Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-s6l46 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:40:20.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of intermittent lighting, light intensity and source on the performance and welfare of broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2007

J. Buyse ,
P.C.M. Simons ,
F.M.G. Boshouwers  and
E. Decuypere
J. Buyse
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Physiology and Immunology of Domestic Animals, Catholic University of Louvain, Kardinaal Mercierlaan 92, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
P.C.M. Simons
Affiliation:
Centre for Applied Poultry Research, Spelderholt 9, 7360 AA Beekbergen, The Netherlands
F.M.G. Boshouwers
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Sciences, R.U. Utrecht, Yalelaan 2, 3508 Utrecht, The Netherlands
E. Decuypere
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Physiology and Immunology of Domestic Animals, Catholic University of Louvain, Kardinaal Mercierlaan 92, 3001 Heverlee, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Broilers are currently reared under nearly continuous lighting (CL) schedules. However, the suitability of such lighting regimens may be questioned in terms of performance and welfare. This paper reviews the literature concerning the effects of intermittent lighting (IL) schedules on these issues. Final body weights at market age of broilers reared under IL schedules are equal to, or even higher than, those of broilers reared under CL schedules. However, endogenous (genotype and sex) and exogenous (dietary composition, feeder space, etc.) factors may interact with the lighting schedule. In contrast, feed conversion is consistently improved with IL, partly as a consequence of a more concave growth curve (initial growth depression followed by compensatory growth). Inconsistencies in the literature concerning the effect of IL on (abdominal) fat content and dressing yield are caused by interactions with other factors. However, it is clearly demonstrated that IL reduces leg abnormalities, in particular the incidence of twisted legs. Additional welfare benefits of IL are found in reduced physiological stress and improved eye condition. An increase in the amount of catching damage has been observed with IL, but this may be avoided by modifying light management before commencement of the catching operation. The importance of light is not restricted to the lighting schedule; aspects of the light quality are also important. Although the data related to light intensity are conflicting, it is generally recommended that an intensity of 51ux should be provided. Whilst fluorescent light does not affect broiler performance adversely, its lower use of electricity compared with incandescent lighting does reduce input costs. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of these qualitative aspects of lighting on poultry welfare.

Keywords

intermittent lightinglight intensityperformancewelfarebroilers

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
World's Poultry Science Journal , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , July 1996 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appleby, M.C. and Hughes, B.O. (1991) Welfare of laying hens in cages and alternative systems: environmental, physical and behavioural aspects. World's Poultry Science Journal 47: 109–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beane, W.L., Cherry, J.A. and Weaver, W.D. Jr. (1979) Intermittent lighting and restricted feeding of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 58: 567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, R., Newberry, R.C. and Gardiner, E.E. (1993) Effects of lighting pattern and dietary tryptophan supplementation on growth and mortality in broilers. Poultry Science 72: 495–502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boshouwers, F.M. and Nicaise, E. (1992) Responses of broiler chickens to high-frequency and low-frequency fluorescent light. British Poultry Science 33: 711–717CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boshouwers, F.M. and Nicaise, E. (1993) Artificial light sources and their influence on physical activity and energy expenditure of laying hens. British Poultry Science 34: 11–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, R.B. (1975) The effect of intermittent lighting programmes on the production of market chickens and turkeys. World's Poultry Science Journal 31: 262–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckland, R.B., Bernon, D.E. and Goldrosen, A. (1976) Effect of four lighting regimes on broiler performance, leg abnormalities and plasma corticoid levels. Poultry Science 55: 1072–1076CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckland, R.B., Hill, A.T. and Bernon, D.E. (1973) Effects of four lighting regimens on the performance of broilers and roasters. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 53: 21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, J. and Decuypere, E. (1988) The influence of intermittent light on broiler performance and on patterns of feed intake. In: Leanness of Domestic Birds. Genetic, Metabolic and Hormonal Aspects (Eds Leclercq, B. and Whitehead, C.C.), Butterworths-INRA, London and Boston, pp. 133–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, J., Decuypere, E. and Michels, H. (1988) Invloed van lichtschema's op de performantie-kenmerken van vrouwelijke slachtkuikens. Landbouwtijdschrift 41: 101–103Google Scholar
Buyse, J., Adelsohn, D.S., Decuypere, E. and Scanes, C.G. (1993) Diurnal-nocturnal changes in food intake, gut storage time of ingesta, food transit time and metabolism in growing broiler chickens: a model for temporal control of energy balance. British Poultry Science 34: 699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buyse, J., Decuypere, E. and Michels, H. (1994a) Intermittent lighting and broiler production. 1. Effect on female broiler performance. Archiv für Geflugelkunde 58: 69–74Google Scholar
Buyse, J., Decuypere, E. and Michels, H. (1994b) Intermittent lighting and broiler production. 2. Effect on energy and on nitrogen metabolism. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 58: 78–83Google Scholar
Buyse, J., Kühn, E.R. and Decuypere, E. (1996) The use of intermittent lighting for broiler production. 1. Effect on male and female broiler performance, and on efficiency of dietary nitrogen retention. Poultry Science 75: 589–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, J.R. (1973) Effect of intermittent light schedules on broiler performance. Poultry Science 52: 2006 (abstract)Google Scholar
Cave, N.A. (1981) The effect of intermittent light on carcass quality, feed efficiency, and growth of broilers. Poultry Science 60: 956–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cave, N.A., Bentley, A.H. and MacLean, H. (1985) The effect of intermittent lighting on growth, feed:gain ratio, and abdominal fat content of broilers of various genotypes and sex. Poultry Science 64: 447–453CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, R.G., Robinson, F.E., Hardin, R.T., Yu, M.W., Feddes, J. and Classen, H.L. (1992) Growth, body composition, and plasma androgen concentration of male broiler chickens subjected to different regimens of photoperiod and light intensity. Poultry Science 71: 1595–1605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherry, J.A., Beane, W.L. and Weaver, W.D. Jr. (1978a) The influence of dietary energy on the performance of broilers reared under different lighting regimes. Poultry Science 57: 998–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, J.A., Siegel, P.B. and Beane, W.L. (1978b) Genetic-nutritional relationships in growth and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 57: 1482–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, T.S., French, J.D. and Fletcher, O.J. (1986) Ophthalmopathy in a broiler breeder flock reared in dark-out housing. Avian Diseases 30: 609–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G.S., Siopes, T.D., Pfeiffer, R.L. and Cook, C. (1986) Morphologic changes induced by photoperiod in eyes of turkey poults. American Journal of Veterinary Research 47: 953–955Google ScholarPubMed
Deaton, J.W., Reece, F.N. and McNaughton, J.L. (1978) Effect of intermittent light on broilers reared under moderate temperature conditions. Poultry Science 57: 785–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, S.H. (1994) Effects of daylength and increasing daylength programmes on broiler welfare and performance. World's Poultry Science Journal 50: 269–282Google Scholar
Haye, U. and Simons, P.C.M. (1978) Twisted legs in broilers. British Poultry Science 19: 549–557CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hester, P.Y. (1994) The role of environment and management on leg abnormalities in meat-type fowl. Poultry Science 73: 904–915CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooppaw, P.D. and Goodman, B.L. (1976) The influence of intermittent light on growth performance and other traits in young chicks. Poultry Science 55: 2285–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulan, H.W. and Proudfoot, F.G. (1987) Effects of light source, ambient temperature, and dietary energy source on the general performance and incidence of leg abnormalities of roaster chickens. Poultry Science 66: 645–651CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kühn, E.R., Darras, V.M., Gysemans, C., Decuypere, E., Berghman, L. and Buyse, J. (1996) The use of intermittent lighting in broiler raising. 2. Effects on the somatotrophic and thyroid axis, and on plasma testosterone levels. Poultry Science 75: 595–600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, T., Troilo, D., Glasser, A. and Howland, H.C. (1995) Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Research 35: 1203–1209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, G.W., Chaloupka, G.W., Walpole, E.W. and Littlefield, L.L. (1980a) The effect of dietary energy and light treatment on broiler performance. Poultry Science 59: 567–581Google Scholar
Malone, G.W., Chaloupka, G.W., Merkley, J.W. and Littlefield, L.L. (1980b) The effect of feeder space and light treatment on broiler performance. Poultry Science 59: 2697–2702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, G.R., Koon, J.L. and Jewitt, T.R. (1977) The effect of intermittent light on broiler performance, dust production and litter moisture. Poultry Science 56: 1381–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakaue, H.S. (1981) Effect of type of feeder, feeder space, and bird density under intermittent lighting regimens with broilers. Poultry Science 60: 708–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newberry, R.C. and Blair, R. (1993) Behavioral responses of broiler chickens to handling: effects of dietary tryptophan and two lighting regimens. Poultry Science 72: 1237–1244CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, R.C., Hunt, J.R. and Gardiner, E.E. (1986) Light intensity effects on performance, activity, leg disorders, and sudden death syndrome of roaster chickens. Poultry Science 65: 2232–2238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newberry, R.C., Hunt, J.R. and Gardiner, E.E. (1988) Influence of light intensity on behavior and performance of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 67: 1020–1025CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierson, F.W., Hester, P.Y. and Wilson, E.K. (1981) The effect of caponisation and dietary 17-methyltestosterone on the incidence of leg abnormalities in turkeys. Poultry Science 60: 2144–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavnik, I. and Hurwitz, S. (1985) The performance of broiler chicks during and following a severe feed restriction at an early age. Poultry Science 64: 348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plavnik, I., McMurtry, J.P. and Rosebrough, R.W. (1986) Effects of early feed restriction in broilers. I. Growth performance and carcass composition. Growth 50: 68–76Google ScholarPubMed
Proudfoot, F.G. (1975) The response of broilers to delays between hatching and feeding under intermittent lighting treatments. Poultry Science 54: 405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proudfoot, F.G. and Hulan, H.W. (1987) Interrelationships among lighting, ambient temperature and dietary energy and broiler chicken performance. Poultry Science 66: 1744–1749CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quarles, C.L. and Kling, H.F. (1974) The effect of three lighting regimes on broiler performance. Poultry Science 53: 1435–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renden, J.A., Lien, R.J., Oates, S.S. and Bilgili, S.F. (1994) Plasma concentration of corticosterone and thyroid hormones in broiler chickens provided various lighting schedules. Poultry Science 73: 186–193CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savory, C.J. (1976) Broiler growth and feeding behaviour in three different lighting regimes. British Poultry Science 17: 557–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, C.J. (1977) What lighting for broiler production? World's Poultry Science Journal 33: 193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheideler, S.A. (1990) Effects of various light sources on broiler performance and efficiency of production under commercial conditions. Poultry Science 69: 1030–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, P.C.M. (1986) The influence of leg problems in broilers as influenced by management. Proceedings of VIIth European Poultry Conference, Paris, Volume 1, pp. 289–297Google Scholar
Simons, P.C.M. (1988) Intermittent light to prevent twisted legs in broilers. Proceedings of XVIIIth World's Poultry CongressJapan, pp. 176–182Google Scholar
Simons, P.C.M. and Haye, U. (1985) Intermittent lighting has a positive effect on twisted leg. Poultry March: 34–37Google Scholar
Wabeck, C.J. and Skoglund, W.C. (1974) Influence of radiant energy from fluorescent light sources on growth, mortality, and feed conversion of broilers. Poultry Science 53: 2055–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wathes, C.M., Spechter, H.H. and Bray, T.S. (1982) The effects of light illuminance and wavelength on the growth of broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Cambridge 98: 195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, W.D. Jr. and Siegel, P.D. (1968) Photoperiod as a factor in feeding rhythms of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 47: 1148–1154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, W.D. Jr., Beane, W.L. and Cherry, J.A. (1982) Effect of light, feeding space, stocking density, and dietary energy on broiler performance. Poultry Science 61: 33–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitley, R.D., Albert, R.A., McDaniel, G.R., Brewer, R.N., Mora, E.C. and Henderson, R.A. (1984) Photoinduced buphthalmic avian eyes. 1. Continuous fluorescent light. Poultry Science 63: 1537–1542CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmermann, N.G. (1988) Broiler performance when reared under various light sources. Poultry Science 67: 43–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed