Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-rz4zl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T17:48:21.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strengthening congenital cardiac care in Vietnam: opportunities for system-level reform

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2025

Tam T. Doan*
Affiliation:
Division of Cardiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, USA Department of Paediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
Huong Tran
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
Khanh-Linh Kaitlin Doan
Affiliation:
Carnegie Vanguard High School, Houston, TX, USA
Minh Phuc Vu
Affiliation:
Children’s Hospital 1 (Bệnh Viện Nhi Đồng 1), Department of Paediatrics, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Casey B. Culbertson
Affiliation:
MD1World, Irvine, CA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Tam T. Doan; Email: tam.doan@bcm.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critical CHD refers to life-threatening cardiac anomalies present at birth that require surgical or catheter-based intervention within the first year of life. Without punctual diagnosis and treatment, these conditions can result in significant morbidity or mortality. In high-income countries like the United States (U.S.), early detection and management of Critical CHD have been greatly improved through universal prenatal screening, pulse oximetry screening, regionalised care, and subspecialty training. In contrast, Vietnam, a low- and middle-income country, faces persistent challenges. The absence of newborn screening policies and limited prenatal detection infrastructure leads to delayed diagnoses. Paediatric cardiac expertise and surgical services are largely confined to urban centres, leaving rural areas underserved. Vietnam also lacks national CHD registries, standardised referral pathways, and consistent training programmes, impeding quality improvement and equitable access. This manuscript compares the U.S. and Vietnamese Critical CHD systems, highlighting structural, infrastructural, and workforce-related disparities. We identify barriers, key areas for intervention, and offer targeted strategic considerations to address these discrepancies. We strongly believe that efforts to implement universal newborn screening, develop regional cardiac hubs with mandatory outreach support to rural proximity, expand workforce training, invest in ICU infrastructure, and establish national data systems are of immediate need. These reforms could significantly improve survival and outcomes for children with Critical CHD in Vietnam and inform similar efforts in other low- and middle-income countries.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Critical CHD includes structural cardiac anomalies that typically require surgical or catheter-based intervention within the first year of life. Global advances in prenatal screening, pulse oximetry, surgical techniques, and intensive care have markedly improved survival, particularly in high-income countries such as the United States (U.S.), where neonatal detection and timely intervention have reduced mortality by up to 33% since the implementation of universal Critical CHD screening. Reference Abouk, Grosse, Ailes and Oster1,Reference Oster, Pinto and Pramanik2 Multidisciplinary CHD programmes in high-income countries benefit from centralised surgical expertise, robust referral networks, and structured transitions of care from childhood through adulthood. Reference Zaidi, Alberts and Chowdhury3

In contrast, low- and middle-income countries like Vietnam face substantial challenges to equitable and timely Critical CHD care. Barriers include a scarcity of trained paediatric cardiac specialists, underdeveloped neonatal cardiac transport system, limited surgical centres capable of neonatal operations, and geographic and financial obstacles to care access. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4Reference Tchervenkov, Herbst and Jacobs6 While successful models such as the Heart Institute in Ho Chi Minh City, Children’s Hospital 1 (Nhi Đồng 1), and National Children’s Hospital have made significant contributions through capacity-building and public-private partnerships, national coverage remains inadequate. Reference Tchervenkov, Herbst and Jacobs6Reference Nguyen, Leon-Wyss, Iyer and Pezzella8

Persistent workforce shortages and reliance on donor-dependent care models limit long-term sustainability in low- and middle-income countries. Educational initiatives that focus on local capacity-building—such as “train-the-trainer” programmes and regional training hubs—are essential to reducing dependence on intermittent international missions. Reference Corno9,Reference McMahon, Tretter and Redington10 Furthermore, social determinants of health, including poverty, transportation barriers, and insurance inequity, continue to impact early detection and continuity of care. Reference Zaidi, Alberts and Chowdhury3,Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11 Improvements in detection and management have led to better outcomes; however, marked disparities remain between high-income countries and low- and middle-income countries. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5,Reference Nguyen, Leon-Wyss, Iyer and Pezzella8,Reference Schidlow, Jenkins and Gauvreau12

This manuscript examines systemic differences in Critical CHD care between Vietnam and the U.S., with a focus on infrastructure, policy, and workforce development. The goal is to inform national strategies that strengthen infrastructure, enhance capacity, promote equitable access to life-saving interventions, and ultimately improve outcomes for children with Critical CHD in Vietnam.

Early detection and diagnosis

In the U.S., early detection of Critical CHD has been significantly enhanced by the widespread implementation of pulse oximetry screening, which became universal in 2011. Reference Harold13,Reference McClain, Hokanson and Grazel14 Following its addition to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, most states enacted policies mandating or recommending universal screening by 24–48 hours of life. By 2016, 48 U.S. states had adopted screening policies, leading to broad national coverage. Reference McClain, Hokanson and Grazel14 These policies have had a measurable impact. In an analysis of over 26 million births, states with mandatory screening experienced a 33.4% reduction in early infant deaths from Critical CHD, which was not observed in states with only nonmandatory screening, underscoring the importance of consistent policy enforcement. Reference Abouk, Grosse, Ailes and Oster1

In addition to postnatal screening, prenatal detection through obstetric ultrasound and foetal echocardiography is widely practiced and supported by structured referral systems and regionalised care. Prenatal diagnosis enables delivery at tertiary centres equipped for immediate cardiac intervention, improving perinatal outcomes. Reference Pruetz, Wang and Noori15 Despite these advances, challenges remain in ensuring uniform implementation and data reporting. However, training programmes, standardised screening algorithms, and telemedicine consultation have helped optimise practices across a diverse healthcare system. Reference McClain, Hokanson and Grazel14 These innovations have been particularly beneficial in mitigating geographic disparities in access to care, especially in remote or undeserved regions where specialist availability is limited.

In recent years, significant efforts by the Ministry of Health and local healthcare leaders in Vietnam have aimed to promote universal prenatal obstetric ultrasound screening and postnatal newborn screening using pulse oximetry. However, the programme has not yet been adopted as a national mandate, and its implementation remains inconsistent, largely dependent on the resources and infrastructure available at the local level. While several large urban hospitals offer prenatal ultrasound and postnatal screening for Critical CHD, most births occur in rural or district-level health centres, where such screening technologies and paediatric echocardiography are not routinely available. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 This results in delayed diagnosis of Critical CHD, with infants often presenting in critical condition outside referral centres. For instance, at Nhi Đồng 1 in Ho Chi Minh City, most patients with total anomalous pulmonary venous return were operated at a median age of 5.5 months, significantly later than in high-income countries. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4

Prenatal ultrasound use is reportedly increasing in Vietnam, with over 80% of pregnant individuals receiving at least three antenatal visits. However, prenatal diagnosis of CHD remains rare due to limited foetal echocardiography expertise, inadequate provider training, and the absence of formal referral or perinatal coordination systems. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Ha and Siddiqui16 Cultural beliefs, such as reluctance to expose newborns to public settings, and logistical issues such as lack of ambulances and limited access to prostaglandin E1, further compound delays in detection, initial resuscitation, and transfer. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Wamala, Gongwer and Doherty-Schmeck17 Prenatal diagnosis is an important area to focus on, and it has been proven to improve clinical outcome and lower neonatal care cost in resource-limited setting. Reference Vaidyanathan, Rani and Kunde18 Delayed postnatal diagnosis in remote areas is often due to limited access to care, while in urban settings, parents may not seek well visits for asymptomatic infants, reflecting both cultural beliefs that healthcare is only for illness and the absence of structured national guidelines for routine paediatric visits. Reference Murni, Wirawan and Patmasari19

Despite progress, such as expanded health insurance for children under six, increased donor support, and growing local surgical capacity, Vietnam has yet to implement systematic national screening or standardised referral pathways. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 As a result, timely detection and coordinated care for infants with Critical CHD remain major challenges, especially in rural areas. Persistent gaps in infrastructure, workforce training, and policy execution highlight the urgent need for scalable screening programmes and strategic, system-level investments.

In rural areas of Vietnam with limited access to subspecialty care, the integration of artificial-intelligence-assisted echocardiographic screening offers a promising strategy to enhance early detection of CHD. Reference Wang, Doan, Reddy and Jone20 By leveraging artificial intelligence to guide basic cardiac ultrasound image acquisition and interpretation, healthcare professionals below the physician level, such as nurses, midwives, and community health workers, who can be trained to perform frontline screening in underserved regions. This task-shifting model not only empowers local providers with practical skills but also facilitates the timely identification of CHD cases for referral to specialised centres. Coupled with telemedicine support and structured referral pathways, artificial-intelligence-assisted screening can serve as a scalable solution to bridge disparities in early CHD diagnosis and improve outcomes for children in remote communities.

Proposed strategy for early detection

  • Mandate universal pulse oximetry screening as part of standard newborn care through national health policy. Reference Zheleva, Nair, Dobrzycka and Saarinen21

  • Establish a national well-child visit programme into the existing preventive health framework, such as the expanded vaccination programme, especially in the first year of life.

  • Develop and implement national guidelines for prenatal CHD screening, including criteria for foetal echocardiography and structured referral pathways.

  • Establish telemedicine-based foetal cardiology consultation services to support prenatal detection, especially in regional and rural hospitals.

  • Expand training in prenatal and neonatal CHD detection for obstetricians, general paediatricians, and mid-level providers.

  • Pilot and scale artificial-intelligence-assisted cardiac screening tools for use by trained non-physician personnel in remote areas.

Access to specialised paediatric cardiac care

Access to specialised paediatric cardiac care in the U.S. remains being shaped by significant regional, socio-economic, and racial disparities, despite overall improvements in workforce growth and subspecialist distribution. Millions of children in rural or underserved communities live more than 80 miles from a paediatric subspecialist, and many must travel over 100 miles for CHD surgery at high-volume centres. Specialised cardiac centres are concentrated in urban areas, and this geographic maldistribution contributes to worse outcomes for high-risk conditions such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Yet, system-level responses, including regionalisation of care, standardised referral networks, and expanded outreach through telemedicine and satellite clinics, have provided critical opportunities to mitigate these disparities to improve access to high-volume centres, mitigate geographic barriers, and promote timely access to interventions. Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11

Vietnam’s paediatric cardiac care infrastructure is concentrated primarily in a few urban centres in the North, Central, and South Vietnam. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 Access in rural provinces remains severely limited due to a combination of geographic, financial, and systemic barriers. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 By 2015, only about 20 paediatric cardiologists were actively practising in major cities, and rural areas lacked trained personnel altogether. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4 While approximately 19 paediatric cardiac care centres had been established by that time, only a handful were equipped for neonatal surgery. As of 2023, there were 27 paediatric cardiac surgeons, at both senior and junior levels, serving across 15 cardiac centres nationwide, with only 7 having the capacity to perform neonatal CHD surgery. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 Many of these surgeons also perform adult cardiac surgeries, further diluting subspecialty focus. This gap often leads to delayed referrals, with children frequently presenting in severe condition by the time they reach a tertiary facility. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4

The Heart Institute in Ho Chi Minh City was the first centre in Vietnam to provide cardiac care for children with CHD since 1992. It allocates 25% of its services to indigent patients. By 2016, it had conducted over 6,700 free surgeries, with extensive outreach and training programmes for provincial providers. Reference Lajos and Carpentier7 In recent years, Nhi Đồng 1 and National Children’s Hospital have emerged as sustainable successful models in urban areas with outreach programmes that help mitigate some of these gaps. In 2023, the National Children’s Hospital reported performing 1,250 CHD surgeries with an early mortality rate of 1.6%, while Nhi Đồng 1 in Ho Chi Minh City performed 487 surgeries with a mortality rate of 0.83%. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 These outcomes are consistent with international standards for low- and middle-income countries and reflect significant efforts from these centres. Despite such successes, the broader paediatric cardiac care system remains under-resourced, with ongoing challenges in referral coordination, surgical capacity, and postoperative critical care and follow-up care. Disparity persists at a systemic level and will require system-wide solutions to ensure equitable and comprehensive care for all children with CHD across Vietnam. A national registry using risk adjustment models, such as the risk adjustment for congenital heart surgery 1 (RACHS-1) would allow for robust benchmarking across centres, identification of care gaps, and systematic quality improvement. Moreover, national data collection would enhance transparency, support equitable resource allocation, and enable participation in international collaboratives such as the International Quality Improvement Collaborative, which has demonstrated reduced perioperative mortality in resource-limited settings. Reference Jenkins, Castaneda and Cherian22

One of the most sustainable and impactful cardiac screening outreach initiatives in Vietnam is the Rural Outreach Clinics programme led by VinaCapital Foundation, which delivers free cardiac screening directly to underserved and remote communities. 23 By partnering with local authorities and transporting the nation’s leading cardiologists and surgeons to rural areas, Rural Outreach Clinics addresses healthcare disparities and key social determinants of health. Children from low-income families, often unable to access or afford care in urban centres, are screened, diagnosed, and referred through a coordinated system for free surgical or interventional treatment at partnering cardiac centres. Since its inception, Rural Outreach Clinics has screened 442,365 children and provided life-saving care to 9,472 children as of May 2025. The programme organises over 500 clinics annually across 49 provinces. This programme exemplifies the power of long-term public-private collaboration, combining medical expertise, logistical support, and financial resources to build a scalable and equitable healthcare model. Beyond immediate impact, the programme’s large dataset informs national health planning and reinforces the value of equity-driven, community-based strategies. Rural Outreach Clinics stands as a cornerstone of VinaCapital Foundation’s mission to “leave no child behind” and offers a replicable model for sustainable, inclusive paediatric care.

Proposed strategy to improve access to care

  • Establish regional paediatric cardiac centres capable of neonatal CHD care, each with structured outreach and referral support for surrounding provinces.

  • Develop a government-funded neonatal cardiac transport system to enable timely transfer of critically ill infants to surgical centres.

  • Train district- and provincial-level providers in CHD recognition, stabilisation protocols, and referral pathways.

  • Use mobile clinics and telehealth to extend specialist access and continuing education to rural and remote areas.

  • Expand public insurance coverage to not only include diagnostic evaluation, but also transport logistics, and post-treatment follow-up, especially for low-income families.

  • Create a national CHD referral and information platform to streamline case coordination and facilitate longitudinal data capture.

Surgical and intensive care capacity

In the United States, congenital cardiac care is supported by a robust infrastructure, with over 150 hospitals performing CHD surgery, most of which participate in national quality registries like the Society of Thoracic Surgeons CHD Database. Specialised surgical centres, paediatric cardiac ICUs, and integrated post-operative services provide 24/7 surgical availability, advanced critical care with high-intensity staffing, including access to mechanical circulatory support. This centralised, multidisciplinary system has led to survival for many forms of Critical CHD exceeding 90%, including complex procedures such as the Norwood operation and arterial switch operation. Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11

In contrast, Vietnam continues to face significant limitations in surgical and intensive care capacity, including:

Expertise shortage

By 2015, only about 20 paediatric cardiologists were actively practising in major cities, and rural areas lacked trained personnel altogether. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4 As of 2023, there are only 27 paediatric cardiac surgeons in Vietnam, many of whom also perform adult cardiac surgery, diluting focus and availability for paediatric cases. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 The training pathway for these individuals remain informal, and there is a strong need to have a standardised process.

Limited neonatal surgery centres

Only seven centres nationwide are equipped to perform neonatal cardiac surgery for complex CHD. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 It is important to have a stepwise approach that includes both regionalisation and high-quality outcomes in all aspects of CHD care. Reference Zheleva and Overman24

ICU limitations

Paediatric cardiac ICUs remain scarce, particularly outside major cities. Critical shortages in trained intensivists, paediatric cardiac anaesthesiologists, perfusionists, and specialised nursing staff limit safe perioperative care. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5,Reference Nguyen, Leon-Wyss, Iyer and Pezzella8,Reference Mocumbi, Lameira and Yaksh25

Equipment and medication gaps

Many centres report unreliable access to essential resources, including ventilators, monitors, extracorporeal support, and key medications such as inotropes and anticoagulants. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5,Reference Nguyen, Leon-Wyss, Iyer and Pezzella8,Reference Mocumbi, Lameira and Yaksh25

Delayed presentation

Many children arrive at tertiary centres in late stages of disease due to upstream system weaknesses, increasing perioperative risk and ICU burden. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5,Reference Mocumbi, Lameira and Yaksh25

Long waiting lists

Despite recent improvements, infrastructure remains inadequate, and waiting lists for surgery remain long, especially for complex cases. Reference Phuc, Tin and Giang4,Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5

One notable success is the Nhi Đồng 1 programme in Ho Chi Minh City. Reference Culbertson, Nguyen and Vu26 Three key pillars contributed to the success and sustainability of the CHD surgical programme at Nhi Đồng 1 since 2007 and serve as a model for replication. First, the programme emphasised accurate and standardised diagnosis, made possible by investments in modern echocardiographic equipment and extensive training of local cardiologists through international partnerships. Second, a commitment to high-quality surgical repair was upheld through intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography and immediate re-intervention if residual defects were detected. Third, aggressive, protocol-driven postoperative care in a dedicated cardiovascular ICU ensured optimised recovery, supported by continuous training of both physicians and nurses (Figure 1). Reference Culbertson, Nguyen and Vu26 In addition, the programme fostered long-term international collaboration, with recurring visits and case-based teaching from U.S. and Singaporean teams, enhancing the local team’s skills and autonomy. Equitable access was promoted through government-funded insurance for children under six and supplemental support from non-governmental organisations for families unable to afford care. Finally, local ownership and retention of trained staff, despite limited compensation, demonstrated the programme’s cultural integration and institutional commitment. These pillars collectively enabled a low surgical mortality rate (0.94%) and the growth of Nhi Đồng 1 into a national referral centre for CHD surgery.

Figure 1. Three key pillars of successful CHD surgical programme at Children’s Hospital 1. Cath/Angio = Cardiac catheterisation and angiography; CT/MRI = Computed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; CXR = Chest X-ray; ECG = Electrocardiogram; ICU = Intensive care unit; TEE = Transoesophageal echocardiography.

Proposed strategy to improve surgical and ICU capacity

  • Scale up public—non-governmental—organisation partnerships to support expansion of neonatal and complex CHD surgical services.

  • Increase the number of centres equipped for neonatal cardiac surgery, with designated hub-and-spoke outreach models for each region.

  • Develop regional training centres for paediatric cardiac anaesthesia, perfusion, ICU nursing, and critical care management.

  • Offer retention incentives (e.g., salary supplements, housing, continuing education) for paediatric cardiac specialists serving in public institutions.

  • Standardise procurement systems to ensure reliable access to essential ICU equipment, perfusion technology, and cardiac medications.

  • Establish a national surgical outcomes database with regular benchmarking to guide resource allocation and performance improvement.

Longitudinal and lifelong care

Longitudinal and lifelong care for individuals with CHD in the United States is characterised by structured, multidisciplinary, and guideline-driven care across the lifespan, including robust transition programmes from paediatric to adult CHD services, regular surveillance, and attention to social determinants of health. Reference Zaidi, Alberts and Chowdhury3,Reference John, Jackson and Moons27 The American Heart Association emphasises the need for continuous, specialised follow-up, and transition education to mitigate gaps in care and improve outcomes. Despite this, gaps in care remain common, particularly during the transition to adulthood and are strongly influenced by social determinants of health such as insurance status, geographic access, and socio-economic factors. Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11

In Vietnam, both intermediate and lifelong CHD care remain limited by less standardised training pathways, fewer specialised centres, and resource constraints. Most care is concentrated in major urban centres, with limited access in rural areas. There is limited public awareness for primary prevention and follow-up care, with the healthcare system primarily focused on acute, life-threatening conditions. There is a lack of formalised transition programmes, and follow-up is often inconsistent, with many patients lost to follow-up after childhood surgery. Efforts such as the Heart Institute model demonstrate that sustainable, high-quality care is possible with long-term investment in local training, infrastructure, and financial models that support indigent care. However, national systems for longitudinal surveillance, transition to adult care, and addressing social determinants of health are not yet widely implemented. Reference Lajos and Carpentier7Reference Corno9,Reference Nayak, Trieu and O’Dell28

Proposed strategy to improve follow-up care

  • Develop structured adult CHD training programmes to build a specialised workforce for adult congenital heart care.

  • Implement electronic health records with cross-specialty continuity, ensuring transition from paediatric to adult care is seamless.

  • Establish and expand national CHD registries and follow-up tracking systems to support life-course management and data-driven care.

  • Develop regional survivorship clinics supported by outreach and telehealth to maintain follow-up in underserved areas.

  • Introduce financial and logistical support policies for families, including transportation assistance and subsidies for follow-up care.

  • Foster long-term international collaborations focused on education, sustainability, and capacity-building rather than short-term missions.

Data collection and quality improvement

Data collection and quality improvement initiatives for CHD in the United States are robust, with national and state-level registries, mandated newborn screening for Critical CHD, and widespread participation in quality improvement collaboratives, all of which have contributed to measurable reductions in perioperative mortality and improved outcomes. The American Academy of Paediatrics recommends standardised data collection, electronic data sharing, and linkage of newborn screening with birth defects monitoring and vital records to enable comprehensive surveillance and quality improvement. All U.S. states have implemented Critical CHD screening, and many participate in national databases and collaboratives, such as the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database and International Quality Improvement Collaborative, which have demonstrated reductions in mortality and infection rates through benchmarking and targeted interventions. Reference Oster, Pinto and Pramanik2,Reference Jenkins, Castaneda and Cherian22,Reference Rahman, Zheleva and Cherian29

In contrast, there is currently a lack of national Critical CHD registries and standardised data collection systems in Vietnam, making it difficult to benchmark outcomes, guide policy, or systematically improve care. Most data collection is centre-based, and participation in international collaboratives like International Quality Improvement Collaborative is limited to a few institutions. Reference Lajos and Carpentier7,Reference Jenkins, Castaneda and Cherian22,Reference Rahman, Zheleva and Cherian29 Surgical outcome data are not available at most surgical centres, although early survival data are excellent at Nhi Đồng 1 and National Children’s Hospital. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5

In addition, the National Children’s Hospital collects morbidity and mortality data for admitted neonates, including those with CHD. These important efforts are primarily hospital-based and not part of a national standardised registry. Da Nang General Hospital has implemented a procedural registry for structural heart interventions, developed in collaboration with international partners. This registry enables longitudinal follow-up and systematic data collection for patients undergoing congenital and structural heart interventions, although its scope is more limited and focused on patients treated during specific collaborative projects. Reference Nayak, Trieu and O’Dell28 There is currently no national CHD registry in Vietnam, and systematic data collection is limited to a few major centres with international collaborations or specific quality improvement initiatives. Reference Miles, Dung and Ha30 This limits the ability to identify gaps, monitor trends, or implement evidence-based quality improvement at a national level. Reference Lajos and Carpentier7,Reference Jenkins, Castaneda and Cherian22,Reference Rahman, Zheleva and Cherian29

Proposed strategy for data collection and quality improvement

These steps would enable benchmarking, drive targeted quality improvement, and support evidence-based policy for CHD care in Vietnam.

Health policy and financing

Health policy and financing for CHD care in the U.S. are supported by a combination of public and private insurance reimbursement, philanthropy, and research grants, which enables significant investment in paediatric cardiac care despite the absence of a unified national child health policy. Insurance coverage (public and private) is a major determinant of access to CHD care, and disparities persist based on insurance status and socio-economic factors. Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11 However, the overall economic strength of the U.S. allows for broad access to advanced diagnostics, surgical interventions, and lifelong follow-up, with additional support from charitable organisations and research funding streams. Reference Lopez, Baker-Smith and Flores11

In Vietnam, families face high out-of-pocket costs for CHD care, and resource limitations constrain the implementation of national health action plans. Although public health insurance expansion has increased enrolment and utilisation, it has not significantly reduced out-of-pocket payments for high-cost services such as CHD surgery. The financial burden remains catastrophic for many families, particularly those with low income, and coverage for complex CHD interventions is often incomplete or unavailable. Sustainable models, such as Nhi Đồng 1 and National Children’s Hospital, have demonstrated that a mix of government support, philanthropy, and cross-subsidisation can provide partial financial protection and access for indigent patients. Reference Nguyen, Leon-Wyss, Iyer and Pezzella8,Reference Pekerti, Vuong, Ho and Vuong31,Reference Tangcharoensathien, Hirabayashi, Topothai, Viriyathorn, Chandrasiri and Patcharanarumol32 The authors strongly believe that the models developed at these two institutions have laid a critical foundation, positioning the country to take the next step in national health policy aimed at improving care and outcomes for children with CHD across Vietnam.

Proposed strategy for health policy and financing

These actions are supported by evidence that government subsidisation and unified insurance schemes targeting vulnerable groups are effective in increasing financial protection and access to care. Reference Myint, Pavlova, Thein and Groot34

Workforce development in congenital cardiac care

To become a CHD surgeon in the United States, the pathway involves a highly structured and standardised training system. This includes an undergraduate degree, medical school (4 years), general surgery residency (5 years), cardiothoracic surgery residency (2–3 years), and a CHD surgery fellowship (now 2 years, formerly 1 year), culminating in board certification by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery. Reference Tchervenkov, Herbst and Jacobs6,Reference Jacob, Hussein and Van Wijk36,Reference Oh, Blitzer and Chen37 The fellowship requires minimum index case volumes, competency milestones, and a national curriculum, with recent reforms responding to feedback about operative experience and career preparedness. Reference Oh, Blitzer and Chen37 Mentorship, structured feedback, and post-graduate support have emerged as key predictors of career satisfaction and retention in this demanding field. Reference Oh, Blitzer and Chen37

In contrast, Vietnam’s medical education lacks the depth of subspecialty structuring seen in high-income countries, although the system is undergoing transformation. Medical training typically begins directly after high school with a 6-year combined undergraduate and MD programme. After graduation, students may enter specialty training without a standardised national licencing examination, and postgraduate training pathways can vary significantly across institutions. Reference Ha and Siddiqui16,Reference Fan, Tran, Kosik, Mandell, Hsu and Chen38 Accreditation is required for medical schools but not yet for specific medical education programmes such as paediatric cardiology or CHD surgery, and there has been no external evaluation of medical curricula at a national level. Reference Ha and Siddiqui16 This limits the ability to ensure uniform quality across training institutions.

Specialty training in paediatric cardiology or CHD surgery in Vietnam is not formally delineated or nationally accredited. Instead, training often relies on informal mentorship, institutional partnerships, or short-term international programmes. Reference Corno9 While select centres such as the Heart Centre in Ho Chi Minh City, or more recently, Nhi Đồng 1, National Children’s Hospital, and others have developed local expertise through sustained educational collaborations, Vietnam still lacks a structured national pipeline for training and producing congenital cardiac specialists.

Globally, paediatric cardiology and CHD surgery training remain fragmented in many regions. Despite formalisation in the U.S., U.K., and parts of Europe, training in low- and middle-income countries often relies on non-standardised, experience-based models that lack consistent case volume requirements, competency frameworks, or certification. Reference McMahon, Tretter and Redington10,Reference Jacob, Hussein and Van Wijk36 In addition, the number of formally trained educators is limited, further constraining the ability to deliver effective education in congenital cardiac care. Reference McMahon, Tretter and Redington10 Disparities in access to simulation, mentorship, and structured assessment limit skill acquisition in resource-constrained settings.

Proposed strategy for workforce development

  • Establish national curricula and certification standards for paediatric cardiology and congenital cardiac surgery.

  • Create postgraduate fellowship programmes with defined durations, minimum case volumes, and competency-based assessments modelled after international standards.

  • Launch faculty development initiatives to grow a cohort of national educators and leaders in congenital cardiac care.

  • Integrate entrustable professional activities and other competency-based tools into training and evaluation frameworks. Reference McMahon, Tretter and Redington10

  • Expand access to simulation and digital learning platforms (e.g., Heart University, Congenital Heart Academy) to support training in low-resource settings.

  • Build and sustain regional training hubs that provide mentorship, hands-on experience, and tele-education for future providers.

Discussions

Figure 2 outlines the current landscape of congenital cardiac care in Vietnam, highlighting key deficiencies across seven interdependent domains: early detection, access to care, surgical and ICU capacity, longitudinal follow-up, data and quality systems, health financing, and workforce development. Superimposed on these gaps are targeted strategies drawn from both domestic initiatives and international models, reflecting the need for a coordinated, systems-based approach to improve outcomes in children with Critical CHD.

Figure 2. Current state of congenital cardiac care in Vietnam and proposed strategies. ACHD = adult congenital heart disease; CHD = congenital heart disease; ICU = intensive care unit; IQIC = International quality improvement collaborative; NCH = National Children’s Hospital; NĐ#1 = Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1 (Children’s Hospital 1); OB sUS = obstetric screening ultrasound; QI = quality improvement. Proposed strategies are in italics on a white background, please refer to the text for more details.

Beyond technical and clinical reform, effective implementation requires strategic collaboration with early and sustained engagement of national stakeholders. The Ministry of Health can lead policy reforms, including the integration of CHD into national child health strategies, standardisation of referral pathways, and mandates for pulse oximetry screening. Other stakeholder participation—such as from the national paediatric and cardiology societies, provincial health departments, and tertiary cardiac and paediatric centres—is important for establishing standardised training requirements, strengthening referral networks, and aligning reform with national health priorities. In-person roundtables, joint training programmes, and collaborative pilot initiatives can help align goals across institutions and build local ownership of reform efforts. In parallel, Vietnam Social Security could expand insurance benefits to cover diagnostics, neonatal transport, and perioperative care. Collaborative task forces involving government agencies, clinicians, and non-governmental organisations will be key to aligning legislation with implementation. Vietnam’s success with programmes such as the Expanded Programme on Immunisation offers a replicable model for nationwide screening and tracking.

A central principle across all reform domains is equity. Rural and low-income populations continue to experience disproportionate delays in diagnosis and limited access to definitive care. These disparities stem from financial hardship, geographic isolation, and inadequate local capacity. Strategies to mitigate these challenges include expanding outreach clinics, subsidising transportation, deploying artificial-intelligence-supported screening in underserved regions, and broadening insurance coverage to reduce out-of-pocket costs. Embedding equity into policy design will help ensure that reforms reach the most vulnerable and reduce CHD-related morbidity and mortality.

Figure 3 presents a proposed phased roadmap for reform. Phase 1 (Years 1–2) focuses on foundational actions: implementing national screening protocols (including obstetric ultrasound, foetal echocardiography, and newborn pulse oximetry), establishing a CHD registry, and piloting referral and transport systems. Phase 2 (Years 3–4) emphasises capacity expansion, including the scale-up of surgical hubs, ICU services, and training programmes. Phase 3 (Year 5 and beyond) focuses on sustainability, including integrating CHD care into national health plans, implementing interoperable medical records, and participating in global benchmarking frameworks.

Figure 3. Phased implementation timeline for CHD system reform in Vietnam. ACHD = adult congenital heart disease; CHD = congenital heart disease; COEs = centres of excellence; EMRs = electronic medical records; ICU = intensive care unit.

Surgical outcome benchmarking is vital to system-wide quality improvement. High-volume centres such as the National Children’s Hospital and Children’s Hospital 1 have reported early mortality rates of 1.6% and 0.83%, respectively. Reference Cao, Le, Ngo, Nguyen and Nguyen5 These encouraging results underscore the need for a national registry to standardise reporting, enable risk-adjusted benchmarking using models like RACHS-1, and guide resource allocation. Participation in international collaboratives such as the International Quality Improvement Collaborative has been shown to improve perioperative outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and would enhance Vietnam’s efforts. Reference Jenkins, Castaneda and Cherian22

Sustainable reform requires formalising workforce training. Currently, Vietnam lacks standardised curricula and accreditation for paediatric cardiology and congenital cardiac surgery. The Ministry of Health, academic centres, and licencing bodies should develop structured fellowships with defined competencies. Institutions like Nhi Đồng 1 and National Children’s Hospital can serve as training hubs, supported by simulation, mentorship, and international collaborations with programmes such as Children’s HeartLink, Heart University, and the World Society for Paediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery.

Our framework for reform can be further strengthened by aligning with non-governmental organisations and global health partners already engaged in congenital cardiac care in Vietnam. These groups offer valuable infrastructure, experience, and networks from surgical mission work, telehealth implementation, and CHD awareness campaigns. Formal partnerships and coordination with these organisations can reduce duplication, ensure culturally appropriate interventions, and promote sustainable, locally led capacity building. Such partnerships complement public sector efforts and foster a more cohesive national strategy for congenital cardiac care.

Several political and real-world challenges may limit the implementation of the proposed reforms. Vietnam’s decentralised health system creates variability in infrastructure, clinical capacity, and referral patterns across provinces. Workforce shortages, particularly in rural areas, remain a significant obstacle to scale-up. In addition, sustained funding for outreach programmes and subspecialty training is not guaranteed, especially in the absence of long-term governmental or philanthropic commitment. The need to balance multiple public health priorities, such as infectious disease control and primary care reform, may also delay national adoption of congenital cardiac initiatives.

Conclusion

Vietnam has made meaningful progress in Critical CHD care in the past two decades through exemplary centres and emerging national and international collaborations. However, systemic challenges exist in early detection, access to subspecialty care, surgical infrastructure, data infrastructure, and follow-up care. As in many low- and middle-income countries, Vietnam faces structural barriers, including financial hardship, limited insurance coverage, inadequate infrastructure, and shortages of trained healthcare personnel, geographic and transportation difficulties, fragmented care delivery, low public awareness, and insufficient work force development strategy. These obstacles significantly hinder early diagnosis and effective management of Critical CHD. Strengthening formal training programmes and leveraging global resources offer a pathway to build a sustainable and high-quality congenital cardiac workforce. Meeting these challenges will require coordinated national policy, sustainable financing models, regionalised care, and participation in global quality improvement initiatives. A unified, equity-driven strategy has the potential to meaningfully improve survival and long-term outcomes for children with Critical CHD. By capitalising on existing national strengths and aligning with global best practices, Vietnam is well-positioned to implement a phased, system-wide transformation in CHD care.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms. Bistra Zheleva, Dr. Phan Tien Loi, Dr Wyman Lai, Dr Hoang Nguyen, Dr Jade Tran, and Dr Shubhika Srivastava for their expert guidance and thoughtful feedback during the initial phase in developing outline for this manuscript. Their contributions, drawn from extensive experience in congenital cardiac care and global health systems, provided valuable insights that strengthened the analysis and recommendations presented in this work.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Graeme McDaniel Foundation Scholar Award, granted to T.T.D., which provided funding for open access publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this manuscript.

Footnotes

Tam T. Doan and Huong Tran are co first authors of this work.

References

Abouk, R, Grosse, S, Ailes, E, Oster, M. Association of US state implementation of newborn screening policies for critical congenital heart disease with early infant cardiac deaths. JAMA 2017; 318: 21112118. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oster, ME, Pinto, NM, Pramanik, AK et al. Newborn screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease: a new algorithm and other updated recommendations: clinical report. Pediatrics 2025; 155: e2024069667. doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-069667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaidi, AH, Alberts, A, Chowdhury, D et al. Trends in gaps of care for patients with Congenital Heart Disease: implications for social determinants of health and child opportunity index. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13: e034796. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phuc, V, Tin, D, Giang, DC. Challenges in the management of congenital heart disease in Vietnam: a single center experience. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2015; 8: 44. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.149517.Google ScholarPubMed
Cao, KD, Le, VTK, Ngo, TK, Nguyen, BK, Nguyen, TLT. Status of congenital heart disease surgery in Vietnam. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2025; 41 801806. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01872-w.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchervenkov, CI, Herbst, C, Jacobs, JP et al. Current status of training and certification for Congenital Heart Surgery around the world proceedings of the meetings of the global council on education for Congenital Heart Surgery of the world society for pediatric and congenital heart surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 2021; 12: 394405. doi: 10.1177/21501351211003520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lajos, P, Carpentier, A. Viện Tim institut du coeur: success of a congenital heart disease center in a developing country. Ann Glob Health 2016; 82: 621624. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, N, Leon-Wyss, J, Iyer, K, Pezzella, A. Paediatric cardiac surgery in low-income and middle-income countries: a continuing challenge. Arch Dis Child 2015; 100 : 11561159. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corno, AF. Paediatric and congenital cardiac surgery in emerging economies: surgical ‘safari’ versus educational programmes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2016; 23: 163167. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMahon, CJ, Tretter, JT, Redington, AN et al. Medical education and training within congenital cardiology: current global status and future directions in a post COVID-19 world. Cardiol Young 2022; 32: 185197. doi: 10.1017/S1047951121001645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, K, Baker-Smith, C, Flores, G, others. Addressing social determinants of health and mitigating health disparities across the lifespan in congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: e025358. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schidlow, DN, Jenkins, KJ, Gauvreau, K et al. Transposition of the great arteries in the developing world. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69: 4351. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.10.051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harold, JG. Screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease in Newborns. Circulation 2014; 130(9): e79-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.008522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClain, M, Hokanson, J, Grazel, R, others. Critical congenital heart disease newborn screening implementation: lessons learned. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21: 12401249. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2273-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pruetz, J, Wang, S, Noori, S. Delivery room emergencies in critical congenital heart diseases. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 24: 101034. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2019.101034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ha, TM, Siddiqui, ZS. Accreditation of medical education in Vietnam: from local to global excellence. Pak J Med Sci 2022; 38(4Part-II): 10771081. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wamala, I, Gongwer, R, Doherty-Schmeck, K et al. Infrastructure availability for the care of Congenital Heart Disease patients and its influence on case volume, complexity and access among healthcare institutions in 17 middle-income countries. Glob Heart 2021; 16: 75. doi: 10.5334/gh.968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaidyanathan, B, Rani, K, Kunde, F et al. Prenatal diagnosis lowers neonatal cardiac care costs in resource-limited settings. Cardiol Young 2022; 32: 17541760. doi: 10.1017/S104795112100487X.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murni, IK, Wirawan, MT, Patmasari, L et al. Delayed diagnosis in children with congenital heart disease: a mixed-method study. BMC Pediatr 2021; 21: 191. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02667-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, A, Doan, TT, Reddy, C, Jone, PN. Artificial intelligence in fetal and pediatric echocardiography. Children 2024; 12: 14. doi: 10.3390/children12010014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheleva, B, Nair, SM, Dobrzycka, A, Saarinen, A. Considerations for newborn screening for Critical Congenital Heart Disease in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Neonatal Screen 2020; 6: 49. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, K, Castaneda, A, Cherian, K, others. Reducing mortality and infections after congenital heart surgery in the developing world. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1422e1430. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rural Outreach Clinic. Available at: https://vinacapitalfoundation.org/en/programs/rural-outreach-clinics/.accessed June 10, 2025Google Scholar
Zheleva, B, Overman, DM. Regionalization in low- and middle-income countries: principles and promise. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 163: e63. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mocumbi, A, Lameira, E, Yaksh, A, others. Challenges on the management of congenital heart disease in developing countries. Int J Cardiol 2011; 148: 285288. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.11.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culbertson, CB, Nguyen, KB, Vu, MP. Developing a congenital heart surgery program in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a five year retrospective and lessons learned. Neonatol Today 2012; 7: 16.Google Scholar
John, AS, Jackson, JL, Moons, P et al. Advances in managing transition to adulthood for adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease: a practical approach to transition program design: a scientific statement from the American heart association. J Am Heart Assoc 2022; 11: e025278. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.025278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nayak, KR, Trieu, NB, O’Dell, J et al. Serial echocardiographic follow-up of structural heart interventions performed during pacific partnership interventional cardiology subject matter exchanges from 2015 to 2017 in Da Nang Vietnam. Mil Med 2021; 186 (Supplement_1): 833838. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rahman, S, Zheleva, B, Cherian, K, others. Linking world bank development indicators and outcomes of congenital heart surgery in low-income and middle-income countries: retrospective analysis of quality improvement data. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e028307. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, M, Dung, KTK, Ha, LT et al. The cause-specific morbidity and mortality, and referral patterns of all neonates admitted to a tertiary referral hospital in the northern provinces of Vietnam over a one year period. Simeoni U, ed. Plos One 2017; 12: e0173407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekerti, A, Vuong, QH, Ho, T, Vuong, TT. Health care payments in Vietnam: patients’ quagmire of caring for health versus economic destitution. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14: 1118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14101118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tangcharoensathien, V, Hirabayashi, KC, Topothai, C, Viriyathorn, S, Chandrasiri, O, Patcharanarumol, W. Children and women’s health in South East Asia: gap analysis and solutions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 3366. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vervoort, D, Swain, JD, Pezzella, AT, Kpodonu, J. Cardiac surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a state-of-the-art review. Ann Thorac Surg 2021; 111: 13941400. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myint, CY, Pavlova, M, Thein, KNN, Groot, W. A systematic review of the health-financing mechanisms in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries and the People’s Republic of China: Lessons for the move towards universal health coverage. Hotchkiss D, ed. Plos One 2019; 14: e0217278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyi-Olajide, JO, Chukwu, I. Global children’s surgery: economic and policy priorities. Semin Pediatr Surg 2023; 32: 151347. doi: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2023.151347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacob, KA, Hussein, N, Van Wijk, A et al. Becoming a congenital heart surgeon: the long and challenging road. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2022; 35: ivac250. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oh, NA, Blitzer, D, Chen, L et al. The impact of congenital cardiac surgery fellowship on training and practice. Ann Thorac Surg 2023; 116: 13201327. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.06.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, AP, Tran, DT, Kosik, RO, Mandell, GA, Hsu, HS, Chen, YS. Medical education in Vietnam. Med Teach 2012; 34: 103107. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.613499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Three key pillars of successful CHD surgical programme at Children’s Hospital 1. Cath/Angio = Cardiac catheterisation and angiography; CT/MRI = Computed tomography / magnetic resonance imaging; CPB = cardiopulmonary bypass; CXR = Chest X-ray; ECG = Electrocardiogram; ICU = Intensive care unit; TEE = Transoesophageal echocardiography.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Current state of congenital cardiac care in Vietnam and proposed strategies. ACHD = adult congenital heart disease; CHD = congenital heart disease; ICU = intensive care unit; IQIC = International quality improvement collaborative; NCH = National Children’s Hospital; NĐ#1 = Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1 (Children’s Hospital 1); OB sUS = obstetric screening ultrasound; QI = quality improvement. Proposed strategies are in italics on a white background, please refer to the text for more details.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Phased implementation timeline for CHD system reform in Vietnam. ACHD = adult congenital heart disease; CHD = congenital heart disease; COEs = centres of excellence; EMRs = electronic medical records; ICU = intensive care unit.