Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-qcl88 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-17T06:31:01.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rediscovery of Meconopsis florindae Kingdon-Ward, a Critically Endangered alpine species endemic to China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2025

Gaoxiang Li
Affiliation:
College of Biological Science and Food Engineering, Southwest Forestry University , Kunming, China
David W.H. Rankin
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Wenyu Jia
Affiliation:
College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, China
Bo Xu*
Affiliation:
College of Biological Science and Food Engineering, Southwest Forestry University , Kunming, China
*
*Corresponding author, alpine_flora@swfu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Meconopsis florindae Kingdon-Ward, an alpine species endemic to Xizang, China, is extremely scarce and restricted in distribution. Prior to this study, the first and only collection was in 1924. During three targeted field surveys, we rediscovered one small population not far from its type locality but at a significantly higher elevation and occupying a highly specialized ecological niche. Meconopsis florindae is a monocarpic perennial at high risk of extinction and categorized as Critically Endangered on the IUCN Red List because of its limited population and restricted geographical range. Its survival is threatened by anthropogenic activities including nomadic livestock grazing, disturbance and habitat destruction, and habitat alteration as a consequence of climate change. We recommend comprehensive in situ and ex situ conservation measures to protect this species, including establishing a micro-reserve, implementing practical conservation interventions and long-term monitoring, and collecting seeds and preserving them in the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species to safeguard genetic diversity. Field surveys should be expanded to locate additional populations, and local communities should be engaged to raise awareness and support the conservation of this rare plant.

Information

Type
Short Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International

Comprehensive field assessments are crucial for identifying and conserving endemic plant species with restricted distributions. Biological surveys and targeted field investigations (Scheffers et al., Reference Scheffers, Yong, Harris, Giam and Sodhi2011; Paglia et al., Reference Paglia, Luber, Mansano and Freitas2022) are rediscovering an increasing number of species but protecting them is a challenge because of their rarity, the remote and difficult-to-access areas where they persist, and a lack of knowledge about their specific habitat requirements (Hernández-Lambraño et al., Reference Hernández-LambraÑo, Carbonell and Sánchez-Agudo2020; Long & Rodríguez, Reference Long and Rodríguez2022). Alpine species, in particular, occur in ecosystems with unique environmental features that are highly vulnerable to climate change (Verrall & Pickering, Reference Verrall and Pickering2020). Whilst global warming induces both positive and negative changes in the growth and survival of alpine plants, the overall effects on rare species are difficult to predict (Walther et al., Reference Walther, Beißner and Burga2005; Steinbauer et al., Reference Steinbauer, Grytnes, Jurasinski, Kulonen, Lenoir and Pauli2018; D’Alò et al., Reference D’Alò, Odriozola, Baldrian, Zucconi, Ripa and Cannone2021; Dolezal et al., Reference Dolezal, Jandova, Macek, Mudrak, Altman and Schweingruber2021).

Meconopsis florindae Kingdon-Ward (Papaveraceae) is endemic to Xizang, China. It was first collected in flower on 2 August 1924 in an open area at the edge of a Abies spp. forest near Tra La in the Rong Chu Valley of Nyingchi at an elevation of 3,350 m (syntypes: F. Kingdon-Ward 6038, K-000653265, BM-000547046, E-00060622). On 27 September 1924, Kingdon-Ward revisited the site and collected specimens with mature seed capsules (syntypes: F. Kingdon-Ward 6206, E-00060623, K-000653266; Kingdon-Ward, Reference Kingdon-Ward1926a,Reference Kingdon-Wardb,Reference Kingdon-Wardc). However, the species’ extremely narrow distribution, exacerbated by changes to the names of geographical locations in the region, meant there were no new reliable records until 2020. The lack of specimens and unknown status of wild populations led to the species being categorized as Least Concern on the China Biodiversity Red List - Higher Plants (2020) (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2023) and Not Evaluated on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2025). Grey-Wilson (Reference Grey-Wilson2014) designated BM-000547046 as the lectotype and the other specimens listed above as isolectotypes. However, he did not reference the original publication by Kingdon-Ward (Reference Kingdon-Ward1926b), which is a valid publication of the name according to Article 38.2 of the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi and plants (Shenzhen Code; Turland et al., Reference Turland, Wiersema, Barrie, Greuter, Hawksworth and Herendeen2018), diagnostically describing M. florindae as ‘the only dwarf, yellow-flowered Meconopsis known’.

We conducted three targeted field surveys to search for M. florindae during its flowering and fruiting periods in 2021–2023 around Lulang Town, Bayi District, Nyingchi City, Xizang. We established two transect lines along existing primitive roads near the type locality described by Kingdon-Ward. These transect lines traversed elevations between 3,350 and 4,000 m, covering the altitudinal range of M. florindae and accounting for potential vegetation migration to higher elevations because of global warming. The transect line at the original type specimen collection site (near Tra La in the Rong Chu Valley; Kingdon-Ward, Reference Kingdon-Ward1926c) was c. 4.5 km long; the second transect was located c. 12 km west of Tra La and measured c. 10.5 km. In July 2021 we surveyed only the type location transect line, in August 2022 both transect lines, and in August 2023 only the transect line west of Tra La. Each transect line was visited once during the survey months. We found no evidence of M. florindae along the transect at the type location. However, in August 2022 we discovered a population of 12 plants at the site west of Tra La (Fig. 1). This population was located in Abies spp. forest, on open, steep, rocky slopes (1–2 m high) that had been formed during construction works along the roadside (Plate 1). The habitat was similar to that described by Kingdon-Ward (Reference Kingdon-Ward1926b) but at a higher altitude (3,840–3,863 m). The species occupied a highly specialized ecological niche, being absent from roadside areas at lower altitude and from less open sites. Its distribution was confined to a narrow strip adjacent to the road (c. 1 m wide and 120 m long; 120 m2), where plants were clumped together. The 12 plants found in August 2022 included seven seedlings and five mature individuals; by August 2023 the population had increased to 18, comprising 10 seedlings and eight mature plants. Given the small population size, we did not collect any specimens and made photographic records only.

Fig. 1 Location of Meconopsis florindae in Bayi District, Xizang, China: site of type specimen collection in the Tra La area (1924) and rediscovered population (2023).

Plate 1 Meconopsis florindae: (a) the lectotype in the Natural History Museum, London, UK (BM-000547046), (b) floral characteristics, (c) natural habitat, (d) mature individuals bearing fruit. Photos: (a) downloaded from Global Plants (2024), (b–d) Bo Xu.

Meconopsis florindae is a monocarpic perennial, which makes it vulnerable to threats and may limit its recovery and re-establishment. Also, Meconopsis are generally not self-compatible (Grey-Wilson, Reference Grey-Wilson2014), which restricts reproductive potential in small and isolated populations. With just a single, small population, genetic diversity is expected to be low, amplifying the risk of inbreeding, genetic drift and extinction.

Based on the single population located in our field surveys, comprising a small number of plants in a vulnerable habitat, we categorized M. florindae as Critically Endangered based on IUCN Red List criteria B (geographical range) and D (very small and restricted populations), specifically B2ab(i,ii,iii) and D, i.e. with area of occupancy < 10 km2 (B2), known to exist at only one location (a), with a continuing decline (b) projected in extent of occurrence (i), area of occupancy (ii), area, extent and quality of habitat (iii), and with the number of mature individuals < 50 (D) (IUCN, 2012, 2024).

We identified the primary threats to M. florindae from the information gathered in our field surveys and from informal interviews with nine individuals, including staff from the local Forestry and Grassland Bureau and community herders. We categorized the identified threats according to the IUCN Threats Classification Scheme, Version 3.3 (IUCN, 2001): 2.31 Nomadic Grazing, 4.1 Roads & Railroads, 10.3 Landslides and 11.1 Habitat Shifting & Alteration; see Table 1 for details.

Table 1 Main threats to Meconopsis florindae following the IUCN Threats Classification Scheme Version 3.3 (IUCN, 2001).

In this study, we confirmed the fragile population status of M. florindae and identified the main threats to its survival. It is a narrowly distributed endemic species and a range of conservation measures are needed to ensure its survival (Wu et al., Reference Wu, Wu and Zhang2023). We recommend a combination of in situ and ex situ interventions, community engagement and further field surveys. We suggest that the site of the newly discovered population of M. florindae should be established as a micro-reserve (Médail et al., Reference Médail, Diadema, Pouget and Baumel2021) with practical interventions including reinforcing the rocky slope habitat where it is found and long-term monitoring of plant numbers, environmental conditions and threats. Further studies to provide baseline data should encompass phenology, population ecology, pollination ecology, population genetics and molecular systematics. In situ actions should be supported by collecting and depositing seeds in the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Kunming, China, to preserve the genetic resource of the species. Although it is challenging to cultivate Meconopsis, ex situ conservation has been carried out successfully for six species of this genus and may be possible for M. florindae. Conservation work should include further field surveys to locate additional populations of M. florindae, focusing on hard-to-reach cliffs and exposed rock slopes near the current population. No populations were found in recent surveys at the site of the original collection in the Tra La area but this area should be searched again. Finally, it is important to raise local awareness through community engagement and education. These initiatives should highlight the species’ Critically Endangered status and prevent human-induced damage, especially from infrastructure development and livestock grazing.

Author contributions

Data collection: BX, GL, WJ; writing: GL, DWHR, BX.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 32060054 to BX) and Xing Dian Talent Program (Grant to BX). We thank Dudan Luosang, Lipeng Hao, Zhu Liu and Yun Liu for their assistance with fieldwork; John McNeill for guidance on nomenclature; and Minyu Chen who rediscovered the species.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical standards.

Data availability

The data supporting this study are presented within the article. Location details of Meconopsis florindae are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

D’Alò, F., Odriozola, I., Baldrian, P., Zucconi, L., Ripa, C., Cannone, N. et al. (2021) Microbial activity in alpine soils under climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 783, 147012.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dolezal, J., Jandova, V., Macek, M., Mudrak, O., Altman, J., Schweingruber, F.H. et al. (2021) Climate warming drives Himalayan alpine plant growth and recruitment dynamics. Journal of Ecology, 109, 179190.10.1111/1365-2745.13459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Plants (2024) Type of Meconopsis florindae Kingdon-Ward [family PAPAVERACEAE]. Global Plants, JSTOR. plants.jstor.org/stable/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.bm000547046.Google Scholar
Grey-Wilson, C. (2014) The Genus Meconopsis: Blue Poppies and Their Relatives. Kew Publishing, London, UK.Google Scholar
Hernández-LambraÑo, R.E., Carbonell, R. & Sánchez-Agudo, J.Á. (2020) Making the most of scarce data: mapping distribution range and variation in population abundance of a threatened narrow-range endemic plant. Journal for Nature Conservation, 57, 125889.10.1016/j.jnc.2020.125889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2001) Threats Classification Scheme (Version 3.3). IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland. iucnredlist.org/resources/threat-classification-scheme [accessed 30 August 2024].Google Scholar
IUCN (2012) IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. iucnredlist.org/resources/categories-and-criteria [accessed August 2025].Google Scholar
IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee (2024) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 16. Standards and Petitions Committee of the IUCN Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland. iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf [accessed 30 August 2024].Google Scholar
IUCN (2025) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, v. 2025-1. iucnredlist.org [accessed 12 August 2025].Google Scholar
Kingdon-Ward, F. (1926a) Explorations in South-eastern Tibet. The Geographical Journal, 67, 97119.10.2307/1783136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon-Ward, F. (1926b) Mr. F. Kingdon Ward’s eight expedition in Asia. XXVIII.-the pick of the herbaceous plants. The Gardeners’ Chronicle: a Weekly Illustrated Journal of Horticulture and Allied Subjects, Series 3, 79, 232.Google Scholar
Kingdon-Ward, F. (1926c) Notes on the genus Meconopsis, with some additional species from Tibet. Annals of Botany, 40, 535546.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a090036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, B. & Rodríguez, J.P. (2022) Lost but not forgotten: a new nomenclature to support a call to rediscover and conserve lost species. Oryx, 56, 481482.10.1017/S0030605322000618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Médail, F., Diadema, K., Pouget, M. & Baumel, A. (2021) Identification of plant micro-reserves using conservation units and population vulnerability: the case of an endangered endemic Snowflake (Acis nicaeensis) in the Mediterranean Basin hotspot. Journal for Nature Conservation, 61, 125980.10.1016/j.jnc.2021.125980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China & the Chinese Academy of Sciences (2023) The China Biodiversity Red List: Higher Plants (2020). mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk01/202305/t20230522_1030745.html [accessed 8 September 2025].Google Scholar
Paglia, I., Luber, J., Mansano, V.d.F. & Freitas, L. (2022) A narrowly endemic species of Begoniaceae: rediscovery, distribution and conservation of Begonia jocelinoi . Oryx, 56, 935938.10.1017/S0030605321000740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffers, B.R., Yong, D.L., Harris, J.B.C., Giam, X. & Sodhi, N.S. (2011) The world’s rediscovered species: back from the brink? PLOS One, 6, e22531.10.1371/journal.pone.0022531CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, N., Wang, C., Wang, J., Wu, N., Naudiyal, N., Zhang, L. et al. (2022) Biogeographic patterns and richness of the Meconopsis species and their influence factors across the Pan-Himalaya and adjacent regions. Diversity, 14, 661.10.3390/d14080661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinbauer, M.J., Grytnes, J.-A., Jurasinski, G., Kulonen, A., Lenoir, J., Pauli, H. et al. (2018) Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming. Nature, 556, 231234.10.1038/s41586-018-0005-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turland, N.J., Wiersema, J.H., Barrie, W., Greuter, F.R., Hawksworth, D.L., Herendeen, P.S. et al. (ed.) (2018) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Koeltz Botanical Books, Glashütten, Germany.Google Scholar
Verrall, B. & Pickering, C.M. (2020) Alpine vegetation in the context of climate change: A global review of past research and future directions. Science of the Total Environment, 748, 141344.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141344CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walther, G.R., Beißner, S. & Burga, C.A. (2005) Trends in the upward shift of alpine plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 16, 541548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W.T., Guo, W.Y., Jarvie, S. & Svenning, J.C. (2021) The fate of Meconopsis species in the Tibeto-Himalayan region under future climate change. Ecology and Evolution, 11, 887899.10.1002/ece3.7096CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, Z., Wu, Y. & Zhang, N. (2023) Rediscovery of the Critically Endangered Primula esquirolii, a karst cave species with an extremely small population endemic to China. Oryx, 57, 540542.10.1017/S0030605322001223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Location of Meconopsis florindae in Bayi District, Xizang, China: site of type specimen collection in the Tra La area (1924) and rediscovered population (2023).

Figure 1

Plate 1 Meconopsis florindae: (a) the lectotype in the Natural History Museum, London, UK (BM-000547046), (b) floral characteristics, (c) natural habitat, (d) mature individuals bearing fruit. Photos: (a) downloaded from Global Plants (2024), (b–d) Bo Xu.

Figure 2

Table 1 Main threats to Meconopsis florindae following the IUCN Threats Classification Scheme Version 3.3 (IUCN, 2001).