and Constantinides2021).

Odor perception plays an important role in social communication. For example, animals use smells to mark their territory, initiate sexual encounters, differentiate among individuals, and identify the emotional state of the other (Ache & Young, Reference Ache and Young2005; Ackerl et al., Reference Ackerl, Atzmueller and Grammer2002; Doty, Reference Doty1986; Ross & Martin, Reference Ross and Martin2007). Studies have shown that natural body odors carry biological salience (Haegler et al., Reference Haegler, Zernecke, Kleemann, Albrecht, Pollatos, Brückmann and Wiesmann2010; Iversen et al., Reference Iversen, Ptito, Møller and Kupers2015) and play a powerful role in creating a sense of connection between people (Calvi et al., Reference Calvi, Quassolo, Massaia, Scandurra, D’Aniello and D’Amelio2020; Gomes & Semin, Reference Gomes and Semin2021; de Groot et al., Reference de Groot, Smeets, Kaldewaij, Duijndam and Semin2012; de Groot et al., Reference de Groot, Haertl, Loos, Bachmann, Kontouli and Smeets2023). For example, odors can influence romantic relationships and partner selection through natural pheromones or shared fragrances 21. Odors also contribute to parent-child bonding, as newborns can recognize their mother’s scent (Kontaris et al., Reference Kontaris, East and Wilson2020; Soudry et al., Reference Soudry, Lemogne, Malinvaud, Consoli and Bonfils2011). Additionally, odors help create a distinct atmosphere in social settings, such as the use of incense in religious ceremonies or the aroma of food and drinks at social and family gatherings (Kontaris et al., Reference Kontaris, East and Wilson2020; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kim, Kim, Kim, Ha, Kim, Hong, Lyoo and Kim2022; Soudry et al., Reference Soudry, Lemogne, Malinvaud, Consoli and Bonfils2011).

The brain networks responsible for olfaction and emotion regulation substantially overlap (Kontaris et al., Reference Kontaris, East and Wilson2020). For instance, the amygdala, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, perirhinal cortex and orbitofrontal cortex respond to both emotional and olfactory cues (Soudry et al., Reference Soudry, Lemogne, Malinvaud, Consoli and Bonfils2011). Patients suffering from anosmia show gray matter reductions in emotion-related brain areas (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kim, Kim, Kim, Ha, Kim, Hong, Lyoo and Kim2022). There is also an important overlap between the olfactory and social brain networks. Regions critical to the social brain, such as the amygdala, medial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, temporal pole, and superior temporal gyrus (Prounis & Ophir, Reference Prounis and Ophir2020), are also deeply involved in olfactory processing (Waymel et al., Reference Waymel, Friedrich, Bastian, Forkel and Thiebaut de Schotten2020).

Odors also influence areas associated with visual and auditory processing, subtly shaping social interactions (Boesveldt & Parma, Reference Boesveldt and Parma2021). The affective valence of the odor thereby plays an important role, with pleasant odors increasing and unpleasant odors decreasing social attraction (Cook et al., Reference Cook, Kokmotou, Soto, Wright, Fallon, Thomas, Giesbrecht, Field and Stancak2018; Demattè et al., Reference Demattè, Osterbauer and Spence2007; Feng & Lei, Reference Feng and Lei2022; Li et al., Reference Li, Moallem, Paller and Gottfried2007). In this study we therefore focused on the effects of positive odors. Pleasantly scented odors enhance memory, attention, and mood regulation (Carlson et al., Reference Carlson, Leitão, Delplanque, Cayeux, Sander and Vuilleumier2020), especially in social contexts, amplifying feelings of warmth and fostering positive interactions. Positive odors also modulate neural circuits by activating regions involved in social and emotional processing, such as the amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex (Watanabe et al., Reference Watanabe, Masaoka, Kawamura, Yoshida, Koiwa, Yoshikawa, Kubota, Ida, Ono and Izumizaki2018; Winston et al., Reference Winston, Gottfried, Kilner and Dolan2005). These odors enhance the perception of trust and warmth in social interactions and influence cognitive and motivational processes that persist beyond the initial olfactory input (Gaby & Zayas, Reference Gaby and Zayas2017; Pause, Reference Pause2012).

Recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies indicate that engaging in shared social experiences, such as watching a film or listening to a story together, can lead to synchronized brain activity across individuals (Cohen and Parra, Reference Cohen and Parra2016; Hasson et al., Reference Hasson, Nir, Levy, Fuhrmann and Malach2004; Herbec et al., Reference Herbec, Kauppi, Jola, Tohka and Pollick2015; Mochalski et al., Reference Mochalski, Friedrich, Li, Kröll, Eickhoff and Weis2024; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Saarimaki, Glerean, Gotsopoulos, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2014; Smirnov et al., Reference Smirnov, Saarimäki, Glerean, Hari, Sams and Nummenmaa2019; Speer et al., Reference Speer, Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, Tsoi, Burns, Falk and Tamir2024). This synchronization may promote a deeper understanding of others and improve the ability to predict their thoughts, emotions, and actions (Cohen and Parra, Reference Cohen and Parra2016; Hasson et al., Reference Hasson, Nir, Levy, Fuhrmann and Malach2004; Mochalski et al., Reference Mochalski, Friedrich, Li, Kröll, Eickhoff and Weis2024; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Saarimaki, Glerean, Gotsopoulos, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2014; Smirnov et al., Reference Smirnov, Saarimäki, Glerean, Hari, Sams and Nummenmaa2019; Speer et al., Reference Speer, Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, Tsoi, Burns, Falk and Tamir2024). These studies have demonstrated that intersubject correlation (ISC) of brain activity across individuals exposed to the same stimulus, reflecting shared neural engagement, is influenced by factors such as the emotional content and complexity of the stimulus, shared background and experiences (i.e., friends vs. strangers), as well as individual personality traits and emotional or psychological states (Schore, Reference Schore2021).

This study tested the hypothesis that adding a positive odor enhances ISC in brain regions linked to social perception in healthy participants watching emotional movie clips (Blomkvist & Hofer, Reference Blomkvist and Hofer2021; Lubke et al., Reference Lubke, Croy, Hoenen, Gerber, Pause and Hummel2014; Spinella, Reference Spinella2002; Zou et al., Reference Zou, Yang, Wang, Lui, Chen, Cheung and Chan2016). More specifically, we predicted this effect to take place in brain areas implicated in synchronizing emotional states across individuals, including limbic areas (amygdala, anterior insula and thalamus) and areas involved in perspective-taking and social cognition (precuneus, temporoparietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex). This effect is expected due to the odor’s ability to enhance emotional salience and multisensory integration, thereby strengthening shared neural responses and facilitating alignment in emotional and social processing.

Methods

Participants

Twenty healthy subjects (10 women, mean age: 34 ± 6.8 years; range: 22–45 years, Supplementary Table 1) took part in this study. All participants were right-handed, non-smoker, and had a normal sense of smell as assessed by the Sniffin Sticks test (Hummel et al., Reference Hummel, Kobal, Gudziol and Mackay-Sim2007). Individuals with a history of neurological disease or currently taking any medication affecting the central nervous system were excluded from participation. The research was completed in accordance with Helsinki Declaration and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the CHU UCL Saint-Luc (Brussels) (ethics approval number N°B403201112591). All participants provided written informed consent before taking part in the study.

Construction and validation of a video database

Based on a review of the available video databases designed to induce specific emotional states, we created a study-specific set of movie clips. After a comprehensive literature review (Gross & Levenson, Reference Gross and Levenson1995; Jenkins & Andrewes, Reference Jenkins and Andrewes2012; Schaefer et al., Reference Schaefer, Nils, Sanchez and Philippot2010), we chose the French language-based database “FilmStim” (Supplementary Table 2) (Schaefer et al., Reference Schaefer, Nils, Sanchez and Philippot2010).This database includes 70 film sequences, lasting between 1 and 7 minutes, (Schaefer et al., Reference Schaefer, Nils, Sanchez and Philippot2010), from which we selected 30 sequences that we reduced to an average length of 95s (±10s). The clips were designed to induce two positive (amusement, tenderness) and two negative (fear, sadness) emotions in the viewers following a similar approach to that described by Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012. The shortened movie sequences were then tested in a panel of 16 participants (mixed men and women, aged between 18 and 45 years) to validate their effectiveness in inducing the intended emotional states.

Experimental design

We used a pseudo-hyperscanning approach, recording brain activity from individual subjects separately while they engage with the same task or stimulus, and then analyzing the data together as if they had been collected simultaneously. This is distinct from genuine hyperscanning, where multiple participants’ brain activity is recorded simultaneously while they interact in real-time. Each participant completed two fMRI sessions, scheduled one week apart on the same day of the week and at the same time of the day (Mai et al., Reference Mai, Rosbach and Hummel2023; Merrow, Reference Merrow2023). Like in the study by Nummenmaa and co-workers (Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012), we presented the movie clips in a fixed order: amusement, fear, tenderness and sadness, totaling 21 minutes. The movie clips chosen are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The clips were displayed using an MRI-compatible screen positioned behind the magnet, reflected onto a mirror above the participant’s eyes. Each movie was preceded by a short description (5 s) describing the context of the ensuring video clip without revealing its actual content (Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012). Each movie clip was followed by a blank screen with a central fixation cross. The order of the odor and control conditions was randomized across participants. In the odor condition, participants watched the movie clips while being exposed to lavender oil, belonging to the floral-woody olfactive space, dissolved in isopropyl myristate (an odorless and non-volatile solvent). The odor was administered by placing three drops on a cotton pad positioned on the head coil, 15–20 cm from the participant’s nose inside the MRI room. In the control condition, participants watched a different series of movie clips of the same duration while exposed to an odorless agent, applied in the same manner. After the functional run, we acquired a 10-minute anatomical sequence (3DT1) for co-registration purposes.

Physiological and Behavioral measurements

Heart rate and respiration rate were measured during the fMRI data acquisition. Heart rate was measured using a pulse plethysmograph transducer, placed on the palmar surface of the left index finger. Respiration was measured using a respiratory effort transducer connected to an elastic respiratory belt encircling the chest. Both signals were subjected to a filtering process to remove potential artifacts. This process typically involves band-pass filtering within the range of 0.01 Hz to 0.1 Hz to eliminate high-frequency noise, baseline drifts, and motion artifacts, ensuring that only the essential physiological signals are retained for further analysis (Bancelin et al., Reference Bancelin, Bachrata, Bollmann, de Lima Cardoso, Szomolanyi, Trattnig and Robinson2023; Birn et al., Reference Birn, Diamond, Smith and Bandettini2006).

After the fMRI experiments, participants watched the same set of movie clips again on a laptop computer to rate in real time the valence and arousal (intensity of the perceived emotions) of each clip. Ratings were conducted offline because they might affect the neural responses during scanning (Hutcherson et al., Reference Hutcherson, Goldin, Ochsner, Gabrieli, Barrett and Gross2005; Lieberman et al., Reference Lieberman, Eisenberger, Crockett, Tom, Pfeifer and Way2007). Valence and arousal were rated on a scale ranging from 1 (negative valence/low intensity) to 10 (positive valence/high intensity). Valence and arousal were measured in separate runs.

Independent two-sample t-tests were used to compare the odor vs control conditions for each behavioral measure across different emotional states: amusement, tenderness, fear, and sadness. The null hypothesis assumed that there would be no difference between the odor and the control condition. A significance level (alpha)<0.05 was used for all statistical tests and corrections for multiple comparisons were applied.

MRI data acquisition

MR imaging was performed using a 3 T SIGNA™ Premier GE (General Electric, Milwaukee, US) with a 48-channel head coil at the CHU UCL Saint-Luc Hospital (Brussels). First, T2*-weighted echo-planar images were acquired with the following parameters: 2-mm slice thickness, TR = 1500 ms, TE = 30 ms, flip angle = 90 deg, FOV = 220 mm, voxel size 2x2x2 mm3, ascending interleaved acquisition. The fMRI run started with the presentation of a fixation cross (3s) in the center of the screen, followed by a “context” sentence (5s), and then the video sequence (90 ± 10s). The sequence concluded with participants completing a questionnaire related to the content of the video. The number of acquired volumes differed slightly between the odor (830 volumes) and control (816 volumes) conditions. Then, a T1-weighted structural image was acquired with a resolution of 1x1x1 mm3.

MRI data pre-processing

The data were pre-processed using fMRIprep (Esteban et al., Reference Esteban, Markiewicz, Blair, Moodie, Isik, Erramuzpe, Kent, Goncalves, DuPre, Snyder, Oya, Ghosh, Wright, Durnez, Poldrack and Gorgolewski2019). In order to correct for slice scan time, a sinc interpolation was performed using information regarding the repetition time (TR) (1500 ms) and the order of slice scanning, as specified in the original raw data. A three-dimensional head motion correction was conducted to address minor head movements by aligning all functional volumes of a subject with the initial volume through rigid body transformations. An examination of the estimated translation and rotation parameters indicated that they never exceeded 3 mm or 2°. The drift removal process entailed the elimination of linear trends and low-frequency nonlinear drifts with a periodicity of three cycles or fewer per time course, corresponding to a frequency of 0.0063 Hz. A Gaussian filter with a full width at half maximum of 5 mm was applied to the volume-based analysis following spatial interpolation to voxel space, in order to perform spatial smoothing. The functional data was aligned to the native anatomical data using a two-step procedure. Firstly, positional information derived from the header of the functional and anatomical scans was applied. Subsequently, a gradient-based alignment was employed to refine the alignment between the two datasets. The functional data were then normalized into a four-dimensional representation with a resolution of 2x2x2 mm, using the alignment information and the MNI “a12” transformation matrix obtained through the MNI normalization of the anatomical data.

fMRI analysis

The fMRI data were analyzed using BrainVoyager v.22.2.4 (Goebel et al., Reference Goebel, Esposito and Formisano2006; Goebel, Reference Goebel2012). The data analysis methodology focused on evaluating the temporal variations in the BOLD signal as participants watched video clips, drawing on the approach outlined by Nummenaa et al. (Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012). The process of ISC analysis starting with the calculation of voxel-wise temporal correlations among all participant pairs across the entire time series. Pairwise correlations were first computed between each subject’s time-series data and that of every other subject. Within this approach the time series are divided into two segments for each of the four emotional categories (split 1 and split 2), resulting in eight segments in total. This procedure allows to test for the temporal dynamics over time within the same emotion category. For each emotion and condition, this step resulted in ((20*19)/2) 190 correlation pairs. Then, we averaged the ISC values within each subject, thus creating one value for each of the emotions and conditions. Finally, we used a Fisher z-transformation to overcome the limitations of the original r-value distribution (Bond & Richardson, Reference Bond and Richardson2004). The individual ISC maps were then employed in a second-level fMRI analysis to assess group-level synchrony and to identify statistically significant regions of ISC across the sample. To analyze the averaged and transformed ISC values at the second level, we applied a 2x2 Analysis of Variance with the factors “Odor” (levels: odor and control) and “Time point/Run” (levels: “split 1” and “split 2” for the first and second movie of each emotional category). This approach aimed to determine the main effects of each factor as well as their interaction, elucidating the differential impact of odor type and temporal dynamics on inter-subject neural synchrony.

In order to calculate the effect size of our study, we used the regression coefficient expressed as a function of the t-statistic (Serdar et al., Reference Serdar, Cihan, Yücel and Serdar2021). For the post-hoc comparison of odor and control conditions, we achieved an r-value of 0.43, which qualifies as a medium (close to large) effect size.

Results

fMRI results

Main effect of emotional movies on ISC

Figure 1 displays the average ISC maps for the entire run, combining data from both the control and odor conditions. As shown, several large clusters of ISC were apparent, located in bilateral cuneus, occipito-parietal and occipito-temporal visual areas, bilateral superior and middle temporal gyrus and sulcus, bilateral parietal cortex, bilateral temporo-parietal junction, bilateral middle frontal, superior frontal and inferior frontal cortices, right precuneus and right posterior parietal cortex. No evidence for significant ISC was found in limbic brain areas. These findings are largely in line with previous research (Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012) and confirm that the selected movies in triggered synchronization of brain activity across participants (Figure 1, Table 1).

Figure 1. Brain areas showing statistically significant (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected) group-level ISCs during viewing of emotional movie clips (full run). Data show the results of the odor and control conditions combined. Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. Several large clusters of ISC were found in the cuneus, precuneus, occipito-parietal and occipito-temporal visual areas, superior and middle temporal gyrus and sulcus, parietal cortex, temporo-parietal junction, middle frontal, superior and inferior frontal cortices, and cerebellum.

Table 1. ISC during emotional videos (all emotions and conditions combined)

Abbreviations: R = right hemisphere; L = left hemisphere.

Main effect odor (full run)

The analysis of fMRI data revealed a significant main effect of odor condition when combining all emotions together (Figure 2, Table 2). Significantly stronger ISC during odor compared to the control condition was identified in bilateral STG, right middle temporal gyrus and left calcarine and left lingual gyrus.

Figure 2. Main effect of the odor condition. A. Significant increases in ISC when comparing the odor with the odorless control condition (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. Significantly stronger ISC was identified in bilateral STG, right middle temporal gyrus and left calcarine and left lingual gyrus in the odor compared to the odorless control condition. B. Average ISC values over all the significant voxels shown in A. The average correlation increased from r = 0.116 ± 0.06 in the control condition to r = 0.153 ± 0.07 in the odor condition (t = 4.99, P < 0.01).

Table 2. Increases in ISC when watching emotional movies during odor exposure (full run)

Abbreviations: R = right hemisphere; L = left hemisphere.

Negative emotions

In a next step, we compared the effect of odor for the positive and negative movie clips separately. For the video clips with the negative emotions during the full run, there was a large cluster of increased ISC in the right calcarine area during odor stimulation (Figure 3, Table 3, upper part). Another large cluster was found in bilateral STG. Smaller clusters of increased ISC during the odor condition were found in superior occipital gyrus, cerebellum, left middle occipital gyrus (MOG) and visual areas right fusiform and lingual gyri (Figure 3, Table 3, upper part).

Figure 3. Effects of odor on ISC during negative movie clips (full run). The colorbar represents regions with increased ISC during negative movies (i.e., higher ISC) (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. ISC increased in the right calcarine area, bilateral STG, superior occipital gyrus, cerebellum, left MOG, and right fusiform and lingual gyri.

Table 3. Effects of odorant on ISC during negative movie clips for full run and split run

Abbreviations: R = right hemisphere; L = left hemisphere.

To investigate whether the effects of odor on ISC changed over time for a particular emotional condition, we applied a split run technique which allowed us to compare ISC during the first and second movie of each emotion type. For negatively-valenced movies, a large cluster of increased ISC was found in bilateral supramarginal gyrus (SMG), although stronger in the right hemisphere, when comparing the second with the first movie of the same emotional category. Additional ISC increases during the second movies were found in bilateral middle temporal gyrus, as well as in various brain areas involved in visual and auditory processing such as the left inferior temporal gyrus, left inferior occipital gyrus, left MOG, left STG, and left lingual gyrus (Figure 4, Table 3, lower part).

Figure 4. Increased ISC in the second compared to the first negative movie clips during odor exposure (split run technique). Colorbar: increased ISC during negative movies under odor exposure. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. A large cluster of increased ISC was found in bilateral supramarginal gyrus, with additional clusters in bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left inferior temporal and occipital gyri, left MOG, STG, and lingual gyrus.

Positive emotions

For the positive movie clips, odor exposure increased ISC in the left angular gyrus, the left precuneus, left cuneus, left MOG and left STG (Table 4). Additional increases in ISC were observed in the cerebellum (including a smaller cluster in the right cerebellum Crus I and Crus II), inferior frontal gyrus, lingual gyrus, left precentral gyrus, bilateral precuneus, right posterior cingulate gyrus, and right superior frontal gyrus.

Table 4. Effects of odorant on ISC during positive movie clips for full run and split run

Abbreviations: R = right hemisphere; L = left hemisphere.

When comparing ISC of the first and second positive emotional clips (split-run) during odor exposure, significantly higher ISC was observed during the second movies in the left superior parietal gyrus, left inferior temporal gyrus, extending into the left lingual gyrus, left middle temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal operculum, right inferior temporal gyrus and right superior parietal gyrus (Table 4). These brain areas are related to sensory integration and emotional processing.

Behavioral results

Physiological results

Heart rate and respiration

Heart rate was not significantly different between the odor and control conditions during the presentation of amusement (t (38) = −0.55, P = 0.59, difference = 2.17 beats/minute) and fear movie clips (t (38) = −0.41, P = 0.68, difference = 1.61 beats/minute). Similarly, no significant differences were observed during the tenderness and sadness clips (Supplementary Figure 1). The respiration data also did not show a significant difference in the number of breaths per minute between the two conditions (Supplementary Figure 2).

Arousal and valence ratings

Participants rated valence and arousal on a scale from 1 (negative valence/low arousal) to 10 (positive valence/high arousal). Mean arousal ratings were 4.83 ± 3.24 (odor condition) and 4.38 ± 3.29 (control condition); (t (38) = −1.34, P = 0.19). Mean valence ratings were 4.47± ± 2.87 (odor condition) and 4.23 ± 2.64 (control condition; t (38) = −1.08, P = 0.28). (Supplementary Figure 3).

Discussion

The aim of this study was to test whether exposure to a pleasant odor affects intersubject synchronicity of brain activity. Participants watched various types of emotional movie clips under tonic exposure of either a positively-valenced odor or an odorless control substance. Participants served as their own control. Our data confirm the hypothesis that adding a positive odor amplifies synchronicity of brain activity among participants watching similar emotional movies. When combining all emotional categories, the odor condition showed significantly higher ISC compared to the control condition in bilateral superior temporal gyri (STG), right middle temporal gyrus, left calcarine, and lingual gyrus. Emotional valence thereby played a significant role since the odor affected ISC more for the negative than the positive movie clips. Finally, we showed that the effects of odor increased over time, indicating a time-by odor interaction. These data offer a physiological perspective for the behavioral observations that odors may promote emotional contagion and enhance the similarity in how individuals perceive and experience the world.

At a general level, our data support previous findings that watching emotional movies increases ISC (Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012). Indeed, emotional movies augmented ISC in a number of cortical areas, including both primary and higher-order visual and auditory cortices, as well as parts of the brain social network (Cohen and Parra, Reference Cohen and Parra2016; Hasson et al., Reference Hasson, Nir, Levy, Fuhrmann and Malach2004; Hasson et al., Reference Hasson, Ghazanfar, Galantucci, Garrod and Keysers2012; Herbec et al., Reference Herbec, Kauppi, Jola, Tohka and Pollick2015; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012), further supporting the claim that emotions promote interpersonal bonding. When adding an odor, ISC increased in temporal (bilateral STG and right middle temporal gyrus) and occipital (left calcarine and left lingual gyrus) brain areas. Earlier studies have highlighted the role of the STG and inferior occipital cortex in emotional and social brain processing. While the STG is typically associated with auditory and speech perception, it is also crucial for emotional processing, emotional learning, and conditioning (Cambiaghi et al., Reference Cambiaghi, Grosso, Renna and Sacchetti2016; Concina et al., Reference Concina, Renna, Grosso and Sacchetti2019; Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, von Kriegstein, Friston and Griffiths2012; Staib et al., Reference Staib, Abivardi and Bach2020). The auditory cortex receives multiple ascending inputs from subcortical structures involved in emotional processing. Injections of a retrograde tracer in the rostral STG of the macaque monkey showed strong projections to basolateral amygdala, suggesting that this area is polysensory in function (Aggleton et al., Reference Aggleton, Burton and Passingham1980; Stefanacci & Amaral, Reference Stefanacci and Amaral2000). In addition, work by Aggleton and colleagues showed heavy projections from the superior temporal sulcus to the lateral nucleus of the amygdala in the macaque (Aggleton et al., Reference Aggleton, Burton and Passingham1980; Stefanacci & Amaral, Reference Stefanacci and Amaral2000). An fMRI study in human volunteers showed that the acoustic features of sounds can modulate the effective connectivity from the auditory cortex to the amygdala, while valence modulates the effective connectivity from the amygdala to the auditory cortex (Kumar et al., Reference Kumar, von Kriegstein, Friston and Griffiths2012). These results suggest a complex interaction between the auditory cortex and amygdala based on the assignment of emotional valence of the acoustic stimuli. The auditory cortex also projects to the prefrontal cortex (Romanski et al., Reference Romanski, Bates and Goldman-Rakic1999a), indicating it is involved in social cognition (Adolphs, Reference Adolphs2009), and that it facilitates the integration of sensory information and higher-order cognitive functions, crucial for processing social cues and auditory information necessary for effective communication (Plakke & Romanski, Reference Plakke and Romanski2014).

In addition to the modulation of the activity of the STG by emotional stimuli, there is also evidence that the STG is involved in social communication (Kanwal & Rauschecker, Reference Kanwal and Rauschecker2007; Romanski et al., Reference Romanski, Tian, Fritz, Mishkin, Goldman-Rakic and Rauschecker1999b). A recent study in gerbils found that the primary auditory cortex is essential for auditory social learning (Paraouty et al., Reference Paraouty, Yao, Varnet, Chou, Chung and Sanes2023). The authors showed that blocking the auditory cortex impaired social learning and that social exposure improved the sensitivity of the auditory cortex to auditory task cues (Paraouty et al., Reference Paraouty, Yao, Varnet, Chou, Chung and Sanes2023). Another recent study in the macaque monkey showed that neural activity in the STG is enhanced in response to species-specific vocalisations paired with a matching visual context, or when vocalisations follow context-congruent visual information (Froesel et al., Reference Froesel, Gacoin, Clavagnier, Hauser, Goudard and Ben Hamed2022). Recent fMRI studies in humans confirmed the role of the STG in interpersonal communication. Notably, Parkinson and co-workers showed that synchrony in the STG was highest among close friends and decreased with increasing social distance. Other brain areas where similar results were reported included the inferior and superior parietal cortex, SMG, nucleus accumbens, caudate, putamen and amygdala (Parkinson et al., Reference Parkinson, Kleinbaum and Wheatley2018). The fact that our results showed that adding an odor increase ISC in the STG may therefore suggest that odors make us more similar in how we perceive the surrounding world around us, and that odors stimulate social attraction.

Outside of the STG and middle temporal area, we found that ISC during odor exposure was also increased in the occipital cortex (calcarine and lingual gyrus). This is in line with previous studies showing that together with the auditory areas, visual areas are among the most synchronized during watching audio-visual movies (Gruskin & Patel, Reference Gruskin and Patel2022; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012). The increase in ISC in occipital areas during the odor condition may be driven by connections between olfactory and visual areas. Seminal work by the group of Amaral (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Behniea and Kelly2003; Freese & Amaral, Reference Freese and Amaral2005) showed that there are feed-back projections from the amygdala to all levels of the ventral visual stream. Since the amygdala, together with the piriform cortex, is part of the primary olfactory cortex, this provides a pathway of how olfactory input may modulate sensory processing within different levels of the ventral-stream visual cortical hierarchy.

Our study also clearly shows that the effect of an odor on ISC depends on the emotional valence of the movie clips. Indeed, clearly distinct patterns of increased ISC were found when analyzing the results for the positively and negatively-valenced movies separately. While watching negative emotions during odor exposure, increased ISC was measured in vision-related areas, the calcarine, lingual gyrus and MOG, along with auditory-related regions like the STG (Adolphs, Reference Adolphs2013). Earlier studies showed increased ISC in vision-related brain areas during negative emotion-related movie scenes (Hasson et al., Reference Hasson, Nir, Levy, Fuhrmann and Malach2004; Lahnakoski et al., Reference Lahnakoski, Glerean, Jääskeläinen, Hyönä, Hari, Sams and Nummenmaa2014; Nummenmaa et al., Reference Nummenmaa, Glerean, Viinikainen, Jaaskelainen, Hari and Sams2012). The lingual gyrus and cuneus support visual attention and the processing of emotionally salient information (Palejwala et al., Reference Palejwala, Dadario, Young, O’Connor, Briggs, Conner, O’Donoghue and Sughrue2021; Vanni et al., Reference Vanni, Tanskanen, Seppä, Uutela and Hari2001). The MOG integrates visual and social cues, interacting with the prefrontal cortex and amygdala to mediate social responses (Pitcher et al., Reference Pitcher, Walsh and Duchaine2011; Pourtois & Vuilleumier, Reference Pourtois and Vuilleumier2006). The fact that odor increased ISC in the occipital brain areas may be explained by afferent projections from olfactory regions to the occipital cortex (Amaral et al., Reference Amaral, Behniea and Kelly2003; Freese & Amaral, Reference Freese and Amaral2005). This modulation highlights the potential of odors to influence the processing of negative emotions and social dynamics, enhancing social and group cohesion, and empathy.

Interestingly, the effect of odor on ISC changed over time. The split-run analysis revealed significantly larger effects of the odor on ISC in bilateral SMG, as well as in left STG, MOG, and lingual gyrus during the second of the negatively-valenced movies. This temporal modulation suggests that the integration of olfactory information relies on sustained sensory input and continuous processing, highlighting a complex dynamic where sensory modalities are differentially engaged over time in response to olfactory cues. The progressive enhancement of odor-induced effects over time may result from multiple interacting factors, such as the cumulative sensory and affective impact of prolonged odor exposure, a gradual intensification of emotional resonance, dynamic adjustments in neural synchrony, or a combination thereof. Further research is warranted to systematically disentangle and quantify the relative contributions of these mechanisms.

Our findings suggest that odor modulates neural synchronization in response to both fear and sadness, enhancing the brain’s ability to process social and emotional information during negative emotional experiences. Concerning the SMG, this structure plays an important role in social cognition, particularly with respect to empathy, perspective-taking, and emotional regulation. The SMG, especially in the right hemisphere, is involved in affective and cognitive empathy and empathy for pain (Kogler et al., Reference Kogler, Müller, Werminghausen, Eickhoff and Derntl2020; Lawrence et al., Reference Lawrence, Shaw, Giampietro, Surguladze, Brammer and David2006; Narumoto et al., Reference Narumoto, Okada, Sadato, Fukui and Yonekura2001; Thye et al., Reference Thye, Hoffman and Mirman2024; Wada et al., Reference Wada, Honma, Masaoka, Yoshida, Koiwa, Sugiyama, Iizuka, Kubota, Kokudai, Yoshikawa, Kamijo, Kamimura, Ida, Ono, Onda, Izumizaki and Hahn2021). The SMG also plays an important role in theory of mind (Frith & Frith, Reference Frith and Frith2005), allowing people to understand that others may have different thoughts, beliefs and emotions to their own, which is crucial for social interactions as it helps to interpret others’ intentions and actions (Schurz et al., Reference Schurz, Tholen, Perner, Mars and Sallet2017; Tholen et al., Reference Tholen, Trautwein, Böckler, Singer and Kanske2020). Finally, the SMG is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments (Silani et al., Reference Silani, Lamm, Ruff and Singer2013; Weigand et al., Reference Weigand, Trilla, Enk, O’Connell, Prehn, Brick and Dziobek2021) and processing of social cues (Hooker et al., Reference Hooker, Verosky, Germine, Knight and D’Esposito2010).

While watching positively-valenced movies under odor exposure, ISC increased in left angular gyrus, precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex, cuneus, precentral and superior frontal gyri, and cerebellum (Frith & Frith, Reference Frith and Frith2012; Zaki & Ochsner, Reference Zaki and Ochsner2012). However, odor did not affect ISC in STG. The precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex are associated with social cognition, self-referential thinking and autobiographical memory (Alcalá-López et al., Reference Alcalá-López, Mei, Margolles and Soto2024; Cavanna & Trimble, Reference Cavanna and Trimble2006; Maddock et al., Reference Maddock, Garrett and Buonocore2003; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Chen, Schafer, Zheng, Chen, Wang, Liang, Qi, Zhang and Huang2022). Interestingly, it was shown that patients suffering from anosmia have gray matter reductions in several brain areas, including the precuneus (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kim, Kim, Kim, Ha, Kim, Hong, Lyoo and Kim2022). The precuneus is involved in self-referential thinking and memory, supporting the recall of positive social interactions and enhancing empathy (Cavanna & Trimble, Reference Cavanna and Trimble2006; Frith & Frith, Reference Frith and Frith2012). The precuneus is activated during empathic and forgivability judgments, highlighting its role in understanding others’ intentions and fostering successful social interactions. The precuneus and posterior cingulate cortex are also part of the default mode network (Smallwood et al., Reference Smallwood, Bernhardt, Leech, Bzdok, Jefferies and Margulies2021). Together, this suggests that the precuneus is key in linking positive emotions and social cognitive processes, promoting empathy and social understanding (Cavanna & Trimble, Reference Cavanna and Trimble2006). As with the negative emotions, we measured a time-dependent effect of odor exposure on the ISC for the positive emotions. Compared to the first movie, ISC increased in parietal and prefrontal areas, the lingual gyrus, and the middle and inferior temporal gyri. The lingual gyrus, known for its role in complex visual processing (e.g., recognizing letters, shapes, and colors), also contributes to the storage and recall of visual memories related to intricate visual scenes. This suggests that odor exposure enhances synchronization in brain regions associated with both visual processing and memory during positive emotional experiences (Davis et al., Reference Davis, Geib, Wing, Wang, Hovhannisyan, Monge and Cabeza2021; Roland & Gulyás, Reference Roland and Gulyás1995; Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Liberzon, Fig, Decker, Minoshima and Koeppe1998).

Finally, our results are in line with the psychological construction theory of emotions (Barrett, Reference Barrett2017). Currently, there are two dominant emotion theories, the basic emotion theory and the psychological construction theory (Gündem et al., Reference Gündem, Potočnik, De Winter, El Kaddouri, Stam, Peeters, Emsell, Sunaert, Van Oudenhove, Vandenbulcke, Feldman Barrett and Van den Stock2022). According to the former, emotions are discrete, innate and automatic, and involve specific physiological patterns. In contrast, the psychological construction theory posits that emotions are shaped by individual experience, culture, language, and context. There are no universal, discrete emotion patterns. The brain interprets bodily sensations within a situation and constructs an emotion based on both past experiences and social learning.

Subjective ratings of valence and intensity did not differ between the odor and control condition. This could be explained by the fact that these ratings were done offline, after the subject had left the MRI and without the presence of the odor. Future studies should consider performing the offline valence and arousal ratings in the same conditions (during odor exposure) as during MRI. For the physiological data, no such effect was observed during the movies. This could be due to selective effects on the sympathetic compared to the parasympathetic nervous system. Alternatively, heart rate may be too imprecise to capture the subtle effects of an odor, and future studies might consider measuring heart rate variability instead. Similarly, the lack of a significant effect of odor exposure on respiration rate could be due to respiration frequency being a too crude measure to detect subtle changes.

This study has several limitations that need to be considered when interpreting the results. First, since the movies were played in a fixed order, we cannot rule out specific order effects when assessing the effects of positively and negatively-valenced movies. Next, different movie clips were used in the odor and control conditions. The reason thereto was that each participant was scanned twice, and the use of the same movie clips would entail the risk of emotional contagion or habituation across conditions. We searched for pairs of movie clips which were not only matched for valence and arousal, but also for theme, speed of action and content. Nevertheless, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that subtle differences in narrative or visual features may have influenced our results. An alternative approach would have been to use a between-subject design in which participants see the same movie clips but in the two conditions. Other limitations are that we tested for the effect of only one type of odor and that the number of participants was rather limited, even though each participant served as its own control. Future studies are therefore needed to test for the reproducibility of the current findings in a larger sample size (Pajula & Tohka, Reference Pajula and Tohka2016) and to test whether the here described results can be generalized to other odor categories. These studies could alternatively use EEG (Maffei et al., Reference Maffei, Polver, Spironelli and Angrilli2020; Maffei, Reference Maffei2020) or fNIRS, which are more accessible and affordable, better suited for naturalistic settings, and allow for easier implementation of true hyperscanning protocols.

Conclusion

In summary, the present results show that odor exposure enhances synchronicity of brain activity across participants watching emotional movies. Our results further show that the brain areas showing odor-induced alterations in ISC depend on the emotional valence of the movies. Our results add novel insights in the social brain and underscore the complex interaction between olfaction and emotion.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617725101082.

Data availability

Data are available on request to the authors. In that case, the corresponding author should be contacted.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by a grant from International Flavors and Fragrances (IFF). The authors thank Quentin de Broqueville with help during the data collection and Mary Jo El Bared for help with the statistical analysis.

Competing interests

The study funder was not involved in the execution and interpretation of the research findings. The authors have maintained full independence in their research decisions. The interpretation of the data was devoid of any influence from the funding source. RK is a member of the scientific board of Brain Impact Neuroscience.

References

Ache, B. W., & Young, J. M. (2005). Olfaction: Diverse species, conserved principles. Neuron, 48(3), 417430.10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ackerl, K., Atzmueller, M., & Grammer, K. (2002). The scent of fear. Neuro endocrinology letters, 23(2), 7984.Google ScholarPubMed
Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 693716.10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163514CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolphs, R. (2013). The biology of fear. Current Biology, 23(2), R79R93.10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aggleton, J. P., Burton, M. J., & Passingham, R. E. (1980). Cortical and subcortical afferents to the amygdala of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Brain Research, 190(2), 347368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcalá-López, D., Mei, N., Margolles, P., & Soto, D. (2024). Brain-wide representation of social knowledge. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 19(1), nsae032. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsae032 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amaral, D. G., Behniea, H., & Kelly, J. L. (2003). Topographic organization of projections from the amygdala to the visual cortex in the macaque monkey. Neuroscience, 118(4), 10991120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bancelin, D., Bachrata, B., Bollmann, S., de Lima Cardoso, P., Szomolanyi, P., Trattnig, S., & Robinson, S. D. (2023). Unsupervised physiological noise correction of functional magnetic resonance imaging data using phase and magnitude information (PREPAIR). Human Brain Mapping, 44(3), 12091226.10.1002/hbm.26152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: An active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 123.10.1093/scan/nsx060CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Birn, R. M., Diamond, J. B., Smith, M. A., & Bandettini, P. A. (2006). Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI. Neuroimage, 31(4), 15361548.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomkvist, A., & Hofer, M. (2021). Olfactory impairment and close social relationships. a narrative review. Chemical Senses, 46, bjab037. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjab037 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boesveldt, S., & Parma, V. (2021). The importance of the olfactory system in human well-being, through nutrition and social behavior. Cell and Tissue Research, 383(1), 559567.10.1007/s00441-020-03367-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, C. F., & Richardson, K. (2004). Seeing the FisherZ-transformation. Psychometrika, 69(2), 291303.10.1007/BF02295945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothers, L. (1990). The neural basis of primate social communication. Motivation and Emotion, 14(2), 8191.10.1007/BF00991637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvi, E., Quassolo, U., Massaia, M., Scandurra, A., D’Aniello, B., & D’Amelio, P. (2020). The scent of emotions: A systematic review of human intra- and interspecific chemical communication of emotions. Brain and Behavior, 10(5), e01585.10.1002/brb3.1585CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cambiaghi, M., Grosso, A., Renna, A., & Sacchetti, B. (2016). Differential recruitment of auditory cortices in the consolidation of recent auditory fearful memories. Journal of Neuroscience, 36(33), 85868597.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0561-16.2016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, H., Leitão, J., Delplanque, S., Cayeux, I., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2020). Sustained effects of pleasant and unpleasant smells on resting state brain activity. Cortex, 132, 386403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129(3), 564583.10.1093/brain/awl004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, S. S., & Parra, L. C. (2016). Memorable audiovisual narratives synchronize sensory and supramodal neural responses. eNeuro, 3(6), ENEURO.0203-16.2016.10.1523/ENEURO.0203-16.2016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Concina, G., Renna, A., Grosso, A., & Sacchetti, B. (2019). The auditory cortex and the emotional valence of sounds. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 256264.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cook, S., Kokmotou, K., Soto, V., Wright, H., Fallon, N., Thomas, A., Giesbrecht, T., Field, M. & Stancak, A. (2018). Simultaneous odour-face presentation strengthens hedonic evaluations and event-related potential responses influenced by unpleasant odour. Neuroscience Letters, 672, 2227.10.1016/j.neulet.2018.02.032CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, S. W., Geib, B. R., Wing, E. A., Wang, W. C., Hovhannisyan, M., Monge, Z. A., Cabeza, R. (2021). Visual and semantic representations predict subsequent memory in perceptual and conceptual memory tests. Cerebral Cortex, 31(2), 974992.10.1093/cercor/bhaa269CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, J. H., Smeets, M. A., Kaldewaij, A., Duijndam, M. J., & Semin, G. R. (2012). Chemosignals communicate human emotions. Psychological Science, 23(11), 14171424.10.1177/0956797612445317CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Groot, J. H. B., Haertl, T., Loos, H. M., Bachmann, C., Kontouli, A., & Smeets, M. A. M. (2023). Unraveling the universality of chemical fear communication: Evidence from behavioral, genetic, and chemical analyses. Chemical Senses, 48, bjad046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demattè, M. L., Osterbauer, R., & Spence, C. (2007). Olfactory cues modulate facial attractiveness. Chemical Senses, 32(6), 603610.10.1093/chemse/bjm030CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doty, R. L. (1986). Odor-guided behavior in mammals. Experientia, 42(3), 257271.10.1007/BF01942506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteban, O., Markiewicz, C. J., Blair, R. W., Moodie, C. A., Isik, A. I., Erramuzpe, A., Kent, J. D., Goncalves, M., DuPre, E., Snyder, M., Oya, H., Ghosh, S. S., Wright, J., Durnez, J., Poldrack, R. A., Gorgolewski, K. J. (2019). FMRIPrep: A robust preprocessing pipeline for functional MRI. Nature Methods, 16(1), 111116.10.1038/s41592-018-0235-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ethofer, T., Anders, S., Erb, M., Droll, C., Royen, L., Saur, R., Reiterer, S., Grodd, W., Wildgruber, D. (2006). Impact of voice on emotional judgment of faces: An event-related fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 27(9), 707714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, G., & Lei, J. (2022). The effect of odor valence on facial attractiveness judgment: A preliminary experiment. Brain Sciences, 12(5), 665.10.3390/brainsci12050665CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freese, J. L., & Amaral, D. G. (2005). The organization of projections from the amygdala to visual cortical areas TE and V1 in the macaque monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 486(4), 295317.10.1002/cne.20520CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2005). Theory of mind. Current Biology, 15(17), R644646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D. (2007). The social brain? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 671678.10.1098/rstb.2006.2003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2012). Mechanisms of social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 287313.10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froesel, M., Gacoin, M., Clavagnier, S., Hauser, M., Goudard, Q., & Ben Hamed, S. (2022). Socially meaningful visual context either enhances or inhibits vocalisation processing in the macaque brain. Nature Communications, 13(1), 4886.10.1038/s41467-022-32512-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaby, J. M., & Zayas, V. (2017). Smelling is telling: Human olfactory cues influence social judgments in semi-realistic interactions. Chemical Senses, 42(5), 405418.10.1093/chemse/bjx012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gobel, M. S., Kim, H. S., & Richardson, D. C. (2015). The dual function of social gaze. Cognition, 136, 359364.10.1016/j.cognition.2014.11.040CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goebel, R. (2012). BrainVoyager--past, present, future. Neuroimage, 62(2), 748756.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goebel, R., Esposito, F., & Formisano, E. (2006). Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 27(5), 392401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gomes, N., & Semin, G. R. (2021). The function of fear chemosignals: Preparing for danger. Chemical Senses, 46, bjab005. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjab005 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1995). Emotion elicitation using films. Cognition and Emotion, 9(1), 87108.10.1080/02699939508408966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruskin, D. C., & Patel, G. H. (2022). Brain connectivity at rest predicts individual differences in normative activity during movie watching. Neuroimage, 253, 119100.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gündem, D., Potočnik, J., De Winter, F. L., El Kaddouri, A., Stam, D., Peeters, R., Emsell, L., Sunaert, S., Van Oudenhove, L., Vandenbulcke, M., Feldman Barrett, L., & Van den Stock, J. (2022). The neurobiological basis of affect is consistent with psychological construction theory and shares a common neural basis across emotional categories. Communications Biology, 5(1), 1354.10.1038/s42003-022-04324-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haegler, K., Zernecke, R., Kleemann, A. M., Albrecht, J., Pollatos, O., Brückmann, H., Wiesmann, M. (2010). Human risk behavior is affected by chemosensory anxiety signals. Neuropsychologia, 48(13), 39013908.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012). Brain-to-brain coupling: A mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 114121.10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject synchronization of cortical activity during natural vision. Science, 303(5664), 16341640.10.1126/science.1089506CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbec, A., Kauppi, J. P., Jola, C., Tohka, J., & Pollick, F. E. (2015). Differences in fMRI intersubject correlation while viewing unedited and edited videos of dance performance. Cortex, 71, 341348.10.1016/j.cortex.2015.06.026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrando, C., & Constantinides, E. (2021). Emotional contagion: A brief overview and future directions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 712606.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712606CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooker, C. I., Verosky, S. C., Germine, L. T., Knight, R. T., & D’Esposito, M. (2010). Neural activity during social signal perception correlates with self-reported empathy. Brain Research, 1308, 100113.10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hummel, T., Kobal, G., Gudziol, H., & Mackay-Sim, A. (2007). Normative data for the “Sniffin’ Sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 264(3), 237243.10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutcherson, C. A., Goldin, P. R., Ochsner, K. N., Gabrieli, J. D., Barrett, L. F., & Gross, J. J. (2005). Attention and emotion: Does rating emotion alter neural responses to amusing and sad films? Neuroimage, 27(3), 656668.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.028CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iversen, K. D., Ptito, M., Møller, P., & Kupers, R. (2015). Enhanced chemosensory detection of negative emotions in congenital blindness. Neural Plasticity, 2015, 469750.10.1155/2015/469750CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jack, R. E., & Schyns, P. G. (2015). The human face as a dynamic tool for social communication. Current Biology, 25(14), R621R634.10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, L. M., & Andrewes, D. G. (2012). A new set of standardised verbal and non-verbal contemporary film stimuli for the elicitation of emotions. Brain Impairment, 13(2), 212227.10.1017/BrImp.2012.18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanwal, J. S., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2007). Auditory cortex of bats and primates: Managing species-specific calls for social communication. Frontiers in Bioscience, 12(8-12), 46214640.10.2741/2413CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kogler, L., Müller, V. I., Werminghausen, E., Eickhoff, S. B., & Derntl, B. (2020). Do I feel or do I know? Neuroimaging meta-analyses on the multiple facets of empathy. Cortex, 129, 341355.10.1016/j.cortex.2020.04.031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kontaris, I., East, B. S., & Wilson, D. A. (2020). Behavioral and neurobiological convergence of odor, mood and emotion: A review. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 14, 35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S., von Kriegstein, K., Friston, K., & Griffiths, T. D. (2012). Features versus feelings: Dissociable representations of the acoustic features and valence of aversive sounds. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(41), 1418414192.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1759-12.2012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahnakoski, J. M., Glerean, E., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Hyönä, J., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2014). Synchronous brain activity across individuals underlies shared psychological perspectives. Neuroimage, 100(100), 316324.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Giampietro, V. P., Surguladze, S., Brammer, M. J., & David, A. S. (2006). The role of shared representations in social perception and empathy: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 29(4), 11731184.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Kim, J., Kim, B. J., Kim, R. Y., Ha, E., Kim, S., Hong, S‐No, Lyoo, I. K., Kim, D. W. (2022). Gray matter volume reduction in the emotional brain networks in adults with anosmia. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 100(6), 13211330.10.1002/jnr.25037CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, B., Solanas, M. P., Marrazzo, G., Raman, R., Taubert, N., Giese, M., Vogels, R., de Gelder, B. (2023). A large-scale brain network of species-specific dynamic human body perception. Progress in Neurobiology, 221, 102398.10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102398CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W., Moallem, I., Paller, K. A., & Gottfried, J. A. (2007). Subliminal smells can guide social preferences. Psychological Science, 18(12), 10441049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science, 18(5), 421428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lubke, K. T., Croy, I., Hoenen, M., Gerber, J., Pause, B. M., & Hummel, T. (2014). Does human body odor represent a significant and rewarding social signal to individuals high in social openness? PLoS One, 9(4), e94314.10.1371/journal.pone.0094314CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddock, R. J., Garrett, A. S., & Buonocore, M. H. (2003). Posterior cingulate cortex activation by emotional words: FMRI evidence from a valence decision task. Human Brain Mapping, 18(1), 3041.10.1002/hbm.10075CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, A. (2020). Spectrally resolved EEG intersubject correlation reveals distinct cortical oscillatory patterns during free-viewing of affective scenes. Psychophysiology, 57(11), e13652.10.1111/psyp.13652CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maffei, A., Polver, S., Spironelli, C., & Angrilli, A. (2020). EEG gamma activity to emotional movies in individuals with high traits of primary “successful” psychopathy. Brain and Cognition, 143, 105599.10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mai, Y., Rosbach, M. C., & Hummel, T. (2023). Variations of olfactory function with circadian timing and chronotype. Rhinology, 61(5), 456469.Google ScholarPubMed
Merrow, M. (2023). Circadian clocks: It’s time for chronobiology. Plos Biology, 21(11), e3002426.10.1371/journal.pbio.3002426CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mochalski, L. N., Friedrich, P., Li, X., Kröll, J. P., Eickhoff, S. B., & Weis, S. (2024). Inter- and intra-subject similarity in network functional connectivity across a full narrative movie. Human Brain Mapping, 45(11), e26802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narumoto, J., Okada, T., Sadato, N., Fukui, K., & Yonekura, Y. (2001). Attention to emotion modulates fMRI activity in human right superior temporal sulcus. Brain Research Cognitive Brain Research, 12(2), 225231.10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00053-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Viinikainen, M., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Hari, R., & Sams, M. (2012). Emotions promote social interaction by synchronizing brain activity across individuals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(24), 95999604.10.1073/pnas.1206095109CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nummenmaa, L., Saarimaki, H., Glerean, E., Gotsopoulos, A., Jaaskelainen, I. P., Hari, R., & Sams, M. (2014). Emotional speech synchronizes brains across listeners and engages large-scale dynamic brain networks. Neuroimage, 102, 498509.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pajula, J., & Tohka, J. (2016). How many is enough? Effect of sample size in inter-subject correlation analysis of fMRI. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016, 2094601.10.1155/2016/2094601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palejwala, A. H., Dadario, N. B., Young, I. M., O’Connor, K., Briggs, R. G., Conner, A. K., O’Donoghue, D. L., Sughrue, M. E. (2021). Anatomy and white matter connections of the Lingual Gyrus and cuneus. World Neurosurgery, 151, e426e437.10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paraouty, N., Yao, J. D., Varnet, L., Chou, C. N., Chung, S., & Sanes, D. H. (2023). Sensory cortex plasticity supports auditory social learning. Nature Communications, 14(1), 5828.10.1038/s41467-023-41641-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkinson, C., Kleinbaum, A. M., & Wheatley, T. (2018). Similar neural responses predict friendship. Nature Communications, 9(1), 332.10.1038/s41467-017-02722-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pause, B. M. (2012). Processing of body odor signals by the human brain. Chemosensory Perception, 5(1), 5563.10.1007/s12078-011-9108-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pitcher, D., Walsh, V., & Duchaine, B. (2011). The role of the occipital face area in the cortical face perception network. Experimental Brain Research, 209(4), 481493.10.1007/s00221-011-2579-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plakke, B., & Romanski, L. M. (2014). Auditory connections and functions of prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00199 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pourtois, G., & Vuilleumier, P. (2006). Dynamics of emotional effects on spatial attention in the human visual cortex. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 6791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preckel, K., Kanske, P., & Singer, T. (2018). On the interaction of social affect and cognition: Empathy, compassion and theory of mind. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 19, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prounis, G. S., & Ophir, A. G. (2020). One cranium, two brains not yet introduced: Distinct but complementary views of the social brain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 108, 231245.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roland, P. E., & Gulyás, B. (1995). Visual memory, visual imagery, and visual recognition of large field patterns by the human brain: Functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. Cerebral Cortex, 5(1), 7993.10.1093/cercor/5.1.79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romanski, L. M., Bates, J. F., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1999a). Auditory belt and parabelt projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 403(2), 141157.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19990111)403:2<141::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-V3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romanski, L. M., Tian, B., Fritz, J., Mishkin, M., Goldman-Rakic, P. S., & Rauschecker, J. P. (1999b). Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(12), 11311136.10.1038/16056CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, C., & Martin, R. (2007). The Role of Vision in the Origin and Evolution of Primates. In (Vol. 4, pp. 827-846). https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-370878-8/00001-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, A., Nils, F., Sanchez, X., & Philippot, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films: A new tool for emotion researchers. Cognition & Emotion, 24(7), 11531172.10.1080/02699930903274322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schore, A. N. (2021). The interpersonal neurobiology of intersubjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648616.10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648616CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schurz, M., Tholen, M. G., Perner, J., Mars, R. B., & Sallet, J. (2017). Specifying the brain anatomy underlying temporo-parietal junction activations for theory of mind: A review using probabilistic atlases from different imaging modalities. Human Brain Mapping, 38(9), 47884805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Serdar, C. C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., & Serdar, M. A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochemia medica (Zagreb), 31(1), 010502.Google ScholarPubMed
Silani, G., Lamm, C., Ruff, C. C., & Singer, T. (2013). Right supramarginal gyrus is crucial to overcome emotional egocentricity bias in social judgments. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(39), 1546615476.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1488-13.2013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, J., Bernhardt, B. C., Leech, R., Bzdok, D., Jefferies, E., & Margulies, D. S. (2021). The default mode network in cognition: A topographical perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 22(8), 503513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smirnov, D., Saarimäki, H., Glerean, E., Hari, R., Sams, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2019). Emotions amplify speaker-listener neural alignment. Human Brain Mapping, 40(16), 47774788.10.1002/hbm.24736CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soudry, Y., Lemogne, C., Malinvaud, D., Consoli, S. M., & Bonfils, P. (2011). Olfactory system and emotion: Common substrates. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, 128(1), 1823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speer, S. P. H., Mwilambwe-Tshilobo, L., Tsoi, L., Burns, S. M., Falk, E. B., & Tamir, D. I. (2024). Hyperscanning shows friends explore and strangers converge in conversation. Nature Communications, 15(1), 7781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spinella, M. (2002). A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SMELL IDENTIFICATION AND EMPATHY. International Journal of Neuroscience, 112(6), 605612.10.1080/00207450290025680CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staib, M., Abivardi, A., & Bach, D. R. (2020). Primary auditory cortex representation of fear-conditioned musical sounds. Human Brain Mapping, 41(4), 882891.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefanacci, L., & Amaral, D. G. (2000). Topographic organization of cortical inputs to the lateral nucleus of the macaque monkey amygdala: A retrograde tracing study. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 421(1), 5279.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000522)421:1<52::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-O3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S. F., Liberzon, I., Fig, L. M., Decker, L. R., Minoshima, S., & Koeppe, R. A. (1998). The effect of emotional content on visual recognition memory: A PET activation study. Neuroimage, 8(2), 188197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tholen, M. G., Trautwein, F. M., Böckler, A., Singer, T., & Kanske, P. (2020). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) item analysis of empathy and theory of mind. Human Brain Mapping, 41(10), 26112628.10.1002/hbm.24966CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thye, M., Hoffman, P., & Mirman, D. (2024). The neural basis of naturalistic semantic and social cognition. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 6796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Kleef, G. A., & Cote, S. (2022). The social effects of emotions. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1), 629658.10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanni, S., Tanskanen, T., Seppä, M., Uutela, K., & Hari, R. (2001). Coinciding early activation of the human primary visual cortex and anteromedial cuneus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(5), 27762780.10.1073/pnas.041600898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wada, S., Honma, M., Masaoka, Y., Yoshida, M., Koiwa, N., Sugiyama, H., Iizuka, N., Kubota, S., Kokudai, Y., Yoshikawa, A., Kamijo, S., Kamimura, S., Ida, M., Ono, K., Onda, H., Izumizaki, M., Hahn, A. (2021). Volume of the right supramarginal gyrus is associated with a maintenance of emotion recognition ability. PLoS One, 16(7), e0254623.10.1371/journal.pone.0254623CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanabe, K., Masaoka, Y., Kawamura, M., Yoshida, M., Koiwa, N., Yoshikawa, A., Kubota, S., Ida, M., Ono, K., Izumizaki, M. (2018). Left posterior orbitofrontal cortex is associated with odor-induced autobiographical memory: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 687.10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waymel, A., Friedrich, P., Bastian, P. A., Forkel, S. J., & Thiebaut de Schotten, M. (2020). Anchoring the human olfactory system within a functional gradient. Neuroimage, 216, 116863.10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116863CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weigand, A., Trilla, I., Enk, L., O’Connell, G., Prehn, K., Brick, T. R., & Dziobek, I. (2021). How much of me do I see in other minds? Modulating egocentricity in emotion judgments by tDCS. Brain Sciences, 11(4), 512.10.3390/brainsci11040512CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, J. S., Gottfried, J. A., Kilner, J. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2005). Integrated neural representations of odor intensity and affective valence in human amygdala. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(39), 89038907.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1569-05.2005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 675680.10.1038/nn.3085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L., Chen, P., Schafer, M., Zheng, S., Chen, L., Wang, S., Liang, Q., Qi, Q., Zhang, Y., Huang, R. (2022). A specific brain network for a social map in the human brain. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1773.10.1038/s41598-022-05601-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zou, L. Q., Yang, Z. Y., Wang, Y., Lui, S. S., Chen, A. T., Cheung, E. F., & Chan, R. C. (2016). What does the nose know? Olfactory function predicts social network size in human. Scientific Reports, 6, 25026.10.1038/srep25026CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Brain areas showing statistically significant (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected) group-level ISCs during viewing of emotional movie clips (full run). Data show the results of the odor and control conditions combined. Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. Several large clusters of ISC were found in the cuneus, precuneus, occipito-parietal and occipito-temporal visual areas, superior and middle temporal gyrus and sulcus, parietal cortex, temporo-parietal junction, middle frontal, superior and inferior frontal cortices, and cerebellum.

Figure 1

Table 1. ISC during emotional videos (all emotions and conditions combined)

Figure 2

Figure 2. Main effect of the odor condition. A. Significant increases in ISC when comparing the odor with the odorless control condition (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. Significantly stronger ISC was identified in bilateral STG, right middle temporal gyrus and left calcarine and left lingual gyrus in the odor compared to the odorless control condition. B. Average ISC values over all the significant voxels shown in A. The average correlation increased from r = 0.116 ± 0.06 in the control condition to r = 0.153 ± 0.07 in the odor condition (t = 4.99, P < 0.01).

Figure 3

Table 2. Increases in ISC when watching emotional movies during odor exposure (full run)

Figure 4

Figure 3. Effects of odor on ISC during negative movie clips (full run). The colorbar represents regions with increased ISC during negative movies (i.e., higher ISC) (P < 0.05, FDR-corrected). Right part of the images refers to the left side of the brain. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. ISC increased in the right calcarine area, bilateral STG, superior occipital gyrus, cerebellum, left MOG, and right fusiform and lingual gyri.

Figure 5

Table 3. Effects of odorant on ISC during negative movie clips for full run and split run

Figure 6

Figure 4. Increased ISC in the second compared to the first negative movie clips during odor exposure (split run technique). Colorbar: increased ISC during negative movies under odor exposure. Numbers below the slices refer to z-levels in MNI space. A large cluster of increased ISC was found in bilateral supramarginal gyrus, with additional clusters in bilateral middle temporal gyrus, left inferior temporal and occipital gyri, left MOG, STG, and lingual gyrus.

Figure 7

Table 4. Effects of odorant on ISC during positive movie clips for full run and split run

Supplementary material: File

Gerardin et al. supplementary material

Gerardin et al. supplementary material
Download Gerardin et al. supplementary material(File)
File 400.4 KB