Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-xc2tv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-20T12:50:53.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gene flow in self-pollinated weed species affected by environmental factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2025

Mahboobeh Mollaee
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Crop, Soil & Environmental Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Aniruddha Maity*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Crop, Soil & Environmental Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Aniruddha Maity; Email: a.maity@auburn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rapid spread of herbicide resistance in weeds, driven by gene flow through multiple pathways, poses an increasing challenge for agricultural systems. This review summarizes the extent and distance of pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow (PMGF and SMGF, respectively) in selected self-pollinated weeds and the environmental factors that influence PMGF. A comprehensive literature review was focused on assessing PMGF patterns, dispersal mechanisms, and influencing factors across self-pollinated weed species. Statistical analyses were conducted to evaluate correlations between PMGF and environmental variables, including temperature, precipitation, humidity, and elevation. Self-pollinated weeds in the Asteraceae family show the highest PMGF (average 10.63%), with common groundsel showing 24% at 0.5 m from the pollen source. Solanaceae and Chenopodiaceae are plant families with the second and third highest PMGF (average 10.00% and 1.58%, respectively). Within Solanaceae, eastern black nightshade exhibited the maximum PMGF (17%), whereas in Chenopodiaceae, magenta spreen showed the highest gene flow, reaching 3% at 15 m from the pollen source. In contrast, the lowest mean PMGF was observed in Poaceae and Brassicaceae (average 1.87% and 0.33%, respectively). Furthermore, among environmental variables, only temperature showed a significant correlation (P < 0.05). Due to the limited number of studies, this correlation should be viewed cautiously, as it likely reflects general patterns rather than a causal link to PMGF. Bold-seeded grasses such as oat may disperse seeds at low frequency (14-18%), however, light-seeded species such as horseweed can disperse as high as 99% of their seeds. Understanding gene flow in self-pollinated weeds with high fecundity is vital to limiting herbicide resistance spread in such species.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America

Introduction

The evolution and widespread occurrence of herbicide-resistant weeds are significant and growing challenges in agriculture. By 2025, more than 534 unique cases of herbicide resistance had been reported globally, involving 273 weed species (117 monocotyledonous and 156 dicotyledonous species), each evolving resistance to one or more herbicides due to repeated selection pressure from the same or herbicides belonging to the same mode of action (Heap Reference Heap2025; Hulme Reference Hulme2023; Kniss Reference Kniss2018). In addition, conservation tillage systems over the last few decades have driven a shift toward increased herbicide use (Ofstehage and Nehring Reference Ofstehage and Nehring2021). Herbicide resistance serves as an illustration of evolutionary adaptation driven by management stresses resulting from intensive agricultural practices involving injudicious herbicide application (Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Busi, Lopez-Ruiz and Umina2021; Hulme Reference Hulme2023). The evolution of herbicide resistance depends on the level of herbicide selection pressure and the existing and newly emerging genetic diversity within weed populations (Neve et al. Reference Neve, Busi, Renton and Vila-Aiub2014). The extent of genetic diversity within a weed species is primarily shaped by the rate at which spontaneous mutations occur in the gene targeted by the herbicide (Vila-Aiub Reference Vila-Aiub2019). These mutations can arise within the local population or they can be introduced through processes such as gene flow, which includes the transfer of genes through seeds and pollen, genetic recombination, and genetic drift (Gressel Reference Gressel2009; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021a; Powles and Yu Reference Powles and Yu2010).

Gene Flow

Gene flow in the context of weeds refers to the movement of genetic material between different weed populations, within or among fields, through various routes (Figure 1). Gene flow can influence the spread and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Beckie, Mallory-Smith, Jasieniuk, Busi, Norsworthy and Geddes2021a; Kreiner et al. Reference Kreiner, Sandler, Stern, Tranel, Weigel, Stinchcombe and Wright2022; Neve et al. Reference Neve, Busi, Renton and Vila-Aiub2014). Understanding gene flow is important to strategize comprehensive weed management tactics (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021b). Scientists have delved into gene flow studies by examining pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF) (Ganie and Jhala Reference Ganie and Jhala2017; Maity et al. Reference Maity, Young, Subramanian and Bagavathiannan2022; Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Hills, Martin and Hall2015; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Yook, Park, Lim, Kim, Song and Kim2018), seed-mediated gene flow (SMGF) (Ansong and Pickering Reference Ansong and Pickering2013; Beckie et al. Reference Beckie, Blackshaw, Hall and Johnson2016; Dauer et al. Reference Dauer, Mortensen and Vangessel2007; Wichmann et al., Reference Wichmann, Alexander, Soons, Galsworthy, Dunne, Gould and Bullock2009), dispersal of vegetative structures (Lu et al. Reference Lu, Baker and Preston2007; Lu Reference Lu2008; Phelan et al. Reference Phelan, Fitzgerald, Grant, Byrne, Meade and Mullins2015), and the exchange of genetic characteristics through bidirectional hybridization (Mallory-Smith and Zapiola Reference Mallory-Smith and Zapiola2008). PMGF plays a significant role in maintaining or enhancing the frequency of alleles linked to specific traits within and among the populations (Campbell and Waser Reference Campbell and Waser2001; Takeuchi and Diway Reference Takeuchi and Diway2021). While PMGF is the key mechanism for gene flow in outcrossing species, this occurs primarily through seed migration in self-pollinated species (Darmency Reference Darmency and Duke1997; Hidayat et al. Reference Hidayat, Baker and Preston2006). Seeds can disperse through natural means (e.g., carried by water, animals, or wind), but in agricultural systems, human activities such as harvesting, transport, and machinery use are the dominant pathways for SMGF. For instance, in wild oat (Avena fatua L.), a self-pollinated weed, seeds have been recorded to move as far as 145 m behind a combine harvester under field conditions (Shirtliffe and Entz Reference Shirtliffe and Entz2005). The same study showed that using a chaff collection system reduced wild oat seed dispersal by nearly 90%, highlighting the importance of harvest weed seed control in limiting the spread of herbicide resistance traits. For cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and horseweed (Erigeron canadensis L.), wind acts as the primary dispersal agent, with horseweed showing seed dispersal rates as high as 99% and speeds up to 444 cm s−1 (Dauer et al. Reference Dauer, Mortensen and Vangessel2007; Johnston Reference Johnston2011).

Figure 1. Routes of gene flow documented in weed species.

PMGF in Cross-Pollinated Weed Species

The PMGF and its effect on the dispersal of herbicide resistance genes have been studied in different cross-pollinating weed species such as Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), a dioecious species with obligate outcrossing reproductive biology (Franssen et al. Reference Franssen, Skinner, Al-Khatib, Horak and Kulakow2001), and the most troublesome weed in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] and corn (Zea mays L.) in the United States. Palmer amaranth showed high levels of PMGF from a glyphosate-resistant source to a glyphosate-susceptible sink by 20% at 300 m and 50% near (1 to 5 m) the pollen source (Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, Kichler, MacRae, Grey and Culpepper2012). In waterhemp (A. tuberculatus L.), glyphosate-resistant gene flow was highest (0.46%) at 0.1 m from the pollen source, but declined sharply with increasing distance, dropping to 0.07% at 50 m (Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic and Jhala2017). Similarly, in annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudian), PMGF has been recorded at distances up to 3,000 m; in other words, the herbicide resistance genes were able to migrate long distances (Busi et al. Reference Busi, Yu, Barrett-Lennard and Powles2008). Loureiro et al. (Reference Loureiro, Escorial and Chueca2016) found that PMGF in annual ryegrass ranged from 5.5% to 11.6% in plants located near (0 m) the pollen source under field conditions. As the distance increased, these rates declined, reaching 4.1% at 25 m downwind. The study highlighted the influence of environmental factors on the extent of outcrossing in both greenhouse and field areas. In johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense L. Pers.), at the closest distance of 5 m, PMGF was 9.6% to 16.2% across the directions and environments, which progressively declined to 0.8% to 1.2% at 50 m (Maity and Bagavathiannan Reference Maity and Bagavathiannan2021). Their exponential decay model predicted 50% reduction in PMGF at 2.2 m and 90% reduction at 5.8 m from the herbicide resistance pollen donor block.

Gene Flow in Self-Pollinated Weed Species

Extensive research has focused on gene flow in cross-pollinating weed species, providing valuable insights into the spread of herbicide resistance (Busi et al. Reference Busi, Michel, Powles and Délye2011Reference Busi, Yu, Barrett-Lennard and PowlesBusi 2008; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Beckie, Mallory-Smith, Jasieniuk, Busi, Norsworthy and Geddes2021a, Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021b; Maity et al. Reference Maity, Young, Subramanian and Bagavathiannan2022; Sarangi et al. Reference Sarangi, Tyre, Patterson, Gaines, Irmak, Knezevic and Jhala2017; Sosnoskie et al. Reference Sosnoskie, Webster, Kichler, MacRae, Grey and Culpepper2012). However, information on gene flow in self-pollinating weed species remains limited. Although these species primarily reproduce through self-pollination, varying extent of gene flow can occur through low levels of outcrossing and movement of seeds or vegetative propagules (Mallory-Smith et al. Reference Mallory-Smith, Hall and Burgos2015). Occasional PMGF may facilitate genetic exchange, particularly under conducive environmental conditions that favor cross-pollination in locally adapted weed biotypes.

While self-pollinated species usually have low outcrossing rates, even a very low level of outcrossing can have critical long-term effects, especially in weeds that produce large number of seeds that can shatter easily. For example, imagine a field with 1,000 plants of a self-pollinated weed, only one of which is herbicide resistant. If the outcrossing rate is only 0.1%, it is likely that at least 1 out of 1,000 flowers can be pollinated with foreign pollen carrying those resistant alleles, producing viable seeds. If these progeny seeds survive into a full plant, it will produce hundreds of seeds, and this will continue to multiply rapidly in each reproductive cycle. So, that single hybrid seed receiving the resistant allele through outcrossing will pass on its resistance gene to hundreds of plants in the next generation. Inherently obvious that this is a simplified scenario, but it highlights how even a low level of gene flow in self-pollinated species can add up over time and significantly contribute to the spread of herbicide resistance. SMGF is a common channel of gene flow in both self- and cross-pollinated weeds; however, PMGF is not frequently reported in self-pollinated weeds and has primarily been studied in cross-pollinated weeds. Therefore, understanding the extent of PMGF and its underlying mechanisms in self-pollinated weeds is necessary for developing effective containment strategies to mitigate the spread of aggressive biotypes and herbicide resistance in such weeds.

Literature Review Procedure

We conducted a comprehensive literature review to examine the extent of gene flow in self-compatible weed species that are predominantly self-pollinated. We selected important self-pollinated weeds from the list provided by the Weed Science Society of America (WSSA 2025). Studies reporting empirical data on the extent of gene flow and distances were collected using combination of the search words such as “self-pollinated,” “autogamous,” “self-compatible,” “gene flow,” “hybridization,” and “outcrossing” for the selected taxonomic families and species. Key variables extracted included the extent and distance of maximum gene flow, geographic location, temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity as the data were available. For subsequent analyses, the extracted data were categorized by weed species family to examine potential family-specific patterns in gene flow. However, it is critically important to note that number of studies conducted on gene flow in self-pollinated weeds is very limited.

Data analysis was conducted using JMP software (v.16; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, range) were calculated for PMGF percent, distances, and environmental factors (temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, and elevation). To explore the relationships between gene flow extents and environmental factors, Pearson correlation analyses were performed between gene flow extents and each environmental variable. Subsequently, simple linear regression models, based on the root mean square error and R 2 values, were used to evaluate the effect of each individual environmental factor on gene flow extent and distance. In each regression analysis, the environmental factor (e.g., temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, elevation) was treated as a fixed independent variable, and gene flow percent or gene flow distance was treated as the dependent variable. No random effects were modeled because the analysis was based on summarized data extracted from the literature rather than experimental replicates within hierarchical structures. All variables were checked for normality before analysis, and wherever necessary, transformations (e.g., logarithmic) were applied to improve the model fit. Significance was evaluated at P < 0.05 for all statistical tests.

Extent and Distance of Gene Flow in Self-Pollinated Weeds

PMGF Across Families. Synthesis of the average gene flow data showed that the self-pollinated weeds in the Solanaceae family had the highest gene flow, averaging 10.63% in our data, among seven taxonomic families considered in the dataset (Table 1). The second and third families with the highest gene flow were Solanaceae and Chenopodiaceae, with averages of 10.00% and 1.58%, respectively. The lowest extent of gene flow was observed in Linaceae followed by Brassicaceae and Poaceae, with average gene flow of 0.01%, 0.33% and 1.87%, respectively. Floral biology, along with factors such as mating system and pollination mechanism, contributes to variation in the extent of gene flow observed among these families (Hermanutz Reference Hermanutz1991; Marshal and Abbott Reference Marshall and Abbott1982). While Asteraceae flowers typically have capitula, an open flower structure, favoring more outcrossing as compared to Poaceace with a cleistogamous or chasmogamous flower, a closed flower structure. Consequently, the self-pollinated weed species in Astereaceae family showed gene flow to as far as 1,000 m, the longest distance found in the data set, with a mean distance of 247.43 m. Self-pollinated weeds from families such as Linaceae, Brassicaceae, and Chenopodiaceae also showed gene flow to considerable distances- 35 m, 20 m, and 15 m, respectively, although the extent of gene flow was low. However, it is highly likely that gene flow over these distances can contaminate an entire field and the nearby fields within a few years.

PMGF Across Species. Among the individual weeds, common groundsel, in the Asteraceae family, showed the highest extent of gene flow (average 23.2%) (Table 2), exhibiting 24% gene flow at 0.5 m from the pollen donor in England (Marshal and Abbott Reference Marshall and Abbott1982). In Solanaceae, eastern black nightshade showed 17% gene flow (average 10%) near the pollen source in Manitoba, Canada (Hemanutz Reference Hermanutz1991). In Arkansas in the United States, magenta spreen, a member of the Chenopodiaceae family, exhibited a maximum gene flow of 3.0% at 15 m from the donor plant (Yerka et al. Reference Yerka, de Leon and Stoltenberg2012). In Poaceae, wild oat showed 1.1% average gene flow but can show as high as 5.2% gene flow at 0 m and 0.09% at 0.6 m from the pollen donor in Saskatchewan, Canada (Murray et al. Reference Murray, Morrison and Friesen2002) (Figure 2). For wild oat and slender wild oat (Avena barbata Pott ex Link AVEBA), the rate of outcrossing has been estimated to be 1% to 12% (Grant Reference Grant1981). Jain (Reference Jain, Solbrig, Jain, Johnson and Raven1979) documented a greater outcrossing rate in wild oat than in slender wild oat and consequently larger inter-family and intra-family variance in the first species. In the Brassicaceae family, false flax [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] showed 0.78% gene flow at 0.2 m and 0.33% at 2.5 m in Montana (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Hills, Martin and Hall2015) (Table 1). Three important weed species in the Poaceae family, goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.], large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and yellow foxtail [Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.], are reported to undergo low levels of cross-pollination; however, no research studies have yet documented the percent of PMGF (Table 2).

Table 1. Extent of pollen mediated gene flow and distance in self-pollinated weeds at selected family level.

a Number of species included within a family.

Figure 2. The relation between the extent of gene flow and distance from the source in 1. Wild oat (Murray et al. Reference Murray, Morrison and Friesen2002) and 2. Foxtail millet (Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhao, Yan, Li, Zhu, Shi, Song, Ma and Darmency2001; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Chen and Darmency1997).

Table 2. Extent of pollen-mediated gene flow and distance in self-pollinated weeds at selected species level.a

a N, numberAbbreviations: N, number; SE, standard error.

b Bisht and Mukai 2002.

c Jones et al. 2021.

d Kimata 2015.

Regarding pollen dispersal distance, plants in the Asteraceae family exhibit the farthest movement, with gene flow recorded up to 1,000 m in horseweed in Illinois (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015). Plants in the Chenopodiaceae and Poaceae families have demonstrated moderate dispersal potential with maximum gene flow recorded at 96 m and 50 m, respectively (Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014; Gasquez Reference Gasquez, Jacquard, Heim and Antonovics1985; Hidayat et al. Reference Hidayat, Baker and Preston2006; Murray et al. Reference Murray, Morrison and Friesen2002; Volenberg and Stoltenberg Reference Volenberg and Stoltenberg2002; Wang et al. Reference Wang, Zhao, Yan, Li, Zhu, Shi, Song, Ma and Darmency2001; Yerka et al. Reference Yerka, de Leon and Stoltenberg2012). Although Brassicaceae plants exhibit a low extent of gene flow, some species, such as false flax, were still able to cause gene flow up to 20 m from the donor plant (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Hills, Martin and Hall2015). Wild oat showed a maximum gene flow distance of 0.3 m, but it was concentrated primarily adjacent to the pollen donor (5.5%), whereas foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] demonstrated gene flow of up to 20 m, with a 1.5% gene flow adjacent to the pollen donor (Figure 2).

Factors That Influence Gene Flow

In general, the extent of PMGF among plant populations is influenced by a combination of biological, environmental, and management-related factors. These include the mating system and reproductive biology of the species, floral structure, population size and spatial arrangement, pollination mechanisms (e.g., wind or insect-mediated), and the foraging behavior of pollinators (Beckie and Hall Reference Beckie and Hall2008; Handel Reference Handel1983; Lal et al. Reference Lal, Bhardwaj, Chahar, Dangwal, Das, Tandon, Shivanna and Koul2020; Murray et al. Reference Murray, Morrison and Friesen2002). Additionally, variables such as temperature, relative humidity, elevation, geographic location, and agricultural practices can significantly affect gene flow dynamics (Hermanutz Reference Hermanutz1991; Hulme Reference Hulme2023; Maity and Bagavathiannan Reference Maity and Bagavathiannan2021; Norsworthy et al. Reference Norsworthy, Ward, Shaw, Llewellyn, Nichols, Webster and Barrett2012; Prasad et al. Reference Prasad, Boote and Allen2006; Rong et al. Reference Rong, Song, De Jong, Zhang, Sun, Xu and Lu2010; Wilkins and Thorogood Reference Wilkins and Thorogood1992).

Environmental Factors. The heat map of correlations between the extent and distance of PMGF and the environmental factors in our data set showed that except for temperature, other environmental factors exhibited weak correlations with PMGF and distances (Figure 3). Generally, none of the environmental factors alone was able to predict PMGF distance in this data set. The evaluation of the regression equation and R 2 between temperature and PMGF showed that there is a strong negative relationship between temperature and PMGF extent, meaning that as temperature increases, gene flow tends to decrease (P < 0.05) (Figure 4). Qu et al. (Reference Qu, Liu, Zhuang and Qiang2022) in their survey on American sloughgrass [Beckmannia syzigachne (Steud.) Fernald] in two consecutive years (2017 and 2018) confirmed that the amount of PMGF in a herbicide resistance trait was significantly negatively correlated with temperature (correlation coefficient −0.340, P = 0.010) but it was not correlated with relative humidity. Wilkins and Thorogood (Reference Wilkins and Thorogood1992) reported that elevated temperatures (34 C) during anthesis increased self-fertilization in perennial ryegrass [Lolium perenne L. ssp. multiflorum (Lam.) Husnot] from 2% to 30%, therefore reduced outcrossing. Although self-pollinated species generally exhibit low levels of the PMGF, environmental factors can occasionally enhance outcrossing. For example, in false flax, gene flow declined sharply with increasing distance, but local wind movement allowed pollen dispersal beyond 10 m (Walsh et al. Reference Walsh, Hills, Martin and Hall2015). In common groundsel, higher plant density likely contributed to slight increase in cross-pollination among neighboring plants, while environmental factors such as seasonal conditions might also influence gene flow dynamics (Marshall and Abbott Reference Marshall and Abbott1982).

Figure 3. Heat map on correlations of extent of gene flow and its distances with environmental factors in self-pollinated weed species selected in this analysis.

Figure 4. Regression between the extent of gene flow across the selected weeds and local temperature.

Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy (Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014) investigated PMGF in barnyardgrass and found that wind speed played a key role in determining the maximum distance of gene flow. In their 2010 study, PMGF was observed at up to 20 m in the northwest direction, aligning with the strongest winds recorded at 15 to 20 km/h. However, in the following year of the study (2011), the highest wind speeds shifted to the northeast at 20 to 25 km/h, and PMGF extended as far as 50 m in that direction. Despite variations in PMGF distance based on wind patterns, the overall outcrossing rates across different directions did not show significant differences (Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014). They also noted that PMGF levels were significantly and negatively correlated with air temperature; higher temperatures can reduce PMGF. Conversely, no significant relationship was found between PMGF and relative humidity. Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015) highlighted the role of wind in influencing pollen dispersal distance, demonstrating that greater wind speeds led to increased pollen travel by horseweed. They also suggested that high relative humidity, in addition to the physiology of the species, could inhibit pollen movement (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015). Similarly, Aboulaich et al. (Reference Aboulaich, Achmakh, Bouziane, Trigo, Recio, Kadiri and Kazzaz2013) explained that pollen can absorb moisture from the air, making it heavier and more likely to settle.

Reproductive Biology. Pollen production per flower can significantly influence the extent of PMGF within a plant population (Table 3). More pollen production increases the probability of pollen dispersal, thereby can enhance cross-pollination rates and facilitate PMGF between individual plants, which is crucial for maintaining genetic diversity during plant evolution (Campbell Reference Campbell1991). Conversely, fewer pollen production may limit PMGF, particularly in spatially isolated populations or those with low pollinator activity (Kwak et al. Reference Kwak, Velterop and van Andel1998). The relationship between pollen quantity and PMGF is influenced by various factors, including floral morphology, pollinator behavior, and environmental conditions (Brunet and Eckert Reference Brunet1998). Common groundsel, the weed that exhibits the highest extent of PMGF, can produce as many as 55 to 65 florets, each containing 350 to 400 pollens (Table 3) (Damgaard and Abbott Reference Damgaard and Abbott1995). Horseweed, a troublesome weed with rapidly spreading herbicide resistance, can produce as many as 1,170 to 2.1 × 106 pollens per plant per day (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015), which can suffice its faster rate of herbicide resistance spread.

Table 3. Pollen characteristics in selected self-pollinated weed species.a

a A dash (–) indicates that no information was found.

Pollen size varies substantially among weed species, which may influence PMGF capacity (Table 3). Species such as velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medikus) and flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) exhibit relatively large pollen grains (51–100 µm; PalDat 2024), whereas intermediate-size grains are produced by common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), mouse barley (Hordeum murinum L.), and common groundsel (26–50 µm; PalDat 2024). While false flax produces smaller pollen (approximately 21–25 µm and 10–25 µm, respectively; PalDat 2024), the pollen grains of horseweed are as small as 16 to 22 µm (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015). Smaller pollen grains generally tend to travel farther, potentially enhancing PMGF distance. Notably, horseweed, with very small pollen grains, exhibited the greatest PMGF distance (1,000 m) in our data set. Estimated maximum PMGF of 17% observed in eastern black nightshade can be attributed to smaller (15–25 µm) pollen size. Although these factors suggest a possible relationship between smaller pollen size and greater dispersal ability, other factors such as pollination vector, pollen viability, and environmental conditions likely influence PMGF patterns.

Vector and their Behavior. Gene flow patterns are also shaped by the behavior of the vectors that facilitate the transfer of seeds and pollen both within and between populations (Nathan and Muller-Landau Reference Nathan and Muller-Landau2000; Taylor et al. Reference Taylor, Touré, Carnahan, Norris, Dolo, Traoré and Lanzaro2001; Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Yook, Park, Lim, Kim, Song and Kim2018). Common gene flow vectors include animals, insects, and human activities (Hoyle et al. Reference Hoyle, Hayter and Cresswell2007; Pickering et al. Reference Pickering, Mount, Wichmann and Bullock2011). Animals, for instance, may disperse seeds over long distances by consuming fruits and defecating the seeds, or by carrying seeds attached to their fur, or via insects, particularly pollinators such as bees, can transfer pollen between plants, enabling cross-pollination and genetic variation (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Gao, Chen, Kim, Zhang and Yan2021b). Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Wang, Gao, Chen, Kim, Zhang and Yan2021b) conducted a 4-yr study on false flax and found that seed yield increase at higher honeybee densities (>20 bees per square meter) was primarily attributed to increased outcrossing. Their research also demonstrated that both honeybees and bumble bees could transfer false flax pollen to nearby flowers of other species such as brown mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czernajew] and rapeseed (B. napus L.), with pollen movement observed up to 10 to 15 m beyond the field edge. Flax exhibited minor increase in outcrossing when insect vectors such as bees were present Zhang et al. (Reference Zhang, Wang, Gao, Chen, Kim, Zhang and Yan2021b). In wild oat, gene flow was restricted to short distances, with seed dispersal and recruitment occurring primarily within a few meters under field conditions (Murray et al. Reference Murray, Morrison and Friesen2002). Furthermore, although eastern black nightshade is primarily self-pollinated, studies have shown that insect movement between closely spaced individuals can enhance occasional gene flow (Hermanutz Reference Hermanutz1991).

Human activities also contribute significantly to gene flow in weeds, as seeds and pollen can be unintentionally moved through clothing, footwear, and agricultural equipment (Pickering et al. Reference Pickering, Mount, Wichmann and Bullock2011). For example, seeds may adhere to shoes or be transported on machinery used in farming, leading to the spread of invasive species to new areas. A study by Pickering et al. (Reference Pickering, Mount, Wichmann and Bullock2011) demonstrated that humans can act as an important vector, and their clothing plays a significant role in seed dispersal, particularly in protected areas. Five weed species (biddy-biddy [Acaena novae-zelandiae Kirk], common sheep sorrel [Rumex acetosella L.[, sweet vernal grass [Anthoxanthum odoratum L.], orchardgrass [Dactylis glomerata L.], and red fescue [Festuca rubra L.]) were tested for their attachment and detachment rates on socks and trousers. Results indicated that socks retained seeds for longer distances, with some seeds still attached after 5,000 m. Theoretically, up to 2.4 million seeds could be dispersed via trousers and 1.9 million via socks in a single season, contributing to the spread of invasive species into conservation areas. Measuring long-distance dispersal presents significant challenges because the likelihood of detection decreases sharply with increasing distance from the source population (Thompson et al. Reference Thompson, Rickard, Hodkinson, Rees, Bullock, Kenward and Hails2002).

Recent advances in agricultural technology can influence gene flow patterns in self-pollinated weeds. The integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, into agricultural practices introduces novel considerations regarding pollen dispersal in self-pollinating weed species. While drones are primarily employed for tasks such as crop monitoring and pesticide application, their rotor-induced airflow can generate significant turbulence capable of dislodging and dispersing pollen grains. This mechanical disturbance may inadvertently enhance outcrossing rates in weeds with inherently low outcrossing potential by facilitating pollen movement beyond typical self-pollination ranges. For instance, studies have demonstrated that the downwash airflow from drones that spray pesticides can influence the distribution of airborne particles, including spores, indicating the potential for increased gene flow among nearby plant populations (Qin et al. Reference Qin, Chen and He2023). Additionally, research on drone-based pollination systems has highlighted the capacity of UAVs to mimic natural pollination mechanisms, further supporting the notion that drone activity could intensify PMGF (Crazzolara et al. Reference Crazzolara, Ebner, Platis, Miranda, Bange and Junginger2019). These examples highlight that even in predominantly selfing weeds, factors such as wind, insect vectors, plant density, and seasonal environmental conditions, together with anthropogenic activities and recent farming advancements, can facilitate gene movement under favorable circumstances.

SMGF Across Species. The available evidence on SMGF in self-pollinated weed species highlights the various dispersal mechanisms involved (Table 4). Although direct data on PMGF or vegetative gene flow are limited for most self-pollinated weed species, Table 4 presents several documented cases of seed dispersal. For example, Avena sativa can disperse 14% to 18% of the seeds in places even at elevations of 1,600 to 2,200 m (Del Toro and Ribbons Reference Del Toro and Ribbons2019). A. fatua seeds can disperse 145 m, whereas cheatgrass seeds can travel 237 m at a speed of 37 cm s−1. Horseweed can disperse 99% of its seed to 110 m (Dauer et al. Reference Dauer, Mortensen and Humston2006), and the speed of its seed dispersal can be as high as 444 cm s−1 to travel 21 m. These findings underscore the significance of SMGF in the spread of herbicide resistance in self-pollinated weed species, particularly through both natural and agricultural dispersal mechanisms.

Table 4. Documented cases of seed-mediated gene flow in self-pollinated weed species.

* Non-pollinating insects comprised of ants.

** Farm machinery included combine harvester.

Gene Flow Scenario in Selected Self-Pollinated Weed Species

Common Groundsel. Common groundsel is a small, annual broadleaf weed belonging to the Asteraceae family, widely distributed in nurseries, vegetable crops, and no-till systems, where it competes with crops and serves as a host for plant pathogens such as Botrytis cinerea (Dauer et al. Reference Dauer, Mortensen and Vangessel2007; Weaver and Warwick Reference Weaver and Warwick1984). It primarily reproduces through seeds and is predominantly self-pollinated, although occasional outcrossing has been reported (Abbott et al. Reference Abbott, James, Milne and Gillies2003). Common groundsel was the first documented case of herbicide resistance, with triazine-resistant populations now prevalent throughout Europe and North America (Holt and Lebaron Reference Holt and Lebaron1990).

In our analysis of the data set, common groundsel exhibited a mean of 23.2% gene flow (Campbell and Abbott Reference Campbell and Abbott1976; Marshal and Abbott Reference Marshall and Abbott1982; Müller-Schärer and Fischer Reference Müller-Schärer and Fischer2001). Marshal and Abbott (Reference Marshall and Abbott1982) reported a maximum gene flow of 24% between neighboring individuals of common groundsel within a natural population, where plants were located close together at very short distances, facilitating a high rate of gene flow. However, Müller-Schärer and Fischer (Reference Müller-Schärer and Fischer2001) found that cross-pollination in common groundsel can occur at rates up to 0.4% at short distances within 1 m, with gene flow decreasing significantly beyond this range. There are no reports of long-distance pollen dispersal for this species. Literature reviews indicate that gene flow in common groundsel generally occurs only among neighboring individuals within natural populations (Campbell and Abbott Reference Campbell and Abbott1976; Marshal and Abbott Reference Marshall and Abbott1982; Müller-Schärer and Fischer Reference Müller-Schärer and Fischer2001). Despite its limited outcrossing potential, seed dispersal plays a major role in the spread of herbicide resistance and adaptive traits in common groundsel, highlighting the need for effective management strategies. Marshal and Abbot (Reference Marshall and Abbott1982, Reference Marshall and Abbott1984a, Reference Marshall and Abbott1984b) noted that outcrossing level in common groundsel is influenced by weed physiology. Radiate plants, which have ray florets, showed significantly higher outcrossing rates (13% to 20%) during peak flowering, whereas non-radiate plants had rates below 1%.

SMGF in common groundsel can occur through multiple pathways (McHenry et al. Reference McHenry, Bushnell, Oliver and Norris1990). Each seed bears a pappus—a plume-like structure—that facilitates wind dispersal along ditches, fencerows, roadsides, and adjacent fields. Additional dispersal routes include irrigation water, contaminated crop seed lots, and farm machinery or vehicles. McHenry et al. also reported that manure from livestock fed hay containing Senecio vulgaris seeds contributed to their spread into cropland.

Eastern Black Nightshade. Eastern black nightshade is an annual weed from the Solanaceae family and native to North America, which infests most crops and causes significant challenges due to its competitive nature and toxic properties (Ogg et al. Reference Ogg, Rogers and Schilling1981). There is evidence of paraquat resistance in eastern black nightshade populations confirmed in Ontario, Canada. It shows considerable cross-pollination, primarily due to insect pollinators such as bees. In the literature we reviewed, eastern black nightshade exhibited 10% outcrossing (Hermanutz Reference Hermanutz1991). Outcrossing rates in eastern black nightshade varied between populations and were linked to floral traits such as stigma position. Hermanutz (Reference Hermanutz1991) demonstrated that the degree of stigma exertion and style position are different between populations and are correlated with outcrossing rate. Self-pollination was more likely due to close contact between the stigma and the anther (Hermanutz Reference Hermanutz1991). This ability to shift between selfing and outcrossing may have helped the species spread successfully.

Eastern black nightshade primarily relies on endozoochorous seed dispersal via frugivores: birds and mammals ingest its small berries, pass viable seeds in their droppings, and thus move them away from the parent plant rather than wind or ballistic dispersal (MSU 2023). It can produce approximately 10,000 seeds/plant (each plant produces between 50 and 100 berries, with each berry containing about 100 seeds).

Barnyardgrass. Barnyardgrass is an annual C4 grass weed that causes significant challenges in agricultural systems, particularly in the midsouthern, southern, and eastern regions, where it competes with crops such as rice (Oryza sativa L.), soybean, and cotton, leading to significant yield losses due to its aggressive growth and adaptability (Holm et al. Reference Holm, Doll, Holm, Pancho and Herberger1997; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Beckie, Mallory-Smith, Jasieniuk, Busi, Norsworthy and Geddes2021a; Norsworthy et al. Reference Norsworthy, Bond and Scott2013). It reproduces primarily through seeds and is predominantly self-pollinated, although some degree of outcrossing has been observed (Maun and Barrett Reference Maun and Barrett1986). Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy (Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014) reported gene flow rates of 12% at 0 m, decreasing to 5.6% at 0.25 m and 0.01% at 50 m from the pollen donor. They also reported that the average gene flow in barnyardgrass was highly variable among directions and years (Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Beckie, Mallory-Smith, Jasieniuk, Busi, Norsworthy and Geddes2021a).

Gravity and water movement are the main channels of short-distance seed dispersal in barnyardgrass (Zhang et al. Reference Zhang, Wang, Cao, Li and Chauhan2023). In dense local infestations, mature seeds frequently break and fall close to the parent plant (Peralta et al. Reference Peralta, Striker and Mollard2019). The seeds can also be carried by floods, runoff, and irrigation water because of their buoyancy and small weight, which helps them colonize wet and marshy areas (Bastiani et al. Reference Bastiani, Lamego, Nunes, Moura, Wickert and Oliveira2015). Across agroecosystems, barnyardgrass can persist and spread quickly due to these natural and secondary dispersal mechanisms.

Horseweed. Horseweed, also known as marestail, is an annual broadleaf weed belonging to the Asteraceae family. It is notorious for its ability to rapidly colonize disturbed areas and agricultural fields of soybean and cotton, contributing to herbicide resistance challenges (VanGessel Reference VanGessel2001; Weaver Reference Weaver2001). It primarily reproduces by producing large quantities of wind-dispersed seeds (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015), and while it is considered predominantly self-pollinating, some level of outcrossing has been reported (Buhler and Owen Reference Buhler and Owen1997; Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021b). Gene flow studies indicate that PMGF in horseweed can occur over significant distances (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021b). Davis et al. (Reference Davis, Kruger, Hallett, Tranel and Johnson2010) reported a maximum observed gene flow distance of 300 m, although most outcrossing events occurred within 100 m. In another study, horseweed showed 7.8% gene flow in the areas adjacent to pollen donors (Loux et al. Reference Loux, Stachler, Johnson, Nice, Davis and Nordby2006), whereas Huang et al. (Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015) reported that in Illinois, horseweed pollen could flow up to 1,000 m. The combination of prolific seed production, long-distance dispersal, and herbicide resistance makes persistent horseweed difficult to manage in agricultural systems.

Horseweed pollen release appears to be influenced more by the plant’s physiology than meteorological conditions (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015; Smisek Reference Smisek1995). Correlation analysis revealed that at lower heights (<3 m) near the source field, vertical pollen transport was linked to vertical wind speed, while horizontal movement depended on horizontal wind speed. Additionally, high relative humidity inhibited pollen dispersal at greater heights (3 to 100 m) and longer distances (0 to 1,000 m) (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015).

SMGF in horseweed primarily occurs via wind. A single mature plant can produce 100,000 to 200,000 seeds, each equipped with a pappus that enables aerial transport (Shields et al. Reference Shields, Dauer, VanGessel and Neumann2006). With wind speeds in the Planetary Boundary Layer frequently exceeding 20 m s−1, seed dispersal can easily exceed 500 km in a single dispersal event. Under moderate winds (5–7 m s−1), one modeling study estimated a longest-distance dispersal of ∼165 km, with ∼27% of seeds moving beyond 5 km in 1 d (Liu et al. Reference Liu, Qi and Wang2018).

Evolutionary Implications

From the perspective of evolutionary implications, when an exotic species is introduced to a new environment, it experiences a genetic bottleneck that decreases genetic diversity (Amsellem et al. Reference Amsellem, Noyer, Le Bourgeois and Hossaert-Mckey2000). When self-incompatible species are introduced to a new environment, this bottleneck can lead to a reduction in allelic variation at the self-incompatibility locus, which in turn diminishes the chances of finding cross-compatible mates in the new habitat (Caño et al. Reference Caño, Escarré, Blanco-Moreno and Sans2008; Reinartz and Les Reference Reinartz and Les1994). Contrastingly, as confirmed by Shivanna (Reference Shivanna2015), autogamy is a key adaptation in annual weed species, providing reproductive assurance and enabling their successful colonization. While some species such as shepherd’s purse [Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medikus], common chickweed [Stellaria media (L.) Villars], and mouse ear-cress [Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynhold] retain the potential for outcrossing, their reliance on selfing ensures survival even in the absence of pollinators (Shivanna Reference Shivanna2015). Self-pollination is often associated with genetic isolation, but this assumption is not absolute. A low rate of outcrossing can occur due to various biological and environmental factors owing to the need to create variation for better persistence and stability under dynamic niche (Goodwillie et al. Reference Goodwillie, Kalisz and Eckert2005). Almost all the self-pollinating plants exhibit both cleistogamous (closed-flower, obligate selfing) and chasmogamous (open-flower, potential outcrossing) mechanisms. Cleistogamy is often considered a strategy for reproductive assurance under unfavorable conditions, while chasmogamy allows occasional genetic exchange by outcrossing (Goodwillie et al. Reference Goodwillie, Kalisz and Eckert2005; Oakley et al. Reference Oakley, Moriuchi and Winn2007). The mechanisms of cleistogamy and chasmogamy contribute to outcrossing in an autogamous species by maintaining a mixed mating system that allows genetic exchange despite a predominant selfing strategy. This dual strategy enhances genetic diversity and helps mitigate the negative effects of inbreeding depression in weeds, which can accumulate in strictly selfing populations.

Environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, and CO2 levels or resource allocation can modify floral traits and increase the likelihood of outcrossing. In shepherd’s purse, the proportion of cleistogamous vs. chasmogamous flowers varies depending on environmental factors that can affect outcrossing rates (Lloyd Reference Lloyd1980). For instance, elevated CO2 has been shown to increase the proportion of chasmogamous flowers in shepherd’s purse (Jurik Reference Jurik1985). Higher temperatures can shorten floral development times, leading to incomplete self-pollination and increased reliance on external pollen (Franks and Weis Reference Franks and Weis2009). Drought stress has been reported to increase flower opening rates, promoting pollen dispersal in Arabidopsis (Heschel and Riginos Reference Heschel and Riginos2005).

Self-pollination in mixed mating systems can take place within a single flower (autogamy) or between different flowers on the same plant (geitonogamy). Additionally, selfing within a flower may happen naturally without assistance (autonomous) or with the help of external pollinators (facilitated) (Goodwillie et al. Reference Goodwillie, Kalisz and Eckert2005; Lloyd and Schoen Reference Lloyd and Schoen1992). This extent of outcrossing can facilitate gene flow, a critical concern in the context of resistant gene escape in weeds. Therefore, pollinator availability can also influence the proportion of cleistogamous and chasmogamous flowers, thereby can contribute to gene flow. For example, rice is primarily a selfing species; however, wind and insect abundance can increase outcrossing rates up to 3% in hybrid systems (Song et al., Reference Song, Lu, Zhu and Chen2003). Similarly, in soybean, bees have been shown to enhance outcrossing rates from <1% to 5% under certain conditions (Abrol Reference Abrol2012). Thus, cleistogamy and chasmogamy together create an evolutionary balance that maintains outcrossing potential in primarily autogamous species, including weeds, contributing to spread of aggressive biotypes and herbicide resistance (Oakley et al. Reference Oakley, Moriuchi and Winn2007).

Practical Implications of PMGF in Self-Pollinated Weeds

While natural cross-pollination rates are typically lower in self-pollinated weeds compared to cross-pollinated species, even this small amount of gene flow could have significant implications for the spread of herbicide resistance alleles (Jhala et al. Reference Jhala, Beckie, Mallory-Smith, Jasieniuk, Busi, Norsworthy and Geddes2021a, Reference Jhala, Norsworthy, Ganie, Sosnoskie, Beckie, Mallory-Smith and Stoltenberg2021b). Numerous studies have examined the life-history traits that can influence the invasive behavior of specific weed species (Noble Reference Noble, Drake, Mooney, di Castri, Groves, Kruger, Rejmanek and Williamson1989). One key attribute believed to affect the invasiveness of plants is self-compatibility, which enables reproduction with just a few individuals or even a single individual in a newly formed population (Baker Reference Baker, Baker and Stebbins1965; Caño et al. Reference Caño, Escarré, Blanco-Moreno and Sans2008). Given the increasing cases of the evolution of herbicide resistance and spread across the weed species, aggravated outcrossing in self-pollinated weeds may intensify the threat of herbicide resistance management. Understanding the extent and distance of gene flow in self-pollinated weed species is crucial for understanding how genetic material spreads within and among populations. This information helps assess factors such as genetic diversity, adaptation to changing environments, and the potential for herbicide resistance evolution and spread. It also helps inform decisions on weed management and conservation strategies. Moreover, they can help forecast the adaptive evolution of weeds and are a critical consideration for improving agricultural practices.

Environmental conditions play a major role in pollen movement, even in self-pollinated weeds. Factors such as wind, temperature, humidity, rainfall, and field structure influence pollen viability and its travel distance (Ganie and Jhala Reference Ganie and Jhala2017; Hulme Reference Hulme2023). Turbulent winds can carry pollen far away beyond its self-pollination ranges, while high humidity or rainfall may shorten pollen viability. Dry weather periods can also extend pollen flight distance from pollen source. Therefore, climate change is likely to amplify these effects via rising temperatures, changing wind patterns, and unpredictable weather, which can disrupt the flowering cycle and increase outcrossing chance even in self-pollinated plants (Aboulaich et al. Reference Aboulaich, Achmakh, Bouziane, Trigo, Recio, Kadiri and Kazzaz2013; Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Ye, Qi, Li, Miller, Stewart and Wang2015).

In summary, gene flow in self-pollinated species can affect genetic diversity, adaptation, inbreeding, herbicide resistance, conservation efforts, population structure, evolutionary dynamics, and biodiversity management. While long-distance PMGF in most of the self-pollinated weeds is unlikely, herbicide resistance can still spread within and between neighboring fields, leading to the same scenarios as in outcrossing species over time. Even at low frequencies, gene flow can introduce resistance alleles into unselected populations, increasing the likelihood of resistance evolution over time. The movement of resistance traits through gene flow can accelerate the establishment of resistant populations, underscoring the need for proactive management.

Based on our findings, growers can reduce gene flow in weeds –selfing or outcrossing – by combining collaborative, cultural, and timely management strategies. Collaborative and awareness strategies among neighboring producers can help reduce the movement of resistance alleles across farm boundaries (Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy Reference Bagavathiannan and Norsworthy2014; Kuroda et al. Reference Kuroda, Sato, Bounphanousay, Kono and Tanaka2005). At the field level, eliminating weeds before they flower, maintaining isolation zones or tall border rows, and cleaning farm machinery can reduce both pollen and seed dispersal (Hulme Reference Hulme2023; Maity et al. Reference Maity, Young, Subramanian and Bagavathiannan2022; Norsworthy et al. Reference Norsworthy, Ward, Shaw, Llewellyn, Nichols, Webster and Barrett2012). Providing spatial and temporal isolation between resistant and susceptible populations can also help minimize pollen movement (Ganie and Jhala Reference Ganie and Jhala2017). Integrating different practices such as rotational cropping, reduced tillage, rotating herbicide modes of action, and implementing long-term seedbank depletion practices can disrupt weed life cycles and reduce the spread of resistance genes (Maity et al. Reference Maity, Young, Subramanian and Bagavathiannan2022; Vencill et al. Reference Vencill, Nichols, Webster, Soteres, Mallory-Smith, Burgos and McClelland2012). In high-risk areas, including field edges and irrigation ditches, targeted control of escapes before flowering is especially important, because irrigation may enhance gene movement by dispersing seeds and creating refugees for resistant weeds (Hulme Reference Hulme2023). Generally, these findings highlight that reducing gene flow requires an integrated weed management approach with diverse strategies and strong grower cooperation (Gani et al. Reference Ganie, Sandell, Jugulam, Kruger, Marx and Jhala2016; Ganie and Jhala Reference Ganie and Jhala2017). In this regard, gene flow management in self-pollinating weeds needs consolidated efforts similar to that in cross-pollinating weeds.

Acknowledgments

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that helped improve the manuscript.

Funding

Auburn University provided A. Maity with startup funds to carry out this review.

Competing Interests

Authors declare they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Amit Jhala, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

References

[MSU] Michigan State University (2023) Eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum). Lansing: Michigan State University College of Agriculture & Natural Resources. https://www.canr.msu.edu/weeds/extension/eastern-black-nightshade. Accessed: March 2025Google Scholar
[PalDat] Palynological Database (2024) https://www.paldat.org. Accessed: April 2025Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America (2025) Composite list of Weeds. Eaton, CO: WSSA. https://wssa.net/weed/composite-list-of-weeds. Accessed: March 2025Google Scholar
Abbott, RJ, James, JK, Milne, RI, Gillies, AC (2003) Plant introductions, hybridization and gene flow. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:11231132 Google Scholar
Aboulaich, N, Achmakh, L, Bouziane, H, Trigo, MM, Recio, M, Kadiri, M, Kazzaz, M (2013) Effect of meteorological parameters on Poaceae pollen in the atmosphere of Tetouan (NW Morocco). Int J Biometeorol 57:197205 Google Scholar
Aboulaich, N, Bouziane, H, Kadiri, M, del Mar Trigo, M, Riadi, H, Kazzaz, M, Merzouki, A (2009) Pollen production in anemophilous species of the Poaceae family in Tetouan (NW Morocco). Aerobiologia 25:2738 Google Scholar
Abrol, DP (2012) Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. Vol. 792. New York: Springer Google Scholar
Amsellem, L, Noyer, JL, Le Bourgeois, T, Hossaert-Mckey, M (2000) Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alceifolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Mol Ecol 9:443455 Google Scholar
Andersen, RN (1988) Outcrossing in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci 36:599602 Google Scholar
Ansong, M, Pickering, C (2013) Are weeds hitchhiking a ride on your car? A systematic review of seed dispersal on cars. PLoS One 8:e80275 Google Scholar
Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2014) Pollen-mediated transfer of herbicide resistance in Echinochloa crus-galli. Pest Manag Sci 70:14251431 Google Scholar
Bajwa, AA, Zulfiqar, U, Sadia, S, Bhowmik, P, Chauhan, BS (2019) A global perspective on the biology, impact, and management of Chenopodium album and Chenopodium murale: two troublesome agricultural and environmental weeds. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:53575371 Google Scholar
Baker, HG, ed. (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. Pp 147168 in Baker, HG, Stebbins, GL, eds. The genetics of colonizing species. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bastiani, MO, Lamego, FP, Nunes, JP, Moura, DS, Wickert, RJ, Oliveira, JI (2015) Germination of barnyardgrass seeds under light and temperature conditions. Adv Weed Sci 33:395 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Blackshaw, RE, Hall, LM, Johnson, EN (2016) Pollen- and seed-mediated gene flow in Kochia scoparia. Weed Sci 64:624633 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Busi, R, Lopez-Ruiz, FJ, Umina, PA (2021) Herbicide resistance management strategies: how do they compare with those for insecticides, fungicides, and antibiotics? Pest Manag Sci 77:30493056 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Hall, LM (2008) Simple to complex: modelling crop pollen-mediated gene flow. Plant Sci 175:615628 Google Scholar
Bisht, M, Mukai, Y (2002) Genome organization and polyploid evolution in the genus Eleusine (Poaceae). Plant Syst Evol 233:243258 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-002-0201-5 Google Scholar
Brunet, J. Eckert CG (1998) Effects of floral morphology and display on outcrossing in blue columbine, Aquilegia caerulea (Ranunculaceae). Funct Ecol 12:596606 Google Scholar
Buhler, DD, Owen, MD (1997) Emergence and survival of horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 45:98101 Google Scholar
Busi, R, Michel, S, Powles, SB, Délye, C (2011) Gene flow increases the initial frequency of herbicide resistance alleles in unselected Lolium rigidum populations. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:403409 Google Scholar
Busi, R, Yu, Q, Barrett-Lennard, R, Powles, S (2008) Long distance pollen-mediated flow of herbicide resistance genes in Lolium rigidum. Theor Appl Genet 117:12811290 Google Scholar
Campbell, DR (1991) Comparing pollen dispersal and gene flow in a natural population. Evolution 45:19651968. https://doi.org/10.2307/2409845 Google Scholar
Campbell, DR, Waser, NM (2001) Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution 55:669676 Google Scholar
Campbell, JM, Abbott, RJ (1976) Variability of outcrossing frequency in Senecio vulgaris L. Heredity 36:267274 Google Scholar
Caño, L, Escarré, J, Blanco-Moreno, JM, Sans, FX (2008) Assessing the effect of inbreeding and long-distance gene flow on the invasive potential of Senecio pterophorus (Asteraceae). Aust J Bot 56:539549 Google Scholar
Crazzolara, C, Ebner, M, Platis, A, Miranda, T, Bange, J, Junginger, A (2019) A new multicopter-based unmanned aerial system for pollen and spores collection in the atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos Meas Tech 12:15811598 Google Scholar
Damgaard, C, Abbott, RJ (1995) Positive correlations between selfing rate and pollen-ovule ratio within plant populations. Evolution 49:214217. https://doi.org/10.2307/2410307 Google Scholar
Darmency, H (1997) Gene flow between crops and weeds: risk for new herbicide resistant weeds. Pages 239248 in Duke, SO, ed. Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands Google Scholar
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, Humston, R (2006). Controlled experiments to predict horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dispersal distances. Weed Sci 54:484489 Google Scholar
Dauer, JT, Mortensen, DA, Vangessel, MJ (2007) Temporal and spatial dynamics of long-distance Conyza canadensis seed dispersal. J Appl Ecol 44:105114 Google Scholar
Davis, VM, Kruger, GR, Hallett, SG, Tranel, PJ, Johnson, WG (2010) Heritability of glyphosate resistance in Indiana horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations. Weed Sci 58:3038 Google Scholar
Del Toro, I, Ribbons, RR (2019) Variation in ant-mediated seed dispersal along elevation gradients. Peer J 7:e6686 Google Scholar
Franks, SJ, Weis, AE (2009) Climate change alters reproductive isolation and potential gene flow in an annual plant. Evol Appl 2:481488 Google Scholar
Franssen, AS, Skinner, DZ, Al-Khatib, K, Horak, MJ, Kulakow, PA (2001) Interspecific hybridization and gene flow of ALS resistance in Amaranthus species. Weed Sci 49:598606 Google Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Jhala, AJ (2017) Modeling pollen-mediated gene flow from glyphosate-resistant to-susceptible giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) under field conditions. Sci Rep 7:17067 Google Scholar
Ganie, ZA, Sandell, LD, Jugulam, M, Kruger, GR, Marx, DB, Jhala, AJ (2016) Integrated management of glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) with tillage and herbicides in soybean. Weed Technol 30:4556 Google Scholar
Gasquez, J (1985) Breeding system and genetic structure of a Chenopodium album population according to crop and herbicide rotation. Pages 5766 in Jacquard, P, Heim, G, Antonovics, J, eds. Genetic Differentiation and Dispersal in Plants. NATO ASI Series Vol G5. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Google Scholar
Goodwillie, C, Kalisz, S, Eckert, CG (2005) The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations and empirical evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:4779 Google Scholar
Grant, V (1981) Plant Speciation. New York: Columbia University Press. 536 pGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J (2009) Evolving understanding of the evolution of herbicide resistance. Pest Manag Sci 65:11641173 Google Scholar
Handel, SN (1983) Contrasting gene flow patterns and genetic subdivision in adjacent populations of Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae). Evolution 37:760771 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2025) International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: February 15, 2025Google Scholar
Hermanutz, L (1991) Outcrossing in the weed, Solanum ptycanthum (Solanaceae): a comparison of agrestal and ruderal populations. Am J Bot 78:638646. https://doi.org/10.2307/2445085 Google Scholar
Heschel, MS, Riginos, C (2005) Mechanisms of selection for drought stress tolerance and avoidance in Impatiens capensis (Balsaminaceae). Am J Bot 92:3744 Google Scholar
Hidayat, I, Baker, J, Preston, C (2006) Pollen-mediated gene flow between paraquat-resistant and susceptible hare barley (Hordeum leporinum). Weed Sci 54:685689 Google Scholar
Holm, L, Doll, J, Holm, E, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1997) World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: John Wiley and Sons. 1129 pGoogle Scholar
Holt, JS, Lebaron, HM (1990) Significance and distribution of herbicide resistance. Weed Technol 4:141149 Google Scholar
Hoyle, M, Hayter, K, Cresswell, JE (2007) Effect of pollinator abundance on self-fertilization and gene flow: Application to GM canola. Ecol Appl 17:21232135 Google Scholar
Huang, H, Ye, R, Qi, M, Li, X, Miller, DR, Stewart, CN, Wang, J (2015) Wind-mediated horseweed (Conyza canadensis) gene flow: pollen emission, dispersion, and deposition. Ecol Evol 5:26462658 Google Scholar
Hulme, PE (2023) Weed resistance to different herbicide modes of action is driven by agricultural intensification. Field Crops Res 292:08819 Google Scholar
Jain, S (1979) Adaptive strategies: polymorphism, plasticity, and homeostasis. Pages 160187 in Solbrig, OT, Jain, S, Johnson, GB, Raven, PH, eds. Topics in Plant Population Biology. London: Columbia University Press Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Beckie, HJ, Mallory-Smith, C, Jasieniuk, M, Busi, R, Norsworthy, JK, Geddes, CM (2021a) Transfer of resistance alleles from herbicide-resistant to susceptible grass weeds via pollen-mediated gene flow. Weed Technol 35:869885 Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Bhatt, H, Topinka, K, Hall, LM (2011) Pollen-Mediated gene flow in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist? Heredity 106:557566 Google Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Norsworthy, JK, Ganie, ZA, Sosnoskie, LM, Beckie, HJ, Mallory-Smith, CA, Stoltenberg, DE (2021b) Pollen-mediated gene flow and transfer of resistance alleles from herbicide-resistant broadleaf weeds. Weed Technol 35:173187 Google Scholar
Johnston, DB (2011) Movement of weed seeds in reclamation areas. Restor Ecol 19:446449 Google Scholar
Joly, C, Barillé, L, Barreau, M, Mancheron, A, Visset, L (2007) Grain and annulus diameter as criteria for distinguishing pollen grains of cereals from wild grasses. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 146(1–4):221233 Google Scholar
Jones, EA, Contreras, DJ, Everman, WJ (2021) Digitaria ciliaris, Digitaria ischaemum, and Digitaria sanguinalis. Pages 173195 in Biology and Management of Problematic Crop Weed Species. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press Google Scholar
Jurik, TW (1985) Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations. Oecologia 66:394403 Google Scholar
Kimata, M (2015) Tertiary domestication process of korati, Setaria pumila (Poaceae) through the mimicry to other grain crops in the Indian subcontinent. Ethnobot Notes 9:3248 Google Scholar
Kniss, AR (2018) Genetically engineered herbicide-resistant crops and herbicide-resistant weed evolution in the United States. Weed Sci 66:260273 Google Scholar
Kreiner, JM, Sandler, G, Stern, AJ, Tranel, PJ, Weigel, D, Stinchcombe, JR, Wright, SI (2022) Repeated origins, widespread gene flow, and allelic interactions of target-site herbicide resistance mutations. eLife 11:e70242 Google Scholar
Kuroda, Y, Sato, YI, Bounphanousay, C, Kono, Y, Tanaka, K (2005) Gene flow from cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.) to wild Oryza species (O. rufipogen Griff. and O. nivara Sharma and Shastry) on the Vientiane plain of Laos. Euphytica 142:7583 Google Scholar
Kwak, MM, Velterop, O, van Andel, J (1998) Pollen and gene flow in fragmented habitats. Appl Veg Sci 1:3754 Google Scholar
Lal, M, Bhardwaj, E, Chahar, N, Dangwal, M, Das, S (2020) (Trans) gene flow: mechanisms, biosafety concerns and mitigation for containment. Pages 335394 in Tandon, R, Shivanna, KR, Koul, M, Reproductive Ecology of Flowering Plants: Patterns and Processes. Springer Nature Google Scholar
Liu, J, Qi, M, Wang, J (2018) Long-distance and dynamic seed dispersal from horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Écoscience 25:271285 Google Scholar
Lloyd, DG (1980) Sexual strategies in plants: i. An hypothesis of serial adjustment of maternal investment during one reproductive session. New Phytol 86:6979 Google Scholar
Lloyd, DG, Schoen, DJ (1992) Self-And cross-fertilization in plants. I. Functional dimensions. Int J plant sci 153:358369 Google Scholar
Loureiro, I, Escorial, MC, Chueca, MC (2016) Pollen-mediated movement of herbicide resistance genes in Lolium rigidum. PLoS One 11:e0157892 Google Scholar
Loux, M, Stachler, J, Johnson, B, Nice, G, Davis, V, Nordby, D (2006) Biology and Management of Horseweed. The Glyphosate, Weeds and Crops Series. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Extension. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Lu, BR (2008) Transgene escape from GM crops and potential biosafety consequences: an environmental perspective. CBR 4:66141 Google Scholar
Lu, YQ, Baker, J, Preston, C (2007) The spread of resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides in a wind-borne, self-pollinated weed species, Lactuca serriola L. Theor Appl Genet 115:443450 Google Scholar
Maity, A, Bagavathiannan, M (2021) Pollen-mediated gene flow between ALS-inhibitor-resistant and -susceptible johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). In: Proceedings of the Weed Science Society of America Virtual Annual Meeting, February 15–18, 2021Google Scholar
Maity, A, Young, B, Subramanian, N, Bagavathiannan, M (2022) Pollen-mediated transfer of herbicide resistance between johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotypes. Sci Rep 12:7663 Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C, Hall, LM, Burgos, NR (2015) Experimental methods to study gene flow. Weed Sci 63:1222 Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C, Zapiola, M (2008) Gene flow from glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 64:428440 Google Scholar
Marshall, D, Abbott, R (1982) Polymorphism for outcrossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. Evidence. Heredity 48:227235 Google Scholar
Marshall, DF, Abbott, RJ (1984a) Polymorphism for outcrossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. II. Confirmation. Heredity 52:331336 Google Scholar
Marshall, DF, Abbott, RJ (1984b) Polymorphism for out crossing frequency at the ray floret locus in Senecio vulgaris L. III. Causes. Heredity 53:145149 Google Scholar
Maun, MA, Barrett, SCH (1986) The biology of Canadian weeds: 77. Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. Can J Plant Sci 66:739759 Google Scholar
McHenry, WB, Bushnell, RB, Oliver, MN, Norris, RF (1990) Three poisonous plants common in pasture and hay: fiddleneck, common groundsel, yellow starthistle. Cooperative Extension Publication 21483. Berkeley: University of California. 9 pGoogle Scholar
Müller-Schärer, H, Fischer, M (2001) Genetic structure of the annual weed Senecio vulgaris in relation to habitat type and population size. Mol Ecol 10:1728 Google Scholar
Murray, BG, Morrison, IN, Friesen, LF (2002) Pollen-mediated gene flow in wild oat. Weed Sci 50:321325 Google Scholar
Nathan, R, Muller-Landau, HC (2000) Spatial patterns of seed dispersal, their determinants and consequences for recruitment. Trends Ecol Evol 15:278285 Google Scholar
Neve, P, Busi, R, Renton, M, Vila-Aiub, MM (2014) Expanding the eco-evolutionary context of herbicide resistance research. Pest Manag Sci 70:13851393 Google Scholar
Noble, IR (1989) Attributes of invaders and the invading process: terrestrial and vascular plants. Pages 301313 in Drake, JA, Mooney, HA, di Castri, F, Groves, RH, Kruger, FJ, Rejmanek, M, Williamson, MH, eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27:623630 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:3162 Google Scholar
Oakley, CG, Moriuchi, KS, Winn, AA (2007) The maintenance of outcrossing in predominantly selfing species: ideas and evidence from cleistogamous species. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:437457 Google Scholar
Ofstehage, A, Nehring, R (2021) No-till agriculture and the deception of sustainability in Brazil. Int J Agric Sustain 19:335348 Google Scholar
Ogg, AG Jr, Rogers, BS, Schilling, EE (1981) Characterization of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States. Weed Sci 29:2732 Google Scholar
Peralta, OL, Striker, GG, Mollard, FPO (2019) Echinochloa crus-galli seed physiological dormancy and germination responses to hypoxic floodwaters. Plant Biol 21:11591166 Google Scholar
Phelan, S, Fitzgerald, T, Grant, J, Byrne, S, Meade, C, Mullins, E (2015) Propensity for seed-mediated gene flow from potato crops and potential consequences for the coexistence of GM and non-GM potato systems. Eur J Agron 67:5260 Google Scholar
Pickering, CM, Mount, A, Wichmann, MC, Bullock, JM (2011) Estimating human-mediated dispersal of seeds within an Australian protected area. Biol Invasions 13:18691880 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Yu, Q (2010) Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:317347 Google Scholar
Prasad, PV, Boote, KJ, Allen, LH Jr (2006) Adverse high temperature effects on pollen viability, seed-set, seed yield and harvest index of grain-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] are more severe at elevated carbon dioxide due to higher tissue temperatures. Agr For Meteorol 139:237251 Google Scholar
Prieto-Baena, JC, Hidalgo, PJ, Domínguez, E, Galán, C (2003) Pollen production in the Poaceae family. Grana 42:153159 Google Scholar
Qin, W, Chen, P, He, R (2023) Study on the dynamic distribution of spores of powdery mildew pathogen in wheat by rotor airflow of plant protection UAV. PLoS One 18:e0288248 Google Scholar
Qu, X, Liu, C, Zhuang, J, Qiang, S (2022) Pollen-mediated flow of herbicide resistance genes in Beckmannia syzigachne. Pest Manag Sci 78:21212128 Google Scholar
Raynor, GS, Ogden, EC, Hayes, JV (1970) Dispersion and deposition of ragweed pollen from experimental sources. J Appl Meteorol 9:885895 Google Scholar
Reinartz, JA, Les, DH (1994) Bottleneck-induced dissolution of self-incompatibility and breeding system consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). Am J Bot 81:446455 Google Scholar
Rong, J, Song, Z, De Jong, TJ, Zhang, X, Sun, S, Xu, X, Lu, BR (2010) Modelling pollen-mediated gene flow in rice: Risk assessment and management of transgene escape. Plant Biotechnol J 8:452464 Google Scholar
Sarangi, D, Tyre, AJ, Patterson, EL, Gaines, TA, Irmak, S, Knezevic, SZ, Jhala, AJ (2017) Pollen-mediated gene flow from glyphosate-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis Sauer): consequences for the dispersal of resistance genes. Sci Rep 7:44913 Google Scholar
Schilling, EE (1978) A systematic study of the Solanum nigrum complex in North America [dissertation]. Bloomington: Indiana University. 245 p. https://search.proquest.com/openview/dfe5a3db0aeda70701a0820bc7143ef8/1?cbl=18750&diss=y. Accessed: December 2025Google Scholar
Severova, E, Kopylov-Guskov, Y, Selezneva, Y, Karaseva, V, Yadav, SR, Sokoloff, D (2022) Pollen production of selected grass species in Russia and India at the levels of anther, flower and inflorescence. Plants 11:285 Google Scholar
Shields, EJ, Dauer, JT, VanGessel, MJ, Neumann, G (2006) Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) seed collected in the planetary boundary layer. Weed Sci 54:10631067 Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, SJ, Entz, MH (2005) Chaff collection reduces seed dispersal of wild oat (Avena fatua) by a combine harvester. Weed Sci 53:465470 Google Scholar
Shivanna, KR (2015) Reproductive assurance through autogamous self-pollination across diverse sexual and breeding systems. Curr Sci 10:12551263 Google Scholar
Smisek, AJJ (1995) The evolution of resistance to paraquat in populations of Erigeron canadensis L. [master’s dissertation]. London, ON: University of Western Ontario. 118 pGoogle Scholar
Song, ZP, Lu, BR, Zhu, YG, Chen, JK (2003) Gene flow from cultivated rice to the wild species Oryza rufipogon under experimental field conditions. New Phytol 157:657665 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Kichler, JM, MacRae, AW, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2012) Pollen-mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistance in Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366373 Google Scholar
Takeuchi, Y, Diway, B (2021) Long pollen dispersal prevents biparental inbreeding depression in seeds in a natural population of the tropical tree Shorea laxa. For Ecol Manag 489:119063 Google Scholar
Taylor, C, Touré, YT, Carnahan, J, Norris, DE, Dolo, G, Traoré, SF, Lanzaro, GC (2001) Gene flow among populations of the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae, in Mali, West Africa. Genetics 157:743750 Google Scholar
Thompson, K, Rickard, LC, Hodkinson, DJ, Rees, M (2002) Seed dispersal: the search for trade-offs. Pages 152172 in Bullock, JM, Kenward, RE, Hails, RS, eds. Dispersal Ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ (2001) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703705 Google Scholar
Vencill, WK, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Soteres, JK, Mallory-Smith, C, Burgos, NR, McClelland, MR (2012) Herbicide resistance: toward an understanding of resistance development and the impact of herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Sci 60:230 Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM (2019) Fitness of herbicide-resistant weeds: Current knowledge and implications for management. Plants 8:469 Google Scholar
Volenberg, DS, Stoltenberg, DE (2002) Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) outcrossing and inheritance of resistance to acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitors. Weed Sci 50:622627 Google Scholar
Walsh, KD, Hills, MJ, Martin, SL, Hall, LM (2015) Pollen-mediated gene flow in Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz. Crop Sci 55:196202 Google Scholar
Walsh, KD, Puttick, DM, Hills, MJ, Yang, RC, Topinka, KC, Hall, LM (2012) First report of outcrossing rates in camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz], a potential platform for bioindustrial oils. Can J Plant Sci 92(4):681685 Google Scholar
Wang, TY, Chen, HB, Darmency, H (1997) Pollen‐mediated gene flow in an autogamous crop: Foxtail millet (Setavia italica). Plant Breed 116(6):579583 Google Scholar
Wang, TY, Zhao, ZH, Yan, HB, Li, Y, Zhu, XH, Shi, YS, Song, YC, Ma, ZY, Darmency, H (2001) Gene flow from cultivated herbicide-resistant foxtail millet to its wild relatives: a basis for risk assessment of the release of transgenic millet. Zuo wu xue bao 27:681687 Google Scholar
Weaver, SE (2001) The biology of Canadian weeds: 115. Conyza canadensis. Can J Plant Sci 81:867875 Google Scholar
Weaver, SE, Warwick, SI (1984) The biology of Canadian weeds: 64. Datura stramonium L. Can J Plant Sci 64:979991 Google Scholar
Wichmann, MC, Alexander, MJ, Soons, MB, Galsworthy, S, Dunne, L, Gould, R, Bullock, JM (2009) Human-mediated dispersal of seeds over long distances. Proc R Soc B 276:523532 Google Scholar
Wilkins, PW, Thorogood, D (1992) Breakdown of self-incompatibility in perennial ryegrass at high temperature and its uses in breeding. Euphytica 64:6569 Google Scholar
Williams, IH, Martin, AP, Clark, SJ (1990) Pollination requirements of linseed (Linum usitatissimum). J Agric Sci 115:347352 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600075778 Google Scholar
Yerka, MK, de Leon, N, Stoltenberg, DE (2012) Pollen-mediated gene flow in common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album). Weed Sci 60:600606 Google Scholar
Zhang, CJ, Kim, DS, Jiang, C, Mahoney, J, Liu, B, Wang, Y, Gao, Y, Zhang, Y, Sun, S, Fan, J, Zhang, H (2021a) Hourly pollen dispersal of Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz under different weather conditions and mitigation of wind-blown pollen dispersal using maize barrier. Ind Crops Prod 162:113318 Google Scholar
Zhang, CJ, Wang, Y, Gao, Y, Chen, M, Kim, DS, Zhang, Y, Yan, X (2021b) High population density of bee pollinators increasing Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz seed yield: Implications on the potential risk for insect-mediated gene flow. Ind Crops Prod 172:114001 Google Scholar
Zhang, CJ, Yook, MJ, Park, HR, Lim, SH, Kim, JW, Song, JS, Kim, DS (2018) Evaluation of maximum potential gene flow from herbicide resistant Brassica napus to its male sterile relatives under open and wind pollination conditions. Sci Total Environ 634:821830 Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Wang, H, Cao, J, Li, G, Chauhan, BS (2023) Seed biology of alkali barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli var. zelayensis) and junglerice (Echinochloa colona) for improved management in direct-seeded rice. Weed Sci 71:112123 Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Routes of gene flow documented in weed species.

Figure 1

Table 1. Extent of pollen mediated gene flow and distance in self-pollinated weeds at selected family level.

Figure 2

Figure 2. The relation between the extent of gene flow and distance from the source in 1. Wild oat (Murray et al. 2002) and 2. Foxtail millet (Wang et al. 2001; Wang et al. 1997).

Figure 3

Table 2. Extent of pollen-mediated gene flow and distance in self-pollinated weeds at selected species level.a

Figure 4

Figure 3. Heat map on correlations of extent of gene flow and its distances with environmental factors in self-pollinated weed species selected in this analysis.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Regression between the extent of gene flow across the selected weeds and local temperature.

Figure 6

Table 3. Pollen characteristics in selected self-pollinated weed species.a

Figure 7

Table 4. Documented cases of seed-mediated gene flow in self-pollinated weed species.