Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-v4vvv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T18:55:12.030Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value-Based CEO Equity Grants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2025

Jin Xu*
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech Pamplin College of Business
Pengfei Ye
Affiliation:
Virginia Tech Pamplin College of Business pye@vt.edu
Cheng Zhang
Affiliation:
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics zhangcheng@mail.shufe.edu.cn
*
xujin@vt.edu (corresponding author)

Abstract

We document firms often determine CEO equity grants based on a predetermined dollar value (value-based equity grant) instead of on the number of shares (share-based grant). Value-based equity grants weaken the relationship between stock performance and CEO equity pay, lower CEO portfolio delta, and slow firms’ investment in R&D. We find that retention pressure is a key reason for the use of value-based equity pay, while governance could also matter. Overall, this paper alerts boards to the unintended consequences of pursuing a target pay level or pay structure because such practices can lead to value-based equity grants in CEO compensation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

We thank Kai Li (the editor), an anonymous referee, Don Bowen, Felipe Cabezon, Zhaohui Chen (Discussant), David Denis, Diane Denis, Roger Edelen, Eli Fich, Michael Gallmeyer, Iftekhar Hasan, Raman Kumar, Katharina Lewellen, Michelle Lowry, Andrew McKinlay, S. Drew Peabody (discussant), Yiming Qian, Vijay Singal, Yihui Wang, Jun Yang and participants at the Boca Conference, Commonwealth Finance Conference, Fordham University, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and Virginia Tech for great suggestions. All errors remain our own.

References

Aarland, K.; Davis, J.; Henderson, V.; and Ono, Y.. “Spatial Organization of Firms: The Decision to Split Production and Administration.” Rand Journal of Economics, 38 (2007), 480494.Google Scholar
Albuquerque, A.; De Franco, G.; and Verdi, R.. “Peer Choice in CEO Compensation.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 160181.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J.. “Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17 (2003), 7192.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J.. “Pay Without Performance: Overview of the Issues.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 17 (2005), 823.Google Scholar
Beneish, M.; Marshall, C.; and Yang, J.. “Explaining CEO Retention in Misreporting Firms.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017), 512535.Google Scholar
Bertrand, M., and Mullainathan, S.. “Are CEOs Rewarded for Luck? The Ones Without Principals Are.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (2001), 901–32.Google Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Lemmon, M.; and Naveen, L.. “Does the Use of Peer Groups Contribute to Higher Pay and Less Efficient Compensation?Journal of Financial Economics, 90 (2008), 152168.Google Scholar
Bizjak, J.; Lemmon, M.; and Nguyen, T.. “Are All CEOs Above Average? An Empirical Analysis of Compensation Peer Groups and Pay Design.” Journal of Financial Economics, 100 (2011), 538555.Google Scholar
Cai, Y.; Sevilir, M.; and Yang, J.. “Made in CEO Factories.” Working Paper, Indiana University (2015).Google Scholar
Chen, S.; Yan, X.; and Yang, B.. “Move to Success? Headquarters Relocation, Political Favoritism, and Corporate Performance.” Journal of Corporate Finance, 64 (2020), 101698.Google Scholar
Choi, D.; Cicero, D.; and Mobbs, S.. “CEO Marketability, Employment Opportunities, and Compensation: Evidence from Compensation Peer Citations.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57 (2022), 27662797.Google Scholar
Coles, J.; Daniel, N.; and Naveen, L.. “Coopted Boards.” Review of Financial Studies, 27 (2014), 17511796.Google Scholar
Core, J., and Guay, W.. “Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and Volatility.” Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (2002), 613630.Google Scholar
Cremers, M., and Grinstein, Y.. “Does the Market for CEO Talent Explain Controversial CEO Pay Practices?Review of Finance, 18 (2013), 921960.Google Scholar
Custodio, C.; Ferreira, M.; and Matos, P.. “Generalists Versus Specialists: Lifetime Work Experience and Chief Executive Officer Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 471492.Google Scholar
Denis, D.Mandatory Clawback Provisions, Information Disclosure, and the Regulation of Securities Markets.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54 (2012), 197200.Google Scholar
Edmans, A.; Gosling, T.; and Jenter, D.. “CEO Compensation: Evidence from the Field.” Working Paper, London Business School (2022).Google Scholar
Edmans, A.; Fang, V.; and Lewellen, K.. “Equity Vesting and Investment.” Review of Financial Studies, 30 (2017), 22292271.Google Scholar
Falato, A.; Li, D.; and Milbourn, T.. “Which Skills Matter in the Market for CEOs? Evidence from Pay for CEO Credentials.” Management Science, 61 2015, 28452869.Google Scholar
Faleye, O.; Kovacs, T.; and Venkateswaran, A.. “Do Better-Connected CEOs Innovate More?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 49 (2014), 12011225.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Yang, J.. “Inside the Black Box: The Role and Composition of Compensation Peer Groups.” Journal of Financial Economics, 96 (2010), 257270.Google Scholar
Faulkender, M., and Yang, J.. “Is Disclosure an Effective Cleansing Mechanism? The Dynamics of Compensation Peer Benchmarking.” Review of Financial Studies, 26 (2013), 806839.Google Scholar
Francis, B.; Hasan, I.; Mani, S.; and Ye, P.. “Relative Peer Quality and Firm Performance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 122 (2016), 196219.Google Scholar
Gabaix, X., and Landier, A.. “Why Has CEO Pay Increased So Much?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123 (2008), 49100.Google Scholar
Gopalan, R.; Milbourn, T.; Song, F.; and Thakor, A.. “Duration of Executive Compensation.” Journal of Finance, 69 (2014), 27772817.Google Scholar
Hacamo, I., and Kleiner, K.. “Competing for Talent: Firms, Managers, and Social Networks.” Review of Financial Studies, 35 (2022), 207253.Google Scholar
Hall, B. J., and Liebman, J. B.. “Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (1998), 653691.Google Scholar
Hall, B. J.The Design of Multi-Year Stock Option Plans.” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 12 (1999), 97106.Google Scholar
Hermalin, B., and Weisbach, M.. “The Determinants of Board Composition.” Rand Journal of Economics, 19 (1988), 589606.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Product Market Synergies and Competition in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Text-Based Analysis.” Review of Financial Studies, 23 (2010), 37733811.Google Scholar
Hoberg, G., and Phillips, G.. “Text-Based Network Industries and Endogenous Product Differentiation.” Journal of Political Economy, 124 (2016), 14231465.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, B., and Milgrom, P.. “Aggregation and Linearity in the Provision of Intertemporal Incentives.” Econometrica, 55 (1987), 303328.Google Scholar
Kogan, L.; Papanikolaou, D.; Seru, A.; and Stoffman, N.. “Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (2017), 665712.Google Scholar
Laamanen, T.; Simula, T.; and Torstila, S.. “Cross–Border Relocations of Headquarters in Europe.” Journal of International Business Studies, 43 (2012), 187210.Google Scholar
Lee, J.; Hwang, B.; and Chen, H.. “Are Founder CEOs More Overconfident than Professional CEOs? Evidence from S&P 1500 Companies.” Strategic Management Journal, 38 (2017), 751769.Google Scholar
Masulis, R., and Mobbs, S.. “Are All Inside Directors the Same? Evidence from the External Directorship Market.” Journal of Finance, 66 (2011), 823872.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. J.Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7 (1985), 1142.Google Scholar
Murphy, K. J.Executive Compensation: Where We Are, and How We Got There.” In Handbook of the Economics of Finance Vol. 2 (2013), 211356.Google Scholar
Oyer, P.Why Do Firms Use Incentives that Have No Incentive Effects?Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 16191650.Google Scholar
Rajgopal, S.; Shevlin, T.; and Zamora, V.. “CEOs’ Outside Employment Opportunities and the Lack of Relative Performance Evaluation in Compensation Contracts.” Journal of Finance, 61 (2006), 18131844.Google Scholar
Shue, K., and Townsend, R.. “Growth Through Rigidity: An Explanation for the Rise in CEO Pay.” Journal of Financial Economics, 123 (2017a), 121.Google Scholar
Shue, K., and Townsend, R.. “How Do Quasi-Random Option Grants Affect CEO Risk-Taking?Journal of Finance, 72 (2017b), 25512588.Google Scholar
Stock, J. H., and Yogo, M.. “Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression.” In Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg, Andrews, D. W. K., Stock, J. H., eds. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (2005), 80108.Google Scholar
Strauss–Kahn, V., and Vives, X.. “Why and Where Do Headquarters Move? Regional: Science and Urban Economics, 39 (2009), 68186.Google Scholar
Sundaram, R., and Yermack, D.. “Pay Me Later: Inside Debt and its Role in Managerial Compensation.” Journal of Finance, 62 (2007), 15511588.Google Scholar
Voget, J.Relocation of Headquarters and International Taxation.” Journal of Public Economics, 95 (2011), 10671081.Google Scholar
Xu, J., and Yang, J.. “Golden Hellos: Signing Bonuses for New Top Executives.” Journal of Financial Economics, 122 (2016), 175195.Google Scholar
Wintoki, M. B.; Linck, N.; and Netter, J.. “Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Internal Corporate Governance.” Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (2012), 581606.Google Scholar
Yonker, S.Geography and the Market for CEOs.” Management Science, 63 (2017), 609630.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Xu et al. supplementary material

Xu et al. supplementary material
Download Xu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 325 KB