References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2025
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Minds, Freedoms and RightsOn Neurorehabilitation in Criminal Justice, pp. 189 - 212Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Addo, K. & Grief, N., ‘Does Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights Enshrine Absolute Rights?’ European Journal of International Law 1998, 9, pp. 510–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aharoni, E. et al., ‘Predictive Accuracy in the Neuroprediction of Rearrest’, Society for Neuroscience 2014, 9(4), pp. 332–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aharoni, E. et al., ‘Neuroprediction of Future Rearrest’, The Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 2013, 110(15), pp. 6223–6228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmed, T. & de Jesús Butler, I., ‘The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective’, European Journal of International Law 2006, 17(4), pp. 771–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akhlaghi, F., ‘Transformative Experience and the Right to Revelatory Autonomy’, Analysis 2023, 83(1), pp. 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegre, S., ‘Rethinking Freedom of Thought for the 21st Century’, European Human Rights Law Review 2017, 3, pp. 221–233.Google Scholar
Alfino, M. & Mayes, G. R., ‘Reconstructing the Right to Privacy’, Social Theory and Practice 2003, 29(1), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, A. L., ‘Privacy-as-Data Control: Conceptual, Practical, and Moral Limits of the Paradigm’, Connecticut Law Review 2000, 32, pp. 861–875.Google Scholar
Allen, C. H. et al., ‘Hemodynamic Activity in the Limbic System Predicts Reoffending in Women’, Neuroimage: Clinical 2022, 36, 103238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alper, M., Update on Prisoner Recidivism: A 9-Year Follow-Up Period (2005–2014), U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistic, May 2018.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association, Diagnosticand Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5 (5th ed.), 2013.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N. C., Brave New Brain: Conquering Mental Illness in the Era of the Genome, New York: Oxford University Press 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, D. A. & Bonta, J., The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (4th ed.), Cincinnati: Anderson 2006.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. & Hoge, R. D., ‘Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 1990, 17(1), pp. 19–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antón, C. B., ‘Coercive Persuasion as a Specific Type of Violence in Criminal Law’, International Journal of Coercion Abuse & Manipulation 2020, 1(1), pp. 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, D., ‘Informed Consent: Autonomy and Self-Ownership’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 2008, 25(1), pp. 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenella, P., ‘Schmerber and the Privilege against Self-incrimination: Reappraisal’, American Criminal Law Review 1982, 20(1), pp. 31–62.Google Scholar
Ashworth, A. & Zedner, L., Preventive Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assary, E. et al., ‘Gene-environment Interaction and Psychiatric Disorders: Review and Future Directions’, Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 2018, 77, pp. 133–143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atherton, M., ‘Locke’s Theory of Personal Identity’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 1983, 8, pp. 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballesteros, J. A. et al., ‘Facial Emotion Recognition through Artificial Intelligence’, Frontiers in Computer Science 2024, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, A. P., ‘Privacy – A Useful Concept?’ Social Forces 1964, 42(4), pp. 429–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batterson, J. R. et al., ‘A Refresher on Tourette Syndrome’, Missouri Medicine 2014, 111(3), pp. 202–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Baumeister, R. F. & Leary, M. R., ‘The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation’, Psychological Bulletin 1995, 117(3), pp. 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baylis, F., ‘“I Am Who I Am”: On the Perceived Threats to Personal Identity from Deep Brain Stimulation’, Neuroethics 2013, 6, pp. 513–526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedard, H. L., ‘The Potential for Bioprediction in Criminal Law’, The Colombia Science & Technology Law Review 2017, 18(2), pp. 268–325.Google Scholar
Behan, D., ‘Locke on Persons and Personal Identity’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1979, 9, pp. 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellier, L. et al., ‘Music Can Be Reconstructed from Human Auditory Cortex Activity Using Nonlinear Decoding Models’, PLOS Biology 2023, 21(8), e3002176, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti-Isaac, J. C. et al., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation in the Posteromedial Hypothalamic Nuclei in Refractory Aggressiveness: Post-Surgical Results of 19 Cases’, The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 2021, 24(12), pp. 977–978.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benn, S. I., ‘Privacy, Freedom, and Respect for Persons’, in Schoeman, F. D. (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984, p. 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, S. E. & Capasso, M., ‘The Right to Mental Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Cognitive Human Enhancement Technologies’, in Custers, B. & Fosch-Villaronga, E. (eds.), Law and Artificial Intelligence, Berlin: TMC Asser Press 2022, pp. 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijlsma, J. et al., ‘Legal Insanity and Risk: An International Perspective on the Justification of Indeterminate Preventive Commitment’, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 2019, Sep–Oct;66:101462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgden, A., ‘Therapeutic Jurisprudence and “Good Lives”: A Rehabilitation Framework for Corrections’, Australian Psychologist 2002, 37(3), pp. 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, D., ‘Can Neurointerventions Communicate Censure? (And So What If They Can’t?)’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birks, D. & Buyx, A., ‘Punishing Intentions and Neurointerventions’, The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2018, 9(3), pp. 133–143.Google Scholar
Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishay, A. E. et al., ‘Global Economic Evaluation of the Reported Costs of Deep Brain Stimulation’, Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery 2024, 102(4), pp. 257–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blitz, M. J., Searching Minds by Scanning Brains, Palgrave Macmillan: Cham 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloustein, E., ‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’, in Schoeman, F. D. (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1984, pp. 156–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal-Barby, J. & Ubel, P., ‘Neurorights in Question: Rethinking the Concept of Mental Integrity’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2024, 50(10), pp. 670–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boire, R. G., ‘On Cognitive Liberty Part I’, Journal of Cognitive Liberties 2000, 1(1), pp. 7–13.Google Scholar
Bolton, D., What Is Mental Disorder? An Essay in Philosophy, Science, and Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bomann-Larsen, L., ‘Voluntary Rehabilitation? On Neurotechnological Behavioural Treatment, Valid Consent and (In)appropriate Offers’, Neuroethics 2013, 6(1), pp. 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-011-9105-9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonta, J., ‘The Risk-Need-Responsivity Model: 1990 to the Present’ (Academic Insights 2023/06, pp. 1–13), Manchester: HM Inspectorate of Probation 2023.Google Scholar
Boonin, D., The Problem of Punishment, New York: Cambridge University Press 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorse, C., ‘What a Theory of Mental Health Should Be’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 1976, 6(1), pp. 61–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bou-Sfia, S., ‘The Right to Identity in the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Boone, I. & Vonk, M. (eds.), The Right to Identity and Access to Information on Genetic Origin and Parentage, Cambridge: Intersentia 2024, pp. 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K., Being Sure of Each Other: An Essay on Social rights and Freedoms, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K., ‘Acting Defensively for the Sake of Our Attacker’, Journal of Moral Philosophy 2019, 2, pp. 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K., ‘Don’t Call People “Rapists”: On the Social Contribution Injustice of Punishment’, Current Legal Problems 2016a, 69(1), pp. 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K., ‘The Lonely Heart Breaks: On the Right to Be a Social Contributor’, Supplementary Volume – Aristotelian Society 2016b, 90(1), pp. 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownlee, K., Jenkins, D. & Neal, A. (eds.), Being Social: The Philosophy of Social Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownsword, B., ‘Regulating Brain Imaging: Questions of Privacy, Informed Consent, and Human Dignity’, in Richmond, S., Rees, G. & Edwards, S. J. L. (eds.), I Know What You’re Thinking, Croydon: Oxford University Press 2012.Google Scholar
Brugman, D. & Bink, M. D., ‘Effects of the EQUIP Peer Intervention Program on Self-serving Cognitive Distortions and Recidivism among Delinquent Male Adolescents’, Psychology, Crime & Law 2011, 17(4), pp. 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘What Is Thought? Interpreting and Constructing Article 18 ICCPR in Light of the Vienna Convention’, in Blitz, M. & Bublitz, J. C. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought Vol. 2: Cognitive Liberty and Privacy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2025 (in press).Google Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Neurotechnologies and Human Rights: Restating and Reaffirming the Multi-layered Protection of the Person’, The International Journal of Human Rights 2024, 28(5), pp. 782–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Novel Neurorights: From Nonsense to Substance’, Neuroethics 2022, 15(7), pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Freedom of Thought as an International Human Right: Elements of a Theory of a Living Right’, in Blitz, M. J. & Bublitz, J. C. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought, Vol. 1, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2021, pp. 49–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘The Nascent Right to Psychological Integrity and Mental Self-Determination’, in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K. & Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric, Padstow: Cambridge University Press 2020a, pp. 387–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Why Means Matter’, in Vincent, N. A., Nadelhoffer, T. & McCay, A. (eds.), Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, New York: Oxford University Press 2020b, pp. 49–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘“The Soul Is in the Prison of the Body” – Mandatory Moral Enhancement, Punishment & Rights against Neuro-rehabilitation’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 289–320.Google Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Cognitive Liberty or the International Human Right to Freedom of Thought’, in Clausen, J. & Levy, N. (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2015, pp. 1309–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘Freedom of Thought in the Age of Neuroscience’, Archiv Für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 2014, 100, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C., ‘My Mind Is Mine!? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept’, in Hildt, E. & Francke, A. (eds.), Cognitive Enhancement, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands 2013, pp. 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, J. C. & Ligthart, S., ‘The New Regulation of Non-Medical Neurotechnologies in the European Union: Overview and Reflection’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2024, 11(2), lsae021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bublitz, J. C. & Merkel, R., ‘Crimes against Minds: On Mental Manipulations, Harms and a Human Right to Mental Self-Determination’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2014, 8(1), pp. 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A., The Heart of Human Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, A. E., ‘The Right to a Decent Minimum of Health Care’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1984, 13(1), pp. 55–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Buchanan, J. M., Liberty, Market, and State: Political Economy in the 1980s, New York: New York University Press 1986.Google Scholar
Buelens, W., Herijgers, C. & Illegems, S., ‘The View of the European Court of Human Rights on Competent Patients’ Right of Informed Consent: Research in the Light of Article 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Journal of Health Law 2016, 23(5), pp. 481–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bychawska-Siniarska, D., Protecting the Right to Freedom of Expression under the European Convention on Human Rights: A Handbook for Legal Practitioners, Strasbourg: Council of Europe 2017.Google Scholar
Cabrera, L. Y., Evans, E. L. & Hamilton, R. H., ‘Ethics of the Electrified Mind: Defining Issues and Perspectives on the Principled Use of Brain Stimulation in Medical Research and Clinical Care’, Brain Topography 2014, 27, pp. 33–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calhoun, C., ‘Social Connections, Social Contributions, and Why They Matter: Comments on Being Sure of Each Other’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2023, 17(2), pp. 453–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, T., ‘Moral Dimensions of Human Rights’, in Campbell, T. & Miller, S. (eds.), Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organisations, Springer: Dordrecht 2004, pp. 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Card, A. J., ‘Moving beyond the WHO Definition of Health: A New Perspective for an Aging World and the Emerging Era of Value-Based Care’, World Medical & Health Policy 2017, 9, pp. 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caruso, D. G., Rejecting Retributivism: Free Will, Punishment and Criminal Justice, New York: Cambridge University Press 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, H., The Preventive Turn in Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassinadri, C., ‘The Right to Mental Integrity: Multidimensional, Multilayered and Extended’, Neuroethics 2025, 18, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caulfield, K. A. et al., ‘A Transdiagnostic Review of Safety, Efficacy, and Parameter Space in Accelerated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation’, Journal of Psychiatric Research 2022, 152, pp. 384–396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chail, A., ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review of Its Evolution and Current Applications’, Industrial Psychiatry Journal 2018, 27(2).Google ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, C., ‘What Am I? Descartes’s Various Ways of Considering the Self’, Journal of Modern Philosophy 2020, 2(1), pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, E. F., Englot, D. J. & Vadera, S., ‘Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy’, Epilepsy & Behavior 2015, 47, pp. 24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, Z. et al., ‘Association between Prescription of Major Psychotropic Medications and Violent Reoffending after Prison Release’, The Journal of American Medical Association 2016, 316(17), pp. 1798–1807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chase, H. W. et al., ‘Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Roadmap for Research, from Mechanism of Action to Clinical Implementation’, Molecular Psychiatry 2020, 25(2), pp. 397–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatham, A. N., Shafi, H. & Hermida, A. P., ‘The Use of ECT in the Elderly-Looking Beyond Depression’, Current Psychiatry Reports 2022, 24(9), pp. 451–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chesak, J., ‘What Psychedelics Legalisation and Decriminalisation Looks Like around the World’, www.bbc.com, 21 March 2024.Google Scholar
Chew, C. et al., ‘Biological Interventions for Crime Prevention’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 11–43.Google Scholar
Choy, O., Focquaert, F. & Raine, A., ‘Benign Biological Interventions to Reduce Offending’, Neuroethics 2020, 13(1), pp. 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, J., Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Churchland, P., ‘The Brain and Its Self’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 2011, 155(1), pp. 41–50.Google ScholarPubMed
Cid, J., ‘Is Imprisonment Criminogenic? A Comparative Study of Recidivism Rates between Prison and Suspended Prison Sanctions’, European Journal of Criminology 2009, 6(6), pp. 459–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppola, F., ‘The Brain in Solitude: An(other) Eighth Amendment Challenge to Solitary Confinement’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2019, 6(1), pp. 184–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coppola, F. & Martufi, A. (eds.), Social Rehabilitation and Criminal Justice, New York: Routledge 2024.Google Scholar
Corlett, J. A., ‘The Nature and Value of the Moral Right to Privacy’, Public Affairs Quarterly 2002, 16(4), pp. 329–350.Google Scholar
Cotrena, C. et al., ‘Executive Functions and Memory in Bipolar Disorders I and II: New Insights from Meta-Analytic Results’, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 2020, 141(2), pp. 110–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craig, J. N., ‘Incarceration, Direct Brain Intervention, and the Right to Mental Integrity – a Reply to Thomas Douglas’, Neuroethics 2016, 9(2), pp. 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, B. & Ievins, A., ‘The Prison as a Reinventive Institution’, Theoretical Criminology 2020, 24(4), pp. 568–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, R., ‘Hedonism Reconsidered’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2006, 73(3), pp. 619–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunha, O. et al., ‘The Impact of Imprisonment on Individuals’ Mental Health and Society Reintegration: Study Protocol’, BMC Psychology 2023, 11(215), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, N., Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.Google Scholar
Dann, B. M., ‘The Fifth Amendment Privilege against Self-Incrimination: Extorting Physical Evidence from a Suspect’, Southern California Law Review 1970, 43, pp. 597–630.Google Scholar
Day, A., Tucker, K. & Howells, K., ‘Coerced Offender Rehabilitation – a Defensible Practice?’ Psychology, Crime & Law 2004, 10(3), pp. 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Groot, N. F., Tesink, V. & Meynen, G., ‘Nissenbaum and Neurorights: The Jury Is Still Out’, The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2024, 15(2), pp. 136–138.Google ScholarPubMed
De Jesus, L. M., ‘Artavia Murillo v. Costa Rica: The Inter-American Court on Human Rights’ Promotion of Non-Existent Human Rights Obligations to Authorize Artificial Reproductive Technologies’, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs 2014, 18(2), pp. 275–302.Google Scholar
De Jong, C. D., The Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion or belief in the United Nations (1946–1992), Antwerp: Intersentia 2000.Google Scholar
De Vries, K., ‘Right to Respect for Private and Family Life’, in van Dijk, P. et al. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, pp. 667–734.Google Scholar
DeGrazia, D., ‘Enhancement Technologies and Human Identity, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 2005, 30, pp. 261–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeGrazia, D., Human Identity and Bioethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delfin, C. et al., ‘Prediction of Recidivism in a Long-Term Follow-Up of Forensic Psychiatric Patients: Incremental Effects of Neuroimaging Data’, PLoS ONE 2019, 14(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delisi, M., ‘Revisiting Lombroso’, in Cullen, F. T. & Wilcox, P. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminological Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Denson, T. F. et al., ‘A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Anger and Aggression’, Aggressive Behavior 2025, 51(4), pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denson, T. F., Griffiths, M. & Smith, L., ‘Attitudes toward Incarceration, Neuronormalization and Psychological Treatment for Violent Offenders’, Psychology, Crime & Law 2024, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVeaux, M., ‘The Trauma of the Incarceration Experience’, Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 2013, 48(1), pp. 257–277.Google Scholar
DeWall, C. N., The Oxford Handbook of Social Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donders, Y., ‘The Right to Enjoy the Benefits of Scientific Progress: In Search of State Obligations in Relation to Health’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2011, 14, pp. 371–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dore-Horgan, E., ‘Do Criminal Offenders Have a Right to Neurorehabilitation?’ Criminal Law and Philosophy 2023, 17, pp. 429–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dore-Horgan, E. & Douglas, T., ‘Thinking What We Want: A Moral Right to Acquire Control over Our Thoughts’, in Blitz, M. & Bublitz, J. C. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought Vol. 2: Cognitive Liberty and Privacy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2025 (in press).Google Scholar
Douglas, T., ‘An Intuitive, Abductive Argument for a Right against Mental Interference’, The Journal of Ethics 2024, 29, pp. 133–115.Google ScholarPubMed
Douglas, T., ‘If Nudges Treat Their Targets as Rational Agents, Nonconsensual Neurointerventions Can Too’, Ethic Theory Moral Prac 2022, 25, pp. 36–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, T., ‘Neural and Environmental Modulation of Motivation: What’s the Moral Difference?’ in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 208–223.Google Scholar
Douglas, T. & Forsberg, L., ‘Three Rationales for a Legal Right to Mental Integrity’, in Ligthart, S. et al. (eds.), Neurolaw: Advances in Neuroscience, Justice, and Security, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2021, pp. 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, T. et al., ‘Risk Assessment Tools in Criminal Justice and Forensic Psychiatry’, European Psychiatry 2017, 42, pp. 134–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dressler, J., Michaels, A. C. & Simmons, R., Understanding Criminal Procedure. Volume 1: Investigation, Durham: Carolina Academic Press 2021.Google Scholar
Duff, A., Punishment, Communication and Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2001.Google Scholar
Duffy, P. J., ‘Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1983, 32, pp. 316–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R., ‘Autonomy and the Demented Self’, The Milbank Quarterly 1986, 64(Suppl. 2), pp. 4–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebrahimi, C. et al., ‘Augmenting Extinction Learning with D-Cycloserine Reduces Return of Fear: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled fMRI Study’, Neuropsychopharmacology 2020, 45(3), pp. 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, A., ‘A Deterrence Theory of Punishment’, The Philosophical Quarterly 2003, 53(212), pp. 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enticott, P. G. et al., ‘Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Clinical Trial’, BMJ Open 2021, 11(7), e046830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar Vidarte, O. A. et al., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation for Severe and Intractable Aggressive Behavior’, Stereotactic Functional Neurosurgery 2022, 100(4), pp. 210–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esmaili, M. et al., ‘Executive Functions and Public Health: A Narrative Review’, Iranian Journal of Public Health 2023, 52(8), pp. 1589–1599.Google Scholar
Evans, C., Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, M. D., Religious Liberty and International Law in Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallin, M., Whooley, O. & Barker, K. K., ‘Criminalizing the Brain: Neurocriminology and the Production of Strategic Ignorance’, BioSocieties 2019, 14, pp. 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farah, M. J., ‘Emerging Ethical Issues in Neuroscience’, Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5(11), pp. 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farahany, N. A., The Battle for Your Brain: Defending the Right to Think Freely in the Age of Neurotechnology, New York: St. Martin’s Press 2023.Google Scholar
Farahany, N. A., ‘The Costs of Changing Our Minds’, Emory Law Journal 2019, 69(1), pp. 75–110.Google Scholar
Farahany, N. A., ‘Searching Secrets’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 2012a, 160, pp. 1239–1307.Google Scholar
Farahany, N. A., ‘Incriminating Thoughts’, Stanford Law Review 2012b, 64, pp. 351–408.Google Scholar
Faria, M., ‘Violence, Mental Illness, and the Brain – a Brief History of Psychosurgery: Part 1 – From Trephination to Lobotomy’, Surgical Neurology International 2013, 4(49).Google Scholar
Farrell, M. et al., ‘Methadone Maintenance Treatment in Opiate Dependence: A Review’, British Medical Journal 1994, 309, pp. 997–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Favril, L., Shaw, J. & Fazel, S., ‘Prevalence and Risk factors for Suicide Attempts in Prison’, Clinical Psychology Review 2022, 97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazel, S. et al., ‘Mental Health of Prisoners: Prevalence, Adverse Outcomes, and Interventions’, Lancet Psychiatry 2016, 3(9), pp. 871–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fazel, S. et al., ‘Use of Risk Assessment Instruments to Predict Violence and Antisocial Behaviour in 73 Samples Involving 24 827 People: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’, British Medical Journal 2012, 345, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J., The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law Volume 3: Harm to Self, New York: Oxford University Press 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J., Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton: Princeton University Press 1970.Google Scholar
Feldman, D., ‘The Developing Scope of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review 1997, 3, pp. 265–274.Google Scholar
Felthous, A. R. et al., ‘Pharmacotherapy of Primary Impulsive Aggression in Violent Criminal Offenders’, Frontiers in Psychology 2021, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandes, B., Wright, M. & Essau, C. A., ‘The Role of Emotion Regulation and Executive Functioning in the Intervention Outcome of Children with Emotional and Behavioural Problems’, Children 2023, 10(1), pp. 139–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fikfak, V. & Izvorova, L., ‘Language and Persuasion: Human Dignity at the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 2022, 22(3), ngac018, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, M. A., ‘The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition’, Yale Journal of Law & Feminism 2008, 20(1), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
First, M. B. et al., ‘DSM-5-TR: Overview of What’s New and What’s Changed’, World Psychiatry 2022, 21(2), pp. 218–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flanagan, T. J., ‘Dealing with Long-Term Confinement: Adaptive Strategies and Perspectives among Long-Term Prisoners’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 1981, 8(2), pp. 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, G., ‘A Fresh Start for the Objective-List Theory of Well-Being’, Utilitas 2013, 25(2), pp. 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focquaert, F. & Schermer, M., ‘Moral Enhancement: Do Means Matter Morally?’ Neuroethics 2015, 8, pp. 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focquaert, F., Van Assche, K. & Sterckx, S., ‘Offering Neurointerventions to Offenders with Cognitive-Emotional Impairments: Ethical and Criminal Justice Aspects’, in Vincent, N. A., Nadelhoffer, T. & McCay, A. (eds.), Neurointerventions and the Law, New York: Oxford University Press 2020, pp. 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltynie, T. et al., ‘Medical, Surgical, and Physical Treatments for Parkinson’s Disease’, Lancet 2024, 403(10423), pp. 305–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forsberg, L., ‘Anti-libidinal Interventions and Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review 2021, 21(2), pp. 384–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, L. & Douglas, T., ‘What Is Criminal Rehabilitation?’ Criminal Law and Philosophy 2022, 16, pp. 103–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forstmann, M. et al., ‘Transformative Experience and Social Connectedness Mediate the Mood-Enhancing Effects of Psychedelic Use in Naturalistic Settings’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2020, 117(5), pp. 2338–2346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortune, C. A. & Ward, T., ‘The Rehabilitation of Offenders: Striving for Good Lives, Desistance, and Risk Reduction’, in Helfgott, J. (ed.), Criminal Psychology, New York: Praeger 2013.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975), translated and republished by Penguin Classics 2020.Google Scholar
Fourie, C., ‘Sufficiency of Capabilities, Social Equality, and Two-Tiered Health Care Systems’, in Fourie, C. & Rid, A. (eds.), What Is Enough?: Sufficiency, Justice, and Health, New York: Oxford University Press 2016, pp. 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, D. L. et al., ‘Why Should We Invest in Health? Evidence from the Lens of Second-Order Benefits of Health’, Journal of Global Health Reports 2023, 7, e2023059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, M. J. et al., ‘Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Medication in Parkinsonism’, Science 2007, 318, pp. 1309–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franzini, A. et al., ‘Deep-Brain Stimulation for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior’, World Neurosurgery 2013, 80(3–4).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frase, R. S. et al., ‘Proportionality of Punishment in Common Law Jurisdictions and in Germany’, in Ambos, K. et al. (eds.), Core Concepts in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020, pp. 213–260.Google Scholar
Freeman, S., ‘Problems with Some Consequentialist Arguments for Basic Rights’, in Ernst, G. & Heilinger, J. C. (eds), The Philosophy if Human Rights: Contemporary Controversies, Berlin: De Gruyter 2012, pp. 107–128.Google Scholar
Friedman, A. K. et al., ‘KCNQ Channel Openers Reverse Depressive Symptoms via an Active Resilience Mechanism’, Nature Communications 2016, 7(1), pp. 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuss, J. et al., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation to Reduce Sexual Drive’, Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 2015, 40, pp. 429–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gable, L. & Gostin, L. O., ‘Mental Health as a Human Right’, Wayne State University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series 2009, 9(15), pp. 252–253.Google Scholar
Galderisi, S. et al., ‘Toward a New Definition of Mental Health’, World Psychiatry 2015, 14, pp. 231–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D. J., ‘The Right to Silence Reconsidered’, Current Legal Problems 1988, 41(1), pp. 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garofalo, M., ‘Family Therapy in Corrections: Implications for Reentry into the Community’, Journal of Correctional Health Care 2020, 26(3), pp. 240–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerards, J., General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J., ‘The Scope of ECHR Rights and Institutional Concerns’, in Brems, E. & Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, pp. 84–106.Google Scholar
Gerety, T., ‘Redefining Privacy’, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 1977, 12(2), pp. 233–296.Google Scholar
Gerstein, R. S., ‘Privacy and Self-incrimination’, Ethics 1970, 80(2), pp. 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F., Ienca, M. & Cook, M., ‘How I Became Myself after Merging with a Computer: Does Human-Machine Symbiosis Raise Human Rights Issues?’ Brain Stimulation 2023, 16, pp. 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F., Viaña, J. N. M. & Ineichen, C., ‘Deflating the “DBS Causes Personality Changes” Bubble’ Neuroethics 2021, 14, pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, F. et al., ‘I Miss Being Me: Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation’, The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2017, 8(2), pp. 96–109.Google Scholar
Giustino, T. F., Fitzgerald, P. J. & Maren, S., ‘Revisiting Propranolol and PTSD: Memory Erasure or Extinction Enhancement?’ Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 2016, 130, pp. 26–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glannon, W., ‘Stimulating Brains, Altering Minds’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2009, 35, pp. 282–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenn, A. L. & Raine, S., ‘Neurocriminology: Implications for the Punishment, Prediction and Prevention of Criminal Behaviour’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2014, 15(1), pp. 54–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glover, J. et al., Fertility & the Family. The Glover Report on Reproductive Technologies to the European Commission, London: Fourth Estate 1989.Google Scholar
Goddard, E., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation through the “Lens of Agency”: Clarifying Threats to Personal Identity from Neurological Intervention’, Neuroethics 2017, 10, pp. 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godien, D., Short Guide to the European Convention on Human Rights, Strasbourg: Council of Europe 2005.Google Scholar
Goering, S. et al., ‘Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies’, Neuroethics 2021, 14, pp. 365–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goethals, I. et al., ‘Brain Activation Associated with Deep Brain Stimulation Causing Dissociation in a Patient with Tourette’s Syndrome’, Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 2008, 9(4), pp. 543–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E., Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, New York: Anchor Books 1961.Google Scholar
Golash, D., The Case against Punishment: Retribution, Crime Prevention, and the Law, New York: New York University Press 2005.Google Scholar
González Moraga, F. R. et al., ‘Facets of Psychopathy, Intelligence, and Aggressive Antisocial Behaviors in Young Violent Offenders’, Frontiers in Psychology 2019, 10, pp. 984–984.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, M. S. et al., ‘A Randomized Clinical Trial of Methadone Maintenance for Prisoners: Findings at 6 Months Post-Release’, Addiction 2008, 103, pp. 1333–1342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottfredson, M. R. & Hirschi, T., A General Theory of Crime, Stanford: Stanford University Press 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. A., ‘An Ethical Argument for a Right to Mental Health Care’, General Hospital Psychiatry 2000, 22(1), pp. 17–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greer, S., ‘Is the Prohibition against Torture, Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment Really “Absolute” in International Human Rights Law?’ Human Rights Law Review 2015, 15, pp. 101–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, W., ‘Depo-provera, Castration, and the Probation of Rape Offenders: Statutory and Constitutional Issues’, University of Dayton Law Review 1986, 12(1), pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Griffin, J., Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1986.Google Scholar
Griffin, S. A., Lynam, D. R. & Samuel, D. B., ‘Dimensional Conceptualizations of Impulsivity’, Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 2018, 9(4), pp. 333–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, H., ‘Privacy and Autonomy’, in Pennock, R. & Chapman, J. W. (eds.), Privacy: Nomos XIII, New York: Atherton Press 1971, pp. 169–181.Google Scholar
Gross, J. J. & Muñoz, R. F., ‘Emotion Regulation and Mental Health’, Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 1995, 2(2), pp. 151–164.Google Scholar
Halse, M. et al., ‘Longitudinal Relations between Impaired Executive Function and Symptoms of Psychiatric Disorders in Childhood’, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines 2022, 63(12), pp. 1574–1582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampson, M., Ruiz, S. & Ushiba, J., ‘Neurofeedback’, Neuroimage 2020, 218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hampton, J., ‘The Moral Education Theory of Punishment’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1984, 13(3), pp. 208–238.Google Scholar
Haney, C., ‘Prison Effects in the Era of Mass Incarceration’, The Prison Journal(Philadelphia, Pa.) 2012, pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harat, M. et al., ‘Treating Aggression and Self-destructive Behaviors by Stimulating the Nucleus Accumbens: A Case Series’, Frontiers in Neurology 2021, 12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harcourt, B. E., Against Prediction: Profiling, Policing, and Punishing in an Actuarial Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2007.Google Scholar
Hardie-Bick, J., ‘Identity Imprisonment, and Narrative Configuration’, New Criminal Law Review 2018, 21(4), pp. 567–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harner, H. M. et al., ‘Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Incarcerated Women: A Call for Evidence-Based Treatment’, Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy 2015, 7(1), pp. 58–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, D. J. et al., Harris, O’Boyle, and Warbrick: Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haybron, D. M., ‘Mental State Approaches to Well-Being’, in Adler, M. D. & Fleurbaey, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016, pp. 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heathwood, C., ‘Desire-Fulfillment Theory’, in Fletcher, G. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being, Oxon: Routledge 2016, pp. 135–147.Google Scholar
Hecht, L. K., Latzman, R. D. & Lilienfeld, S. O., ‘The Psychological Treatment of Psychopathy: Theory and Research’, in David, D., Lynn, S. J. & Montgomery, G. H. (eds.), Evidence-Based Psychotherapy: The State of the Science and Practice, Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 2018, pp. 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmond, P., Overbeek, G. & Brugman, D., ‘An Examination of Program Intensity Recidivism of a Cognitive-behavioural Program for Incarcerated Youth in The Netherlands’, Psychology, Crime & Law 2015, 21(4), pp. 330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heri, C., ‘Deference, Dignity and “Theoretical Crisis”: Justifying ECtHR Rights between Prudence and Protection’, Human Rights Law Review 2024, 24(1), ngad032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, N., ‘The Human Right to Freedom of Thought—Operationalising a Disputed Right in the Context of Neurotechnologies’, Human Rights Law Review 2025, 25(3), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertz, N., ‘Neurorights – Do We Need New Human Rights? A Reconsideration of the Right to Freedom of Thought’, Neuroethics 2023, 16(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildt, E., ‘A Conceptual Approach to the Right to Mental Integrity’, in López-Silva, P. & Valera, L. (eds.), Protecting the Mind, Series on Ethics of Science and Technology, Cham: Springer 2022, pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
Holbrook, C. et al., ‘Neuromodulation of Group Prejudice and Religious Belief’, Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 2016, 11, pp. 387–394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmen, S. J., ‘A Note on Psychological Continuity Theories of Identity and Neurointerventions’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2022, 48, pp. 742–745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoogsteder, L. et al., ‘Response Aggression Regulation Therapy (Re-ART): An Evaluation Study in a Dutch Juvenile Justice Institution in Terms of Recidivism’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2018, 62(14), pp. 4403–4424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houeto, J. et al., ‘Behavioural Disorders, Parkinson’s Disease and Subthalamic Stimulation’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2002, 72(6), pp. 701–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hulley, S., Crewe, B. & Wright, S., ‘Re-examining the Problems of Long-term Imprisonment’, The British Journal of Criminology 2016, 56(4), pp. 769–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ienca, M., Common Human Rights Challenges Raised by Different Applications of Neurotechnologies in the Biomedical Field, Strasburg: Council of Europe, October 2021.Google Scholar
Ienca, M. & Malgieri, G., ‘Mental Data Protection and the GDPR’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2022, 9(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ienca, M. & Andorno, R., ‘Towards New Human Rights in the Age of Neuroscience and Neurotechnology’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy 2017, 13(5), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ienca, M. & Haselager, P., ‘Hacking the Brain’, Ethics and Information Technology 2016, 18, pp. 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inness, J. C., Privacy, Intimacy, and Isolation, New York: Oxford University Press 1992.Google Scholar
Istace, T., ‘Human Rights Law: An Incomplete but Flexible Framework to Protect the Human Mind against Neurotechnological Instructions’, Law Innovation and Technology 2024, 16, pp. 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Istace, T., ‘Protecting the Mental Realm: What Does Human Rights Law Bring to the Table?’ Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2023, 41(4), pp. 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobowitz, S. et al., ‘Assessing Needs for Psychiatric Treatment in Prisoners: 2. Met and Unmet Need’, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 2017, 52, pp. 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janicak, P. et al., ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder: A Comprehensive Summary of Safety Experience from Acute Exposure, Extended Exposure, and during Reintroduction Treatment’, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2008, 69, pp. 222–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jolliffe, D. & Hedderman, C., ‘Investigating the Impact of Custody on Reoffending Using Propensity Score Matching’, Crime & Delinquency 2015, 61(8), pp. 1051–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolliffe, D., Farrington, D. & Howard, P., ‘How Long Did It Last? A 10-Year Reconviction Follow-Up Study of High Intensity Training for Young Offenders’, Journal of Experimental Criminology 2013, 9(4), pp. 515–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jose-Kampfner, C., ‘Coming to Terms with Existential Death: An Analysis of Women’s Adaptation to Life in Prison’, Social Justice 1990, 17(2), pp. 110–125.Google Scholar
Jotterand, F. & Giordano, J., ‘Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Deep Brain Stimulation and Personal Identity: Ethical Questions, and Neuroethical Approaches for Medical Practice’, International Review of Psychiatry 2011, 23(5), pp. 476–485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jovanovic, M., ‘The Essence of Slavery: Exploitation in Human Rights Law’, Human Rights Law Review 2020, 20, pp. 674–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keese, N. & Leiser, M., ‘Online Manipulation as a Potential Interference with the Right to Freedom of Thought’, in O’Callaghan, P. & Shiner, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook on the Right to Freedom of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2025, pp. 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellmeyer, P. et al., ‘The Effects of Closed-Loop Medical Devices on the Autonomy and Accountability of Persons and Systems’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2016, 25(4), pp. 623–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, E., The Limits of Blame: Rethinking Punishment and Responsibility, Harvard: Harvard University Press 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiehl, K. A. et al., ‘Age of Gray Matters: Neuroprediction of Recidivism’, NeuroImage: Clinical 2018, 19, pp. 813–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinlock, T. W. et al., ‘A Study of Methadone Maintenance for Male Prisoners: 3-Month Postrelease Outcomes’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 2008, 35, pp. 34–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchmair, L., ‘Objections to Coercive Neurocorrectives for Criminal Offenders –Why Offenders’ Human Rights Should Fundamentally Come First’, Criminal Justice Ethics 2019, 38(1), pp. 19–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kivimäki, M., & Steptoe, A., ‘Effects of Stress on the Development and Progression of Cardiovascular Disease’, Nature Reviews Cardiology 2018, 15, pp. 215–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klaming, L. & Haselager, P., ‘Did My Brain Implant Make Me Do It? Questions Raised by DBS Regarding Psychological Continuity, Responsibility for Action and Mental Competence’, Neuroethics 2013, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knehans, R. et al., ‘Modulating Behavioural and Self-Reported Aggression with Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: A Literature Review’, Brain Sciences 2022, 12, pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kober, H. et al., ‘Brain Activity during Cocaine Craving and Gambling Urges: An fMRI Study’, Neuropsychopharmacology 2016, 41(2), pp. 628–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosta, E. & Boehm, F. (eds.), The EU Law Enforcement Directive (LED): A Commentary, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, F., ‘Me, Myself and My Brain Implant: Deep Brain Stimulation Raises Questions of Personal Authenticity and Alimentation’, Neuroethics 2013, 6, pp. 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraiss, J. et al., ‘The Relationship between Emotion Regulation and Well-Being in Patients with Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis’, Comprehensive Psychiatry 2020, 102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuhn, L. et al., ‘Prefrontal tDCS Modulates Risk-Taking in Male Violent Offenders’, Scientific Reports 2024, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larden, M. et al., ‘Effectiveness of Aggression Replacement Training in Reducing Criminal Recidivism among Convicted Adult Offenders’, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 2018, 28(6) pp. 476–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavazza, A., ‘Freedom of Thought and Mental Integrity: The Moral Requirements for Any Neural Prosthesis’, Frontiers in Neuroscience 2018, 12(82), pp. 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavazza, A. & Giorgi, R., ‘Philosophical Foundations of the Right to Mental Integrity’, Neuroethics 2023, 16(10).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrysen, L., ‘System of Restrictions’, in Van Dijk, P. et al. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, pp. 307–330.Google Scholar
Le, J. et al., ‘Oxytocin Facilitation of Emotional Empathy Is Associated with Increased Eye Gaze toward the Faces of Individuals in Emotional Contexts’, Frontiers in Neuroscience 2020, 14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Le Moli, G., Human Dignity in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, A. Y. K., ‘Arguing against the Expressive Function of Punishment: Is the Standard Account That Insufficient?’ Law and Philosophy 2019, 38(4), pp. 359–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. Y. & Pearce, E. N., ‘Hyperthyroidism: A Review’, The Journal of American Medical Association 2023, 330(15), pp.1472–1483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, A. et al., ‘Horticultural Therapy Program for Mental Health of Prisoners: Case Report’, Integrative Medicine Research 2021, 10(2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leidenfrost, C. M. & Antonius, D., ‘Incarceration and Trauma: A Challenge for the Mental Health Care Delivery System’, in Javier, R. A., Owen, E. A. & Maddux, J. A. (eds.), Assessing Trauma in Forensic Contexts, Cham: Springer International, 2020, pp. 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leijten, I., Core Socio-Economic Rights and the European Court of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.Google Scholar
Levan, K., Prison Violence: Causes, Consequences, and Solutions, Solving Social Problems, London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, J. S. et al., ‘Learning from Consumers of Mandated Sex-Offending Programs: “It’s Not Treatment, I Wish It Was”’, Sexual Abuse 2024, 36(2), pp. 203–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, N., ‘Cognitive Enhancement, in Neurointerventions and the Law’, in Vincent, N. A., Nadelhoffer, T. & McCay, A. (eds.), Neurointerventions and the Law, New York: Oxford University Press 2020, pp. 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, N., Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C., ‘Risk-Based Sentencing and the Principles of Punishment’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 2022, 112(2), pp. 213–264.Google Scholar
Lewis, D., ‘Survival and Identity’, in Rorty, A. Oksenberg (ed.), The Identities of Persons, Berkely: University of California Press 1976, pp. 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘Mental Privacy as Part of the Human Right to Freedom of Thought?’ in Blitz, M. & Bublitz, J. C. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought Vol. 2: Cognitive Liberty and Privacy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2025a (in press).Google Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘What Is Thought, or What Should It Be? – Reply to Bublitz’, in Blitz, M. & Bublitz, J. C. (eds.), The Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought Vol. 2: Cognitive Liberty and Privacy, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan 2025b (in press).Google Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘Reconsidering the Absolute Nature of the Right to Freedom of Thought’, Human Rights Law Review 2025c, 25(3), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘The Right to Mental Integrity in the Age of Neurotechnology: Constructing Scope and Exploring Permissible Limitations’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2025d, 12(1), pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘Towards a Human Right to Psychological Continuity? Reflections on the Rights to Personal Identity, Self-Determination, and Personal Integrity’, European Convention on Human Rights Law Review 2024, 5, pp. 199–229.Google Scholar
Ligthart, S., Coercive Brain-Reading in Criminal Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S., ‘Freedom of Thought in Europe: Do Advances in “Brain-Reading” Technology Call for Revision?’ Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2020, 7(1), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligthart, S. et al., ‘Minding Rights: Mapping Ethical and Legal Foundations of “Neurorights”’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2023a, 32(4), pp. 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S. et al., ‘The Relevance of Neuropsychology for Social Rehabilitation: A Human Rights Perspective’, in Coppola, F. & Martufi, A. (eds.), Social Rehabilitation and Criminal Justice, London: Routledge 2023b, pp. 319–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S. et al., ‘Rethinking the Right to Freedom of Thought: A Multidisciplinary Analysis’, Human Rights Law Review 2022, 22(4), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S. et al., ‘Forensic Brain-Reading and Mental Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges’, Neuroethics 2021, 14, pp. 191–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligthart, S. et al., ‘Prison and the Brain: Neuropsychological Research in the Light of the European Convention on Human Rights’, New Journal of European Criminal Law, 2019, 10(3), pp. 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ligthart, S., Dore-Horgan, E. & Meynen, G., ‘The Various Faces of Vulnerability: Offering Neurointerventions to Criminal Offenders’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2023, 10(1), pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ligthart, S. & Van de Pol, N., ‘Freedom of Thought: Absolute Protection of Mental Privacy and Mental Integrity? Considering the Case of Neurotechnology in Criminal Justice’, in O’Callaghan, P. & Shiner, B., The Cambridge Handbook for Freedom of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2025, pp. 350–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limanté, A., ‘Vulnerable Groups in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’, in Limanté, A. & Pūraitė-Andrikienė, D. (eds.), Legal Protection of Vulnerable Groups in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland, Cham: Springer International 2022, pp. 29–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippke, R., ‘Some Surprising Implications of Negative Retributivism’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 2014, 31(1), pp. 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsman, N. & Glannon, W., ‘Brain, Mind and Machine: What Are the Implications of Deep Brain Stimulation for Perceptions of Personal Identity, Agency and Free Will?’ Bioethics 2013, 27(9), pp. 465–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, J., ‘Of Identity and Diversity’, in Nidditch, P. H. (ed.), An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Oxford: Clarendon Press 1975.Google Scholar
Lösel, F. et al., ‘On the Effectiveness of Sexual Offender Treatment in Prisons: A Comparison of Two Different Evaluation Designs in Routine Practice’, Sexual Abuse 2020, 32(4), pp. 452–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loucaides, L. G., ‘The Right to Freedom of Thought as Protected by the European Convention on Human Rights’, Cyprus Human Rights Law Review 2012, 1(1), pp. 79–87.Google Scholar
Luna, F., ‘Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers Not Labels’, The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2009, 2, pp. 121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwoff, L., ‘New Technologies, New Challenges for Human Rights? The Work of the Council of Europe’, European Journal of Health Law 2020, 27, pp. 335–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackenzie, C. & Walker, M., Neurotechnologies, Personal Identity and the Ethics of Authenticity’, in Clausen, J. & Levy, N. (eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics, Dordrecht: Springer 2015, pp. 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maier, K. & Ricciardelli, R., ‘“Prison Didn’t Change Me, I Have Changed”: Narratives of Change, Self, and Prison Time’, Criminology & Criminal Justice 2022, 22(5), pp. 774–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marmor, A., ‘What Is the Right to Privacy?’ Philosophy and Public Affairs 2015, 43, pp. 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J. (ed.), Personal Identity and the European Court of Human Rights, New York: Routledge 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, J., Personal Freedom through Human Rights Law? Autonomy, Identity and Integrity under the European Convention on Human Rights, Leiden: Brill 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martini, S., ‘Strong New Branches to the Trunk – Realizing the Right to Health Decentrally’, in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K. & Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric, Padstow: Cambridge University Press 2020, pp. 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martufi, A., ‘The Paths of Offender Rehabilitation and the European Dimension of Punishment: New Challenges for an Old Ideal? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2018, 25(6), pp. 672–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mater, R. & Murray, D., ‘Re-thinking International Human Rights Law’s Approach to Identity in Light of Surveillance and AI’, Human Rights Law Review 2025, 25(3), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Mathews, D. J. H., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation, Personal Identity and Policy’, International Review of Psychiatry 2011, 23(5), pp. 486–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattick, R. P. et al., ‘Methadone Maintenance Therapy versus No Opioid Replacement Therapy for Opioid Dependence’, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009 (2).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mavronicola, M., Torture, Inhumanity and Degradation under Article 3 of the ECHR: Absolute Rights and Absolute Wrongs, New York: Hart 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayerfield, J., ‘In Defense of the Absolute Prohibition of Torture’, Public Affairs Quarterly, 2008, 22(2), pp. 109–128.Google Scholar
McCarthy-Jones, S., ‘The Autonomous Mind: The Right to Freedom of Thought in the Twenty-First Century’, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 2019, 2(19), pp. 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McMillan, J., ‘The Kindest Cut? Surgical Castration, Sex Offenders and Coercive Offers’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2014, 40(9), pp. 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-101030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeill, F., ‘Four Forms of “Offender” Rehabilitation: Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 2012, 17, pp. 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTernan, E., ‘Freedom, Spontaneity, and Our Encounters’, Political Philosophy 2024, 1(2), 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTernan, R., ‘Those Who Forget the Past: An Ethical Challenge from the History of Treating Deviance’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 273–288.Google Scholar
Meijer, S., ‘Rehabilitation as a Positive Obligation’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law, and Criminal Justice 2017, 25(2), pp. 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijers, J., ‘Reduced Self-Control after 3 Months of Imprisonment; A Pilot Study’, Frontiers in Psychology 2018, 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijers, J., Harte, J. M. & Scherder, J. A., ‘Prison and the Brain’, in Swaab, H. & Meynen, G. (eds.), Brain and Crime, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Volume 197, Amsterdam: Elsevier 2023, pp. 55–64.Google Scholar
Mendlow, G., ‘Why Is It Wrong To Punish Thought?’ The Yale Law Journal 2018, 127(8), pp. 2342–2486.Google Scholar
Menefee, D. S. et al., ‘The Importance of Emotional Regulation in Mental Health’, American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2022, 16(1), pp. 28–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metz, T., ‘A Relational Theory of Dignity and Human Rights: An Alternative to Autonomy’, The Monist 2024, 107(3), pp. 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mews, A., Di Bella, L. & Purver, M., ‘Impact Evaluation of the Prison-Based Core Sex Offender Treatment Programme’, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series London 2017.Google Scholar
Meynen, G., ‘Brain-Based Mind Reading: Conceptual Clarifications and Legal Applications’, Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2018, 5(1), pp. 212–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meynen, G. et al., ‘Neurotechnology to Reduce Recidivism: Ethical and Legal Challenges’, in Swaab, H. & Meynen, G. (eds.), Brain and Crime, Series: Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Amsterdam: Elsevier 2023, pp. 265–276.Google Scholar
Michalowski, S., ‘Critical Reflections on the Need for a Right to Mental Self-Determination’, in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K. & Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric, Padstow: Cambridge University Press 2020, pp. 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S., Utilitarianism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014 [1861].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molero, Y. et al., ‘Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Violent Crime: A Cohort Study’, PLoS Medicine 2015, 12(9), e1001875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molero-Chamizo, A. et al., ‘Bilateral Prefrontal Cortex Anodal tDCS Effects on Self-reported Aggressiveness in Imprisoned Violent Offenders’, Neuroscience 2019, 15, pp. 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, J. et al. ‘Voluntary Enhancement of Neural Signatures of Affiliative Emotion Using fMRI Neurofeedback’, PLoS ONE 2014, 9(5), e97343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möller, K., The Global Model of Constitutional Rights, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. D., Privacy Rights: Moral and Legal Foundations, University Park: Penn State University Press 2010.Google Scholar
Morris, H., ‘A Paternalistic Theory of Punishment’, American Philosophical Quarterly (Oxford) 1981, 18(4), pp. 263–271.Google Scholar
Moschella, M., ‘Contextualizing, Clarifying, and Defending the Doctrine of Double Effect’, Journal of ethics & social philosophy 2023, 26(2), pp. 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowbray, A., ‘Between the Will of the Contracting Parties and the Needs of Today’, in Brems, E. & Gerards, J. (eds.), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013, pp. 17–37.Google Scholar
Murdoch, J., Protecting the Right to Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights, Strasbourg: Council of Europe 2012.Google Scholar
Nadelhoffer, T. et al., ‘Neuroprediction, Violence, and the Law: Setting the Stage’, Neuroethics 2012, 5(1), pp. 67–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissenbaum, H., Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life, California: Stanford Law Books 2010.Google Scholar
Novisky, M. A. & Peralta, R. L., ‘Gladiator School: Returning Citizens’ Experiences with Secondary Violence Exposure in Prison’, Victims & Offenders 2020, 15(5), pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M., ‘Article 3 CFR’, in EU Network of Independent Experts on Fundamental Rights (ed). Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Brussels: European Commission 2006.Google Scholar
Nowak, M., ‘Social Rights in International Law: Categorization versus Indivisibility’, in Binder, C. et al. (eds.), Research Handbook on International Law and Social Rights, Northampton: Edward Elgar 2020, pp. 2–18.Google Scholar
Nowak, M., ‘What’s in a Name? The Prohibitions on Torture and Ill Treatment Today’, in Gearty, C. & Douzinas, C. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Human Rights Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012, pp. 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, M. & Schabas, W., U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Nowak’s CCPR Commentary, 3rd revised ed., N.P. Engel: Kehl 2019.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C., Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, P. et al., ‘The Right to Freedom of Thought: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of the UN Special Rapporteur’s Report on Freedom of Thought’, The International Journal of Human Rights 2024, 28(1), pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, P. & Shiner, B., ‘The Right to Freedom of Thought in the European Convention of Human Rights’, European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance 2021, 8(2–3), pp. 112–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Callaghan, P. & Shiner, B., ‘Introduction’, in O’Callaghan, P. & Shiner, B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook for Freedom of Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2025, pp. 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ooms, P. et al., ‘Cost-effectiveness of Deep Brain Stimulation versus Treatment as Usual for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder’, Brain Stimulation 2017, 10(4), pp. 836–842.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pardo, S. & Patterson, D., Minds, Brains, and Law. The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience, New York: Oxford University Press 2015.Google Scholar
Parfit, D., ‘Personal Identity’, The Philosophical Review 1971, 80(1), pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parola, A. et al., ‘Pragmatics, Theory of Mind and Executive Functions in Schizophrenia: Disentangling the Puzzle Using Machine Learning’, PloS One 2020, 15(3), e0229603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Partsch, K. J., ‘Freedom of Conscience and Expression, and Political Freedoms’, in Henkin, L. (ed.), The International Bill of Rights, New York: Columbia University Press 1981.Google Scholar
Paszkiel, S., Applications of Brain-Computer Interfaces in Intelligent Technologies, Cham: Springer 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peroni, L. & Timmer, A., ‘Vulnerable Groups’, International Journal of Constitutional Law 2013, 11(4), pp. 1056–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. (ed.), Personal Identity, 2nd Ed., London: University of California Press 2008.Google Scholar
Piper, A. & Berle, D., ‘The Association between Trauma Experienced during Incarceration and PTSD Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis’, The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology 2019, 30(5), pp. 854–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ploch, A., ‘Why Dignity Matters: Dignity and the Right (or Not) to Rehabilitation from International and National Perspectives’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 2012, 44(3), pp. 887–950.Google Scholar
Poldrack, R. A. et al., ‘Predicting Violent Behavior: What Can Neuroscience Add?’ Trends in Cognitive Science 2018, 22(2), pp. 111–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powers, M. & Faden, R., Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy, New York: Oxford University Press 2006.Google Scholar
Pratt, T. C. & Cullen, F. T., ‘The Empirical Status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A Meta‐Analysis’, Criminology 2000, 38(3), pp. 931–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Privitera, A. J. & Du, H., ‘Educational Neurotechnology: Where Do We Go from Here?’ Trends in Neuroscience and Education 2022, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, J., ‘Clarifying the Normative Significance of “Personality Changes” Following Deep Brain Stimulation’, Science and Engineering Ethics 2020, 26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pugh, J., ‘Coercion and the Neurocorrective Offer’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in criminal Justice, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 94–115.Google Scholar
Pugh, J. et al., ‘Brainjacking in Deep Brain Stimulation and Autonomy’, Ethics and Information Technology 2018, 20, pp. 219–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pycroft, L. et al., ‘Brainjacking: Implant Security Issues in Invasive Neuromodulation’, World Neurosurgery 2016, 92, pp. 454–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radden, J., ‘Entry: Mental Disorder (Illness)’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online). First published Wed Feb 20, 2019; substantive revision Wed Sep 4, 2024 (accessed May 28, 2025).Google Scholar
Rainey, B., McCormick, P. & Ovey, C., The European Convention on Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press 2021.Google Scholar
Rainey, S. et al., ‘Is the European Data Protection Regulation Sufficient to Deal with Emerging Data Concerns Relating to Neurotechnology?’ Journal of Law and the Biosciences 2020, 7(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratoff, W., ‘The Right to Mental Autonomy: It’s Nature and Scope’, Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2024, 27(1), pp. 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., The Law of Peoples: With, ‘the Idea of Public Reason Revisited’, Harvard: Harvard University Press 1999a.Google Scholar
Rawls, J., A Theory of Justice, Revised ed., Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1999b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, W., ‘Psychiatric Diagnosis as an Ethical Problem’, in Bloch, S., Chodoff, P. & Green, S. (eds.), Psychiatric Ethics, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.Google Scholar
Reinecke, A. et al., ‘Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy Reduces Unwanted Thought Intrusions in Generalized Anxiety Disorder’, Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2013, 44(1), pp. 1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reti, I. M., & Chang, A. D., ‘Introduction to Brain Stimulation’, in Reti, I. (ed.), Brain Stimulation: Methodologies and Interventions, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell 2015, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568323.ch1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, M. E. & Harris, G. T., ‘Psychopathy and Violent Recidivism’, in Kiehl, K. A. & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. P. (eds.), Handbook on Psychopathy and Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013, pp. 231–249.Google Scholar
Richmond, S., Rees, G. &. Edwards, S. J. L. (eds.), I Know What You’re Thinking: Brain Imaging and Mental Privacy, Croydon: Oxford University Press 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickli, J. M. & Ienca, M., ‘The Security and Military Implications of Neurotechnology and Artificial Intelligence’, in Friedrich, O. et al. (eds.), Clinical Neurotechnology Meets Artificial Intelligence: Advances in Neuroethics, Cham: Springer 2021, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedel, E., ‘The Right to Health under the ICESCR: Existing Scope, New Challenges and How to Deal with It’, in Von Arnauld, A., Von der Decken, K. & Susi, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of New Human Rights: Recognition, Novelty, Rhetoric, Padstow: Cambridge University Press 2020, pp. 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, A., ‘Beyond the Harm Principle’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 2006, 34(3), pp. 215–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. K., Reconceptualising the Place of the Forum Internum and Forum Externum in Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (diss. University of Bristol), Bristol 2020.Google Scholar
Roehr, B., ‘American Psychiatric Association explains DSM-5’, British Medical Journal 2013, 346, f3591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogan, M., ‘Social Rehabilitation and Torture Prevention Bodies in International Human Rights Law: Remits and Roles’, in Coppola, F., Martufi, A. (eds.), Social Rehabilitation and Criminal Justice, London: Routledge 2024, pp. 155–171.Google Scholar
Rogers, W., Mackenzie, C. & Dodds, S., ‘Why Bioethics Needs a Concept Vulnerability’, The International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2012, 5, pp. 11–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, C. P. R. & Boggio, A., The Human Right to Science: History, Development, and Normative Content, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosell, D. R. & Siever, J. L., ‘The Neurobiology of Aggression and Violence’, CNS Spectrums 2015, 20, pp. 254–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenfeld, J. P. (ed.), Detecting Concealed Information and Deception, London: Academic Press 2018.Google Scholar
Ross, A., ‘Ethics of CIA and Military Contracting by Psychiatrists and Psychologists’, Ethical Human Psychology and Psychiatry 2007, 9(1), pp. 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotman, E., ‘The History of Rehabilitation as a Penological Principle’, in Coppola, F., Martufi, A. (eds.), Social Rehabilitation and Criminal Justice, London: Routledge 2024, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, J., ‘The Right of Privacy’, Harvard Law Review 1989, 102(4), pp. 737–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruger, P. J., ‘Toward a Theory of a Right to Health: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements’, Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 2006, 18, pp. 273–326.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L., Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness, New York: Guilford Press 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, J., ‘Retributivism and the (Lack of) Justification of Proportionality’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2021, 15, pp. 447–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryberg, J., Neurointerventions, Crime, and Punishment, New York: Oxford University Press 2020.Google Scholar
Ryberg, J., ‘Neuroscientific Treatment of Criminals and Penal Theory’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime: Philosophical Essays on Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 177–195.Google Scholar
Ryberg, J., ‘Punishment, Pharmacological Treatment, and Early Release’, International Journey of Applied Philosophy 2012, 26, pp. 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safron, A. et al., ‘Neural Correlates of Sexual Orientation in Heterosexual, Bisexual, and Homosexual Men’, Scientific Reports 2017, 7, pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salama, H. et al., ‘The Role of Neuromodulation in the Management of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy’, Neurological Sciences 2024, 45(9), pp. 4243–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sapsford, R. J., ‘Life-Sentence Prisoners: Psychological Changes during Sentence’, British Journal of Criminology 1978, 18(2), pp. 128–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, T., The Difficulty of Tolerance: Essays in Political Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schartmueller, D., ‘Too Dangerous to Get Out? The Use of Individualized Release Mechanisms for Lifetime Incarcerated Offenders in Sweden’, Criminal Justice Policy Review 2014, 25(4), pp. 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, M., Staying Alive: Personal Identity, Practical Concerns, and the Unity of a Life, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechtman, M., ‘The Narrative Self’, in Gallagher, S. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011, pp. 394–416.Google Scholar
Schechtman, M., ‘Philosophical Reflections on Narrative and Deep Brain Stimulation’, The Journal of Clinical Ethics 2010, 21, pp. 133–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schechtman, M., ‘Getting Our Stories Straight: Self-narrative and Personal Identity’, in Mathews, D. J. H., Bok, H. & Rabins, P. V. (eds.), Personal Identity and Fractured Selves, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press 2009, pp. 65–94.Google Scholar
Schermer, M., ‘Changes in the Self: The Need for Conceptual Research Next to Empirical Research’, The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2009, 9(5), pp. 45–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schnittker, J., ‘The Psychological Dimensions and the Social Consequences of Incarceration’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2014, 651, pp. 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schüpbach, M. et al., ‘Neurosurgery in Parkinson Disease a Distressed Mind in a Repaired Body?’ Neurology 2006, 66(12), pp. 1811–1816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, P. M., ‘Internet Privacy and the State’, Connecticut Law Review 2000, 32, pp. 815–875.Google Scholar
Scott, C. & Macklem, P., ‘Constitutional Ropes of Sand or Justiciable Guarantees? Social Rights in a New South African Constitution’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1992, 141(1), pp. 1–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seligman, M., Flourish: A New Understanding of Happiness and Wellbeing: The Practical Guide to Using Positive Psychology to Make You Happier and Healthier, London: Nicholas Brealey, 2011.Google Scholar
Sensi, M., Eleopra, R., Cavallo, M., et al., ‘Explosive-Aggressive Behavior Related to Bilateral Subthalamic Stimulation’, Parkinsonism Related Disorders 2004, 10(4), pp. 247–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sententia, W., ‘Neuroethical Considerations: Cognitive Liberty and Converging Technologies for Improving Human Cognition’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004, 1013(1), pp. 221–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergiou, C. et al., ‘Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Targeting the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Reduces Reactive Aggression and Modulates Electrophysiological Responses in a Forensic Population’, Biological Psychiatry: CNNI 2022, 7(1), pp. 95–107.Google Scholar
Sharma, A. & Weintraub, A., ‘Neuroimaging’, in Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J. & Caplan, B. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology, Cham: Springer 2016, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Shaw, E., ‘Neuroscience, Criminal Sentencing, and Human Rights’, William & Mary Law Review 2022, 63(4), pp. 1409–1443.Google Scholar
Shen, F. X., ‘Neuroscience, Mental Privacy and the Law’, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 2013, 36, pp. 653–713.Google Scholar
Shih, J. J., Krusienski, D. J. & Wolpaw, J. R., ‘Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine’, Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2012, 87(3), pp. 268–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shoemaker, D., ‘Personal Identity and Ethics’, in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2021.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, D., ‘Persons and Their Pasts’, American Philosophy Quarterly 1970, 7, pp. 269–285.Google Scholar
Shue, H., Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Sifferd, K. L., ‘Chemical Castration as Punishment’, in Vincent, N. A., Nadelhoffer, T. & McCay, A. (eds.), Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, New York: Oxford University Press 2020, pp. 293–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skogly, S., ‘The Requirement of Using the “Maximum of Available Resources” for Human Rights Realisation: A Question of Quality as Well as Quantity?’ Human Rights Law Review 2012, 12(3), pp. 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobogin, C., ‘Principles of Risk Assessment: Sentencing and Policing’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 2018, 15, pp. 583–596.Google Scholar
Smilowska, K. et al., ‘Cost-Effectiveness of Device-Aided Therapies in Parkinson’s Disease: A Structured Review’, Journal of Parkinson’s Disease 2021, 11(2), pp. 475–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R., ‘The End of Disease and the Beginning of Health’, BMJ Group Blogs, 2008, accessed November 15, 2023.Google Scholar
Snacken, S. & van Zyl Smit, D., ‘The Prisoner as Rechtsburger: A European Perspective’, in Franken, A. A., de Langen, M. & Moerings, M. (eds.), Constante waarden. Liber Amicorum Prof. mr. Constantijn Kelk, Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Pompe reeks 2008, pp. 573–584.Google Scholar
Solove, D. J., ‘Conceptualizing Privacy’, California Law Review 2002, 90(4), pp. 1087–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starcevic, V., ‘Benzodiazepines for Anxiety Disorders: Maximising the Benefits and Minimising the Risks’, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 2012, 18(4), pp. 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starfield, B., ‘Basic Concepts in Population Health and Health Care’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2001, 55(7), pp. 452–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, A., ‘I Am the Person Now I Was Always Meant to Be: Identity Reconstruction and Narrative Reframing in Therapeutic Community Prisons’, Criminology & Criminal Justice 2012, 12(5), pp. 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoyanova, V., ‘Framing Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights Law: Mediating between the Abstract and the Concrete’, Human Rights Law Review 2023, 23(3), ngad010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susser, D. & Cabrera, L. Y., ‘Brain Data in Context: Are New Rights the Way to Mental and Brain Privacy?’ The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2023, 15(2), pp. 122–133.Google ScholarPubMed
Swaab, H. & Meynen, G., ‘Preface’, in Swaab, H. & Meynen, G. (eds.), Brain and Crime, Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Volume 197, Amsterdam: Elsevier 2023, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar
Swaine, L., ‘Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty’, Political Theory 2018, 46(3), pp. 405–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbott, W. J., ‘The Consequentialist Project for Human Rights’, in Talbott, W. J. (ed.), Human Rights and Human Well-Being Oxford, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010, pp. 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamimi, Y. Al, ‘Human Rights and the Excess of Identity: A Legal and Theoretical Inquiry into the Notion of Identity in Strasbourg Case Law’, Social & Legal Studies 2018, 27(3), pp. 283–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tan, A. et al., ‘Effects of the KCNQ Channel Opener Ezogabine on Functional Connectivity of the Ventral Striatum and Clinical Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder’, Molecular Psychiatry 2020, 25(6), pp. 1323–1333.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, J. et al., ‘Semantic Reconstruction of Continuous Language from Non-invasive Brain Recordings’, Nature Neuroscience 2023, 26, pp. 858–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, J., ‘Neuromeditation: The Science and Practice of Combining Neurofeedback and Meditation for Improved Mental Health’, in Da-Yin Liao, E. (ed.), Smart Biofeedback – Perspectives and Applications, London: IntechOpen 2020, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. M., A Commentary on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teo, S. A., ‘How to Think about Freedom of Thought (and Opinion) in the Age of AI’, Computer Law & Security Review 2024, 53, 105969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesink, V. et al., ‘Right to Mental Integrity and Neurotechnologies: Implications of the Extended Mind Thesis’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2024, 50, pp. 656–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tesink, V. et al., ‘Neurointerventions in Criminal Justice: On the Scope of the Moral Right to Bodily Integrity’, Neuroethics 2023, 6(3), pp. 16–26.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C. R., Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness (1st ed.), New York: Penguin 2009.Google Scholar
Thibaut, F. et al., ‘The World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for the Biological Treatment of Paraphilias’, The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 2010, 11(4), pp. 604–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thielbörger, P., ‘The “Essence” of International Human Rights’, German Law Journal 2019, 20, pp. 924–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. J., ‘The Right to Privacy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 1975, 4(4), pp. 295–314.Google Scholar
Tiedemann, T. (ed.), Right to Identity: Proceedings of the Special Workshop “Right to Identity” Held at the 27th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Washington DC, Franz Steiner Verlag 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timler, K., Brown, H. & Varcoe, C., ‘Growing Connection beyond Prison Walls: How a Prison Garden Fosters Rehabilitation and Healing for Incarcerated Men’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2019, 58, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmer, A., ‘A Quiet Revolution: Vulnerability in the European Court of Human Rights’, in Fineman, M. A. & Grear, A. (eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics, Surray: Ashgate 2013, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Tonry, M., ‘Predictions of Dangerousness in Sentencing: Déjà Vu All Over Again’, Crime and Justice (Chicago, Ill.) 2019, 48(1), pp. 439–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, C. V. et al., ‘Long-Term Results of Posteromedial Hypothalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients with Resistant Aggressiveness’, Journal of Neurosurger 2013, 119(2), pp. 277–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tortora, L. et al., ‘Neuroprediction and A.I. in Forensic Psychiatry and Criminal Justice: A Neurolaw Perspective’, Frontiers in Psychology 2020, 11(222), pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Travers, R. et al., ‘Reconviction Following a Cognitive Skills Intervention: An Alternative Quasi‐Experimental Methodology’, Legal and Criminological Psychology 2013, 18(1), pp. 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tridimas, T. & Gentile, G., ‘The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?’ German Law Journal 2020, 20(6), pp. 794–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotter, S., ‘Narratives of Absence: On the Construction and Limits of the Category of Personal Identity in European Human Rights Law’, in Marshall, J. (ed.), Personal Identity and the European Court of Human Rights, New York: Routledge 2022, pp. 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D., ‘Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases’, Science 1974, 185, pp. 1124–113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ugwudike, P. et al. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Rehabilitative Work in Criminal Justice, Oxon: Routledge 2020.Google Scholar
Umbach, R., Raine, A. & Leonard, N. R., ‘Cognitive Decline as a Result of Incarceration and the Effects of a CBT/MT Intervention: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 2018, 45(1), pp. 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallentyne, P., ‘Neurointerventions, Self-Ownership, and Enforcement Rights’, in Birks, D. & Douglas, T. (eds.), Treatment for Crime, New York: Oxford University Press 2018, pp. 124–139.Google Scholar
Van de Pol, N., ‘Neuro-Interventions in Criminal Justice: An Analysis of Article 3 ECHR’, European Human Rights Law Review 2023 (5), pp. 459–476.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, R. & Schermer, M., ‘Health and Disease as Practical Concepts: Exploring Function in Context-Specific Definitions’, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 2022, 25(1), pp. 131–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Schyff, G., ‘Cutting to the Core of Conflicting Rights: The Question of Inalienable Cores in Comparative Perspective’, in Brems, E. (ed.), Conflicts between Fundamental Rights, Antwerp: Intersentia 2008, pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
Van Drooghenbroeck, S. & Rizcallah, C., ‘The ECHR and the Essence of Fundamental Rights: Searching for Sugar in Hot Milk?’ German Law Journal 2019, 20(6), pp. 904–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, P., ‘Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity’, Philosophical Perspectives 1997, 11, pp. 305–319.Google Scholar
Van Rijn, A., ‘Freedom of Expression’, in Van Dijk, P. et al. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, pp. 765–812.Google Scholar
Van Voren, R., ‘Ending Political Abuse of Psychiatry: Where We Are at and What Needs to Be Done’, British Journal of Psychiatry Bulletin 2016, 40(1), pp. 30–33.Google Scholar
Van Zyl Smit, D., ‘Rehabilitation as a Dominant Idea in European Prison Law: Problems and Prospect’, Romanian Journal of Sociological Studies 2018, 1, pp. 9–18.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, B. & Battjes, H., ‘Prohibition of Torture and Other Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’, in Van Dijk, P. et al. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, pp. 381–423.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, B. & Roosmalen, M., ‘Freedom of Thought, Conscience and Religion’, in Van Dijk, P. et al. (eds.), Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights, Cambridge: Intersentia 2018, pp. 735–763.Google Scholar
Vieraitis, L. M., Kovandzic, T. V. & Marvell, T. B., ‘The Criminogenic Effects of Imprisonment: Evidence from State Panel Data, 1974–2002’, Criminology & Public Policy 2007, 6(3), pp. 589–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N., ‘Restoring Responsibility: Promoting Justice, Therapy and Reform through Direct Brain Interventions’, Criminal Law and Philosophy 2014, 8, pp. 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N. A., Nadelhoffer, T. & McCay, A. (eds.), Neurointerventions and the Law: Regulating Human Mental Capacity, New York: Oxford University Press 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnerman Paz, S., ‘Is Mental Privacy a Component of Personal Identity?’ Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2021, 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldron, J., ‘Moral Autonomy and Personal Autonomy’, in Christman, J. & Anderson, J. (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism: New Essays, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005, pp. 307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, E. & Diamond, P., ‘Empirically Identifying Factors Related to Violence Risk in Corrections’, Behavioral Sciences and the Law 1999, 17, pp. 377–389.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, T., ‘Ethical Issues in the Treatment of Offenders’, in Davies, J. & Nagi, C. (eds.), Individual Psychological Therapies in Forensic Settings, New York: Routledge 2017, pp. 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T., ‘Human Rights and Dignity in Offender Rehabilitation’, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 2011, 11(2–3), pp. 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T., ‘The Management of Risk and the Design of Good Lives’, Australian Psychologist 2002, 37, pp. 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, T. & Brown, M., ‘The Good Lives Model and Conceptual Issues in Offender Rehabilitation’, Psychology, Crime, & Law 2004, 10, pp. 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, S. D. & Brandeis, L.D., ‘The Right to Privacy’, Harvard Law Review 1890, 4, pp. 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendel, B. E., Rocque, M. & Posick, C., ‘Rethinking Self-control and Crime: Are All Forms of Impulsivity Criminogenic?’ European Journal of Criminology 2022, 19(4), pp. 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werb, D. et al., ‘The Effectiveness of Compulsory Drug Treatment: A Systematic Review’, International Journal of Drug Policy 2016, 28, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wermink, H. et al., ‘ShortTerm Effects of Imprisonment Length on Recidivism in the Netherlands’, Crime & Delinquency 2018, 64(8), pp. 1057–1010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willis, G. M. & Ward, T., ‘Risk Management versus the Good Lives Model: The Construction of Better Lives and the Reduction of Harm’, in Dréan-Rivette, M. & Evans, M. (eds.), Transnational Criminology Manual, Netherlands: Wolf Legal Publishing 2010, pp. 763–781.Google Scholar
Wilson, D., Feder, L. & Olaghere, A., ‘Court‐Mandated Interventions for Individuals Convicted of Domestic Violence: An Updated Campbell Systematic Review’, Campbell Systematic Reviews 2021, 17, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkler, K., ‘Locke on Personal Identity’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 1991, 29(2), pp. 201–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, K. et al., ‘Deep Brain Stimulation and the Search for Identity’, Neuroethics 2013, 6, pp. 499–511.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Witzel, J., ‘Implications of Neuroimaging for Dangerousness Assessment’, in Simpson, J. R. (ed.), Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry. From Clinic to the Courtroom, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell 2012, pp. 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witzleb, N. & Paterson, M., ‘Micro-targeting in Political Campaigns: Political Promise and Democratic Risk’, in Kohl, U. & Eisler, J. (eds.), Data-Driven Personalisation in Markets, Politics and Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2021, pp. 223–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, T., ‘Cogency, Seriousness, Cohesion and Importance’, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 2023, 11, pp. 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpe, P. R., ‘Is My Mind Mine? Neuroethics and Brain Imaging’, in Ravitsky, V., Fiester, A. & Caplan, A. (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics, New York: Springer 2009, pp. 86–93.Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S. & Alexandrova, A., ‘Mental Health without Well-Being’, Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 2021, 46(6), pp. 684–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S. E. et al., ‘Functional Connectivity Signatures of Political Ideology’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Nexus 2022, 1(3), pp. 1–11.Google ScholarPubMed
Yukhnenko, D., Sridhar, S. & Fazel, S., ‘A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update’, Wellcome Open Research 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuste, R., Genser, J. & Herrmann, S., ‘It’s Time for Neuro-Rights’, Horizons 2021, 18, pp. 154–164.Google Scholar
Zainal, N. H. & Newman, M. G., ‘Depression and Executive Functioning Bidirectionally Impair One Another across 9 Years: Evidence from within-Person Latent Change and Cross-Lagged Models’, European Psychiatry 2021, 64(1), e43, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zawadzki, P., ‘Dimensions of the Threat to the Self Posed by Deep Brain Stimulation: Personal Identity, Authenticity, and Autonomy’, Diametros 2021, 18, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar
Zijlmans, J. et al., ‘The Predictive Value of Neurobiological Measures for Recidivism in Delinquent Male Young Adults’, Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 2021, 46(2), E272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zohny, H. et al., ‘The Mystery of Mental Integrity: Clarifying Its Relevance to Neurotechnologies’, Neuroethics 2023, 16: 20, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuk, P., ‘Mental Integrity, Autonomy, and Fundamental Interests’, Journal of Medical Ethics 2024, 50, pp. 676–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwolinski, M., Ferguson, B. & Wertheimer, A., ‘Exploitation’, in Zalta, E. N. & Nodelman, U. (eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2022 Ed.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this book is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
You have
Access
Open access