Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T05:42:33.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preplanting Applications of IPC and CIPC for Selective Control of Wild Oats. (Avena fatua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. F. Wiese  and
R. S. Dunham
A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
R. S. Dunham
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Extract

In recent years, chemical control methods have been discovered for most common annual weeds with the notable exception of wild oats. Isopropyl N-phenyl carbamate (IPC) and isopropyl N-(3–chlorophenyl)-carbamate (CIPC) appeared promising in 1950 when they successfully controlled wild oats in barley at University Farm, Saint Paul, Minnesota. In the spring of 1951, investigations were started in an attempt to evaluate these two chemicals further for selective use in field crops.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1954 , pp. 321 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © 1954 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Buchholtz, K. P. The use of CIPC as an herbicide. Proc. Eighth Annual N. C. Weed Control Conf. p. 105. 1951.Google Scholar
2. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Plant responses to O-Isopropyl N-Phenyl Carbamate. Proc. Fourth Annual N. C. Weed Control Conf. p. 54. 1951.Google Scholar
3. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Some effects of O-Isopropyl N-Phenyl Carbamate upon cereals. Science 105: 95–96. 1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Ennis, W. B. Jr. Responses of crop plants to O-Isopropyl N-Phenyl Carbamate. Bot. Gaz. 109: 473–493. 1948.Google Scholar
5. Freed, V. H., and Bierman, H. E. IPC a new weed killer. Oregon State College Sta. Bul. 483. 1950.Google Scholar
6. Freed, V. H. Some factors influencing the herbicidal efficacy of Isopropyl N-Phenyl Carbamate. Weeds 1: 48–59. 1951.Google Scholar
7. Friesen, G. Untersuchungen über die wirkung des Phenylurethane auf samenkeimung und entwicklung. Planta. 8: 666–679. 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Malzew, A. I. Wild and cultivated oats. Suppl. 38 of the Bul. Applied Botany, Genetics and Plant Breeding. Leningrad. 1930.Google Scholar
9. Mitchell, J. W., and Marth, P. C. Sensitivity of grasses and some crop plants to Isopropyl N-Phenyl Carbamate. Science 106: 15–17. 1947.Google Scholar
10. Robinson, R. G., and Dunham, R. S. A sprayer for experimental plots. Agron. Jour. 42: 57–58. 1950.Google Scholar
11. Templeman, W. G., and Sexton, W. A. Effect of some arylcarbamic esters and related compounds upon cereals and other plant species. Nature 156: 630. 1945.Google Scholar
12. Weaver, R. J. Reaction of certain plant growth-regulators with ion exchangers. Bot. Gaz. 109: 72–84. 1948.Google Scholar