Aquinas, Thomas. Compendium theologiae ad fratrem Reginaldum. In Opuscula theologica. Edited by R. Verado. Vol.1 of 2 vols. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1954. Translated by C. Vollert as The Compendium of Theology. St. Louis: Herder Book Co., 1947.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De aeternitate mundi. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vol.43 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by Cyril Vollert as On the Eternity of the World. In St. Thomas Aquinas, Siger of Brabant, St. Bonaventure: On the Eternity of the World. Translated by Cyril Vollert, Lottie Kendzierski, and Paul Byrne. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1957, 18–24.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De ente et essentia. Edited by Baur, L.. Westfalorum, Monasterii, 1933. Amended J. Koch, 1956. Translated, with an interpretation, by Joseph Bobik as Aquinas on Being and Essence. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De iudciis astrorum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vol.43 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De principiis naturae ad Fratrem Sylvestrum. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vol.42 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by Pierre Conway as The Principles of Nature. Columbus, OH: College of St. Mary of the Springs, 1963.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. De substantiis separatis. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vol. 40 [pars D] of 50 volumes (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by Francis Lescoe as Treatise on Separate Substances. West Hartford, CT: St. Joseph College, 1959.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio libri Posteriorum Analyticorum. Edited by Spiazzi, R.. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1964. Translated by F.R. Larcher as Commentary on the Posterior Analytics of Aristotle. Albany, NY: Magi Books, 1970.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio super librum Boethii De Trinitate. Edited by Decker, B.. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1955. Translated by A. Maurer as Faith, Reason, and Theology: Questions I–IV of His Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius and as The Division and Methods of the Sciences: Questions V and VI of His Commentary on the De Trinitate of Boethius. 4th rev. ed. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1986.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In Boetium De trinitate et de hebdomadibus expositio. Edited by Calcaterra, M.-R.. In Opuscula theologica. Vol.2 of 2 vols. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1954. Translated by Janet Schultz and Edward Synan as An Exposition of the “On the Hebdomads” of Boethius. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2001. See also the previous entry.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Cathala, M.-R. and Spiazzi, R.. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1950. Translated by J. Rowan as Saint Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle. Chicago: Henry Regnery, 1964.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In libros Aristotelis De caelo et mundo expositio. Edited by Spiazzi, R.. Turin-Rome: Marietti 1952. Translated by R.F. Larcher and Pierre Conway as Exposition of Aristotle’s Treatise on the Heavens. Columbus, OH: College of St. Mary of the Springs, 1963.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In librum Beati Dionysii De divinis nominibus expositio. Ed. by C. Pera. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1950. Translated by Michael Augros as An Exposition of the Divine Names, The Book of Blessed Dionysius. Thomas More College Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Edited by Maggiolo, P.. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1954. Translated by Richard J. Blackwell, Richard J. Spath, and W. Edmund Thirlkel as Commentary on Aristotle’s Physics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata De spiritualibus creaturis. In Quaestiones Disputatae. 9th rev. ed. Edited by P. Bazzi et al. Vol.2 of 2 vols. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1953. Translated by M. FitzPatrick and J. Wellmuth as On Spiritual Creatures. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestio disputata De virtutibus. In Quaestiones Disputatae. 9th rev. ed. Edited by P. Bazzi et al. Vol.2 of 2 vols. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1953. Translated by Ralph McInerny as Disputed Questions on Virtue. South Bend, IN. St. Augustine’s Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae De potentia. In Quaestiones Disputatae. 9th rev. ed. Edited by P. Bazzi et al. Vol.2 of 2 vols. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1953. Translated by the English Dominican Fathers as On the Power of God. Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1952.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones disputatae De veritate. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vols.22(1/1)-22(3/2) of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by Robert Mulligan, James McGlynn, and R. Schmidt as On Truth. 3 vols. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co., 1952–1954.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Quaestiones quodlibetales. 9th rev. ed. Edited by R. Spiazzi. Turin-Rome: Marietti, 1956. Translated by Brian Davies and Turner Nevitt as Thomas Aquinas’s Quodlibetal Questions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi. Edited by Mandonnet, P. (vols.1–2) and Moos, M. (vols.3–4). 4 vols. Paris: P. Lethielleux, 1929–1947.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio libri Peryermeneias. In Sancti Thomae Aquinatis Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vol.1 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa contra Gentiles. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vols.13-15 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by Anton Pegis, James Anderson, Vernon Bourke, and Charles O’Neil as On the Truth of the Catholic Faith. 3 vols. New York: Doubleday, 1955–57. Reprint, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae. In Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII. Edited by the Leonine Commission. Vols.4–12 of 50 vols. (in preparation). Rome: 1882–. Translated by the English Dominican Fathers as Summa Theologica. 3 vols. New York: Benzinger Brothers, 1947. See also the Blackfriars Edition. Edited and translated by Thomas Gilby et al. 61 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–1981. See also Alfred Freddoso’s new translation currently in progress at www3.nd.edu/~afreddos/.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Holy Teaching: Introducing the Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated and edited, with commentary, by Frederick Bauerschmidt. Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2005.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Summa of the Summa: The Essential Philosophical Passages of St. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologica. Translated and edited, with commentary, by Peter Kreeft. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Thomas Aquinas: The Treatise on the Divine Nature, Summa Theologiae I 1–13. Translated and edited, with commentary, by Brian Shanley. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. Super librum de causis expositio. Edited by Saffrey, H.D.. Fribourg: Textus philosophici Friburgenses, 1954. Translated and annotated by V. Guagliardo et al. as Commentary on the Book of Causes. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Adams, Marilyn McCord. William Ockham. 2 vols. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Adler, Mortimer and Van Doren, Charles. How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading. Rev. ed. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1972.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe. 3 vols. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1981. Printed in the U.S., Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. “Times, Beginnings and Causes,” In The Collected Philosophical Papers of G.E.M. Anscombe: Volume Two, Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Mind. Vol.2 of 3 vols. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1981.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G.E.M. “‘Whatever Has a Beginning of Existence Must Have a Cause’: Hume’s Argument Exposed.” Analysis 34 (1974): 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anselm. Monologion. Translated by Simon Harrison. In Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Edited by Davies, Brian and Evans, G.R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Anselm. Proslogion. Translated by M.J. Charlesworth. In Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Edited by Davies, Brian and Evans, G.R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Anselm. S. Anselmi: Opera omnia. Edited by F.S. Schmitt. 6 vols. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson, 1940–1961. See Anselm of Canterbury: The Major Works. Edited by Davies, Brian and Evans, G.R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Aristotle. The Basic Works of Aristotle. Translated by W.D. Ross. Edited by McKeon, Richard. New York: Random house, 1941.Google Scholar

Aristotle. The Complete Works of Aristotle, Revised Oxford Translation. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Aristotle. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium. Edited and translated by Martha Nussbaum. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Audi, Paul. “Existential Inertia.” Philosophic Exchange 48 (2019): 1–26.Google Scholar

Augros, Michael. Aquinas on Theology and God’s Existence: The First Two Questions of the Summa Theologiae Newly Translated and Carefully Explained. Heusenstamm, Germany: Editiones Scholasticae, 2019.Google Scholar

Augustine. Works [incomplete]. Edited by Roberts, James and Donaldson, James, et al. In A Select Library of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers: Series I. Series I of II. Vols.1–8 of 14 vols. Edinburg: T & T Clark; Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Co., 1886–1889. Revised and reissued by various publishers.Google Scholar

Avicenna. Avicenna Latinus: Liber de philosophia prima sive Scientia divina. Edited by Van Riet, S.. Vol.3 of 3 vols. Louvain: E. Peeters; Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1977.Google Scholar

Avicenna. Metaphysices compendium (al-Nadjat). Edited by Carame, N.. Rome: Pontifical Institute for Oriental Studies, 1926.Google Scholar

Baille, John. Our Knowledge of God. London: Humphrey Milford, 1939.Google Scholar

Barr, Stephen. Modern Physics and Ancient Faith. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Belloc, Hilaire, The Question and the Answer. Milwaukee: Bruce Publishing, 1932.Google Scholar

Beaudoin, John. “The World’s Continuance: Divine Conservation or Existential Inertia?” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2007): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackburn, Simon. Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Boethius, Anicius Manlius Severinus, The Consolation of Philosophy (De consolatione philosophiae). Translated and edited by Scott Goins and Barbara Wyman. San Francisco, Ignatius Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Bonnette, Dennis. Aquinas’ Proofs for God’s Existence: St. Thomas Aquinas on: The Per Accidens Necessarily Implies the Per Se. New York: Springer, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Leonard. The Setting of the Summa Theologiae of Saint Thomas. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braine, David. The Reality of Time and the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Brown, Patterson. “Infinite Causal Regression.” The Philosophical Review 75 (1966): 510–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Patterson. “St. Thomas’s Doctrine of Necessary Being.” The Philosophical Review 73 (1964): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahn, Steven, ed. Classics of Western Philosophy. 8th ed. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar

Calvin, John. The Institutes of the Christian Religion. Translated by Henry Beveridge. Edinburgh, 1845.Google Scholar

Carl, Brian. “The Transcendentals and the Divine Names in Thomas Aquinas.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2018): 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through the Logical Analysis of Language.” Translated by Arthur Pap. In Logical Positivism, edited by Ayer, A.J.. New York: The Free Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Chenu, M.-D. “Le plan de la Somme théologique de saint Thomas,” Revue thomiste 47 (1939): 93–107.Google Scholar

Chenu, M.-D. Toward Understanding Saint Thomas. Translated by A.-M. Landry and D. Hughes. Chicago: Regnery, 1964.Google Scholar

Clarke, Norris. The One and the Many: A Contemporary Thomistic Metaphysics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God (1705). In A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God and Other Writings. Edited by Vailati, Ezio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Clifford, W.K. “The Ethics of Belief.” In Lectures and Essays. 3rd ed. Edited by Leslie Stephen and Frederick Pollock. Vol.2 of 2 vols. London: MacMillan, 1879.Google Scholar

Coffey, Peter. Ontology or the Theory of Being: An Introduction to Metaphysics. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith, 1970.Google Scholar

Copleston, F.C. Aquinas. New York: Penguin Books, 1955.Google Scholar

Craig, William Lane. The Cosmological Argument from Plato to Leibniz. New York: Barnes and Noble, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, William Lane. Philosophy of Religion: A Reader and Guide. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, 2002.Google Scholar

Craig, William Lane and Smith, Quentin. Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Descartes, Rene. The Philosophical Works of Descartes. Edited by Haldane, Elizabeth and Ross, G.R.T.. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1931. Reprinted, 1979.Google Scholar

Davidson, Herbert. Alfarabi, Avicenna, and Averroes on Intellect: Their Cosmologies, Theories of the Active Intellect, and Theories of Human Intellect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Brian. “Aquinas’s Third Way.” New Blackfriars 82 (2001): 450–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Brian. “Classical Theism and the Doctrine of Divine Simplicity.” In Language, Meaning, and God: Essays in Honor of Herbert McCabe OP, 4th ed., edited by Brian Davies. London: Geoffrey Chapman, 1987.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. “A Modern Defence of Divine Simplicity.” Philosophy of Religion: A Guide and Anthology, edited by Davies, Brian. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. The Reality of God and the Problem of Evil. New York: Continuum, 2006.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Contra Gentiles: A Guide and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologiae: A Guide and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Davies, Brian. The Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul. God and the New Physics. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1983.Google Scholar

Davies, Paul. The Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Touchstone Books, 1993.Google Scholar

Davis, Stephen. “Hierarchical Causes in the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 31 (1992): 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dionysius. Dionysius the Areopagite ‘On the Divine Names’ and ‘The Mystical Theology.’ Translated by C. Rolt. London: SPCK, 1957.Google Scholar

Doig, James. Aquinas on Metaphysics: A Historico-Doctrinal Study of the Commentary on the Metaphysics. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duhem, Pierre. Medieval Cosmology: Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void, and the Plurality of Worlds. Edited and translated by Ariew, Roger. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edwards, Paul. “The Cosmological Argument.” In The Rationalist Annual for 1959. London: Pemberton. Reprinted in Critiques of God: Making the Case against Belief in God, edited by Angeles, Peter. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1976.Google Scholar

Edwards, Paul and Arthur, Pap, eds. A Modern Introduction to Philosophy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Einstein, Albert. Essays in Science. Translated by Alan Harris. New York: Philosophical Library, 1934.Google Scholar

Elders, Leo. The Philosophical Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Leiden, Netherlands: E. J. Brill, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Farrell, Walter. A Companion to the Summa: Volume One, Part One, The Architect of the Universe. Vol.1 of 4 vols. London: Sheed and Ward, 1941.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. Aquinas: A Beginner’s Guide. Oxford: Oneworld, 2009.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. “On Aristotle, Aquinas, and Paley: A Reply to Marie George.” In Evangelical Philosophical Society Online Article Library (2011). Available at www.epsociety.org.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. “Existential Inertia and the Five Ways.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 85 (2011): 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feser, Edward. Five Proofs of the Existence of God. San Francisco: Ignatius, 2017.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. “The Medieval Principle of Motion and the Modern Principle of Inertia.” Proceedings of the Society for Medieval Logic and Metaphysics 10 (2010): 4–16.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. “Oppy on Thomistic Cosmological Arguments.” Religious Studies 57 (2021): 503–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feser, Edward. Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Heusenstamm, Germany: Editiones Scholasticae, 2014.Google Scholar

Feser, Edward. “Teleology: A Shoppers’ Guide.” Philosophia Christi 12 (2010): 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feynman, Richard. The Character of Physical Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Fradd, Matthew and Delfino, Robert. Does God Exist?: A Socratic Dialogue on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas. St. Louis: En Route Books, 2018.Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob. “On Concept and Object.” In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Edited by Geach, Peter and Black, Max. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980.Google Scholar

Gallagher, David. “Thomas Aquinas on the Will as Rational Appetite.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (1991): 559–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald. Reality: A Synthesis of Thomistic Thought. Translated by Patrick Cummins. St. Louis: B. Herder Co., 1950.Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. “Aquinas.” In Three Philosophers, edited by Anscombe, G.E.M. and Geach, P.T.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. “Form and Existence.” In God and the Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1969.Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17 (1956): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Geach, Peter. “An Irrelevance of Omnipotence.” Philosophy 48 (1973), 327–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

George, Marie. “On Attempts to Salvage Paley’s Argument from Design.” In Science, Philosophy, and Theology, edited by O’Callaghan, John. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2008.Google Scholar

George, Marie. “Thomistic Rebuttal of Some Common Objections to Paley’s Argument from Design.” New Blackfriars 97 (2015): 266–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gerrity, Benignus (Joseph). Nature, Knowledge, and God: An Introduction to Thomistic Philosophy. Milwaukee: Bruce, 1947. Reprint, Kessinger Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Godart, Odon and Heller, Michael. Cosmology of Lemaître. Tucson, AZ: Pachart, 1985.Google Scholar

Gilby, Thomas. “The Dialectic of Love in the Summa.” Appendix 5 (pp. 124–132) of vol.1 of the Blackfriars Edition of the Summa theologiae. Edited by Gilby, Thomas et al. 61 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–1981.Google Scholar

Gilby, Thomas. “The Fifth Way.” Appendix 10 (pp. 206–208) of vol.2 of the Blackfriars Edition of the Summa theologiae. Edited by Gilby, Thomas et al. 61 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–1981.Google Scholar

Gilby, Thomas. “The First Way.” Appendix 6 (pp. 191–195) of vol.2 of the Blackfriars Edition of the Summa theologiae. Edited by Gilby, Thomas et al. 61 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–1981.Google Scholar

Gilby, Thomas. “The Second Way.” Appendix 7 (pp. 196–200) of vol.2 of the Blackfriars Edition of the Summa theologiae. Edited by Gilby, Thomas et al. 61 vols. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode; New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–1981.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas. Translated by L. Shook. New York: Random House, 1954. Reprint, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. History of Christian Philosophy in the Middle Ages. New York: Random House, 1955.Google Scholar

Gilson, Étienne. The Spirit of Mediaeval Philosophy (Gifford Lectures 1931–1932). Translated by A.H.C. Downes. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1940.Google Scholar

Gordon, David. “Anscombe on Coming into Existence and Causation.” Analysis 44 (1984): 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grisez, Germain. Beyond the New Theism: A Philosophy of Religion. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf. “Why Is There Anything at All, Rather than Just Nothing,” Ontology Studies 9 (2009): 7–19.Google Scholar

Grünbaum, Adolf. Interview with James Holt. In chapter 4 of Holt’s Why Does the World Exist?: One Man’s Quest for the Big Answer. New York: Liveright, 2013.Google Scholar

Gurr, John E. The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Some Scholastic Systems, 1750–1900. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Haldane, John, and Smart, J.J.C.. Atheism and Theism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Hankey, Wayne. “The Place of the Proof of God’s Existence in the Summa Theologiae.” The Thomist 46 (1982): 370–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankey, Wayne. God in Himself: Aquinas’ Doctrine of God as Expounded in the Summa Theologiae. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hankinson, R.J. “Philosophy of Science.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle, edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, Werner. “The Representation of Nature in Contemporary Physics.” Daedalus 87 (1958): 95–108.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, Werner. “Über den anschaulichen Inhalt der quanten theoretischen Kinematic und Mechanik.” Zeitschrift für Physik 43 (1927): 172–198. Translated by John Wheeler and Wojiech Zurek as “The Physical Content of Quantum Kinematics and Mechanics.” In Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by John Wheeler and Wojciech Zurek. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heller, Michael. Ultimate Explanations of the Universe. Berlin: Springer, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Desmond. Medieval Logic and Metaphysics. London: Hutchinson, 1972.Google Scholar

Henry of Ghent. Henrici de Gandavo Opera omnia. Edited by Macken, R.. 38 vols. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1979–. Translated (selections) by Roland Teske as Quodlibetal Questions on Free Will. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Hepburn, Ronald. “Cosmological Argument.” In The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edited by Edwards, Paul. 8 vols. New York: MacMillan, 1967.Google Scholar

Hick, John. Philosophy of Religion. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Pearson, 1990.Google Scholar

Hick, John. Review of Anthony Kenny. The Five Ways. Mind 79 (1970): 467–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holt, James. Why Does the World Exist?: One Man’s Quest for the Big Answer. New York: Liveright, 2013.Google Scholar

Hourani, George. “Ibn Sina on Necessary and Possible Existence.” Philosophical Forum 4 (1972): 74–86.Google Scholar

Hughes, Christopher. Aquinas on Being, Goodness, and God. New York: Routledge, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hughes, Christopher. On a Complex Theory of a Simple God: An Investigation in Aquinas’ Philosophical Theology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Hume, David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Edited by Popkin, Richard. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1980.Google Scholar

Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited By Steinberg, Eric. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1977.Google Scholar

Hume, David. The Letters of David Hume. Edited by Greig, John Y.T.. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1932. Reprint, Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Hume, David. A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Selby-Bigge, A.. 2nd rev. ed. Edited by P. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978Google Scholar

Jaki, Stanley. “Chance or Reality: Interaction in Nature versus Measurement in Physics.” In Chance or Reality and Other Essays. Lanham, MD: The University Press of America, 1986.Google Scholar

Jay, Eric. The Existence of God: A Commentary on St. Thomas Aquinas’s Five Ways of Demonstrating the Existence of God. London: Society for the Promotion of Christian Knowledge, 1946.Google Scholar

Joyce, George H. Principles of Natural Theology. London: Longmans, Green, 1923.Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by N. K. Smith. London: Macmillan, 1929.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Aquinas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. Aquinas on Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kenny, Anthony. The Five Ways: St. Thomas Aquinas’ Proofs of God’s Existence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.Google Scholar

Kerr, Gavin. Aquinas’s Way to God: The Proof in de Ente et Essentia. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, Gavin. “Essentially Ordered Series Reconsidered.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2012): 541–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerr, Gavin. “Essentially Ordered Series Reconsidered Once Again.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2017): 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khamara, Edward. “Hume versus Clarke on the Cosmological Argument.” The Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1992): 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kirk, G.S., Raven, J.E., and Schofield, M., eds. and trans. The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts. 2nd ed. London: Cambridge University Press, 1983. 1st ed, 1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, Gyula. “Aquinas’ Theory of the Copula and the Analogy of Being.” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 5 (2002): 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, Gyula. “Existence and Reference in Medieval Logic.” In New Essays in Free Logic, edited by Hieke, A. and Morscher, E.. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar

Klima, Gyula. “On Kenny on Aquinas on Being,” International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2004): 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klima, Gyula. “The Semantic Principles Underlying Saint Thomas Aquinas’s Metaphysics of Being.” Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 5 (2002): 87–141.Google Scholar

Klubertanz, George. Introduction to the Philosophy of Being. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955.Google Scholar

Kolak, Daniel. “Quantum Cosmology, the Anthropic Principle, and Why Is There Something Rather than Nothing?” In The Experience of Philosophy, 6th ed., edited by Daniel Kolak and Raymond Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Koons, Robert, and Gage, Logan. “St. Thomas on Intelligent Design.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 85 (2012): 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knasas, John F. Being and Some Twentieth-Century Thomists. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Knasas, John F. “Making Sense of the Tertia Via.” The New Scholasticism 54 (1980): 476–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kneale, William. “Is Existence a Predicate.” In Readings in Philosophical Analysis, edited by Feigl, Herbert and Sellars, Wilfrid. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company, 1949.Google Scholar

Knuuttila, Simo. “Being qua Being in Thomas Aquinas and John Duns Scotus.” In The Logic of Being: Historical Studies, edited by Knuuttila, Simo and Hintikka, Jaakko. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragh, Helge. Cosmology and Controversy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kragh, Helge. Higher Speculations: Grand Theories and Failed Revolutions in Physics and Cosmology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Kragh, Helge. Quantum Generations: A History of Physics in the Twentieth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Theism: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles I. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kvanvig, Jonathan, and McCann, Hugh. “Divine Conservation and the Persistence of the World.” In Divine and Human Action: Essays in the Metaphysics of Theism, edited by Morris, Thomas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Laughlin, Peter. “Divine Necessity and Created Contingence in Aquinas.” Heythrop Journal 50 (2009): 648–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lear, Jonathan. Aristotle: The Desire to Understand. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz: Philosophical Writings. Edited by Parkinson, G.H.R.. Translated by Mary Morris and G.H.R. Parkinson. London: J.M. Dent, 1973. Reprinted, 1995.Google Scholar

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Philosophical Essays. Translated by Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1989.Google Scholar

Lemaître, Georges. “Recontre avec Einstein.” Revue des Questions Scientifiques 129 (1958): 129–132. Translated as “My Encounters with A. Einstein.” In The Interdisciplinary Encyclopedia of Religion and Science. Available at www.inters.org/Lemaître-einsten.Google Scholar

Leslie, John, and Kuhn, Robert, eds. The Mystery of Existence: Why Is There Anything at All? Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liber de causis. Translated by Brand, D. as The Book of Causes. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Lindbeck, George. The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, Arthur. The Great Chain of Being: The History of an Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1936. Reprint, New York: Harper and Row, 1960.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Scott. “The Esse/Essentia Argument in Aquinas’s De ente et essentia.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (1984): 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacDonald, Scott. “[Aquinas’s] Theory of Knowledge.” In Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, edited by Kretzmann, Norman and Stump, Eleonore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Mackie, J.L. The Miracle of Theism: Arguments for and against the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Maimonides, Moses Ben. The Guide for the Perplexed. Translated by M. Friedlander. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1904.Google Scholar

Maimonides, Moses Ben. The Guide of the Perplexed. Translated by Shlomo Pines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. Approaches to God. Translated by Peter O’Reilly. New York: Harper, 1954.Google Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. The Degrees of Knowledge. Translated by Gerald Phelan. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1959.Google Scholar

Maritain, Jacques. A Preface to Metaphysics: Seven Lectures on Being. London: Sheed and Ward, 1940.Google Scholar

Marmura, Michael. “Avicenna’s Proof from Contingency for God’s Existence in the Metaphysics of the Shifa.” Medieval Studies 42 (1980): 337–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Christopher. Thomas Aquinas: God and Explanations. Edinburgh University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Charles B. Religious Belief. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1959.Google Scholar

Mascall, E.L. He Who Is: A Study in Traditional Theism. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1943. Revised, 1966.Google Scholar

Maurer, Armand. “Form and Essence in the Philosophy of St Thomas.” Mediaeval Studies 13 (1951): 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Maurer, Armand. Medieval Philosophy. Wetteron, Belgium: Universa, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCann, Hugh. “Creation and Conservation.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Quinn, Philip and Taliaferro, Charles. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

McGinnis, Jon and Reisman, David, eds. and trans. Classical Arabic Philosophy: An Anthology of Sources. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan. “Four Senses of ‘Potency.’” In The Concept of Matter, edited by McMullin, Ernan. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Miller, Barry. A Most Unlikely God: A Philosophical Inquiry into the Nature of God. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Moreno, Anthony. “The Law of Inertia and the Principle Quidquid movetur ab alio movetur.” The Thomist 38 (1974): 306–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Opticks. London: The Royal Society, 1704. 4th ed., corrected, 1730. Available at sirisaacnewton.info/writings/.Google Scholar

Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy). London: The Royal Society, 1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nielsen, Kai. Reasoned Practice: An Introduction to Modern Philosophy. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.Google Scholar

Nozick, Robert. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Ockham, William. Quaestiones quodlibetales. Translated (selections) by Freddoso, Alfred and Kelly, Francis as Quodlibetal Questions: Quodlibets 1–7. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Oppy, Graham. “On Stage One of Feser’s ‘Aristotelian Proof.’” Religious Studies 57 (2021): 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

O’Rourke, Francis. Pseudo-Dionysius and the Metaphysics of Aquinas. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owen, H.P. Concepts of Deity. London: MacMillan, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, John. “Aquinas’ Fifth Way.” New Blackfriars 101 (2020): 726–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, Joseph. “Actuality in the “Prima Via” of St Thomas.” Mediaeval Studies 29 (1967): 26–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, Joseph. “Aquinas and the Five Ways.” In St. Thomas Aquinas on the Existence of God: Collected Papers of Joseph Owens. Edited by John, R. Catan. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Owens, Joseph. The Doctrine of Being in the Aristotelian Metaphysics. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 1962.Google Scholar

Owens, Joseph. An Elementary Christian Metaphysics. Houston: Center for Thomistic Studies, 1985.Google Scholar

Owens, Joseph. “Quandoque and Aliquando in Aquinas’s Tertia Via.” New Scholasticism 54 (1980): 447–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Owens, Joseph. St. Thomas Aquinas on the Existence of God: The Collected Papers of Joseph Owens. Edited by Catan, John. Albany, New York: SUNY Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Paley, William. Natural Theology or Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity. London: R. Faulder, 1802.Google Scholar

Parfit, Derek. “Why Anything? Why This?” In two articles in the London Review of Books. Vol.20 (January 22, 1998): 24–27 and vol.20 (February 5, 1998): 22–25.Google Scholar

Phillips, R.P. Modern Thomistic Philosophy. 2 vols. Westminster, MD: The Newman Press, 1934.Google Scholar

Plantinga, Alvin. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Plato. Complete Works. Edited by Cooper, John. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1997.Google Scholar

Plotinus. Enneads. 3rd rev. ed. Translated by Stephen MacKenna. New York: Pantheon Books, 1962.Google Scholar

Pojman, Louis. Philosophical Traditions: A Text with Readings. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2006.Google Scholar

Preller, Victor. Divine Science and the Science of God. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Proclus. The Elements of Theology. Translated, with commentary, by E. Dodds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander. “Ex Nihilo Nihil Fit: Arguments New and Old for the Principle of Sufficient Reason.” In Explanation and Causation: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, edited by Campbell, J., O’Rourke, M., and Silverstein, H.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pruss, Alexander. “The Hume-Edwards Principle and the Cosmological Argument.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (1998):149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pruss, Alexander. The Principle of Sufficient Reason: A Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

“Quantifier Shift Fallacy.” In The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, 2nd ed., edited by Blackburn, Simon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Quine, W.V.O. “On What There Is.” In From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Randal, John. Aristotle. New York: Columbia University Press, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reichenbach, Bruce. The Cosmological Argument: A Reassessment. Springfield, IL: Charles, 1972.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. Leibniz: An Introduction to his Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1979.Google Scholar

Rescher, Nicholas. The Riddle of Existence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1984.Google Scholar

Robson, Gregory. “Reconsidering the Necessary Beings of Aquinas’s Third Way.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2012): 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rocca, Gregory. “The Distinction between Res Significata and Modus Significandi in Aquinas’ Theological Epistemology.” The Thomist 55 (1991): 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rocca, Gregory. Speaking the Incomprehensible God: Thomas Aquinas on the Interplay of Positive and Negative Theology. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Rosenblum, Bruce and Kuttner, Fred. Quantum Enigma: Physics Encounters Consciousness. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Ross, James. “Analogy as a Rule of Meaning for Religious Language.” International Philosophical Quarterly 1 (1961): 468–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, James. Philosophical Theology. New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1969.Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Pereyra, Gonzalo. “The Principles of Contradiction, Sufficient Reason, and Identity of Indiscernibles.” In The Oxford Handbook of Leibniz, edited by Antognazza, Maria. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Rudman, Stanley. Concepts of Person and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Rundle, Bede. Why There Is Something Rather than Nothing. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. “Am I an Atheist or Agnostic?: A Plea For Tolerance in the Face of New Dogmas.” Girard, KS: E. Haldeman-Julius, 1950.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. and Copleston, F.C.. “A Debate on the Existence of God.” In The Existence of God, edited by Hick, John. New York: Macmillan, 1964.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. My Philosophical Development. London: Allen & Unwin, 1959.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. “On Denoting.” Mind 14 (1905): 479–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sadowsky, James. “The Cosmological Argument and the Endless Regress.” International Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1980): 465–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scotus, John Duns. Duns Scotus: Philosophical Writings [Latin/English]. Edited and translated by Allan Wolter. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1987.Google Scholar

Scotus, John Duns. Opus oxoniense (Oxford Lectures). Edited by Fernandez Garcia, M. as Commentaria oxoniensia. Quaracchi: Collegii S. Bonaventurae, 1913–1914.Google Scholar

Schmidt, Joseph. “Existential Inertia and the Aristotelian Proof.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 89 (2021), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Joseph and Linford, Daniel. Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs. New York: Springer, 2023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, Robert. The Domain of Logic According to Saint Thomas Aquinas. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shields, Christopher. Aristotle. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shields, Daniel. “Everything in Motion Is Put in Motion by Another: A Principle in Aquinas’s First Way.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2018): 535–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siger of Brabant. Quaestiones in metaphysicam. Munich and Vienna versions. Edited by Dunphy, William. Louvain-la-Neuve: Éditions de l’Institut supérieur de philosophie, 1981.Google Scholar

Sillem, Edward. Ways of Thinking about God: Thomas Aquinas and the Modern Mind. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1962.Google Scholar

Smith, Gerard. Natural Theology–Metaphysics II. New York: Macmillan, 1961.Google Scholar

Smith, Gerard and Kendzierski, Lottie. The Philosophy of Being–Metaphysics I. New York: MacMillan, 1960.Google Scholar

Smith, John. Reason and God: Encounters of Philosophy with Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961.Google Scholar

Sokolowski, Robert. The God of Faith and Reason. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Spade, Paul. “The Semantics of Terms.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Spitzer, Robert. New Proofs for the Existence of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar

Stump, Eleonore. Aquinas. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Leo. Authentic Metaphysics in an Age of Unreality. New York: Peter Lang, 1963.Google Scholar

Sweeney, Leo. “Essence and Existence in Thomas Aquinas’s Early Writings,” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 37 (1963): 97–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Swinburne, Richard. The Coherence of Theism. 2nd rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, Richard. Metaphysics. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.Google Scholar

Tegmark, Max. “Parallel Universes.” In Science and Ultimate Reality: Quantum Theory, Cosmology, and Complexity, edited by Barrow, John et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Tegmark, Max. “Parallel Universes” [abbreviated version]. Scientific American 288 (2003): 41–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Volume 1: The Person and His Work. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Torrell, Jean-Pierre. Saint Thomas Aquinas, Volume 2: Spiritual Master. Translated by Robert Royal. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Twetten, David. “Clearing a ‘Way’ for Aquinas: How the Proof from Motion Concludes to God.” Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 70 (1996): 259–278.Google Scholar

Twetten, David. “To Which ‘God’ Must a Proof of God’s Existence Conclude for Aquinas?” In Laudemus viros glorioses: Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, edited by Houser, R.E.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, 2007.Google Scholar

Tyron, Edward P. “Is the Universe a Vacuum Fluctuation?” Nature 246 (1973): 396–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Urban, Wilbur. The History of the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Its Metaphysical and Logical Formulations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1900.Google Scholar

Inwagen, Van, Peter. An Essay on Free Will. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Inwagen, Van, “Why Is There Anything at All?” Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 70 (1996): 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Roo, William. “Act and Potency.” The Modern Schoolman 18 (1940): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Velecky, Lubar. Aquinas’ Five Arguments in the Summa Theologiae 1a 2, 3. The Netherlands: Kok Pharos, 1994.Google Scholar

Verschuuren, Gerard. Aquinas and Modern Science: A New Synthesis of Faith and Reason. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Wallace, William. Elements of Philosophy: A Compendium for Philosophers and Theologians. Staten Island, NY: Alba House, 1977.Google Scholar

Wallace, William. The Modeling of Nature: Philosophy of Science and the Philosophy of Nature in Synthesis. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1996.Google Scholar

Wallace, William. “Newtonian Antinomies against the Prima Via.” The Thomist 19 (1956): 151–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weidemann, Hermann. “The Logic of Being in Thomas Aquinas.” In The Logic of Being, edited by Knuuttila, Simo and Hintikka, Jaakko. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co., 1986.Google Scholar

Weigel, Peter. Aquinas on Simplicity: An Investigation into the Foundations of His Philosophical Theology. Bern: Peter Lang, 2008.Google Scholar

Weigel, Peter. “Attributes of God.” In The Rowan and Littlefield Handbook of the Philosophy of Religion, edited by Lamport, Mark. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2022.Google Scholar

Weigel, Peter. “Divine Simplicity.” In Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Fieser, James and Dowden, Bradley, 2008. Available at www.iep.utm.edu/divine-simplicity/.Google Scholar

Weigel, Peter. “Notes on Finality in Aquinas’s Fifth Way.” New Blackfriars 105 (2024).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weingartner, Paul. God’s Existence. Can It Be Proven?: A Logical Commentary on the Five Ways of Thomas Aquinas. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisheipl, James. Friar Thomas D’Aquino: His Life, Thought, and Works. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Weisheipl, James. “The Principle Omne quod movetur ab alio movetur in Medieval Physics.” Isis 50 (1959): 439–54. Reprinted in Nature and Motion in the Middle Ages, edited by William Carroll. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Weisheipl, James. “Natural and Compulsory Movement,” In Nature and Motion in the Middle Ages. Edited by Carroll, William. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Wheeler, John and Zurek, Wojciech, eds. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

White, Victor. God the Unknown: and Other Essays. London: Harvill Press, 1956.Google Scholar

Williams, C.J.F. “Being.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Quinn, Philip and Taliaferro, Charles. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1997.Google Scholar

Wippel, John. “Essence and Existence.” In The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, edited by Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., and Pinborg, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Wippel, John. Metaphysical Themes in Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Wippel, John. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas: From Finite Being to Uncreated Being. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wippel, John. “Metaphysics.” In The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, edited by Kretzmann, N. and Stump, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Wippel, John. “Thomas Aquinas on the Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather than Nothing Whatsoever?” In The Ultimate Why Question: Why Is There Anything at All Rather than Nothing Whatsoever?, edited by Wippel, John. Washington, DC: Catholic University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C.K. Ogden. London: Kegan Paul, 1922.Google Scholar

Zedler, Beatrice. “Saint Thomas and Avicenna in the De Potentia Dei.” Traditio 6 (1948): 105–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar