Book contents
- Triage Bureaucracy
- Triage Bureaucracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Challenge of Implementing Growing Policy Stocks
- 2 Bureaucratic Overload and Organizational Policy Triage
- 3 Observing and Explaining Policy Triage
- 4 Denmark
- 5 Germany
- 6 The United Kingdom
- 7 Ireland
- 8 Italy
- 9 Portugal
- 10 Bureaucratic Policy Triage in Comparative Perspective
- 11 Conclusion
- Book part
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 December 2025
Book contents
- Triage Bureaucracy
- Triage Bureaucracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- 1 The Challenge of Implementing Growing Policy Stocks
- 2 Bureaucratic Overload and Organizational Policy Triage
- 3 Observing and Explaining Policy Triage
- 4 Denmark
- 5 Germany
- 6 The United Kingdom
- 7 Ireland
- 8 Italy
- 9 Portugal
- 10 Bureaucratic Policy Triage in Comparative Perspective
- 11 Conclusion
- Book part
- References
- Index
- References
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Triage BureaucracyThe Organizational Challenge of Implementing Growing Policy Stocks, pp. 316 - 348Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2026
- Creative Commons
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/
References
Abrantes, R. D. (2019). Decentralization and (de)politization in Portugal. Perspectivas – Journal of Political Science, 20(20), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C. (2025). More policies, more work? An epidemiological assessment of accumulating implementation stress in the Context of German Pension Policy. Regulation & Governance, 19(3), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2019). Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108646888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2022). On democratic intelligence and failure: The vice and virtue of incrementalism under political fragmentation and policy accumulation. Governance, 35(2), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C., Knill, C., & Fernández-i-Marín, X. (2017). Rule growth and government effectiveness: Why it takes the capacity to learn and coordinate to constrain rule growth. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9265-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adema, W., Fron, P., & Ladaique, M. (2011). Is the European Welfare State Really More Expensive?: Indicators on Social Spending, 1980–2012; and a Manual to the OECD Social Expenditure Database (SOCX). OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 124. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg2d2d4pbf0-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adie, S. (2023). Eustice blames ‘management failure’ not budget cuts for EA river pollution performance [ENDS Report]. www.endsreport.com/article/1813804?utm_source=website&utm_medium=socialGoogle Scholar
Alvesson, M., & Sandkull, B. (1988). The organizational melting-pot: An arena for different cultures. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 4(3), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-5221(88)90005-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, J. G., & Carstensen, M. B. (2009). The welfare state and welfare reforms in Denmark. In Golinowska, S., Hengstenberg, P., & Zukowski, M. (Eds.), Diversity ad Commonality in European Social Politics: The Forging of a European Social Model (pp. 70–109). Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Andersen, T. M. (2011). Social policies and activation in the Scandinavian welfare model: The case of Denmark. Institut for Økonomi, Aarhus Universitet.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. K., Comfort, L., Keller, A., LaPorte, T., & Schulman, P. (2021). The loss of capacity in public organizations: A public administration challenge. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvaa025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antwi, S. H., Linnane, S., Getty, D., & Rolston, A. (2021). River basin management planning in the Republic of Ireland: Past, present and the future. Water, 13(15), 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, S., & Bordogna, L. (2013). Reframing public service employment relations: The impact of economic crisis and the new EU economic governance. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(4), 270–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113505031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, T., Van Thiel, S., Hammerschmid, G., & Steiner, R. (2017). Administrative tradition and management reforms: A comparison of agency chief executive accountability in four Continental Rechtsstaat countries. Public Management Review, 19(6), 765–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2016.1210205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach, T., & Veit, S. (2019). Verwaltungspolitik und Verwaltungsreform. In Veit, S., Reichard, C., & Wewer, G. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (pp. 63–75). Springer Fachmedien.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame games and climate change: Accountability, multi-level governance and carbon management. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 17(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldini, G., & Baldi, B. (2014). Decentralization in Italy and the troubles of federalization. Regional & Federal Studies, 24(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.827116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balzarolo, D., Lazzara, P., Colonna, P., Becciu, G., & Rana, G. (2011). The implementation of the Water Framework Directive in Italy. In Junier, S., El Moujabber, M., Trisorio-Liuzzi, G., Tigrek, S., Serneguet, M., Choukr-Allah, R., Shatanawi, M., & Rodríguez, R. (Eds.), Dialogues on Mediterranean Water Challenges: Rational Water Use, Water Price Versus Value and Lessons Learned from the European Water Framework Directive (pp. 155–167). CIHEAM (Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 98).Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1976). Policy termination as a political process. Policy Sciences, 7(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardt, H. (2018). Kommunale Umweltpolitik zwischen strategischer Planung und Pragmatismus – das Beispiel der Anpassung an den Klimawandel. In Gadatsch, A., Ihne, H., Monhemius, J., & Schreiber, D. (Eds.), Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften im digitalen Zeitalter: Innovation – Steuerung – Compliance (pp. 323–332). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-20174-6_23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, M. W., Jordan, A., Green-Pedersen, C., & Héritier, A. (Eds.). (2012). Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199656646.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayerischer Landkreistag. (2018). Mitteilungen des Bayerischen Landkreistags (Pressemitteilung No. 3 vom 09. Mai 2018; Landkreistag Kompakt). www.bay-landkreistag.de/media/58287/2018-ausgabe-3.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bayerlein, L., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2020). A Matter of Style: Organizational Agency in Global Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108864671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayerlein, L., Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Zink, D. (2021). Empirically assessing administrative styles as bureaucratic routines. In Howlett, M. & Tosun, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Policy Styles (pp. 176–187). Routledge.10.4324/9780429286322-18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayerlein, L., Knill, C., & Zink, D. (2021). The concept of administrative styles. In Howlett, M. & Tosun, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Policy Styles (pp. 153–164). Routledge.10.4324/9780429286322-16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BayORH – Bayerischer Oberster Rechnungshof. (2013). Jahresbericht 2013. www.orh.bayern.de/mam/berichte/jahresberichte/archiv/orh-bericht_2013.pdfGoogle Scholar
BayORH – Bayerischer Oberster Rechnungshof. (2018). Jahresbericht 2018. https://orh.bayern.de/mam/berichte/jahresberichte/archiv/orh-bericht_2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bazzani, T. (2017). Italy, Denmark and Germany: A comparative analysis in active and passive labour market policies. European Labour Law Journal, 8(2), 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/2031952517712124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, C., & Fothergill, S. (2018). Welfare reform in the United Kingdom 2010–16: Expectations, outcomes, and local impacts. Social Policy & Administration, 52(5), 950–968. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2005). Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bel, G., & Elston, T. (2024). Disentangling the separate and combined effects of privatization and cooperation on local government service delivery. Public Administration, 102(4), 1624–1646. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (1991). Die kulturellen Widersprüche des Kapitalismus (Dt. Neuausg). Campus-Verl.Google Scholar
Bell, D., & Gray, T. (2002). The ambiguous role of the environment agency in England and Wales. Environmental Politics, 11(3), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertelli, A. M., Clouser McCann, P. J., & Travaglini, G. L. (2019). Delegation, collaborative governance, and nondistributive policy: The curious case of joint partnerships in American federalism. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1086/700724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevir, M., & O’Brien, D. (2001). New labour and the public sector in Britain. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 535–547. http://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bigg, M. (2018). Introduction to environmental regulation and practice in the UK and Europe. In Foreman, J. (Ed.), Developments in Environmental Regulation: Risk Based Regulation in the UK and Europe (pp. 1–47). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
Bleich, E., & Pekkanen, R. (2019). How to report interview data. In Layna, M. (ed.) Interview Research in Political Science (pp. 84–106). Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Blom-Hansen, J. (2012). Local government in Denmark and the 2007 reform. In Moisio, A. (Ed.), Rethinking Local Government: Essays on Municipal Reform (pp. 43–81). Government Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
Blöndal, J. R., & Ruffner, M. (2004). Budgeting in Denmark. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 4(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v4-1-enCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böcher, M., & Töller, A. E. (2012). Umweltpolitik in Deutschland: Eine politikfeldanalytische Einführung. Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-531-19465-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeckh, J., Benz, B., Huster, E.-U., & Schütte, J. D. (2015). Sozialpolitik (No. 327; Informationen Zur Politischen Bildung, p. 75). Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. www.bpb.de/system/files/dokument_pdf/IzpB_327_Sozialpolitik_barrierefrei.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bogumil, J., & Kuhlmann, S. (2022). Verwaltungsverflechtung als “missing link” der Föderalismusforschung: Administrative Bewältigung der Flüchtlingskrise im deutschen Mehrebenensystem. der moderne staat – dms: Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 15(1), 84–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v15i1.06Google Scholar
Bolgherini, S., Casula, M., & Marotta, M. (2018). Municipal reaction to functional rescaling in Italy. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(4), 448–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2016-0204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. A. (2000). Improving compliance through domestic mobilisation? New instruments and effectiveness of implementation in Spain. In Knill, C. & Lenschow, A. (Eds.), Implementing EU Environmental Policy: New Directions and Old Problems (pp. 222–250). Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, T. A. (2021). Why Noncompliance: The Politics of Law in the European Union. Cornell University Press.10.1515/9781501753411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brattström, E., & Hellström, T. (2019). Street-level priority-setting: The role of discretion in implementation of research, development, and innovation priorities. Energy Policy, 127, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brendler, V., & Thomann, E. (2024). Does institutional misfit trigger customisation instead of non-compliance? West European Politics, 47(3), 515–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2023.2166734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breunig, C., & Busemeyer, M. R. (2012). Fiscal austerity and the trade-off between public investment and social spending. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(6), 921–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.614158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brittan, S. (1975). The economic contradictions of democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 129–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronchi, C. (2003). The Effectiveness of Public Expenditure in Portugal. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Vol. 349. https://doi.org/10.1787/636037755640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brussig, M. (2017). Methoden und Daten zur Erforschung spezieller Organisationen: Organisationen der Sozialversicherung. In Liebig, S., Matiaske, W., & Rosenbohm, S. (Eds.), Handbuch Empirische Organisationsforschung (pp. 589–608). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-08493-6_32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulman, T. (2021). Strenghtening Italy’s Public Sector Effectiveness. Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1690. https://one.oecd.org/document/ECO/WKP(2021)41/En/pdfGoogle Scholar
Buoso, E. (2025). The civil service in Italy: A flood of legislative reforms and a few safe harbours. In Sommermann, K.-P., Krzywoń, A., & Fraenkel-Haeberle, C. (Eds.), The Civil Service in Europe (pp. 203–220). Routledge.10.4324/9781003458333-13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, F., Mordue, S., al Fulaji, N., Boersch-Supan, P. H., Boswell, J., Boyd, R. J., Bradfer-Lawrence, T., de Ornellas, P., de Palma, A., de Zylva, P., Dennis, E. B., Foster, S., Gilbert, G., Halliwell, L., Hawkins, K., Haysom, K. A., Holland, M. M., Hughes, J., Jackson, A. C., … Gregory, R. D. (2023). State of Nature 2023. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20636.26245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, N. (2010). The Impact of European Environmental Policy in Ireland (pp. 1–63) [Background Paper]. National Economic and Social Council. http://files.nesc.ie/nesc_background_papers/NESC_122g__bg_paper_5.pdfGoogle Scholar
Caldas, J. C. (2012). The Consequences of Austerity Policies in Portugal. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Campbell, G. R. (1990). Social Security in Portugal: Harmonizing for Europe 1992. Social Security Bulletin, 53(8), 6. https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v53n8/v53n8p2.pdfGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113500475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capurro, D. (2023, April 5). “Morale is the lowest I’ve known in 27 years:” How the Environment Agency hit rock bottom. The i Paper. https://inews.co.uk/news/environment/environment-agency-strike-hit-rock-bottom-morale-lowest-ever-known-2256638Google Scholar
Carmel, E., & Papadopoulos, T. (2003). The new governance of social security in Britain. In Millar, J. (Ed.), Understanding Social Security: Issues for Policy and Practice (pp. 31–52). Policy Press.Google Scholar
Carter, N., & Lowe, P. (1995). The establishment of a cross-sector environment agency. In Gray, T. S. (Ed.), UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s (pp. 38–56). Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar
Casquilho-Martins, I. (2021). The impacts of socioeconomic crisis in Portugal on social protection and social work practices. Sustainability, 13(23), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132313198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellani, L. (2019, July 28). Administrative traditions matter. The Italian style and the New Public Management. An historical perspective. International Public Policy Conference, Montreal, CA. https://ippapublicpolicy.org/file/paper/5cdc2e77b3616.pdfGoogle Scholar
Catalano, S., Graziano, P., & Bassoli, M. (2015). Devolution and local cohesion policy: Bureaucratic obstacles to policy integration in Italy. Journal of Social Policy, 44(4), 747–768. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279415000239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavatorto, S., & La Spina, A. (2020). The Politics of Public Administration Reform in Italy. Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-32288-510.1007/978-3-030-32288-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CCDR. (2022). Breve Historial CCDR. www.ccdr-lvt.pt/ccdr-lvt/quem-somos-ccdr-lvt/breve-historial-ccdr/Google Scholar
CEMR. (2007). Consultation Procedures Within European States. Council of European Municipalities and Regions.Google Scholar
Cepiku, D. (2018). Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28: Italy. European Commission.Google Scholar
Cepiku, D., & Meneguzzo, M. (2020). Public administration in Italy. In Bouckaert, G. & Jann, W. (Eds.), European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward (pp. 387–402). Leuven University Press.10.2307/j.ctvv417th.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R. K., Goerdel, H., & Nicholson-Crotty, S. (2011). Management, law, and the pursuit of the public good in public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 1), 125–140. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=218746510.1093/jopart/muq065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, G., Lippi, A., & Profeti, S. (2016). Local public services in Italy: Still fragmentation. In Wollmann, H., Koprić, I., & Marcou, G. (Eds.), Public and Social Services in Europe: From Public and Municipal to Private Sector Provision (pp. 103–117). Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, C. D. (2025). The civil service in Germany: A service based on mutual loyalty. In Sommermann, K.-P., Krzywoń, A., & Fraenkel-Haeberle, C. (Eds.), The Civil Service in Europe (pp. 163–184). Routledge.10.4324/9781003458333-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, N. (2021). Policy Entrepreneurship at the Street Level: Understanding the Effect of the Individual. Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/core/elements/policy-entrepreneurship-at-the-street-level/2579D7560AFE0663924A6C361D54D7A310.1017/9781108864299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, N., & Aviram, N. F. (2021). Street-level bureaucrats and policy entrepreneurship: When implementers challenge policy design. Public Administration, 99(3), 427–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colley, T. (2024). DEFRA ‘haemorrhaging staff’ and work not getting done, say insiders [ENDS Report]. www.endsreport.com/article/1816729?utm_source=website&utm_medium=socialGoogle Scholar
Considine, J., & Reidy, T. (2015). Baby steps: The expanding financial base of local government in Ireland. Administration, 63(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/admin-2015-0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, C. A., Elston, T., & Bilous, A. (2024). Shifting the deckchairs: How blame avoiders cope with the loss of a scapegoat. In Flinders, M., Hinterleitner, M., Rhodes, R. A. W., Weaver, R. K., & Dimova, G. (Eds.), The Politics and Governance of Blame (pp. 348–376). Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198896388.003.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corte-Real, I. (2018). The modernization of public administration in Portugal, 1950s–1970s. Memoria y Civilización, 21, 455–478. https://doi.org/10.15581/001.21.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotta, B., & Domorenok, E. (2022). Catching up with the European Union’s recovery and resilience agenda: Green transition reforms in the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan. Contemporary Italian Politics, 14(4), 424–440, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23248823.2022.2126925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyle, C. (1994). Administrative capacity and the implementation of EU environmental policy in Ireland. Regional Politics and Policy, 4(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569408420887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, M. K. D. (2013). Rethinking epistemic communities twenty years later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–160.10.1017/S0260210512000034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S. P., Watanuki, J., & Commission, T. (1975). The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice Hall/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Dalingwater, L. (2015). Civil service reform and the legacy of thatcherism. Observatoire de La Société Britannique, 17, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.1765Google Scholar
Danish Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Environmental Factors and Health: The Danish Experience. www2.mst.dk/udgiv/Publications/2001/87-7944-519-5/html/helepubl_eng.htm#kap2.5.3Google Scholar
Dasgupta, A., & Kapur, D. (2020). The political economy of bureaucratic overload: Evidence from rural development officials in India. American Political Science Review, 114(4), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daugbjerg, C., & Swinbank, A. (2016). Three decades of policy layering and politically sustainable reform in the European Union’s Agricultural Policy. Governance, 29(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, J. (2020). UK Has “Led the World” in Destroying the Natural Environment. National History Museum. www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/news/2020/september/uk-has-led-the-world-in-destroying-the-natural-environment.htmlGoogle Scholar
de Ruiter, M. (2019). Taking the heat or shifting the blame? Ethical leadership in political-administrative relations after policy failures. Public Integrity, 21(6), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2019.1608740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Pino, E., & Pavolini, E. (2015). Decentralisation at a time of harsh austerity: Multilevel governance and the welfare state in Spain and Italy facing the crisis. European Journal of Social Security, 17(2), 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271501700206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell’Anno, R., Pergolizzi, A., Pittiglio, R., & Reganati, F. (2020). Waste crime in Italian Regions: A structural equation approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2019.100751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department for Communities and Local Government. (2022). New burdens doctrine: Guidance for government departments. www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-burdens-doctrine-guidance-for-government-departments/new-burdens-doctrine-guidance-for-government-departmentsGoogle Scholar
Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage. (2021). Strategic Review of Ireland’s National Parks and Wildlife Service. Government of Ireland. www.npws.ie/about-npws/review-npws-2021-terms-referenceGoogle Scholar
Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. (2016). Code of Practice for Governance of State Bodies 2016. https://hea.ie/assets/uploads/2017/05/Code-of-Practice-for-Governance-of-State-Bodies-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Unterrichtung durch die Bundesregierung – Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Einführung des Elterngeld Plus mit Partnerschaftsbonus und einer flexibleren Elternzeit im Bundeselterngeld- und Elternzeitgesetz – Gegenäußerung der Bundesregierung zu der Stellungnahme des Bundesrates (No. Drucksache 18/2625). https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/18/026/1802625.pdfGoogle Scholar
Devine, K., Mulleady, D., & Nevin, C. (2021, January). Occupational Pension Funds in Ireland – What Do We Know? Central Bank of Ireland. www.centralbank.ie/statistics/statistical-publications/behind-the-data/occupational-pension-funds-in-ireland-what-do-we-knowGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2014). Austerity and public administration: Italy between modernization and spending cuts. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(12), 1634–1656. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764214534667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2015). Fiscal retrenchment in Southern Europe: Changing patterns of public management in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Public Management Review, 17(1), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.790275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. (2023). Post-Brexit challenges to the UK machinery of government in an ‘Age of Fiasco’: The dangers of muddling through? Journal of European Public Policy, 30(11), 2251–2274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2225562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P., & Richardson, J. (2023). The Brexit Omnishambles and the law of large solutions. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(11), 2235–2250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2245425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R., & Elston, T. (2020). Efficiency and legitimacy in collaborative public management: Mapping inter‐local agreements in England using social network analysis. Public Administration, 98(3), 746–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DMEA. (2014). Municipalities and Regions: Tasks and Financing. Danish Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior. www.english.sm.dk/media/16477/municipalities-and-regions-tasks-and-financing-june-2014.pdfGoogle Scholar
Döhler, M. (2019). Staat und Verwaltung. In Veit, S., Reichard, C., & Wewer, G. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (pp. 17–26). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-21563-7_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donelan, E. (2022). Regulatory Governance: Policy Making, Legislative Drafting and Law Reform. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-96351-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorey, P. (2016). Policies under Cameron: Modernisation abandoned. In Peele, G. & Francis, J. (Eds.), David Cameron and Conservative Renewal: The Limits of Modernisation? (pp. 58–81). Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
DRV – Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund. (2024). Rentenversicherung in Zeitreihen (No. Band 22; DRV-Schriften). www.deutsche-rentenversicherung.de/DRV/DE/Experten/Zahlen-und-Fakten/Statistiken-und-Berichte/statistiken_und_berichte.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dudley, G., & Gamble, A. (2023). Brexit and UK policy-making: An overview. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(11), 2573–2597. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2258164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DWP. (2010). Universal Credit: Welfare That Works. Department for Work and Pensions. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/48897/universal-credit-full-document.pdfGoogle Scholar
DWP. (2023). Independent Review of the Pensions Regulator (TPR) [Corporate Report]. Department for Work and Pensions. www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-the-pensions-regulator-tprGoogle Scholar
Eichenhofer, E., Rische, H., & Schmähl, W. (Eds.). (2012). Handbuch der gesetzlichen Rentenversicherung – SGB VI (2. Aufl). Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Elliott, F. E., & Capurro, D. (2023, February 15). Environment Agency failed to protect England’s rivers says former environment secretary. The i Paper. https://inews.co.uk/news/environment/environment-agency-failed-protect-englands-rivers-environment-secretary-2150626Google Scholar
Elston, T. (2014). Not so ‘arm’s length’: Reinterpreting agencies in UK Central Government. Public Administration, 92(2), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elston, T., & Bel, G. (2023). Does inter-municipal collaboration improve public service resilience? Evidence from local authorities in England. Public Management Review, 25(4), 734–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2012377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Act. (1995). Retrieved February 18, 2025, from www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1995/25/section/2Google Scholar
Environment Agency. (2024). Review of activities regulated by the Environment Agency, 2022. www.gov.uk/government/publications/review-of-activities-regulated-by-the-environment-agency-2022/review-of-activities-regulated-by-the-environment-agency-2022Google Scholar
EPA. (2019). Compliance and Enforcement Policy. www.epa.ie/publications/compliance--enforcement/licensees/performance/EPA_ComplianceandEnforcementPolicy.pdfGoogle Scholar
EPA. (2023). Focus on Local Authority Environmental Enforcement – Performance Report 2022. Environmental Protection Agency. www.epa.ie/publications/compliance--enforcement/public-authorities/Focus-on-Local-Authority-Environmental-Enforcement---Performance-Report-2022.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2007). Ireland: Commission takes action to secure clean drinking water and citizens’ rights [Press Release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_07_391Google Scholar
European Commission. (2018). Public administration characteristics and performance in EU28 – EU Law and Publications. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2767/297733Google Scholar
European Commission. (2019). Implementation Review 2019 Country Report – DENMARK. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/0d555d45-0ac3-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1/language-enGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2022). Environmental Implementation Review 2022. Country Report – PORTUGAL [Commission Staff Working Document]. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52022SC0270Google Scholar
European Commission. (2023). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committe and the Committee of the Regions, Commission work programme 2024, Delivering today and preparing for tomorrow, Strasbourg, 17.10.2023 (COM (2023) No. 638 final).Google Scholar
Fargion, V. (2005). From the southern to the northern question: Territorial and social politics in Italy. In McEwen, N. & Moreno, L. (Eds.), The Territorial Politics of Welfare (pp. 127–147). Routledge.Google Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2023a). Bureaucratic overburdening in advanced democracies. Public Administration Review, 84(4), 696–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2023b). Policy growth, implementation capacities, and the effect on policy performance. Governance, 37(3), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2025). Do governments put their money where their mouth is? Policy adoption and administrative resource provision in 15 OECD countries. Perspectives on Politics 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592724001944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hurka, S., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2022). Systemic dynamics of policy change: Overcoming some blind spots of punctuated equilibrium theory. Policy Studies Journal, 50(3), 527–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Bureaucratic quality and the gap between implementation burden and administrative capacities. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1240–1260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Zink, D. (2024). Tackling blind spots in Europeanisation research: The impact of EU legislation on national policy portfolios. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2397129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-i-Marín, X., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2021). Studying policy design quality in comparative perspective. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 931–947. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrera, M. (2005). Welfare states and social safety nets in Southern Europe. In Ferrera, M. (Ed.), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe: Fighting Poverty and Social Exclusion in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal (pp. 1–24). Routledge.10.4324/9780203356906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisch, S. (2025). Governing and administering: The European origins and traditions of the civil service. In Sommermann, K.-P., Krzywoń, A., & Fraenkel-Haeberle, C. (Eds.), The Civil Service in Europe (pp. 28–41). Routledge.10.4324/9781003458333-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGerald, G., Jelinek, G. A., Scott, D., & Gerdtz, M. F. (2010). Emergency department triage revisited. Emergency Medicine Journal: EMJ, 27(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.2009.077081CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flink, C. M. (2017). Rethinking punctuated equilibrium theory: A public administration approach to budgetary changes. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flynn, B. (2004). Ireland: The triumph of policy style over substance. In Jordan, A. J. & Liefferink, D. (Eds.), Environmental Policy in Europe: The Europeanization of National Environmental Policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Forde, C. (2005). Participatory democracy or pseudo-participation? Local government reform in Ireland. Local Government Studies, 31(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930500031934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiburghaus, R., Vatter, A., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2023). Kinder, gentler – and crisis-proof? Consensus democracy, inclusive institutions and COVID-19 pandemic performance. West European Politics, 46(6), 1106–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2156164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, T. (1999). Unconvinced by Europe of the regions: The 1998 regionalization referendum in Portugal. South European Society and Politics, 4(1), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608740408539562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GEA – German Environment Agency. (2019). A Guide to Environmental Administration in Germany. Umweltbundesamt. www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/a-guide-to-environmental-administration-in-germanyGoogle Scholar
Gemeindetag Baden Württemberg. (2022, September 22). Belastungsgrenze überschritten – Kein „Weiter so”! | Gemeindetag Baden-Württemberg [Positionspapier]. Baden-Württemberg. Kommunaler Landesverband Kreisangehöriger Städte Und Gemeinden. www.gemeindetag-bw.de/system/files/downloads_buch/Positionspapier_Leistungsf%C3%A4higkeit_final_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Gerring, J. (2017). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2008). Delegation in the regulatory state: Independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781848441361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gofen, A. (2014). Mind the gap: Dimensions and influence of street-level divergence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, M. M. (2000). What Motivates Bureaucrats?: Politics and Administration During the Reagan Years. Columbia University Press.10.7312/gold10696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, J. F. P. (2006). Forest fires in Portugal: How they happen and why they happen. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 63(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207230500435304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodsell, C. T. (2011). Mission Mystique: Strength at the Institutional Center. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(5), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011409566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gratton, G., Guiso, L., Michelacci, C., & Morelli, M. (2021). From Weber to Kafka: Political instability and the overproduction of laws. American Economic Review, 111(9), 2964–3003. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, A. M., & Birrell, D. (2012). Coalition government in Northern Ireland: Social policy and the lowest common denominator thesis. Social Policy and Society, 11(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746411000376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graziano, P., & Winkler, J. (2012). Governance and implementation of activation policies: Czech Republic and Italy compared. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(5–6), 340–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331211237032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, A., & Grant, W. (2023). Divergence and continuity after Brexit in agriculture. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(11), 2326–2348. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2204118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, B. (2012). Denmark a Nordic welfare state – Are the active labour market policy withering away? The Open Social Science Journal, 5(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874945301205010015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, B. (2018). At the heart of the Nordic occupational welfare model: Occupational welfare trajectories in Sweden and Denmark. Social Policy & Administration, 52(2), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, C. (2006). Public management reform in Denmark. Public Management Review, 8(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500518956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, D. (2013). Austerity, privatization and levelling down: Public sector reforms in the United Kingdom. In Vaughan-Whitehead, D. (Ed.), Public Sector Shock (pp. 576–626). Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781781955352.00020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønbech-Jensen, C. (1998). The Scandinavian tradition of open government and the European Union: Problems of compatibility? Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, C., & Stewart, A. (1999). ‘Market workfare’: Social security, social regulation and competitiveness in the 1990s. Journal of Social Policy, 28(1), 73–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279499005449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M. B. (2013). The evolution and challenges of the Danish civil service system. Journal of Policy Science, 7(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. K., & Sigman, R. (2021). Leviathan’s Latent Dimensions: Measuring State Capacity for Comparative Political Research. The Journal of Politics, 83(4), 1495–1510. https://doi.org/10.1086/715066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardiman, N., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). The un-politics of New Public Management in Ireland. In Eymeri-Douzans, J.-M. & Pierre, J. (Eds.), Administrative Reforms and Democratic Governance (pp. 55–67). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardiman, N., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2017). State retrenchment and administrative reform in Ireland: Probing comparative policy paradigms. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(2), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1103432Google Scholar
Heffernan, R. (2005). Exploring (and explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00203.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegele, Y., & Behnke, N. (2017). Horizontal coordination in cooperative federalism: The purpose of ministerial conferences in Germany. Regional & Federal Studies, 27(5), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1315716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinkelmann-Wild, T., & Zangl, B. (2020). Multilevel blame games: Blame-shifting in the European Union. Governance, 33(4), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemme, M. S. (2025). The civil service in Denmark: From a public to a private law employment regime. In Sommermann, K.-P., Krzywoń, A., & Fraenkel-Haeberle, C. (Eds.), The Civil Service in Europe (pp. 114–134). Routledge.10.4324/9781003458333-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendeliowitz, J. (2008). Danish Employment Policy. National Target Setting, Regional Performance Management and Local Delivery. The Danish National Labour Market Authority. https://docslib.org/doc/4584208/danish-employment-policyGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, T. A. (2021). The consequences of the austerity policies for public services in the UK. Studies in Social Justice, 15(3), 518–537. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v15i3.2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2018). Policy failures, blame games and changes to policy practice. Journal of Public Policy, 38(2), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X16000283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M. (2020). Policy Controversies and Political Blame Games. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108860116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2023). The growth of policies, rules, and regulations: A review of the literature and research agenda. Regulation & Governance, 18(2), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueglin, T. O., & Fenna, A. (2015). Comparative Federalism: A Systematic Inquiry (2nd ed.). University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. P. (1975). The democratic distemper. The Public Interest, 41(9), 9–38. www.proquest.com/openview/116a74107013f269e67a22d9f001ea59/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1817076Google Scholar
Hupe, P. (2019). The decision made: On the inspection encounter. In Van de Walle, S. & Raaphorst, N. (Eds.), Inspectors and Enforcement at the Front Line of Government (pp. 227–258). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-04058-1_12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00650.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (2015). Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy. Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hupe, P., & Hill, M. J. (2016). ‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond great expectations. Public Policy and Administration, 31(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715598828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurka, S. (2023). The institutional and political roots of complex policies: Evidence from the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 62(4), 1168–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization. (2020). ILO modelled estimates database, ILOSTAT [employment]. https://ilostat.ilo.org/data/Google Scholar
IMF – International Monetary Fund. (2009). Government Finance Statistics Yearbook, 2008. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781589067554.043Google Scholar
IMF – International Monetary Fund. (2024, April). World Economic Outlook Database: April 2024. IMF. www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2024/AprilGoogle Scholar
ISS. (2021). Relatório de Atividades 2021 Instituto da Segurança Social, IP. Instituto da Segurança Social. www.seg-social.pt/documents/10152/59447/RA2021_v1.2.pdf/0fec56be-807b-44ba-a10a-38aa8e676948Google Scholar
Jackson, P. M. (2014). Thatcherism and the public sector. Industrial Relations Journal, 45(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, M. L. F., & Mortensen, P. B. (2015). How politics shapes the growth of rules. Governance, 28(4), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jann, W. (1999). Zur Entwicklung der öffentlichen Verwaltung. In Ellwein, T. & Holtmann, E. (Eds.), 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Rahmenbedingungen – Entwicklungen – Perspektiven (pp. 520–543). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-322-80357-3_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jantz, B., & Veit, S. (2019). Entbürokratisierung und bessere Rechtsetzung. In Veit, S., Reichard, C., & Wewer, G. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (pp. 509–520). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-21563-7_45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C. B. (2007). Implementing Europe: A question of oversight. European Union Politics, 8(4), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507082810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. M. (2018). Intergovernmental lobbying in the United States: Assessing the benefits of accumulated knowledge. State and Local Government Review, 50(4), 270–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160323X18824514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, A. E. G., & Gibbs, D. C. (2003). Changing local modes of economic and environmental governance in England: A tale of two areas. Social Science Quarterly, 84(4), 1018–1037. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404011.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2022). The durability–flexibility dialectic: The evolution of decarbonisation policies in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(3), 425–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2042721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation in the age of governance. In Jordana, J. & Levi-Faur, D. (Eds.), The Politics of Regulation (pp. 1–28). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420673.00009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juncos, A. E., & Pomorska, K. (2014). Manufacturing Esprit de Corps: The case of the European external action service. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 302–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12107Google Scholar
Kaminski, I. (2016). DEFRA urged EA to deny its preferred chief executive candidate. ENDS Report. www.endsreport.com/article/1531384?utm_source=website&utm_medium=socialGoogle Scholar
Kananen, J. (2012). Nordic paths from welfare to workfare: Danish, Swedish and Finnish labour market reforms in comparison. Local Economy, 27(5–6), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094212445351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplaner, C., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2025). Policy integration in the European Union: Mapping patterns of intersectoral policy-making over time and across policy sectors. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(1), 26–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2288932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplaner, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Coping practices and the spatial dimension of authority design. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2007). Worldwide Governance Indicators Project: Answering the Critics. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 965077. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=96507710.1596/1813-9450-4149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 1682130. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=168213010.1596/1813-9450-5430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y. (2010). Rescaling Social Policies Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe: Social Assistance, Activation and Care for Older People. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kearney, G. (2022, February). Reflect and Renew – A Review of the National Parks and Wildlife Service. https://irishriverproject.com/2022/05/06/reflect-and-renew-a-review-of-the-national-parks-and-wildlife-service/Google Scholar
Keating, M. (2022a). Between two unions: UK devolution, European integration and Brexit. Territory, Politics, Governance, 10(5), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2050939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. (2022b). Taking back control? Brexit and the territorial constitution of the United Kingdom. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(4), 491–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1876156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kickert, W. (2011). Distinctiveness of administrative reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Common characteristics of context, administrations and reforms. Public Administration, 89(3), 801–818.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01862.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. (1975). Overload: Problems of governing in the 1970s. Political Studies, 23(2–3), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1975.tb00068.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C. (2001). The Europeanisation of National Administrations: Patterns of Institutional Change and Persistence. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511491986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., Bauer, M. W., & Benzing, S. (2007). Hemmt das Konnexitätsprinzip politische Innovationen?: Die Einführung der doppelten Buchführung in Bayern und Nordrhein-Westfalen. Die Öffentliche Verwaltung, 60(13), 550–555. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:352-opus-92473Google Scholar
Knill, C., & Lenschow, A. (1998). Coping with Europe: The impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 595–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769880000041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2020). Policy integration: Challenges for public administration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1413Google Scholar
Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2021a). Balancing trade‐offs between policy responsiveness and effectiveness: The impact of vertical policy‐process integration on policy accumulation. Public Administration Review, 81(1), 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2021b). Sustaining statehood: A comparative analysis of vertical policy-process integration in Denmark and Italy. Public Administration, 99(4), 758–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2022). Crises as driver of policy accumulation: Regulatory change and ratcheting in German asylum policies between 1975 and 2019. Regulation & Governance, 16(2), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Buitkamp, B. (2022). Analysing policy proximity through media reporting / Eine Analyse von ‘Policy Proximity’ durch Medienberichterstattung. Dms – Der Moderne Staat – Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management, 15(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v15i2.02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2020). Public Policy: A New Introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Knuth, M., & Larsen, F. (2010). Increasing roles for municipalities in delivering public employment services: The cases of Germany and Denmark. European Journal of Social Security, 12(3), 174–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271001200301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kørnøv, L., Christensen, P., & Nielsen, E. H. (2005). Mission impossible: Does environmental impact assessment in Denmark secure a holistic approach to the environment? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 23(4), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154605781765427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kosti, N., & Levi-Faur, D. (2019). The coproduction of primary and secondary legislation: Israel as a case study of substitutive relationships. Law & Policy, 41(4), 432–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretsch, C. E. (2021). International Benchmarking Study for NPWS Strategic Review 2021. In Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage, Strategic Review of Ireland’s National Parks and Wildlife Service (pp. 73–114). Government of Ireland. www.npws.ie/about-npws/review-npws-2021-terms-referenceGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, S. (2019). Verwaltungstraditionen und Verwaltungssysteme im Vergleich. In Veit, S., Reichard, C., & Wewer, G. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (pp. 39–49). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-21563-7_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, S., & Franzke, J. (2022). Multi-level responses to COVID-19: Crisis coordination in Germany from an intergovernmental perspective. Local Government Studies, 48(2), 312–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2021.1904398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2013). Verwaltung und Verwaltungsreformen in Europa: Einführung in die vergleichende Verwaltungswissenschaft. Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-00173-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, S., & Wollmann, H. (2019). Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe, Second Edition. Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Lægreid, P. (2017). Nordic administrative traditions. In Nedergaard, P. & Wivel, A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Scandinavian Politics (pp. 80–91). Routledge.10.4324/9781315695716-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffan, B., & O’Mahony, J. (2008). ‘Bringing politics back in’. Domestic conflict and the negotiated implementation of EU Nature Conservation Legislation in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 10(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080801928428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapuente, V., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Politicization, bureaucratic legalism, and innovative attitudes in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 80(3), 454–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsen, F., & Wright, S. (2014). Interpreting the marketisation of employment services in Great Britain and Denmark. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714543903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, N. (2022). Do policy makers listen to experts? Evidence from a National Survey of Local and State Policy Makers. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 677–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. (2014). The welfare state: A regulatory perspective. Public Administration, 92(3), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi-Faur, D., Kariv-Teitelbaum, Y., & Medzini, R. (2021, May 26). Regulatory Governance: History, Theories, Strategies, and Challenges. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leyland, P. (2025). The civil service UK style: Facing up to change? In Sommermann, K.-P., Krzywoń, A., & Fraenkel-Haeberle, C. (Eds.), The Civil Service in Europe (pp. 320–341). Routledge.10.4324/9781003458333-19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LGA. (2024a). Local Government Capacity Survey – Environmental Health. Local Government Association. www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/workforce_capacity_survey_-_environmental_health.pdfGoogle Scholar
LGA. (2024b). New Local Government Enforcement Duties: Preferred Policy Approach | Local Government Association. Local Government Association. www.local.gov.uk/new-local-government-enforcement-duties-preferred-policy-approachGoogle Scholar
Liefferink, D., & Wiering, M. (2011, August). Environmental pioneers in retreat? The cases of the Netherlands and Denmark. 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavík. https://ecpr.eu/Events/Event/PaperDetails/7740Google Scholar
Limberg, J., Steinebach, Y., Bayerlein, L., & Knill, C. (2021). The more the better? Rule growth and policy impact from a macro perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 60(2), 438–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lind, J., & Hornemann Møller, I. (2006). Activation for what purpose? Lessons from Denmark. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 26(1/2), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330610644399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, C., & McQuaid, R. W. (2009). New governance and the case of activation policies: Comparing experiences in Denmark and the Netherlands. Social Policy & Administration, 43(5), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00673.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindvall, J. (2010). Power sharing and reform capacity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 22(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629810369524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi, A. (2011). Evaluating the ‘Quasi Federalist’ Programme of Decentralisation in Italy since the 1990s: A side-effect approach. Local Government Studies, 37(5), 495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.604543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy, 30th Ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lobao, L., Gray, M., Cox, K., & Kitson, M. (2018). The shrinking state? Understanding the assault on the public sector. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(3), 389–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, M. (2010). Public service bargains in British Central Government: Multiplication, diversification and reassertion? In Painter, M. & Peters, B. G. (Eds.), Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 99–113). Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230289635_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftis, M. W., & Kettler, J. J. (2015). Lobbying from inside the system: Why local governments pay for representation in the U.S. Congress. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912914563764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, J., & Peters, B. G. (1997). State traditions, administrative reform and regionalization. In Keating, M. & Loughlin, J. (Eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism (pp. 41–62). Routledge.Google Scholar
Lourenço, R. P. (2023). Government transparency: Monitoring public policy accumulation and administrative overload. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, R., & Pemberton, H. (2020). The Official History of the British Civil Service: Reforming the Civil Service, Volume II: The Thatcher and Major Revolutions, 1982–97. Routledge.10.4324/9780429470783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowndes, V., & Gardner, A. (2016). Local governance under the conservatives: Super-austerity, devolution and the ‘smarter state.’ Local Government Studies, 42(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2016.1150837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundin, M. (2007). When does cooperation improve public policy implementation? Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00240.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, J., & Ceretti, P. (2015). Welfare, Italian Style: From Bismarckian beginnings to crisis and reform. In Mammone, A., Parini, E. G., & Veltri, G. A. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Italy: History, Politics, Society (pp. 239–251). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709970Google Scholar
Lynott, D. (2013). A Strategic Approach to Risk Based Regulation. European Risk Summit, Dublin. http://risksummit.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Dara-Lynott-presentation1.pdfGoogle Scholar
MacCarthaigh, M. (2017). Public Sector Reform in Ireland. Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCarthaigh, M., Biggins, J., & Hardiman, N. (2023). Public policy accumulation in Ireland: The changing profile of ministerial departments 1922–2022. Irish Political Studies, 38(1), 92–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2023.2167350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, A. M. (2006). Denmark: Which Type of Welfare Regime? And Recent Political Changes in Denmark: Lecture Notes. Socialrådgiveruddannelsen i Aarhus, VIA University College.Google Scholar
Madureira, C. (2018). Public Administration Characteristics and Performance in EU28 Portugal. European Commission.Google Scholar
Magone, J. M. (2011). The difficult transformation of state and public administration in Portugal. Europeanization and the persistence of neo-patrimonialism. Public Administration, 89(3), 756–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01913.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mailand, M. (2014). Austerity measures and municipalities: The case of Denmark. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 20(3), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258914538212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. (1996, July 15). Temporal Consistency and Policy Credibility: Why Democracies Need Non-Majoritarian Institutions. Working Paper RSC No 96/57. www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Temporal-Consistency-and-Policy-Credibility%3A-Why-Majone/8efcce4de276fb867cf309f97a46083bc89f9124Google Scholar
March, J. G., Schulz, M., & Xueguang, Z. (2000). The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes. Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503618411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchetti, G. (2010). Italian Regions and Local Authorities within the framework of a new Autonomist System. Perspectives on Federalism – Centro Studi Sul Federalismo, 2, 89–121. www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Italian-Regions-and-Local-Authorities-within-the-of-Marchetti/b7a7f134d5f6fe2abf9f20c1e6f31369641fb19aGoogle Scholar
Masood, A., & Nisar, M. A. (2022). Repairing the state: Policy repair in the frontline bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 82(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mateus, P., & Fernandes, P. M. (2014). Forest fires in Portugal: Dynamics, causes and policies. In Reboredo, F. (Ed.), Forest Context and Policies in Portugal (Vol. 19, pp. 97–115). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08455-8_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037242Google Scholar
Matz, U. (1977). Der überforderte Staat: Zur Problematik der heute wirksamen Staatszielvorstellungen. In Hennis, W., Wilhelm, P. G., & Matz, U., Regierbarkeit. Studien zu ihrer Problematisierung (pp. 82–102). Klett.Google Scholar
May, P., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish Agro-Environmental Inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.00089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mccarthy, E., & Yearley, S. (1995). The Irish environmental protection agency: The early years. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 258–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644019508414238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGauran, A.-M., Verhoest, K., & Humphreys, P. C. (2005). The Corporate Governance of Agencies in Ireland: Non-Commercial National Agencies (Vol. 6). Institute of Public Administration.Google Scholar
McGlone, C. (2024). ‘Poor cousins’: DEFRA staff paid less than equivalent roles in other departments. ENDS Report. www.endsreport.com/article/1866326?utm_source=website&utm_medium=socialGoogle Scholar
Mettler, S. (2016). The policyscape and the challenges of contemporary politics to policy maintenance. Perspectives on Politics, 14(2), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716000074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, C. L., Meza, O. D., & Cejudo, G. M. (2022). Interacting institutional logics in policy implementation. Governance, 35(2), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. (2010). Two models of devolution: A framework for analysis. In Stolz, K. (Ed.), Ten Years of Devolution in the United Kingdom: Snapshots at a Moving Target (pp. 52–71). Wissner-Verlag.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (2015). Vested interests and political institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 130(2), 277–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/polq.12321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra-network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The Hurricane Katrina example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01593.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussari, R., & Giordano, F. (2013). Emerging issues in Italian fiscal federalism: The case of municipalities. In Cepiku, D., Jesuit, D. K., & Roberge, I. (Eds.), Making Multilevel Public Management Work. Stories of Success and Failure from Europe and North America (pp. 27–50). Routledge.Google Scholar
NAO. (2021). Local Government and Net Zero in England – NAO Report. National Audit Office. www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Local-government-and-net-zero-in-England.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, V. L. (2015). Law enforcement behaviour of regulatory inspectors. In Buffat, A., Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (Eds.), Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy (pp. 115–132). Bristol University Press.10.2307/j.ctt1t89bw0.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemann, F.-S. (2019). Denmark. In Geißler, R., Hammerschmid, G., & Raffer, C. (Eds.), Local Public Finance in Europe – Country Reports (pp. 51–60). Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
Nishimura, A. Z. F. C., Moreira, A., Sousa, M. J., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2021). Weaknesses in motivation and in establishing a meritocratic system: A portrait of the Portuguese Public Administration. Administrative Sciences, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11030087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueiro, L., & Ramos, T. B. (2009). Environmental management practices in local public administration in Portugal. In Responsible Leader-Ship (pp. 500–521). Vaasan yliopisto.Google Scholar
Nou, J., & Stiglitz, E. (2018). Regulatory Bundling. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3228312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunes Silva, C. (2017). Political and administrative decentralization in Portugal: Four decades of democratic local government. In Nunes Silva, C. & Buček, J. (Eds.), Local Government and Urban Governance in Europe (pp. 9–32). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43979-2_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, H. (2024, June 13). Dirty waters: How the Environment Agency lost its way. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jun/13/dirty-waters-how-the-environment-agency-lost-its-wayGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2001). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Portugal 2001. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264195721-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2010). Better Regulation in Europe: Denmark 2010 (Better Regulation in Europe). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264084551-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2011). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Portugal 2011. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097896-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2013). Better Regulation in Europe: Italy 2012: Revised Edition, June 2013. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204454-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2019). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Denmark 2019. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/1eeec492-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2020a). Decentralisation and Regionalisation in Portugal: What Reform Scenarios? OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/fea62108-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2020b). Driving Performance at Ireland’s Environmental Protection Agency. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/009a0785-enGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2020c). General government spending [OECD Data]. www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/general-government-spending.htmlGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2021a). General government debt [OECD Data]. www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/general-government-debt.htmlGoogle Scholar
OECD. (2021c). OECD Environmental Performance Reviews: Ireland 2021. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9ef10b4f-enGoogle Scholar
Office for Environmental Protection. (2024). Progress in improving the natural environment in England 2022/2023. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65a7c8f8ed27ca001327b106/E02987560-progress-in-improving-natural-environment.pdfGoogle Scholar
O’Hagan, A. M., & Ballinger, R. C. (2010). Implementing Integrated Coastal Zone Management in a national policy vacuum: Local case studies from Ireland. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53(12), 750–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J. P. (1991). Modernization programs in perspective: Institutional analysis of organizational change. Governance, 4(2), 125–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1991.tb00007.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, E., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2011). Governing Ireland: From Cabinet Government to Delegated Governance. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2437974. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2437974Google Scholar
Ongaro, E. (2010). The Napoleonic Administrative Tradition and Public Management Reform in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. In Painter, M. & Peters, B. G. (Eds.), Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 174–190). Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230289635_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongaro, E., & Valotti, G. (2008). Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opello, W. C. (1992). Portuguese regionalism in the transition from the Estado Novo to the single market. Regional Politics and Policy, 2(1–2), 162–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569208420840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, E. (2012). Environmental governance in Italy. In Alberton, M. & Palermo, F. (Eds.), Environmental Protection in Multi-Layered Systems: Comparative Lessons from the Water Sector (Vol. 1, pp. 135–159). Brill.10.1163/9789004235250_008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (2017). The Policy State: An American Predicament. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674982659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouchi, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1985). Organizational culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 457–483. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.002325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.). (2010). Tradition and Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230289635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palermo, F., Parolari, S., & Valdesalici, A. (2016). Italy. In Merloni, F. (Ed.), Regionalisation Trends in European Countries. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities.Google Scholar
Palermo, F., & Wilson, A. (2014). The multi-level dynamics of state decentralization in Italy. Comparative European Politics, 12(4–5), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panzeri, L. (2018). The distribution of legislative competences between state and regions in the evolution of Italian constitutional court case-law. Comparative Law Review, 23, 159–185. https://doi.org/10.12775/CLR.2017.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PCS. (2023). Staffing Crisis in the DWP. PCS Members Explain How They Are Affected. Public and Commercial Services Union. www.rightsnet.org.uk/?ACT=39&fid=11&aid=2767_LKtLmCQKx8mHfHZEgz9x&board_id=1Google Scholar
Pedersen, J. S., & Löfgren, K. (2012). Public sector reforms: New public management without marketization? The Danish Case. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(7), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2012.679579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedroso, P. (2014). Portugal and the Global Crisis. The Impact of Austerity on the Economy, the Social Model and the Performance of the State. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Peled, A. (2002). Why style matters: A comparison of two administrative reform initiatives in the Israelic Public Sector, 1989–1998. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pensions Authority. (2019). The Pensions Authority Annual Report and Accounts 2019. https://pensionsauthority.ie/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/the_pensions_authority_annual_report_and_accounts_2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pereirinha, J. A., & Murteira, M. C. (2016). The Portuguese welfare system in a time of crisis and fiscal austerity. In Schubert, K., de Villota, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.), Challenges to European Welfare Systems (pp. 587–613). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07680-5_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2008). The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2014). Implementation structures as institutions. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713517733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2021). Administrative Traditions: Understanding the Roots of Contemporary Administrative Behavior. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198297253.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the Welfare State?: Reagan, Thatcher and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2016). The Inner Workings of Performance Management in Danish Job Centers: Rational Decisions or Cowboy Solutions? Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, J. (2018). Evolução histórica dos organismos no âmbito da administração pública florestal (1824–2012). Cadernos de Análise e Prospetiva, 11, 1–14. www.gpp.pt/images/GPP/O_que_disponibilizamos/Publicacoes/CULTIVAR_11/SeccaoII3ArtigoJoaoPinho.pdfGoogle Scholar
Pope, T., Dalton, G., & Coggins, M. (2022). Subnational Government in England. Institute for Government, 14. subnational-government-in-england-international-comparison.pdfGoogle Scholar
Portugal, S. (1999). Family and social policy in Portugal. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 13(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/13.3.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland: Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, this Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Prosser, C. (2024). Fragmentation revisited: The UK General Election of 2024. West European Politics, 48(6), 1501–1513. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2024.2430915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queirós, M. (2002). O ambiente nas políticas públicas em Portugal. Finisterra, 37(73), Article 73. https://doi.org/10.18055/Finis1607Google Scholar
Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion-policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, N., Quinn, B., & Connaughton, B. (2013). Europeanisation and New Patterns of Governance in Ireland. Manchester University Press.10.7765/9781847793362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiter, R. (2017). Sozialpolitik aus politikfeldanalytischer Perspektive. Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-14656-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Röber, M. (2019). Aufgabenkritik. In Veit, S., Reichard, C., & Wewer, G. (Eds.), Handbuch zur Verwaltungsreform (pp. 677–689). Springer Fachmedien.10.1007/978-3-658-21563-7_60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, A. S. (2014). The Slow Death of the Overload Thesis: Review of “The Fourth Revolution” by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge. SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2458888. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2458888Google Scholar
Rokkan, S., & Urwin, D. W. (with European Consortium for Political Research). (1983). Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rose, R. (1979). Ungovernability: Is there fire behind the smoke? Political Studies, 27(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1979.tb01209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruge, K., & Ritgen, K. (2021). Local self-government and administration. In Kuhlmann, S., Proeller, I., Schimanke, D., & Ziekow, J. (Eds.), Public Administration in Germany (pp. 123–141). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sætren, H., & Hupe, P. L. (2018). Policy implementation in an age of governance. In Ongaro, E. & Van Thiel, S. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 553–575). Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, F., & Gofen, A. (2022). The polity of implementation: Organizational and institutional arrangements in policy implementation. Governance, 35(2), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sager, F., Thomann, E., Zollinger, C., van der Heiden, N., & Mavrot, C. (2014). Street-level bureaucrats and new modes of governance: How conflicting roles affect the implementation of the Swiss Ordinance on Veterinary Medicinal Products. Public Management Review, 16(4), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvidge, R. (2022, January 10). Ignore reports of low-impact pollution events, Environment Agency tells staff. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/jan/10/ignore-low-impact-pollution-events-environment-agency-staffGoogle Scholar
Salvidge, R., & Hosea, L. (2023a, August 19). Fury as national health check of England’s waters faces six-year wait. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/19/fury-as-national-health-check-of-englands-waters-delayed-by-six-yearsGoogle Scholar
Salvidge, R., & Hosea, L. (2023b, November 2). Environment Agency has nearly halved water-use inspections in last five years. The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/nov/02/environment-agency-england-water-use-inspections-rivers-aquifersGoogle Scholar
Sargent, N. (2022, September 30). Commission warns Ireland over ‘stalled’ action to halt extraction in protected peatlands. TheJournal.Ie. www.thejournal.ie/peats-sake-pt11-commission-action-5880606-Sep2022/Google Scholar
SCETRA. (2000). House of Commons – Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs – Sixth Report (No. 6). Select Committee on Environment, Transport and Regional Affairs. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmenvtra/34/3414.htm#a32Google Scholar
Schäfer, A. (2009). Krisentheorien der Demokratie: Unregierbarkeit, Spätkapitalismus und Postdemokratie. Dms – Der Moderne Staat – Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management, 2(1), 159–183. www.armin-schaefer.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/schaefer_dms1_2009.pdf10.3224/dms.v2i1.09CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharpf, F. W., Reissert, B., & Schnabel, F. (1976). Politikverflechtung. Theorie und Empirie des kooperativen Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik. Scriptor-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scherf, W. (2010). Die kommunalen Finanzen in Deutschland. In Kost, A. & Wehling, H.-G. (Eds.), Kommunalpolitik in den deutschen Ländern: Eine Einführung (pp. 367–388). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-92034-4_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seanad Éireann, Volume 127, Volume 127 No. 6 (1991). www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/1991-01-23Google Scholar
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secco, L., Favero, M., Masiero, M., & Pettenella, D. M. (2017). Failures of political decentralization in promoting network governance in the forest sector: Observations from Italy. Land Use Policy, 62, 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibel, W. (2016). Verwaltung Verstehen: Eine Theoriegeschichtliche Einführung. Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Seibel, W. (2022). Collapsing Structures and Public Mismanagement. Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-67818-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibel, W., Klamann, K., & Treis, H. (2017). Verwaltungsdesaster: Von der Loveparade bis zu den NSU-Ermittlungen. Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Sevä, M., & Jagers, S. C. (2013). Inspecting environmental management from within: The role of street-level bureaucrats in environmental policy implementation. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 1060–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipan, C. R. (2006). Independence and the Irish Environmental Protection Agency: A Comparative Assessment. Policy Institute at Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
Simonelli, F., & Iacob, N. (2021). Can we better the European Union Better Regulation Agenda? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(4), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommermann, K.-P. (2021). Constitutional state and public administration. In Kuhlmann, S., Proeller, I., Schimanke, D., & Ziekow, J. (Eds.), Public Administration in Germany (pp. 17–33). Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sønderskov, K. M., & Daugbjerg, C. (2011). The state and consumer confidence in eco-labeling: Organic labeling in Denmark, Sweden, The United Kingdom and The United States. Agriculture and Human Values, 28(4), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9295-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2015). Southern European governments and public bureaucracies in the context of economic crisis. European Journal of Social Security, 17(2), 226–245.10.1177/138826271501700205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spendzharova, A., & Versluis, E. (2013). Issue salience in the European policy process: What impact on transposition? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1499–1516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2022). Verwaltungsgerichte – Fachserie 10 Reihe 2.4 – 2021. www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Staat/Justiz-Rechtspflege/Publikationen/Downloads-Gerichte/verwaltungsgerichte-2100240217004.htmlGoogle Scholar
Steinebach, Y. (2019). Water quality and the Effectiveness of European Union Policies. Water, 11(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11112244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinebach, Y. (2022). Instrument choice, implementation structures, and the effectiveness of environmental policies: A cross-national analysis. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinebach, Y., Hinterleitner, M., & Fernández‐i‐Marín, X. (2024). Regulatory offsetting in advanced democracies. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
StMI – Staatsministerium des Innern, für Sport und Integration. (2020). Antwort auf schriftliche Anfrage des Abgeordneten Klaus Adelt, SPD, zur Stellenbesetzung an Landratsämtern (Drucksache No. 18/5044). www.bayern.landtag.de/www/ElanTextAblage_WP18/Drucksachen/Schriftliche%20Anfragen/18_0005044.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stout, J. C., & Ó Cinnéide, M. (2021). Review of the NPWS 2021: Final report on the key findings and recommendations. https://irishriverproject.com/2022/01/22/review-of-the-npws-2021-final-report-on-the-key-findings-and-recommendations/Google Scholar
Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, G., & Murphy, C. (2002). Environmental policy in Ireland. In Taylor, G. (Ed.), Issues in Irish Public Policy (pp. 80–98). Irish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Teles, F. (2016). Local government and the bailout: Reform singularities in Portugal. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(3), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776413517249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, F. (2020). Public administration in Portugal. In Jann, W. & Bouckaert, G. (Eds.), European Perspectives for Public Administration: The Way Forward (pp. 439–452). Leuven: Leuven University Press.10.2307/j.ctvv417th.27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, M. (2002). Delegation to independent regulatory agencies: Pressures, functions and contextual mediation. West European Politics, 25(1), 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Pensions Regulator. (2023, March 23). Review of climate-related disclosures by occupational pension schemes 2023. www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/en/document-library/research-and-analysis/review-of-climate-related-disclosuresGoogle Scholar
The Pensions Regulator. (2024). Perceptions of the Pensions Regulator. Research Report on the 2023 Perceptions Tracker Survey [Research Report]. The Pensions Regulator. www.thepensionsregulator.gov.uk/-/media/thepensionsregulator/files/import/pdf/perceptions-tracker-2023.ashxGoogle Scholar
Theodoropoulou, S. (2015). National social and labour market policy reforms in the shadow of EU bail-out conditionality: The cases of Greece and Portugal. Comparative European Politics, 13(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomann, E., Hupe, P., & Sager, F. (2018). Serving many masters: Public accountability in private policy implementation. Governance, 31(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorgaard, C., & Vinther, H. (2007). RESCALING SOCIAL WELFARE POLICIES IN DENMARK. Social Policy and Welfare Services Working Paper 10:2007. www.semanticscholar.org/paper/RESCALING-SOCIAL-WELFARE-POLICIES-IN-DENMARK-Thorgaard-Vinther/79ff28ea9f5e48c59c674bde5ad02841433698c0Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. (2025). ‘Targeted and belittled’: Scientists at US environmental agency speak out as layoffs begin. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-00491-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torres, L. (2004). Trajectories in public administration reforms in European Continental countries. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(3), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00394.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trampusch, C. (2002). Die Bundesanstalt für Arbeit und das Zusammenwirken von Staat und Verbänden in der Arbeitsmarktpolitik von 1952 bis 2001 (Working Paper No. 02/5). MPIfG Working Paper. www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/44281Google Scholar
Trench, A. (2004). The more things change the more they stay the same. Intergovernmental relations four years on. In Trench, A. (Ed.), Has Devolution Made a Difference? The State of the Nations 2004 (pp. 165–192). Andrews UK Limited.Google Scholar
Trench, A. (Ed.). (2015). Has Devolution Made a Difference? The State of the Nations 2004. Andrews UK Limited.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, G. (2000). Veto players and institutional analysis. Governance, 13(4), 441–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, L., & Bekkers, V. (2013). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2009). Policy alienation of public professionals: Application in a new public management context. Public Management Review, 11(5), 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030902798230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turley, G., & Flannery, D. (2013). The impact of the economic boom and bust on local government finances in Ireland. Administration, 61(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.13025/22898Google Scholar
Turley, G., & McNena, S. (2016). An analysis of local public finances and the 2014 local government reforms. The Economic and Social Review, 47(2), Article 2.Google Scholar
Usman, M., Ali, M., Mughal, F., & Agyemang-Mintah, P. (2021). Policy alienation and street-level bureaucrats’ psychological wellbeing: The mediating role of alienative commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Engen, N. A. M. (2017). A short measure of general policy alienation: Scale development using a 10-step procedure. Public Administration, 95(2), 512–526. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Witteloostuijn, A., & de Jong, G. (2010). Ecology of national rule birth: A longitudinal study of Dutch Higher Education Law, 1960–2004. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(1), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoest, K., Roness, P. G., Verschuere, B., Rubecksen, K., & MacCarthaigh, M. (2010). Autonomy and Control of State Agencies: Comparing States and Agencies. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230277274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Lüpke, H., & Wietschel, J. (2021). Deutsche Klimapolitik im Wechselspiel mit der Europäischen Union. In Böttger, K., Jopp, M., Abels, G., & Roth, M. (Eds.), Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik (2., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage, pp. 329–350). Nomos.10.5771/9783748909514-329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrangbæk, K. (2010). Structural reform in Denmark, 2007–09: Central reform processes in a decentralised environment. Local Government Studies, 36(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930903560562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehling, H.-G. (1989). The bundesrat. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 19(4), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a037830Google Scholar
Weiner, D., Bloomer, J., Conchúir, R. Ó., & Dalton, C. (2022). The role of volunteers and citizen scientists in addressing declining water quality in Irish River Catchments. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 7(1), Article 13. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.447Google Scholar
Weise, F.-J. (2011). Der Umbau der Bundesanstalt/Bundesagentur für Arbeit zum modernen Dienstleister. Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 80(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.80.1.67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiley, K., & Berry, F. (2018). Compassionate bureaucracy: Assuming the administrative burden of policy implementation. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47(4_Suppl), 55S–75S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018760401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. C. (2012). Implementation perspectives: Status and reconsideration. In Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 265–278). Sage London.10.4135/9781446200506.n17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, S. C., Dinesen, P. T., & May, P. (2007). Implementation Regimes and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Employment Service Delivery in Denmark. Public Management Research Conference, Tucson. https://pure.au.dk/portal/da/publications/implementation-regimes-and-street-level-bureaucrats-employment-seGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2016). Public Opinion and Public Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. J., Emerson, J. W., Esty, D. C., de Sherbinin, A., & Wendling, Z. A. (2022). 2022 Environmental Performance Index: Ranking Country Performance on Sustainability Issues. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2023). Worldwide Governance Indicators. www.worldbank.org/en/publication/worldwide-governance-indicatorsGoogle Scholar
Ziekow, J., Bauer, C., Keimeyer, F., Steffens, C., Herrmann, A., & Willwacher, H. (2018). Dialog mit Expertinnen und Experten zum EU-Rechtsakt für Umweltinspektionen – Austausch über mögliche Veränderungen im Vollzug des EU-Umweltrechts (No. 21/2018). Umweltbundesamt. www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/1410/publikationen/2018-04-25_texte_21-2018_umweltinspektionen_kurz_de.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ziller, J., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2012). The continental system of administrative legality. In Peters, B. G. (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 323–332). SAGE Publications.10.4135/9781446200506.n21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, K., & Rice, D. (2016). Organizational barriers to service integration in one-stop shops: The case of Germany. In Heidenreich, M. & Rice, D. (Eds.), Integrating Social and Employment Policies in Europe (pp. 162–184). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Zink, D., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Bureaucratic overload and organizational policy triage: A comparative study of implementation agencies in five European countries. Regulation & Governance, 19(3), 637–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.2 AAA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this book
complies with version 2.2 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), offering more comprehensive accessibility measures for a broad range
of users and attains the highest
(AAA)
level of WCAG compliance, optimising the user experience by meeting the most extensive
accessibility guidelines.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Index navigation
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Provides an interactive index, letting you go straight to where a term or subject appears in the text without manual searching.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visualised data also available as non-graphical data
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
You can access graphs or charts in a text or tabular format, so you are not excluded if you cannot process visual displays.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You have
Access
Open access