Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-23T05:40:30.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Public health response to a tuberculosis exposure in a daycare: lessons on transmission risk and intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2025

Kari Neemann*
Affiliation:
Children’s Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA Douglas County Health Department, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Caleb Kuddes
Affiliation:
Douglas County Health Department, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Chad Wetzel
Affiliation:
Douglas County Health Department, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Alice I Sato
Affiliation:
Children’s Nebraska, Omaha, Nebraska, USA University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
Justin Frederick
Affiliation:
Douglas County Health Department, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
*
Corresponding author: Kari Neemann; Email: kneemann@unmc.edu

Abstract

Type
Concise Communication
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Background

Over 9,600 cases of tuberculosis (TB) were diagnosed in the United States in 2023, a 16% increase over the previous year. Reference Williams, Pratt, Walker, Price, Stewart and Feng1 When an individual is diagnosed with potentially contagious TB, public health agencies initiate a case investigation, which identifies individuals who have been in close contact with the index patient and provides them with recommendations for testing and, if necessary, treatment. The rapid identification of child contacts is particularly important as younger children have a higher risk of developing symptomatic tuberculosis disease. Reference Marais, Gie and Schaaf2 Additionally, the very young are more likely than other age groups to develop miliary, extrapulmonary, or meningeal TB acutely following infection. Reference Marais, Gie and Schaaf2 The CDC and WHO designate children <5 years of age exposed to TB as high-risk contacts who should be evaluated for window prophylaxis. Reference Taylor, Nolan and Blumberg3,4 Window prophylaxis is the administration of preventive antibiotic treatment to those who have been exposed to TB but have not yet developed symptoms or tested positive by immunologically based assays, and is recommended during the period between initial exposure and a follow-up test 8–10 weeks later to prevent the development of active TB. Reference Taylor, Nolan and Blumberg3,4 While it is known that the risk of TB infection increases with a longer exposure period, Reference Reichler, Khan and Yuan5 the duration of exposure time resulting in high-risk status has not been well described. Additionally, the density of infectious droplet nuclei in the air at the time of exposure and the ventilation capability of the environment also contribute to the risk of exposure. Reference Taylor, Nolan and Blumberg3

Public health response to community TB exposure

This report details a public health response to a TB exposure at a Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA) drop-in daycare center. The internationally infected source patient, without underlying health conditions, exhibited signs and symptoms of active pulmonary TB for three months before being diagnosed. This resulted in a potential exposure period totaling six months. Reference Sterling, Njie and Zenner6

Clinical findings of the index patient included a computed tomography scan showing a partially cavitary 7 mm right lung apex nodule, positive smear microscopy, GeneXpert MTB/RIF PCR, and AFB culture with Mycobacterium tuberculosis identified. The daycare consisted of a 1,473-square-foot room equipped with a standard HVAC system. The daycare utilized an electronic badge system to record the entry and exit of each child into the daycare center, allowing for highly accurate identification of contacts and exposure times.

A total of 592 individuals had exposures related to the drop-in daycare, of which 359 were <5 years of age. Of those <5,211 had been exposed within the prior 10 weeks and were offered evaluation for window prophylaxis (Table 1). Cumulative exposure times ranged from 26 minutes to over 21 hours (Figure 1). The public health department, in consultation with the CDC’s Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, notified families with more than 30 minutes of documented exposure through multiple communication channels. These included emails (using contact information from YMCA membership profiles), phone calls, a public meeting, a press conference, and several press releases. Families were advised on patient-specific evaluations based on the last known exposure date. Individuals ≥5 years old or <5 years but more than 10 weeks from last exposure were offered TB testing at clinics set up at the YMCA (interferon- $\gamma $ release assay [IGRA] ≥2 years or tuberculin skin test <2 years old). Individuals <5 years old and <10 weeks from exposure were referred to a TB Exposure Clinic developed in cooperation with the local children’s hospital where they had an exam performed by a provider, had chest x-ray and TB testing performed, and if indicated, initiated on prophylactic medication.

Table 1. Demographics of tuberculosis exposures at YMCA

Figure 1. Cumulative time of tuberculosis exposure by age.

A 1-step testing strategy was utilized for individuals with exposure ≥10 weeks from last contact and a 2-step testing strategy was utilized for those with <10 weeks from last exposure. Reference Sterling, Njie and Zenner6 Overall, 298 of 592 (50.3%) exposed individuals received recommended testing. Of the 211 individuals eligible for window prophylaxis (<5 years of age and <10 weeks from exposure), 107 of 211 (50.7%) completed initial testing, and 75 of 211 (35.5%) completed follow-up testing. Out of 211 individuals eligible for window prophylaxis, 92 (43.6%) initiated therapy. Notably, the acceptance rate increased to 93.7% (119 of 127) among those who were evaluated by a provider. As of this writing, none of the individuals identified in this community exposure have developed TB infection, and there are no known cases of TB disease among the non-household contacts.

Discussion

The risk of developing TB disease among exposed infants and toddlers is high, necessitating prompt evaluation and consideration of window prophylaxis. This community exposure, involving 592 individuals, required a swift public health response. Within 72 hours of notification, the health department conducted an in-person informational session for families, held a press conference, issued a Health Alert Network Advisory, launched an online scheduler, and collaborated with the local children’s hospital for medical evaluations. To date, two household contacts have tested positive, resulting in an attack rate of 0.06%. No positive tests have been identified in non-household contacts, though only 49.6% of recommended testing was completed. Given that no child has been diagnosed with TB infection from this daycare exposure, it raises questions about whether the response scale was proportionate.

In 2013, Fang et al. reported a comparable community exposure in a Chinese high school, where the index patient went undiagnosed for three months. Contact tracing revealed that 61% (28/46) of students and 53% (9/17) of teachers in the primary classroom developed TB infection. Over the following year, three additional cases emerged among students not in close contact with the index patient, totaling 164 infected individuals out of 518 exposed. This included 4 confirmed TB cases, 20 probable cases, and 140 TB infections. Reference Fang, Ma, Lu, Sun and Pei7 Although exact exposure times were unknown, this case shows that prolonged exposure can increase TB risk, even without close contact. Both outbreaks involved undiagnosed infectious individuals, but the high school setting likely had more sustained interactions than the daycare, where exposure varied. The high school’s higher transmission rate (30% vs. 0.06%) suggests ventilation, exposure duration, and population density played key roles. Given China’s high burden of TB, infection may also have been acquired elsewhere. 8 This highlights the importance of context-specific public health responses.

Conversely, limited exposure in a confined setting can also transmit TB. Kanamori et al. describe an 87-year-old woman with undiagnosed pulmonary TB confined to a disaster shelter in Japan in 2011, leading to a 20% prevalence of TB infection among co-evacuees over three days. Poor ventilation, as windows remained shut in cold weather, contributed. Reference Kanamori, Aso and Tadano9 Our drop-in daycare had an HVAC ventilation system but no windows that opened outdoors, and the median exposure time was under five hours.

Conclusion

The risk of TB infection is influenced by several variables. First, the density of infectious droplet nuclei produced by the source patient is challenging to quantify; second, the adequacy of ventilation in the exposure environment; and third, the duration of the exposure. Notably, 60% of our exposures involved young children, who are most vulnerable to disseminated TB disease. Although exposure time ranged from 29 minutes to over 21 hours, no transmission was observed in daycare-related contacts. This case provides evidence of low TB transmission risk among high-risk age groups in a classroom with exposure times under 24 hours, offering valuable insights for future outbreak investigations.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the staff at the Douglas County Health Department who participated in this response, as well as our community partners: Children’s Nebraska, the Nebraska Public Health Laboratory, the Nebraska Department of Human Resources, the CDC TB Elimination Program, and our local YMCA leadership.

Financial support

None.

Competing interests

The authors attest that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Transparency and Reproducibility

NA.

References

Williams, PM, Pratt, RH, Walker, WL, Price, SF, Stewart, RJ, Feng, PJI. Tuberculosis - United States, 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73:265270 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marais, BJ, Gie, RP, Schaaf, HS, et al. The natural history of childhood intra-thoracic tuberculosis: a critical review of literature from the pre-chemotherapy era. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Off J Int Union Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004;8:392402 Google ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Z, Nolan, CM, Blumberg, HM, American Thoracic Society, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Infectious Diseases Society of America. Controlling tuberculosis in the United States. Recommendations from the American Thoracic Society, CDC, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2005;54:181 Google ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. WHO consolidated guidelines on tuberculosis Module 1: Prevention: Tuberculosis preventive treatment. Published online 2020.https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240001503 Accessed July 29, 2024Google Scholar
Reichler, MR, Khan, A, Yuan, Y, et al. Duration of exposure among close contacts of patients with infectious tuberculosis and risk of latent tuberculosis infection. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2020;71:16271634 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterling, TR, Njie, G, Zenner, D, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2020;69:111 Google ScholarPubMed
Fang, Y, Ma, Y, Lu, Q, Sun, J, Pei, Y. An outbreak of pulmonary tuberculosis and a follow-up investigation of latent tuberculosis in a high school in an eastern city in China, 2016–2019. PloS One. 2021;16:e0247564 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geneva: World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; 2024.Google Scholar
Kanamori, H, Aso, N, Tadano, S, et al. Tuberculosis exposure among evacuees at a shelter after earthquake, Japan, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:799801 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographics of tuberculosis exposures at YMCA

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cumulative time of tuberculosis exposure by age.