Abdulaziz, M., Mahmood, A. M., & Azher, M. (2016). Variation in learner’s argumentative essays – A multidimensional comparative analysis. Science International, 28(4), 413–415.Google Scholar

Aguado-Jiménez, P., Pérez-Paredes, P., & Sánchez, P. (2012). Exploring the use of multidimensional analysis of learner language to promote register awareness. System, 40(1), 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ajayi, T. M. (2018). The pragmatics of commendation in selected ‘abusive’ utterances among Yoruba youths in Nigeria. African Notes, 40(1&2), 80–94.Google Scholar

Al-Surmi, M. (2012). Authenticity and TV shows: A multidimensional analysis perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 671–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, F. K., & Terkourafi, M. (2019). What if …? Imagining non-Western perspectives on pragmatic theory and practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 72–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc [Computer software]. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar

Ard, J. (1982). Auxiliary do: Support or emphasis? Linguistics, 20(5–6), 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asención Delaney, Y. (2014). A multi-dimensional analysis of advanced written L2 Spanish. In Sardinha, T. B. & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 329–369). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Asención-Delaney, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (Eds.). (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistics research. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberg, M. (Ed.). (1997). Narrative development: Six approaches. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Bamberg, M. (2004). Talk, small stories, and adolescent identities. Human Development, 47(6), 366–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberg, M. (2006). Stories: Big or small: Why do we care? Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bamberg, M., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk, 28(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23(4), 397–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barthes, R., & Duisit, L. (1966). Introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 6(2), 237–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bednarek, M. (2018). Language and television series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benzécri, J. P. (1979). Sur le calcul des taux d’inertie dans l’analyse d’un questionnaire. Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 4(3), 377–378.Google Scholar

Benzecri, J. P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berber Sardinha, T. (2014). 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 81–105). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berber Sardinha, T., Kauffmann, C., & Acunzo, C. M. (2014). A multi-dimensional analysis of register variation in Brazilian Portuguese. Corpora, 9(2), 239–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berber Sardinha, T., Pinto, M. V., Mayer, C., Zuppardi, M. C., & Kauffmann, C. H. (2019). Adding registers to a previous multi-dimensional analysis. In Sardinha, T. B. & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 165–186). London: Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, R. A. (1999). Bilingual proficiency/proficient bilingualism: Insights from narrative texts. In Extra, G. & Verhoeven, L. (Eds.), Bilingualism and migration (pp. 187–208). Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, R. A. (2001). Narrative development in multilingual contexts: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Verhoeven, L. & Strömquist, S. (Eds.), Narrative development in a multilingual context (pp. 419–428). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berman, R. A., & Slobin, D. I. (1994). Relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Bértoli-Dutra, P. (2014). Multi-dimensional analysis of pop songs. In Sardinha, T. B. & Pinto, M. V. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 149–176). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besnier, N. (1988). The linguistic relationships of spoken and written Nukulaelae registers. Language, 64(4), 707–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1984). A model of textual relations within the written and spoken modes. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California].Google Scholar

Biber, D. (1985). Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multi-feature/multi-dimensional analyses. Linguistics, 23(2), 337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62(2), 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (1993). The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: An overview of methodology and findings. Computers and the Humanities, 26(5–6), 331–345.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2001). Dimensions of variation among 18th century registers. In Diller, H. J. & Gorlach, M. (Eds.), Towards a history of English as a history of genres (pp. 89–110). Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2004). Conversation text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In Purnelle, Gérald, Fairon, Cédrick, and Dister, Anne (Eds.), Le poids des mots: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (pp. 15–34). Louvain: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (2014). Multi-dimensional analysis: A personal history. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. xxvi–xxxviii). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2019). Multi-dimensional analysis: A historical synopsis. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto, M. (Eds.), Multi-dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues (pp. 11–26). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Discourse characteristics of writing and speaking task types on the TOEFL iBT: A lexico-grammatical analysis. ETS TOEFL Research Report Series, TOEFL ibT-19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1992). Dimensions of register variation in Somali. Language Variation and Change, 4(1), 41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., & Hared, M. (1994). Linguistic correlates of the transition to literacy in Somali: Language adaptation in six press registers. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 182–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Gray, B. (2022). Designing and evaluating language corpora: A practical framework for corpus representativeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar of spoken and written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, S. H., Claus, P. J., Flueckiger, J. B., & Wadley, S. S. (1989). Oral epics in India. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bohmann, A. (2017). Variation in English worldwide: Varieties and genres in a quantitative perspective. [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin].Google Scholar

Brezina, V., Hawtin, A., & McEnery, T. (2021). The Written British National Corpus 2014 – Design and comparability. Text & Talk, 41(5–6), 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brockmeier, J., & Harré, R. (2001). Narrative: Problems and promises of an alternative paradigm. In Brockmeier, J. & Carbaugh, D. (Eds.), Narrative and identity: Studies in autobiography, self, and culture (pp. 39–58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooke-Rose, C. (1990). Stories, theories, and things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brookes, G., & Collins, L. C. (2023). Corpus linguistics for health communication: A guide for research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brookes, G., McEnery, T., McGlashan, M., Smith, G., & Wilkinson, L. (2022). Narrative evaluation in patient feedback: A study of online comments about UK healthcare services. Narrative Inquiry, 32(1), 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, P., & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In Scherer, K. & Giles, H. (Eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 33–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2003). Using functional grammar – An explorer’s guide. Sydney: Macquarie University, National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.Google Scholar

Buysse, L. (2020). ‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’. The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2005). Identity crisis? Language and communication, 25(2), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carmiol, A., & Sparks, A. (2014). Narrative development across cultural contexts: Finding the pragmatic in parent-child reminiscing. In Matthews, D. (Ed.), Pragmatic development in first language acquisition (pp. 279–295). Benjamins, Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In Tannen, D. (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–53). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In Olson, D., Torrance, N. & Hilyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 105–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Chałupnik, M. (2021). Storying selves and others at work: Story ownership, tellership and functions of narratives in a workplace domain. Narrative Inquiry, 32(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, C., & Chen, C. (2022). Universality? Cross-linguistic influence? Evidence from Chinese and English apology response strategy use. Concentric, 48(2), 174–211.Google Scholar

Clancy, P. M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In Chafe, W. L. (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production (pp. 127–201). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Clarke, I. (2018). Stylistic variation in Twitter trolling. In: Golbeck, J. (Ed.) Online harassment: Human-computer interaction series (pp. 151–178). Manhattan, NY: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, I. (2019). Functional linguistic variation in Twitter trolling. The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 26(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, I. (2020). Linguistic variation across Twitter and Twitter trolling. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Birmingham.Google Scholar

Clarke, I. (2022). A multi-dimensional analysis of English tweets. Language and Literature, 31(2), 124–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2017). Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on abusive language online. Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL, Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Canada, July 30, 2017, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account. Plos One, 14(9), e0222062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, I., McEnery, T., & Brookes, G. (2021). Multiple correspondence analysis, newspaper discourse and subregister: A case study of discourses of Islam in the British press. Register Studies, 3(1), 144–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, A. (1999). Generics, frequency adverbs, and probability. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, 221–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Collins, P. (2008). The progressive aspect in world Englishes: A corpus-based Study, Australian. Journal of Linguistics, 28(2), 225–249.Google Scholar

Connor-Linton, J. (1999). Competing communicative styles and crosstalk: A multi-feature analysis. Language in Society, 28(1), 25–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor-Linton, J., & Shohamy, E. (2001). Register variation, oral proficiency sampling, and the promise of multi-dimensional analysis. In Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 124–137). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonçalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain (July 17–21, 2011), 89–96.Google Scholar

Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2001). Multidimensional methodology and the dimensions of register variation in English. In Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 13–42). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Cornu, A. M., & Delahaye, M. (1987). Variability in interlanguage reconsidered: LSP vs. Non-LSP IL talk. English for Specific Purposes, 6(2), 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, P. S., Santos, N. C., Cunha, P., Cotter, J., & Sousa, N. (2013). The use of multiple correspondence analysis to explore associations between categories of qualitative variables in healthy ageing. Journal of Aging Research, 2013, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Curry, N. (2019). Learners as models: The pedagogical value of near peer role models. Speak Out! Journal of the IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group, 60, 34–43.Google Scholar

Darics, E. (2010). Politeness in computer-mediated discourse of a virtual team. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fina, A. (2003). Identity in narrative: A study of immigrant discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Fina, A., & Johnstone, B. (2015). Discourse analysis and narrative. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 152–167). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., von Grumbkow, J. (2008). Emoticons in computer mediated communication: Social motives and social context. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 11(1), 99–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dresner, E., & Herring, S. C. (2010). Functions of the nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and illocutionary force. Communication Theory, 20(3), 249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, S. L. (2014). Using personal narrative to deepen emotional awareness of practice. Nursing Standard, 28(50), 46–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Egbert, J. (2012). Style in nineteenth century fiction: A multi-dimensional analysis. The Scientific Study of Literature, 2(3), 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Egbert, J., Biber, D., & McEnery, T. (forthcoming). Linguistic variation in conversational registers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Egbert, J., Wizner, S., Keller, D., Biber, D., McEnery, T., & Baker, P. (2021). Identifying and describing functional discourse units in the BNC spoken 2014. Text & Talk, 41(5–6), 715–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In Gumperz, J. & Hymes, D. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 213–250). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Evnitskaya, N. (2021). Implications for peer interaction in CLIL classrooms. In Kunitz, S., Markee, N., & Sert, O. (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research (pp. 169–196). Cham: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Finegan, E. (1980). Attitudes toward English usage: The history of a war of words. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Finegan, E. (1982). Form and function in testament language. In Di Pietro, R. J. (Ed.) Linguistics and the professions (pp. 113–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Holt.Google Scholar

Fox, L. (2024). Phraseological competence in spoken L1 and L2 English: Using corpus methods to inform language testing. [Unpublished PhD thesis]. Lancaster University.Google Scholar

Friginal, E. (2009). The language of outsourced call centers: A corpus-based study of cross-cultural interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friginal, E., & Polat, B. (2015). Linguistic dimensions of learner speech in English interviews. Corpus Linguistics Research, 1, 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friginal, E., Lee, J., Polat, B., & Roberson, A. (2017). Exploring spoken English learner language using corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuoli, M., Clarke, I., Weigand, V., Ziezold, H., & Mahlberg, M. (2020). Responding effectively to customer feedback on Twitter: A mixed methods study of webcare styles. Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 569–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gablasova, D., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2019). The Trinity Lancaster Corpus: Development, description, and application. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 5(2), 126–158.Google Scholar

Ganti, T. (2004). Bollywood: A guidebook to popular Hindi cinema. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (1997). Narrative performances: A study of modern Greek storytelling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopolou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1881–1900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction, and identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gilquin, G. (2015). From design to collection of learner corpora. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 9–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gimenez, J. (2010). Narrative analysis in linguistic research. In Litosseliti, L. (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 198–215). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Glynn, D. (2009). Polysemy, syntax, and variation: A usage-based method for cognitive semantics. In Evans, V. & Pourcel, S. (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 77–106). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gonzalez, S., Riffo, J., & Anabalón, A. (2020). Narrative present in the Spanish of Santiago, Chile: Convergence and divergence with the Spanish variety from Mexico City. Spanish in Context, 17(2), 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. (2011). Patterns of linguistic variation in American legal English: A corpus-based study. Oxford: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Graff, D. (2002). An overview of broadcast news. Speech Communication, 37(1–2), 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grainger, K. (2018). We’re not in a club now: A neo-Brown and Levinson approach to analyzing courtroom data. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Granger, S. (Ed.). (1998). Learner English on computer. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gray, B. (2013). More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenacre, M., & Pardo, R. (2006). Multiple correspondence analysis of a subset of response categories. In Greenacre, M. & Blasius, J. (Eds.), Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods (pp. 197–217). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Grieve, J., Ruette, T., Speelman, S., & Geeraerts, D. (2017). Social functional variation in conversational Dutch. In Friginal, E. (Ed.), Studies in corpus-based sociolinguistics (pp. 253–272). London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. (2002). Narratives in two languages: Assessing performance of bilingual children. Linguistics and Education, 13(2), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M., & Hassan, R. (2013). Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hanks, E., McEnery, T., Egbert, J., Larsson, T., Biber, D., Reppen, R., Baker, P., Brezina, V., Brookes, G., Clarke, I., & Bottini, R. (2024). Building LANA-CASE, a spoken corpus of American English Conversation: Challenges and innovations in corpus compilation. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardie, A. (2012). CQPweb – Combining power, flexibility, and usability in a corpus analysis tool. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17(3), 380–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hasselgren, A. (1997). The EVA corpus of Norwegian school English. ICAME Journal, 21, 123–124.Google Scholar

Hogan, P. C. (2013). Narrative discourse: Authors and narrators in literature, film, and art. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar

Holmes, J. (2020). Politeness, power, and provocation: How humour functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies, 2(2), 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, L. (2012). Using laugh responses to defuse complaints. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(4), 430–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honeycutt, C., & Herring, S. C. (2009). Beyond Microblogging: Conversation and Collaboration via Twitter. Proceedings of the Forty-Second Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-42). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press (5–8 January 2009) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2009.89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hopper, P. (1997). Dualism in the study of narrative: A note on Labov and Waletzky. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Husson, F., Josse, J., Le, S., & Mazet, J. (2020). FactoMineR. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/FactoMineR.pdfGoogle Scholar

Hymes, D. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hymes, D. H. (1981). In vain I tried to tell you: Essays in Native American ethnopoetics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishikawa, S. (2019). The ICNALE spoken dialogue: A new dataset for the study of Asian learners’ performance in L2 English interviews. English Teaching, 74(4), 153–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ishikawa, S. (2023). The ICNALE guide: An introduction to a learner corpus study of Asian learners’ L2 English. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jalayer, M., & Zhou, H. (2017). A multiple correspondence analysis of at-fault motorcycle-involved crashes in Alabama. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 50(8), 2089–2099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jang, S. C. (1998). Dimensions of spoken and written Taiwanese: A corpus-based register study. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hawaii].Google Scholar

Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (Eds.). (2014). The discourse reader (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2002). Is ‘no’ an acknowledgement token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10/11), 1345–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnstone, B. (2006). A new role for narrative in variationist sociolinguistics. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Juvonen, P. (1989). Repair in second-language instruction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 12(2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahma, N., & Toikka, A. (2012). Cultural map of Finland 2007: Analysing cultural differences using multiple correspondence analysis. Cultural Trends, 21(2), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (Eds.), Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (pp. 73–119). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keenan, E. O. (1976). The universality of conversational postulates. Language and Society, 5(1), 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kim, Y., & Biber, D. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of register variation in Korean. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 157–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kupersmitt, J., & Berman, R. A. (2001). Linguistic features of Spanish-Hebrew children’s narratives. In Verhoeven, L. & Strömquist, S. (Eds.), Narrative development in a multilingual context (pp. 277–317). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1997). Some further steps in narrative analysis. The Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W., & Waletzky, J. (1997). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lamb, W. (2008). Scottish Gaelic speech and writing: Register variation in an endangered language. Belfast: Cló Ollscoil na Banríona.Google Scholar

Langellier, K. M. (1989). Personal narratives: Perspectives on theory and research. Text and Performance Quarterly, 9(4), 243–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (1984). L’analyse multidimensionnelle des données structurées. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 85, 5–18.Google Scholar

Le Roux, B., & Rouanet, H. (2010). Multiple correspondence analysis. California: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Le Roux, B., Rouanet, H., Savage, M., & Warde, A. (2008). Class and cultural division in the UK. Sociology, 42(6), 1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. (1996). Finding ‘face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(44), 303–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi-Strauss, C. (1955). The structural study of myth. Journal of American Folklore, 68(270), 428–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liimatta, A. (2020). Using lengthwise scaling to compare feature frequencies across text lengths on Reddit. In Rüdiger, S. & Dayter, D. (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liimatta, A. (2022). Do registers have different functions for text length? A case study of Reddit. Register Studies, 4(2), 263–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, R. (2020). Overcoming challenges in corpus construction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Love, R., Dembry, C., Hardie, A., Brezina, V., & McEnery, T. (2017). The spoken BNC 2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3), 319–344.Google Scholar

Lund, R. J. (1991). A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Matsumoto, Y. (1988). Re-examination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 12(4), 403–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarthy, M. J., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McCarthy, M. J., & O’Keeffe, A. (2014). Spoken grammar. In Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.) Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.) (pp. 271–287). Boston, MA: National Geographic/Cengage.Google Scholar

McEnery, T., & Brezina, V. (2022). Fundamental principles of corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T., & Brookes, G. (2022a). Building a written corpus: What are the basics? In O’Keeffe, A. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (2nd ed.) (pp. 35–47). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T., & Brookes, G. (2022b). Register, belief, and violence: A multi-dimensional approach. In Posch, C., Rampl, G., & Irschara, K. (Eds.), Wort – Satz – Korpus: Beiträge zur Korpuslinguistik (pp. 87–117). Innsbruck: Innsbruck University Press.Google Scholar

McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T., Brezina, V., Gablasova, D., & Banerjee, J. (2019). Corpus linguistics, learner corpora, and SLA: Employing technology to analyse language use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McEnery, T., Brookes, G., Hanks, E., Gerigk, K., & Egbert, J. (2023). Swearing, discourse, and function in conversational British English. Journal of Pragmatics, 213, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meunier, F. (2015). Developmental patterns in learner corpora. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 379–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Minanmi, M. (2000). The relationship between narrative identity and culture. Narrative Inquiry, 10(1), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Murray, G. (2011). Older language learners, social learning spaces, and community. In Benson, P. & Reinders, H. (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 132–145). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Myles, F. (2005). Interlanguage corpora and second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 21(4), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neff-van Aertselear, J. (2015). Learner corpora and discourse. In Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 255–280). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neumaier, T. (2023). Conversation in world Englishes: Turn-taking and cultural variation in Southeast Asian and Caribbean English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. R. (1994). Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 22, 409–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Brien, T. (2019). Bringing cross-cultural communication analysis into foreign language classrooms. In Romanowski, P. & Bandura, E. (Eds.), Intercultural foreign language teaching and learning in higher education contexts (pp. 71–98). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In Givon, T. (Ed.) Syntax and semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and semantics (pp. 51–80). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

O’Keeffe, A., & Mark, G. (2017). The English grammar profile of learner competence: Methodology and key findings. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(4), 457–489.Google Scholar

Page, R. (Ed.). (2009). New perspectives on narrative and multimodality. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, R. (2012). Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Page, R., & Thomas, B. (2011). New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partington, A., Duguid, A., & Taylor, C. (2013). Patterns and meanings in discourse: Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Passonneau, R. J., Ide, N., Su, S., & Stuart, J. (2014). Biber Redux: Reconsidering dimensions of variation in American English. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers (pp. 565–576). Dublin, Ireland, 23–29 August 2014.Google Scholar

Pavlenko, A. (2006). Narrative competence in a second language. In Byrnes, H., Weger-Guntharp, H., & Sprang, K. (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities: Constructs, curriculum, instruction, assessment (pp. 105–117). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Pérez-Paredes, P., & Sánchez-Tornel, P. (2015). A multidimensional analysis of learner language during story reconstruction in interviews. In Callies, M. & Götz, S. (Eds.), Learner corpora in language testing and assessment (pp. 141–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1992). Parental styles of narrative elicitation: Effects on children’s narrative structure and content. First Language, 12(36), 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1994). A social interactionist account of developing decontextualised narrative skill. Developmental Psychology, 30(6), 937–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petitjean, C., & Morel, E. (2017). ‘Hahaha’: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 110, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pizziconi, B. (2007). Facework and multiple selves in apologetic metapragmatic comments in Japanese. In Bublitz, W. & Hübler, A. (Eds.), Metapragmatics in use (pp. 49–72). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26(3), 341–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powers, D. (2011). Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, Informedness, Markedness, and Correlation. International Journal of Machine Learning Technology, 2(1), 37–63.Google Scholar

Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the folktale. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Quaglio, P. (2009). Television dialogue: The sitcom Friends versus natural conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Reissman, C. (1993). Narrative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective. [Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University].Google Scholar

Ringbom, H. (1992). On L1 transfer in L2 comprehension and L2 production. Language Learning, 42(1), 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, L. (2012). Psycholinguistic techniques and resources in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 28(1), 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rodino, A., Gimbert, C., Pérez, C., & McCabe, A. (1991). Getting your point across: Contrastive sequencing in low-income African-American and Latino children’s personal narratives. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Rühlemann, C. (2014). Narrative in English conversation: A corpus analysis of storytelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sankaranarayanan, J., Samet, H., Teitler, B. E., Lieberman, M. D., & Sperling, J. (2009). Twitterstand: News in tweets. Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, GIS ’09, New York, NY, USA, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In Wyer, R. (Ed.) Knowledge and memory: The real story (pp. 1–85). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (1997). ‘Narrative analysis’ thirty years later. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 97–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. (2001). Getting serious: joke → serious ‘no’. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 1947–1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society, 13(3), 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D. (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: Sociolinguistic constructions of identity. Language in Society, 25(2), 167–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schiffrin, D., & De Fina, A. (2010). Introduction. In Schiffrin, D., De Fina, A., & Nylund, A. (Eds.), Telling stories: Language, narrative, and social life (pp. 1–6). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, D., & Lengyel, Z. (Eds.). (1995). The age factor in second language acquisition: A critical look at the critical period hypothesis. Avon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, B. (2003). The use of communication strategies in computer-mediated communication. System, 31(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C., Adolphs, S., Harvey, K., & Mullany, L. (2014). Spelling errors and keywords in born-digital data: A case study using the Teenage Health Freak Corpus. Corpora, 9(2), 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spertus, E. (1997). Smokey: Automatic recognition of hostile messages. Proceedings of IAAI-97, 1058–1065.Google Scholar

Staples, S. (2015). The discourse of nurse-patient interactions: Contrasting the communicative styles of U.S. and international nurses. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Staples, S., Laflair, G. T., & Egbert, J. (2017). Comparing language use in oral proficiency interviews to target domains: Conversational, academic, and professional discourse. The Modern Language Journal, 101(1), 194–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sutherland, S. (1989). Hinduism in modern India: Traditions, rituals, and festivals. New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tannen, D. (1980). A comparative analysis of oral narrative strategies: Athenian Greek and American English. In Chafe, W. (Ed.), The pear stories (pp. 51–87). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Thompson, P., Hunston, S., Murakami, A., & Vajn, D. (2017). Multi-dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 153–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thornborrow, J. (2012). Narrative analysis. In: Handford, M. & Gee, J. P. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 51–65). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Thornborrow, J., & Coates, J. (Eds.). (2005). The sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toolan, M. (2001). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Toolan, M. (2008). Narrative progression in the short story: A corpus stylistic approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tottie, G. (1983). Much about not and nothing: A study of the variation between analytic and synthetic negation in contemporary American English. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Tracy-Ventura, N., & Paquot, M. (Eds.) (2021). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and corpora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tummers, J., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D. (2012). Multiple correspondence analysis as a heuristic tool to unveil confounding variables in corpus linguistics. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Statistical Analysis of Textual Data, Liege, Belgium, pp. 923–936.Google Scholar

Turnbull, W. (2003). Language in action: Psychological models of conversation. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uygur-Distexhe, D. (2012). Lol, mdr and ptdr: An inclusive and gradual approach to discourse markers. Lingvisticæ Investigationes, 35(2), 389–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Van Rooy, B., & Terblanch, L. (2006). A corpus-based analysis of involved aspects of student writing. Language Matters, 37(2), 160–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vandergriff, I. (2013). Emotive communication online: A contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. Journal of Pragmatics, 51, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viberg, Å. (2009). The verbs of perception: A typological study. Linguistics, 21(1), 123–162.Google Scholar

Virtanen, T. (1992). Discourse functions of adverbial placement in English: Clause-initial adverbials of time and place in narratives and procedural place descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wadsworth, M., & Bynner, J. (2011). A companion to life course studies: The social and historical context of British birth cohort studies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wales, K. (2006). Personal pronouns in present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Waseem, Z., & Hovy, D. (2016). Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2016, San Diego, CA, 12–17 June 2016, pp. 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Waseleski, C. (2006). Gender and the use of exclamation points in computer‐ mediated communication: An analysis of exclamations posted to two electronic discussion lists. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1012–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Werry, C. C. (1996). Language and interactional features of Internet Relay Chat. In Herring, S. C. (Ed.) Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 47–63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Westin, I., & Geisler, C. (2002). A multi-dimensional study of diachronic variation in British newspaper editorials. ICAME Journal, 26, 133–152.Google Scholar

White, M. (1994). Language in job interviews: Differences relating to success and socioeconomic variables. [Doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University].Google Scholar

Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 3(5), 827–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wolfson, N. (1976). Speech events and natural speech: Some implications for sociolinguistic methodology. Language in Society, 5(2), 188–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional analysis and the study of world Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yazdanfar, N., & Thomo, A. (2013). LINK RECOMMENDER: Collaborative filtering for recommending URLs to Twitter users. Procedia Computer Science, 19, 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Yokota, K., Watanabe, K., Wachi, T., Otsuka, Y., Hirama, K., & Fujita, G. (2016). Crime linkage of sex offences in Japan by multiple correspondence analysis. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14(2), 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zhu, W., & Wang, J. (2022). Disagreement by Chinese speakers of English: Evidence of pragmatic transfer. Language Sciences, 93, 101484.Google Scholar