Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-12T09:19:19.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical Control of Big Sagebrush and Its Effect Upon Production and Utilization of Native Grass Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Harold P. Alley
Harold P. Alley*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wyoming; now Research Assistant, Department of Agronomy, University of Wyoming
Get access

Extract

As early as 1946, a limited study conducted in Oregon (5) showed big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) to be susceptible to the sodium salt of 2,4–D. Cornelius and Graham (3) stated that big sagebrush was highly susceptible or hypersensitive to 2,4–D. Kissinger, Hull and Vaughn (7), reporting on experiments conducted at the Beaver Rim area near Lander, Wyoming, found that the isopropyl and amyl ester of 2,4,5–T consistently gave higher kills for a given amount of chemical. One pound acid equivalent (hereafter referred to as pounds acid) of 2,4,5–T usually gave somewhat higher kills than two pounds acid equivalent of 2,4–D.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 1956 , pp. 164 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © 1956 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. New life for ranges. Farm and Home Research. Colo. Agri. Exp. Sta. 5(2):3–4. 1954.Google Scholar
2. Bohmont, D. W. Chemical control of big sagebrush. Wyo. Agri. Exp. Sta. Mimeo. Circ. No. 39. 1954.Google Scholar
3. Cornelius, D. R., and Graham, C. A. Selective herbicides for improving California forest ranges. Jour. Range Management. 4:95–100. 1951.Google Scholar
4. Hull, A. C., and Vaughn, W. T. Controlling sagebrush with 2,4–D and other chemicals. Jour. Range Management. 4:159–164. 1951.Google Scholar
5. Hyder, D. W. Controlling big sagebrush with growth regulators. Jour. Range Management. 6:109–116. 1953.Google Scholar
6. Hyder, D. W. Spray to control big sagebrush. Oregon State College Sta. Bul. No. 538. 1954.Google Scholar
7. Kissinger, N. A. Jr., Hull, A. G. Jr., and Vaughn, W. R. Chemical control of big sagebrush in Central Wyoming. Rocky Mtn. Forest and Range Exp. Sta. Paper No. 9. 1952.Google Scholar