Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-t7r7g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-04T23:29:43.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Leonard P. Gianessi  and
Nathan P. Reigner
Leonard P. Gianessi*
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research Institute, 1156 15th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
Nathan P. Reigner
Affiliation:
Crop Protection Research Institute, 1156 15th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: lgianessi@croplifefoundation.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The vast majority of crop hectares in the United States are treated with chemical herbicides annually. The adoption of herbicides for weed control was rapid in the 1950s and 1960s. Herbicides replaced the use of millions of workers to pull and hoe weeds by hand and greatly reduced the use of tillage for weed control. Costs of production were reduced and crop yields increased because herbicides were cheaper and more effective than hand weeding and cultivation. Organic crop growers cite weed control as their greatest difficulty in crop production because they are not permitted the use of chemical herbicides. They substitute hand weeding and cultivation for herbicides at a greatly increased cost and with reduced effectiveness. Aggregate studies that estimate the value of herbicides assume that growers would substitute a certain amount of hand weeding and tillage if chemicals were not used, which would not be sufficient to prevent yield losses totaling about 20% of U.S. crop production.

Keywords

Herbicidesorganicagricultural historyeconomicscrop production

Information

Type
Review
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 559 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Adams, R. L. 1938. Seasonal Labor Requirements for California Crops. University of California Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 623.Google Scholar
Alley, H. P. 1981. Weed control in Winter Wheat Production in Wyoming. University of Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 603 Revised.Google Scholar
Andrilenas, P. A. 1975. Farmers' Use of Pesticides in 1971: Extent of Crop Use. Washington, DC U.S. Depaartment of Agriculture Economic Research Service Agricultural. Economic Rep. 268.Google Scholar
Asai, W., Hendricks, L., Verdegaal, P., Klonsky, K., Ingels, C., Livingston, P., and Tourte, L. 1992. Sample Costs to Produce Organic Almonds in the Northern San Joaquin Valley. Davis, CA University of California Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Ashton, F. M. 1960. The major problem in vegetable crop production—weed control. Proc. California Weed Sci. Soc. 12:72–74.Google Scholar
Bolgenhom, V. 2004. The Use and Importance of Handweeding in Organic Farming, letter to Jose H. Millan, Deputy Secretary, Enforcement, California Labor and Workforce Development Agency. Available at http://www.croplifefoundation.org.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. 1992. Crop losses due to weeds in the United States—1992. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Brodell, A. P., Strickler, P. E., and Phillips, H. C. 1955. Extent and Cost of Spraying and Dusting on Farms—1952. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service Statistical Bull. 156.Google Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., Murray, D. S., and Hauser, E. W. 1982. Weeds and their control in peanuts. Peanut Science and Technology. Yoakum, TX: American Peanut Research and Education Society. Pages 206–249 in.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1964. Cultivation and herbicide treatments of dryland sorghum. Weeds 12:307–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, J. 2001. An Hour Before Daylight: Memories of a Rural Boyhood. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Case, H. C. M. and Mosher, M. L. 1932. Farm Practices That Pay. University of Illinois College of Agriculture and Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 389.Google Scholar
Comes, R. D., Timmons, F. L., and Weldon, L. W. 1962. Chemical Control of Annual Weeds in Pinto and Great Northern Field Beans. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Wyoming Bull. 393.Google Scholar
Cross, C. E. 1952. Weeds of the Massachusetts Cranberry Bogs. Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts Bull. 463.Google Scholar
Dana, M. N. 1989. The American cranberry industry. Acta Hort. 241:287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniell, J. W. and Hardcastle, W. S. 1972. Response of peach trees to herbicide and mechanical weed control. Weed Sci. 20:133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dartt, B. A. and Schwab, G. D. 2001. Crops and Livestock Budgets Estimates for Michigan. Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural Economic Rep. 609.Google Scholar
Davis, R. M., Hamilton, G., Lanini, W. T., Spreen, T. H., and Osteen, C. 1998. The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Tomato Production. Washington, DC USDA, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, 1-CA-98 Available at http://cipm.ncsu.edu/piappud/.Google Scholar
Davis, R. M., Sorenson, E. J., and Nunez, J. 1999. The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Carrot Production. Washington, DC USDA, National Agricultural Impact Assessment Program, University of California, Davis, Plant Pathology Document 99-007 Available at http://cipm.ncsu.edu/piappud/.Google Scholar
Donaldson, D., Kiely, T., and Grube, A. 2002. Pesticides Industry Sales and Usage, 1998 and 1999 Market Estimates. Washington, DC Environmental Protection Agency Office of Pesticide Programs.Google Scholar
Duffy, M. 1983. Pesticide Use and Practices, 1982. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, Agricultural Information Bull. 462.Google Scholar
Earthbound Organic 2006. Organic Farming 101: Controlling Weeds Without Chemical Herbicides. Available at http://www.ebfarm.com/Organic/WeedControl.aspx.Google Scholar
Eck, P. 1990. The American Cranberry. New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Eichers, T. R. 1978. Farmers' Use of Pesticides in 1976. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economics, Statistics and Cooperative Service, Agricultural Economic Rep. 418.Google Scholar
Fielder, L. L., Kelly, S. S., and Nelson, B. A. 1986. Agricultural Statistics and Prices for Louisiana, 1909–1985. Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Deparment of Agricultural Economics Research Rep. 659.Google Scholar
Freed, V. H. 1980. Weed science: the emergence of a vital technology. Weed Sci. 28:621–625.Google Scholar
Fults, J. L. 1962. Weed Technology in Colorado and a Program for Research. Colorado State University Agricultural Experiment Station, General Series 779.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L. and Reigner, N. 2005. Why California Organic Growers Want an Exemption from a Farm Worker Protection Rule. CropLife Foundation. Available at http://www.croplifefoundation.org.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L. and Reigner, N. 2006. The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production, 2005 Update. CropLife Foundation. Available at http://www.croplifefoundation.org.Google Scholar
Gianessi, L. and Sankula, S. 2003. The Value of Herbicides in U.S. Crop Production. National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Available at http://www.croplifefoundation.org.Google Scholar
Glaze, N. C. 1975. Weed control in cucumber and watermelon. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 100:207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Colburn, A. E. 1993. Effect of dinitroaniline herbicides upon yield and grade of five runner cultivars. Peanut Sci. 20:126–128.Google Scholar
Grubinger, V. P. 1999. Sustainable Vegetable Production From Start-Up To Market. Ithaca, NY: Cooperative Extension NRAES-104.Google Scholar
Hanson, N. S. 1947. Past, present, and future in the North Central Weed Control Conference. in Proceedings of the 4th Annual Meeting of the North Central Weed Control conference. 8–12.Google Scholar
Holstun, J. T., Wooten, O. B. Jr, McWhorter, C. G., and Crowe, G. B. 1960. Weed control practices, labor requirements and costs in cotton production. Weeds 8:232–243.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K., Livingston, P., Vargas, R., and Weir, B. 1995. Production Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Cotton—Northern San Joaquin Valley. Davis, CA U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K., Tourte, L., and Chaney, D. 1993. Production Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Processing Tomatoes in the Sacramento Valley. Davis, CA University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K., Tourte, L., Chaney, D., Livingston, P., and Smith, R. 1994. Cultural Practices and Sample Costs for Organic Vegetable Production on the Central Coast of California. University of California, Giannini Foundation Inf. Series No. 94-2.Google Scholar
Klonsky, K., Tourte, L., and Ingels, C. 1992. Sample Costs to Produce Organic Wine Grapes in the North Coast. Davis, CA University of California Cooperative Extension.Google Scholar
Knutson, R. D., Hall, C. R., Smith, E. G., Cotner, S. D., and Miller, J. W. 1993. Economic Impacts of Reduced Pesticide Use on Fruits and Vegetables. College Station, TX American Farm Bureau Res. Found.Google Scholar
Kvien, C. K., Culbreath, A. K., Wilcut, J. W., Brown, S. L., and Bell, D. K. 1993. Peanut production in systems restricting use of pesticides based on carcinogenicity or leachability. Peanut Sci. 20:118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, A. H. and Brendler, R. A. 1965. Weed control in transplanted celery. Calif. Agric. 19 (2):2–3.Google Scholar
Love, J. M. 1994. U.S. Onion Statistics, 1960–93. Washington, DC U.S. Deparment of Agriculture Economic Research Service Statistical Bull. 880.Google Scholar
Mahr, S. and Moffitt, J. L. 1994. Biologic and Economic Assessment of Pesticide Usage on Cranberry. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, Report 2-CA-94 Available at http://cipm.ncsu.edu/piappud/.Google Scholar
Majek, B. A. 1985. Cost and effectiveness of hand weeding and cultivation compared to labeled and experimental herbicide programs. Proc. Northeastern Weed Sci. Soc. 39:124–125.Google Scholar
Marra, M. C., Criner, G. C., and Carmichael, A. 1995. Enterprise Budgets for Maine Blueberries: Three Production Methods. Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station Misc. Rep. 394.Google Scholar
Meith, H. C. and Parsons, P. S. 1965. Nontillage and strip weed control: cut almond production costs in Butte County test. Calif. Agric. 19 (6):2–4.Google Scholar
Mueller, K. E. and Oelke, E. A. 1965. Watergrass control in rice fields with propanil and Ordram. Calif. Agric. 19 (7):10–12.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. 1975. Herbicidal weed control uses energy efficiently. Weeds Today, Fall 1975:10–12.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1986. Implication of postemergence tillage on root injury and yields of potatoes. Am. Potato J. 63:445.Google Scholar
Nelson, D. C. and Giles, J. F. 1989. Weed management in two potato cultivars using tillage and pendimethalin. Weed Sci. 37:228–232.Google Scholar
Norris, J. 2005. Growing up growing sugar: local teenage labor in the sugar beet fields, 1958–1974. Agric. History 79:298–320.Google Scholar
Nylund, R. E., Nelson, D. C., and Dinkel, D. H. 1958. Comparative costs of weeding onions by hand or with monuron, CIPC, and CDAA. Weeds 6:305–309.Google Scholar
Parker, R. and Boydston, R. A. 1990. Weed Control in Asparagus. Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service, CEB 1145.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., Goodman, W. R., Norris, N. E., and Webster, W. B. 1991. Herbicide, Cultivation, Combination Proves Best for Cotton Weed Control. Highlights of Agricultural Research. Auburn, AL: Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E. 1967. The discovery and development of 2,4-D. Agric. History 41:243–253.Google Scholar
Raleigh, S. M. and Berggren, G. H. 1964. Atrazine Effective Weed Control Chemical in Corn. Science for Farmers, Pennsylvania State University. Spring–Summer:6.Google Scholar
Ricks, D., Hull, J., and Kelsey, M. 1993. Impact on the Apple Industry of Reduced Pesticide Use. Michigan State University Department of Agricultural Economics, Staff Paper 93–46.Google Scholar
Rood, Mary Ann 2002. Long-haul organic. Rice J. 105:12–17.Google Scholar
Schneider, Paul June 20. 1993. The Cotton Brief. New York Times.Google Scholar
Schroder, D., Headley, J. C., and Finley, R. M. 1981. The Contribution of Herbicides and Other Technologies to Soybean Production in the Corn Belt Region, 1965–1979. University of Missouri Agricultural Economics Paper 1981-33.Google Scholar
Schroder, D., Headley, J. C., and Finley, R. M. 1984. The contribution of herbicides and other technologies to corn production in the Corn Belt Region, 1964 to 1979. North Central J. Agric. Econ. 6 (1):95–104.Google Scholar
Smith, E. G., Knutson, R. D., Taylor, C. R., and Penson, J. B. 1990. Impacts of Chemical Use Reduction on Crop Yields and Costs. College Station, TX Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.Google Scholar
Smith, N. J. 1956. How to kill 20 million weeds an hour Am. Veg. Grower May:12–13.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J., Flinchum, W. T., and Seaman, D. E. 1977. Weed Control in U.S. Rice Production. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 497.Google Scholar
Sorenson, K. A., Gubler, W. D., Welch, N. C., and Osteen, C. 1997. The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Strawberry Production. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program, Document No. 1-CA-97 Available at http://cipm.ncsu.edu/croplife/.Google Scholar
Stamper, E. R. 1959. New developments in weed and grass control in sugarcane in Louisiana. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 6:82–87.Google Scholar
Strickler, P. E. and Hinson, W. C. 1962. Extent of Spraying and Dusting on Farms, 1958—With Comparisons. Washington, DC U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Statistical Bull. 314.Google Scholar
Supak, J. R., Anderson, C. G., and Mayfield, W. D. 1992. Trends in cotton production: history, culture, mechanization and economics. in Weeds of Cotton: Characterization and Control. Memphis, TN Cotton Foundation. 9–45.Google Scholar
Swann, C. W. 1980. Principles and Practices of Weed Control in Peanuts, University of Georgia. Cooperative Extension Service Bull. 833.Google Scholar
Swenson, A. and Brummond, B. 2000. Projected 2000 Organic Crop Budgets South Central North Dakota. North Dakota State University Extension Service. Available at http://www.ext.nodak.edu/extpubs/agecon/ecguides/sc-org.htm.Google Scholar
Swezey, S. L., Vossen, P., Caprile, J., and Bentley, W. 2000. Organic Apple Production Manual, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Publication 3403.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. 1972. Contributions to the Control of Peach Decline in Georgia Orchards. Georgia Agricultural Research, University of Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station. Fall 3–7.Google Scholar
Timmons, F. L. 1969. A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci. 18:294–307.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1965. Losses in Agriculture. ARS, Agriculture Handbook 291.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1968. Extent and Cost of Weed Control With Herbicides and an Evaluation of Important Weeds, 1965, ARS 34-102.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1993. The Importance of Pesticides and Other Pest Management Practices in U.S. Cotton Production. National Agricultural Pesticide Impact Assessment Program. Available at http://cipm.ncsu.edu/croplife/.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 1996. Chart for U.S. Hired Farm Workers and Wage Rates. Available at http://www.usda.gov/nass/aggraphs/fl_hired.htm.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2000. Agricultural Statistics, 1950–2000 (separate volumes) National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2001. Agricultural Chemical Usage 1990–2001 Field Crops Summary (separate volumes). National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2002. Non-Citrus Fruits and Nuts 2001 Summary. National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2005. Organic Production Data Sets, ERS. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/Organic.Google Scholar
Waldo, G. F. 1959. The history of the development of the small fruit industry in Oregon. Volume 51. in Proceeding of the 74th Annual Meeting of the Oregon State Horticultural Society. 79–83.Google Scholar
Walz, E. 1999. Final Results of the Third Biennial National Organic Farmers' Survey. Santa Cruz, CA Organic Farming Research Foundation.Google Scholar
Watwood, R. P. 1959. Weed control in carrots and celery. Volume 11. in Proceeding of the 11th Annual Meeting of the California Weed Science Society. 21–22.Google Scholar
Welsh, R. 1999. Economics of Organic Grain and Soybean Production in the Midwestern United States, Policy Studies Report 13. Greenbelt, MD: Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture.Google Scholar
White, G. B. 1995. The Economics of Growing Grapes Organically. Organic Grape and Wine Production Symposium Special Report, Number 69. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station 69:76–85.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D. 2005. Wild Blueberry Crop Statistics. Available at: http://www.wildblueberries.maine.edu/PDFs/Miscellaneous/WBCropStatistics.pdf.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D. E., Hanchar, J. J., Skinner, S. P., and Ismail, A. I. 1986. Weed response, yield, and economics of hexazinone and nitrogen use in lowbush blueberry production. Weed Sci. 34:723–729.Google Scholar
Yarborough, D. E. and Ismail, A. A. 1985. Hexazinone on weeds and on lowbush blueberry growth and yield. Hort Sci. 20:406–407.Google Scholar
Yarrick, B. E. 1946. Notes on non-tillage. Calif. Citrogr. 31:318–319.Google Scholar