Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-7jgsp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-29T19:14:49.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on G. Herranz: The timing of monozygotic twinning: a criticism of the common model. Zygote (2013)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Hans-Werner Denker
Hans-Werner Denker*
Affiliation:
Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Institut fuer Anatomie, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45122, Germany
*
All correspondence to: Hans-Werner Denker. Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Institut fuer Anatomie, Hufelandstr. 55, Essen 45122, Germany. e-mail: hans-werner.denker@uni-due.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The topic of monozygotic twinning (MT) on which the recent paper by Herranz (Herranz, 2013) focuses is indeed a fascinating one, not only for the embryologist. And, as pointed out by the author, it may on principle also be relevant for ethical discussions in the context of embryo research and stem cell work in humans. Obviously, this is the reason why the paper was published in Zygote, in spite of the fact that it concentrates on history and speculation. When reading through the paper, however, I have ended up disappointed.

Information

Type
Article Commentary
Information
Zygote , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , April 2015 , pp. 312 - 314
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Denker, H.-W. (2004). Early human development: new data raise important embryological and ethical questions relevant for stem cell research. Naturwissenschaften 91, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denker, H.W. (2009). Induced pluripotent stem cells: how to deal with the developmental potential. Reprod. Biomed. Online 19(Suppl 1), 34–7.Google Scholar
Enders, A.C. (2002). Implantation in the nine-banded armadillo: how does a single blastocyst form four embryos? Placenta 23, 71–85.Google Scholar
Hammadeh, M.E., Fischer-Hammadeh, C. & Ali, K.R. (2011). Assisted hatching in assisted reproduction: a state of the art. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 28, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herranz, G. (2013). The timing of monozygotic twinning: a criticism of the common model. Zygote, Epub ahead of print http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0967199413000257Google Scholar
Schramm, R.D. & Paprocki, A.M. (2004). Strategies for the production of genetically identical monkeys by embryo splitting. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2, 38.Google Scholar
Tam, P.P.L. & Gad, J.M. (2004). Gastrulation in the mouse embryo. In Gastrulation: From Cells to Embryo (ed. Stern, C.D.), pp. 233–262. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar