Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-glrdx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:27:18.967Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Shifting Mandate: International Ownership, Global Fragmentation, and a Case for Deeper Integration under the WTO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

EMILY J. BLANCHARD
EMILY J. BLANCHARD*
Affiliation:
Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth, Hanover
*
*Email: emily.blanchard@tuck.dartmouth.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reviews several key implications of international investment and global supply chain fragmentation for the multilateral trading system. Based on existing economic research, I identify a two-fold challenge for policy makers: first, to leverage the trade-liberalizing potential of global fragmentation at the multilateral level; and, second, to counter the potential for opportunistic manipulation of behind-the-border policy instruments.

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2015 , pp. 87 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Emily J. Blanchard 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Antràs, P. and Staiger, R. (2012a), ‘Offshoring and the Role of Trade Agreements’, American Economic Review, 102(7): 3140–3183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antràs, P. and Staiger, R. (2012b), ‘Trade Agreements and the Nature of Price Determination’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 102(3): 470–476.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. (1999), ‘An Economic Theory of the GATT’, American Economic Review, 89: 215–248.Google Scholar
Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R. (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2006), ‘Multilateralizing Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocks on the Path to Global Free Trade’, The World Economy, 29(11): 1151–1518.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. (2010), ‘Unilateral Tariff Liberalization’, The International Economy, 14: 10–43.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R., Evenett, S., and Low, P. (2009), ‘Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralizing Non-Tariff RTA Commitments’, in Baldwin, R. and Low, P. (eds.), Multilateralising Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Chapter 3.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E., Bown, C., and Johnson, R. (2014), ‘Global Supply Chains and Trade Policy’, Working paper.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. and Matschke, X. (2014), ‘US Multinationals and Preferential Market Access’, Review of Economics and Statistics, forthcoming, http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/REST_a_00496.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. J. (2007), ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Endogenous Tariffs, and Preferential Trade Agreements’, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy – Advances, 7(1): 1–50.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. J. (2009), ‘Trade Taxes and International Investment’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 42: 882–899.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. J. (2010), ‘Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?’, Journal of International Economics, 82(1): 63–72.Google Scholar
Blanchard, E. J. (2013), ‘What Global Fragmentation Means for the WTO: Article xxiv, Behind-the-Border Concessions, and a New Case for WTO Limits on Investment Incentives’, Background Paper for the 2014 World Trade Report and WTO Working Paper #ERSD-2014-03.Google Scholar
Devereux, M. B. and Lee, K. M. (1999), ‘Endogenous Trade Policy and the Gains from International Financial Markets’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 43: 35–59.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. (1990), The GATT Legal System and World Trade Dipolomacy, Salem: Butterworth Legal Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, R. W. (1967), ‘International Capital Movements and the Theory of Tariffs and Trade’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81: 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, M. C. (1966), ‘The Gain from International Trade and Investment: A Neo−Heckscher−Ohlin Approach’, American Economic Review, 56: 788–809.Google Scholar
Kojima, K. (1975), ‘International Trade and Foreign Direct Investment: Substitutes or Complements’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 17: 1–12.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R. Z. (2011), ‘Competing with Regionalism by Revitalizing the WTO’, Trade and Development Symposium, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development December.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W. (2011), ‘Non-Tariff Measures and the WTO’, Background Paper for the 2012 World Trade Report.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. W. and Sykes, A. O. (2011), ‘International Trade, National Treatment, and Domestic Regulation’, Journal of Legal Studies, 40(2).Google Scholar
Stockman, A. and Dellas, H. (1986), ‘Asset Markets, Tariffs, and Political Risk’, Journal of International Economics, 21: 119–213.Google Scholar