Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-m259h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-28T11:12:10.464Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Miniature antenna for GNSS satellite constellation reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2025

Karim Kouny*
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Valentin Lourenco Martins
Affiliation:
DEMR, ONERA, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, Occitanie, France Institut d’Electronique et des Technologies du numeRique (IETR), UMR CNRS 6164, INSA Rennes, Rennes, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Hassan Bouazzaoui
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Noham Martin
Affiliation:
Universite de Brest, Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285, 6 Avenue Le Gorgeu, Brest Cedex 3, Brittany (Bretagne), France
Fabien Ferrero
Affiliation:
CNRS/LEAT, Universite Cote d’Azur, Sophia Antipolis, France
Guillaume Ferre
Affiliation:
IMS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, Talence, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
Anthony Ghiotto
Affiliation:
IMS, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux INP, CNRS, Talence, Nouvelle-Aquitaine, France
*
Corresponding author: Karim Kouny; Email: karim.kouny@outlook.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the design, simulation, and real-world validation of a compact, dual-band, right-hand circularly polarized antenna for Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) applications. The antenna operates in the L1 (1575 MHz) and L5 (1176 MHz) bands, utilizing a stacked patch structure on low-cost FR4 substrates to achieve compactness and circular polarization. The design ensures axial ratio values below 3 dB, with peak gains of 2.59 dBi (L1) and -0.89 dBi (L5), while maintaining wide radiation coverage. Unlike many recent proposals based on Rogers substrates or complex geometries, our design focuses on cost-effectiveness and manufacturing simplicity. The prototype was validated using a Quectel LC29HAAMD GNSS receiver during the 2024 French National Microwaves Days (JNM), successfully acquiring over 40 satellites within 60 seconds in a real-world suburban environment. These results demonstrate the antenna’s suitability for space-constrained and low-cost GNSS platforms in the “New Space” era.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The European Microwave Association.

Introduction

Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) play a fundamental role in modern positioning, navigation, and timing across both civilian and defense sectors [Reference Montenbruck, Steigenberger and Hauschild1],[Reference Wang2]. For many years, it has been demonstrated to be highly effective in trajectory definition and localization [Reference Montenbruck, Steigenberger and Hauschild1]. This capability is enabled by satellite constellations that facilitate the trilateration procedure, thereby enabling the user to receive precise measurements of their speed and geographic coordinates. A substantial array of phone applications exists that facilitate the identification of one’s location, and these applications have attained a high degree of renown within the civil sphere. However, given their capacity to ensure both definition and trajectory guidance, as well as knowledge of strategic position, they emerge as indispensable instruments within the military context. The proliferation of multiple constellations, including GPS, Galileo, BeiDou-3, and GLONASS, has led to a surge in demand for compact, multi-band, and robust GNSS receivers. One of the critical challenges in receiver design lies in the antenna, which must offer dual-band operation (e.g., L1 and L5), right-hand circular polarization (RHCP), wide radiation coverage, and minimal size – all while remaining low-cost and tolerant to fabrication variations. Achieving this combination is non-trivial. Dual-band operation typically requires large radiating surfaces or complex feed structures, while circular polarization is sensitive to geometrical precision and substrate losses. These constraints are especially limiting in low-cost applications such as small satellites (CubeSats), UAVs, or IoT-enabled GNSS platforms. This assertion holds particular weight when considering the advent of new space. A substantial and pressing demand exists for cost-effective, miniature, and highly compact solutions. As a key component of the overall RF system, the search is on for a dual-band antenna with circular polarization that is both compact and cost-effective. Currently, the most suited technology available for this type of antenna is PCB (Printed Circuit Board) technology, which is inherently low profile, small, and very low cost, especially when combined with a low-cost substrate. A prominent difficulty in PCB design, especially within the purview of GNSS applications, lies in the development of designs that exhibit minimal substrate losses. In other words, a trade-off must be managed between antenna efficiency and compactness/price. This work prioritizes the cost-effectiveness aspect while maximizing the performance achievable within the specified topology.

Numerous antenna designs have been proposed as a solution to a low-cost, circularly polarized bi-band GNSS antenna. Classical solutions involve stacked patches on high-performance substrates [Reference Wang, Fang, Fu and Lu3, Reference Anguera, Puente, Borja, Delbene and Soler4], while others explore multi-element arrays [Reference Maqsood, Bhandari, Gao, Van Steenwijk and Unwin5], which are often unsuitable for wide-angle omnidirectional reception. More recent work includes dual-band CP antennas with advanced slot geometries such as V-shaped [Reference Awais, Bilal and Salamat7], eye-shaped [Reference Sun, Zhang and Feng8], and sunlight-shaped [Reference Ding, Yu, Zhang and Luo9] configurations. A hexaband slotted patch for GNSS and 5G is also reported in [Reference Gomaa, Afifi and Abdalrazik10]

However, most of these approaches either lack experimental validation, require expensive materials (e.g., Rogers RO4003, Duroid), or involve manufacturing complexity. In this context, our work proposes a low-cost, dual-band RHCP antenna designed using two identical-height FR4 substrates. The antenna uses a stacked patch architecture with optimized geometry to ensure resonance at L1 and L5 while achieving an axial ratio of < 3 dB across both bands. Unlike prior work, the antenna was fabricated and validated in a real-world environment using a GNSS receiver and satellite tracking software.

Indeed, within the framework of the 23rd French National Microwaves Days (JNM) at Antibes (France) in 2024, a student contest was organized to highlight the best miniature receiving antenna for GNSS signals. The number of GNSS satellites discovered served as the criterion for determining the antenna’s performance, in addition to its adherence to the prescribed requirements. A Quectel LC29HAAMD GNSS receiver and the QGNSS software, which can decode the NMEA frames from the GNSS module, were used to actually test the antenna. Over the course of 60 seconds, a full cold start measurement was conducted. The jury examined how many GNSS satellites were found within the 60-second period after it ended. The evening of the semi-finals and final took place at the Côte d’Azur racecourse in Cagnes-sur-Mer, as illustrated in Fig. 1 (semi-final). This paper presents the co-winning antenna, which is a stacked dual-band circularly polarized patch antenna. According to the constraints imposed by the contest organization, this antenna is fully passive, has a maximal size inferior or equal to 100 mm × 100 mm × 50 mm. The results confirm excellent acquisition performance, demonstrating the feasibility of low-cost, passive GNSS antennas compatible with emerging “New Space” requirements.

Figure 1. 1/2 final fight – antenna from CROMA PhD students (Grenoble) vs the antenna from the XLIM PhD student (Limoges).

The paper is organized as follows. Section II examines the current state of the art in terms of the imposed parameters, while Section III provides a detailed description of the designed antenna and its performance. Section IV of this study presents an analysis of the design’s tolerance robustness. Section V provides a state-of-the-art comparison, highlighting the advantages of the proposed antenna in terms of dimensions, cost, and real-world applicability. Finally, conclusions follow in Section VI.

Antenna specifications for a GNSS reception application

A comprehensive examination of the state of the art was conducted to ascertain an antenna solution that would satisfy all pertinent specifications presented in Table 1. Several studies dedicated to the development of antennas that are compatible with the performance requirements of GNSS applications can be found in the state of the art [Reference Wang2]. The authors of this study elected to concentrate exclusively on solutions in planar PCB technology. Indeed, the solution’s attributes, including its low profile, low cost, and versatility in terms of antenna performance, appear to make it the most suitable option in the context of a student competition. Moreover, the cost of a GNSS antenna is one of the most significant aspects of the design, particularly in the new space context [Reference Wang2].

Table 1. Specifications of the L-band GNSS reception antenna.

The optimal antenna configuration must exhibit characteristics that are contradictory, including a wide radiation pattern ensuring spatial coverage and a substantial gain ensuring the link budget. Consequently, the authors opted to employ topologies that are optimized to address this trade-off. The majority of designs existing in the literature that are compatible with the specifications utilize patch antenna stacking methods. Indeed, the combination of two patches has been demonstrated to generate two distinct operating bands [Reference Wang, Fang, Fu and Lu3], [Reference Anguera, Puente, Borja, Delbene and Soler4]. Designs using antenna arrays, such as references [Reference Maqsood, Bhandari, Gao, Van Steenwijk and Unwin5], were not retained, since the final system is incompatible with beamforming operation to cover the largest possible angular area. Finally, the design only simulated in the reference [Reference Wang and Zhang6], which consists of a stacked patch antenna, was chosen for its compliance with the specifications, its radiation performance respecting the compromise between angular opening and gain, and its simplicity of design, specifically in relation to its feeding. As previously mentioned, [Reference Wang and Zhang6] merely demonstrates simulations of the antenna design. This paper presents both the conception and the fabrication of the antenna, in addition to a practical validation of the antenna’s performance in a real-world environment. The most crucial component was, above all, the substrate (FR4) that was utilized since it is a very accessible and affordable substrate that allows the antenna to be employed as a low-cost antenna that is compatible with new space. While [Reference Wang and Zhang6] uses two distinct FR4 substrate heights, this work presents a design with the same height for both substrates, enhancing the concept’s low-cost aspect.

Proposed antenna design

As mentioned previously, based on the simulated work available in [Reference Wang and Zhang6], an antenna that meets the specifications imposed by the application was simulated (see Fig. 2) and fabricated (see Fig. 3) using an Enclosed Fiber Laser Marking Machine (50W fiber laser) [11] available in Lab-STICC UMR CNRS 6285.

Figure 2. Simulated antenna with Ansys HFSS software, (a) side view, (b) top view, and (c) isometric view as proposed in [Reference Wang and Zhang6].

Figure 3. Different parts of the antenna, including the connector and screws used to adhere the two parts together

The structure of the proposed dual-band circularly polarized (CP) microstrip antenna is illustrated in Fig. 2. It consists of two stacked radiating patches: an upper patch and a lower patch. Dual-band operation is achieved by placing the high-frequency patch above the low-frequency one. The process of miniaturization is accomplished through a conventional method involving the cutting of slots in the surface of the patch. This stacked dual-layer configuration enables independent tuning of each operating frequency, offering greater flexibility in the optimization process.

The upper patch is designed to operate at (L1 band) 1.57542 GHz, while the lower patch resonates at (L5 Band) 1.17645 GHz, with respective heights denoted as h 1 and h 2. To achieve size reduction, four vertical rectangular slits are etched into the lower patch, and four irregular triangular slots are incorporated into the upper patch. Additionally, a rectangular slot is introduced in the lower patch to enhance impedance matching for the single-feed CP antenna as explained in [Reference Wang and Zhang6]. The antenna differs from [Reference Wang and Zhang6] by the substrates’ heights as explained previously, which leads to different geometric parameters. Note that a parametric study is presented in [Reference Wang and Zhang6], where the impact of the height on the gain is highlighted.

The antenna was designed on a double FR4 substrate (thickness: 1.6 mm, dielectric constant ϵr: 4.4, and dielectric loss tangent: 0.02). In Fig. 3, the different parts of the antenna, including the connector and screws used to mount the two parts together, are presented. Note that the screws have been strategically positioned to avoid compromising electrical performance. The dimensions of the different values of the antenna (for the same variable as [Reference Wang and Zhang6]) are presented in Table 2. As a reminder, our antenna uses two identical substrates of the same height (1.6 mm), whereas in [Reference Wang and Zhang6], they use two substrates with different heights.

Table 2. Geometric parameters

Figs. 4 and 5 show the surface current distributions at L1 and L5 frequencies, evaluated at various time phases, revealing a rotating vector field characteristic of RHCP. This behavior is enabled by the intentional design of the stacked patch geometry, which excites two orthogonal current modes with nearly identical amplitudes and a 90 phase shift. The simulated vector current patterns confirm the temporal rotation of the surface currents, resulting in RHCP radiation in the far field – fully aligned with the polarization requirements of GNSS applications.

Figure 4. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.176 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Figure 5. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.575 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Fig. 6 shows the co-polarized and cross-polarized realized gain of the proposed antenna at low frequency and high frequency 1.18 and 1.57 GHz, respectively. The shape of the radiation pattern is completely compatible with the expected diagram of a GNSS antenna, i.e., a wide aperture with a significant reduction in gain near the horizon to avoid certain interference effects near the horizon [Reference Wang2]. The cross-polarization remains significantly suppressed in all directions for the two bands. This confirms the polarization purity of the proposed antenna, which is essential to reject reflected multipath components in GNSS scenarios. The performance of the antenna in terms of radiation is completely consistent with the performance shown in simulation in ref [Reference Wang and Zhang6]. However, the gain in the L1 band is significantly lower than the gain in the L5 band, which can be explained by the reduction in substrate height [Reference Wang and Zhang6].

Figure 6. Simulated radiation pattern for ϕ = 0 at the center frequency (continuous/dotted lines correspond respectively to co-polarization/cross-polarization).

The simulated and measured S 11 (dB) parameters are presented in Fig. 7, showing a good correlation and agreement with the specifications for the L1 and L5 bands.

Figure 7. Comparison between simulated and measured return loss.

Figure 8 illustrates the axial ratio as a function of the elevation angle, showing favorable circular polarization performance for both the L1 and L5 bands.

Figure 8. Simulated axial ratio (dB) as a function of the angle theta.

Finally, Fig. 9a) illustrates the simulated axial ratio as a function of frequency for both L1 and L5 bands. In both cases, the axial ratio remains below the critical 3 dB threshold, confirming the generation of RHCP. This behavior is maintained across the entire operating bandwidth, which is a key performance metric for GNSS reception. The smooth evolution of the axial ratio also demonstrates the stability of the stacked geometry and its robustness to fabrication tolerances. Figure 9b) presents the simulated efficiency of the proposed antenna, reaching approximately 45% for the L1 band and 25% for the L5 band.

Figure 9. Performance over frequency. (a) Axial ratios ( $\theta=0;\phi=0$). (b) Efficiencies.

The antenna presented in this work meets the specifications imposed by the requirements. On the one hand, it is miniature and simple to manufacture, and on the other hand, thanks to the use of two stacked substrates, it is easy to achieve both dual-band characteristics (stacked patch) and RHCP polarization for the two operating frequency bands (L1 and L5), given the patch geometry, as illustrated in [Reference Wang and Zhang6].

Ultimately, this simple, miniature, low-cost, and easily manufacturable antenna is fully aligned with the new space era.

Future work will explore integrating the proposed antenna into embedded platforms, extending it to tri-band operation (L1/L2/L5), and assessing performance under conformal configurations or additive manufacturing processes.

Study of substrate tolerance

The design of reference [Reference Wang and Zhang6] has been constructed, measured, and tested. The results reveal that the design is well-suited to GNSS applications in terms of antenna performance.

It is a very basic and low-cost system that performs well even after reducing the first substrate height.

However, the design’s tolerance to the substrate modification has not been investigated. In terms of dimension, the substrate height can vary by $\pm10\%$. The variation of antenna performances with substrate height tolerance has been simulated with two extreme cases: both substrate increases or reduces height by $10\%$.

Due to the variations, the return loss and radiation characteristics are impacted. However, the frequency corresponding to the lowest return loss level remains steady. Therefore, only S 11 is presented in Fig. 10.

Figure 10. Evolution of return loss with substrate height tolerance.

The L5-band is less sensitive than the L1-band, as the S 11 minimum remains in the band in both tolerance cases. Even when L1-band adaptation changes to lower frequencies, the adaptation remains acceptable, and the overall operation is not compromised.

Comparison with existing designs

To highlight the advantages of the proposed antenna in terms of size, cost, and real-world applicability, a comparative analysis with several referenced GNSS antenna designs is presented in Table 3. The comparison considers key metrics such as physical dimensions, supported bands, gain, polarization, substrate, and whether the design was simulated or fabricated.

Table 3. Comparison with existing GNSS antenna designs

As shown, while some designs offer higher gain or wider bandwidths, they often rely on more complex structures or costly substrates such as Rogers or Duroid.

The proposed antenna (our work) demonstrates a unique combination of simplicity, cost-efficiency, and validated performance that differentiates it from existing designs. While many state-of-the-art GNSS antennas offer competitive performance in terms of gain or bandwidth, they often rely on complex geometries, costly high-frequency substrates such as Rogers or Duroid, or require advanced feeding networks and beamforming techniques.

In contrast, our antenna is fully passive, employs standard FR4 substrates, and maintains a compact form factor ( $80\,\mathrm{mm} \times 80\,\mathrm{mm} \times 3.2\,\mathrm{mm}$) compatible with low-profile enclosures. Its dual-band behavior is achieved through a simple stacked patch configuration, eliminating the need for filters or external matching circuits. Most notably, this design has been tested and validated under real-world conditions winning, the JNM 2024 GNSS reception competition, confirming its readiness for practical deployment.

These characteristics make it particularly attractive for applications such as CubeSats, UAV-based navigation, and cost-constrained IoT GNSS receivers, where high performance, low cost, and ease of integration are equally critical. As the demand for scalable and autonomous navigation platforms grows, our antenna provides a balanced, manufacturable solution aligned with emerging “New Space” paradigms.

Conclusion

In this study, a compact, circularly polarized, bi-band antenna design is proposed, consisting of two stacked patch antennas with two FR4 substrates of the same height. The antenna has been meticulously designed to meet the established specifications for GNSS applications. The antenna’s attributes, including its low profile, cost-effectiveness, straightforward design, robustness to manufacturing variations, and great performance, align seamlessly with new space technology trends and specifications.

A prototype was manufactured with a PCB laser engraver, and its performance was validated with a Quectel LC29HAAMD GNSS receiver and the QGNSS software during functional tests performed at the JNM’2024 antenna design contest.

Finally, the antenna won the competition (with approximately ten participating teams) tied with the team from the CROMA laboratory in Grenoble, detecting around 40 satellites in 60 seconds in real conditions in a suburban area.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the organizers of the JNM Design Contest. This contest was supported by IEEE MTT-S France, IEEE AP-S France, Rogers Corporation, Group ACB, Ansys, and especially David Prestaux from Ansys, as well as Anyfields, who performed the antenna measurements.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Karim Kouny (Graduate Student Member, IEEE) received the Electronics and Telecommunications engineering degree from the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA), Rennes, France, and the research master’s degree in Microtechnologies, Architecture, Communication Networks, and Systems, also from INSA Rennes, in 2022.

Valentin Lourenço Martins received the Electronics Engineering degree from the ENSEIRB-MATMECA Engineering School, Bordeaux Institute of Technology, Talence, France, in 2023. He is currently pursuing a Ph.D. degree in microwave engineering with ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab (ONERA, Toulouse), and Institut d $'$Électronique et des Technologies du numéRique (IETR, Rennes). His current research interests include microwave engineering, with a focus on antenna design in additive manufacturing.

Hassan Bouazzaou (Member, IEEE) received the Engineering and Ph.D. degrees in electronics from the University of Brest, France, in 2018 and 2022, respectively. From 2018 to 2022, he worked on the development of novel manufacturing processes in PCB technology for innovative microwave devices at Protecno GTID Company, France. Since 2022, he has been working at the Laboratory-STICC, University of Brest, as a full-time Researcher.

Noham Martin was born in Saint Omer, France, in 1976. He received the Diplôme d’Études Approfondies (D.E.A.) at Lille (France) and the Ph.D. degree from the Université de Bretagne Occidentale (UBO), Brest, France, in 2004. Since 2006, he has been an Associate Professor at UBO and at the Lab-STICC Laboratory. His research activities concern the integration of microwave components (phase shifter, filter, etc.) and broadband antennas. Since 2017, he has also been working on the coupling between the microwave and optics fields.

Fabien Ferrero (M’11) was born in Nice, France, in 1980. He received the EPU Engineer degree in electronics and the master’s degree in propagation, télédétection, and télécommunications, and the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from the University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France, in 2003 and 2007, respectively. He was with IMRA Europe (Aisin Seiki Research Center), Valbonne, France, from 2008 to 2009, as a Research Engineer, and developed automotive antennas. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Polytechnic School, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis. He is doing his research with the Laboratoire d’Electronique, Antennes et Telecommunications, French National Centre for Scientific Research, Paris, France, and the Centre de Recherche Mutualisé sur les Antennes, Valbonne. His current research interests include design and measurement of millimetric, miniature, and reconfigurable antennas.

Guillaume Ferre received the Ph.D. degree in the field of digital communications and signal processing from the Limoges University of Technology, in 2006. From 2006 to 2008, he was a Postdoctoral Researcher at the Limoges XLIM laboratory and then at the IMS laboratory in Bordeaux. Since 2022, he is a Full Professor at ENSEIRB-MATMECA, Engineering School of Bordeaux INP. After several administrative responsibilities in the Telecommunications Department of ENSEIRB-MATMECA, he is now the Director of Industrial Relations at ENSEIRB-MATMECA.

He carries out his research activities within the IMS Laboratory in the “signal and image” team. These fields of research concern the circuits and systems for digital communications, whihc include:

  • - Signal processing and digital communications,

  • - Digital enhancement for wideband power amplifiers and time-interleaved analog-to-digital converters.

Guillaume Ferré is the author of more than 190 papers in international journals and conferences. He is also the author of 14 patents. He currently supervises 6 PhD students with a significant part of industrial research activities. He is a Member of several Technical Program Committees. He is the Principal Investigator (PI) of many national and international projects.

Anthony Ghiotto (Senior Member, IEEE) received the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees (both with distinction) in optics, optoelectronics, and microwave engineering from the Grenoble Institute of Technology, Grenoble, France, in 2005 and 2008, respectively. From 2009 to 2012, he was a Postdoctoral Research Associate at the École Polytechnique de Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada. In 2012, he joined the Department of Electronics, ENSEIRB-MATMECA Engineering School, Bordeaux Institute of Technology, and the Laboratory of Integration from Materials to Systems (IMS), University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France, where he is currently an Associate Professor (with Full Professor habilitation). In 2016 and 2017, he was a Guest Professor at the University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. His current research interests include the analysis, design, and integration of microwave and millimeter wave passive and active circuits in PCB (including SIW and Air-Filled SIW), dielectric waveguides, BiCMOS, and CMOS technologies. Dr. Ghiotto was the recipient of the IEEE MTT-S Outstanding Young Engineer Award in 2022, the IEEE/SEE Léon-Nicolas Brillouin Award in 2020, the IEEE SPI Young Investigator Training Program Award in 2016 and 2017, the Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Merit Scholarship Program for Foreign Students of the Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies of Québec in 2009, and the Young Scientist Award of the International Union of Radio Science in 2008. He is the 2024 IEEE MTT-S Adcom Secretary. He was the TPC Chair of the 2019 European Microwave Conference (EuMC) and the Chair of the 2024 European Microwave Conference (EuMC). He is an Associate Editor of the EuMA International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies and a Technical Reviewer for the IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, IEEE Transactions on Antenna and Propagation, IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, and the IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters. He is the Chair of the MTT-4 Microwave Passive Components and Transmission Line Structures and a Member of the MTT Technical Coordination and Future Directions Committee (TCFDC), the MTT-1 Field Theory and Computational EM, and the MTT-5 Filters Committees of the IEEE Microwave Theory and Techniques Society (MTT-S). Since 2017, he has been the Chair of the IEEE MTT French Chapter. He was the Counselor of the IEEE Student Branch of Bordeaux: the BEE Branch, from 2012 to 2019, and is the Advisor of the MTT and AP BEE Branch Chapters.

References

Montenbruck, O, Steigenberger, P and Hauschild, A (2020) Comparing the ‘Big 4’ - A User’s View on GNSS Performance 2020 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS). Portland, OR, USA.10.1109/PLANS46316.2020.9110208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, JJH (2012) Antennas for global navigation satellite system (GNSS). Proceedings of the IEEE 100(7), 23492355.10.1109/JPROC.2011.2179630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z, Fang, S, Fu, S and Lu, S (2009) Dual-band probe-fed stacked patch antenna for GNSS applications. In IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 8 100103.10.1109/LAWP.2008.2012355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anguera, J, Puente, C, Borja, C, Delbene, N and Soler, J (2003) Dual-frequency broad-band stacked microstrip patch antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 2 3639.10.1109/LAWP.2003.811325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maqsood, M, Bhandari, B, Gao, S, Van Steenwijk, RDV and Unwin, M (2010) Dual-band circularly polarized antennas for GNSS remote sensing onboard small satellites. In 7th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP 2010). Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.10.1109/CSNDSP16145.2010.5580454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H and Zhang, W (2021) A Dual-Band Circularly Polarized Stacked Microstrip Antenna for BeiDou Navigation Application. In 2021 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Smart Grid (ICWCSG). Hangzhou, China.10.1109/ICWCSG53609.2021.00040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awais, M, Bilal, A and Salamat, S (2021) A low cost coplanar capacitively coupled probe fed stacked patch antenna for GNSS applications. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters 99 1118.Google Scholar
Sun, X, Zhang, Z and Feng, Z (2011) Dual-band circularly polarized stacked annular-ring patch antenna for GPS application. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 10 4952.Google Scholar
Ding, K, Yu, T, Zhang, Q and Luo, K (2014) Dual-band circularly polarized aperture coupled annular-ring microstrip antenna for GNSS applications. Frequenz 68 (1–2).10.1515/freq-2013-0065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomaa, A, Afifi, A and Abdalrazik, A (2024) A Dual-Band Wide Axial-Ratio Beamwidth Circularly-Polarized Antenna with V-Shaped Slot for L2/L5 GNSS Applications. In 6th Novel Intelligent and Leading Emerging Sciences Conference (NILES), Giza. Egypt.10.1109/NILES63360.2024.10753263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. 1/2 final fight – antenna from CROMA PhD students (Grenoble) vs the antenna from the XLIM PhD student (Limoges).

Figure 1

Table 1. Specifications of the L-band GNSS reception antenna.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Simulated antenna with Ansys HFSS software, (a) side view, (b) top view, and (c) isometric view as proposed in [6].

Figure 3

Figure 3. Different parts of the antenna, including the connector and screws used to adhere the two parts together

Figure 4

Table 2. Geometric parameters

Figure 5

Figure 4. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.176 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Figure 6

Figure 5. Simulated surface currents distribution at 1.575 GHz. (a) 0. (b) 90. (c) 180. (d) 270. (e) Colorbar.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Simulated radiation pattern for ϕ = 0 at the center frequency (continuous/dotted lines correspond respectively to co-polarization/cross-polarization).

Figure 8

Figure 7. Comparison between simulated and measured return loss.

Figure 9

Figure 8. Simulated axial ratio (dB) as a function of the angle theta.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Performance over frequency. (a) Axial ratios ($\theta=0;\phi=0$). (b) Efficiencies.

Figure 11

Figure 10. Evolution of return loss with substrate height tolerance.

Figure 12

Table 3. Comparison with existing GNSS antenna designs