Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:43:01.973Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replicating corpus-based research in English for academic purposes: Proposed replication of Cortes (2013) and Biber and Gray (2010)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2021

Taha Omidian ,
Oliver James Ballance  and
Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
Taha Omidian*
Affiliation:
Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
Oliver James Ballance
Affiliation:
Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Anna Siyanova-Chanturia
Affiliation:
Te Herenga Waka - Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: taha.omidian@vuw.ac.nz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Accurate description of language use is central to English for academic purposes (EAP) practice. Thanks to the development of corpus tools, it has been possible to undertake systematic studies of language in academic contexts. This line of research aims to provide detailed and accurate characterization of academic communication and to ultimately inform EAP practice. Very few studies, however, have attempted to ascertain whether, and to what the extent, corpus-based findings have achieved such goals. The diverse nature of EAP, and the unique methodological challenges involved in compiling and using corpora, provide sufficient incentive for replication research in this area. The present article makes a case for replication of corpus-based studies in the field of EAP. It argues that replication research not only enhances the credibility of corpus linguistics for EAP pedagogy and research but also provides practical advice for EAP teachers and materials designers. It then looks at how two key corpus-based studies on the topic, Cortes (2013) and Biber and Gray (2010), can be replicated with respect to replication approaches described in Porte (2012).

Type
Replication Research
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 128 - 136
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2005). Generic patterns in promotional discourse. In Halmari, H., & Virtanen, T. (Eds.), Persuasion across genres: A linguistic approach (pp. 213–225). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied linguistics, 25(3), 371–405. DOI: 10.1093/applin/25.3.371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Douglas, B., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson.Google Scholar
Casal, J. E., & Kessler, M. (2020). Form and rhetorical function of phrase-frames in promotional writing: A corpus-and genre-based analysis. System, 95, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. (2007). Exploring genre and corpora in the English for academic writing class. The ORTESOL Journal, 25, 8–14.Google Scholar
Cortes, V. (2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P. (2014). Discipline and level specificity in university students' written vocabulary. Applied linguistics, 35(3), 328–356. DOI: 10.1093/applin/amt016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P. (2016). To what extent is the academic vocabulary list relevant to university student writing? English for Specific Purposes, 43, 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.01.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P. (2017). Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation in university students’ writing: Mapping the territories. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2014). Learner corpus research in EAP: Some key issues and future pathways. English Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.17960/ell.2014.20.2.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, B., Cotos, E., & Smith, J. (2020). Combining rhetorical move analysis with multi-dimensional analysis: Research writing across disciplines. In Römer, U., Cortes, V., & Friginal, E. (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 137–168). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. H. (2015). The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora, 10(1), 95–125. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2015.0068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamp-Lyons, L. (2011). English for academic purposes. In Hinkel, E. (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, Vol. 2 (pp. 89–103). Routledge.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles. Written Communication, 18(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018004005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2020). A move-marker list: A study of rhetorical move-lexis linguistic realizations of research article abstracts in social and behavioural sciences. RELC Journal, 51(3), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219833131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M. (2015). Phraseology used to comment on results in the discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L., Franken, M., & Wu, S. (2020). Bundle-driven move analysis: Sentence initial lexical bundles in PhD abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 60, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, A. I., & Swales, J. M. (2018). Strengthening move analysis methodology towards bridging the function-form gap. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omidian, T., Beliaeva, N., Todd, L., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2017). The use of academic words and formulae in L1 and L2 secondary school writing. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 39–59.Google Scholar
Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omidian, T., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2021). Parameters of variation in the use of words in empirical research writing. English for Specific Purposes, 62, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omidian, T., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Biber, D. (2021). A new multidimensional model of writing for research publication: An analysis of disciplinarity, intra-textual variation, and L1 versus LX expert writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omidian, T., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Durrant, P. (2021). Predicting parameters of variation in the use of academic formulas in university student writing. In Szudarski, P., & Barclay, S. (Eds.), Vocabulary theory, patterning and teaching (pp. 141–166). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Omidian, T., Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Spina, S. (2021). Development of formulaic language in learner writing: A longitudinal perspective. In Granger, S. (Ed.), Perspectives on the L2 phrasicon: The view from learner corpora (pp. 178–206). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, G. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porte, G., & McManus, K. (2018). Doing replication research in applied linguistics. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P. (2006). Evaluative language in evaluative and promotional genres. In Del Lungo, G., Dossena, M., & Crawford, B. (Eds.), Variation in business and economics discourse: Diachronic and genre perspectives (pp. 152–165). Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A., & Omidian, T. (2020). Key issues in researching multi-word expressions. In Webb, S. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 529–544). Routledge.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). P-frames and rhetorical moves in applied linguistics conference abstracts. In Römer, U., Cortes, V., & Friginal, E. (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register, and writer expertise (pp. 282–305). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar