Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-65tv2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-06T16:53:01.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed Germination, Physical and Chemical Control of Catclaw Mimosa (Mimosa pigra var. pigra)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. A. Creager
R. A. Creager*
Affiliation:
Foreign Disease-Weed Sci. Res., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Bldg. 1301, Ft. Detrick, Frederick, MD 21702
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Catclaw mimosa, an exotic member of the Leguminosae, occurs in three areas of Florida. Propagation is by seed only. Seeds collected from Florida were used for germination, growth, and herbicide evaluation studies. Seeds germinated at 75 to 94% but were not influenced by different environmental conditions under which they were stored. Greenhouse-grown plants cut or burned off at ground level failed to regrow. However, plants cut at 2 cm or more above ground level regrew from lateral shoots. Sixteen herbicides were evaluated to determine their effects on 6- to 8-wk-old plants grown in the greenhouse. Catclaw mimosa was killed by picloram, tebuthiuron, hexazinone and sulfometuron at 0.4, 0.07, 0.14, and 0.56 kg ha-1, respectively. Dicamba at 1.12, triclopyr at 1.12 (Garlon 3A and 4), linuron at 4.48, and glyphosate at 8.96 kg ha-1 were also effective. Chlorsulfuron and metsulfuron killed 9 out of 10 plants at the highest rates tested. Four herbicides, imazapyr, thifensulfuron, DPX-L5300, and atrazine killed 50% or less of the plants at the highest rates of each compound tested. Fosamine did not kill catclaw mimosa at the rates tested.

Keywords

dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidfosamine, ethyl hydrogen(aminocarbonyl)phosphonateglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinepicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidtriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acidcatclaw mimosa, Mimosa pigra L. var. Pigra.Leguminosaeherbicidesforeign noxious weedssensitive weedexotic weed

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 884 - 891
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Creager, R. A. 1987. A containment facility for research on foreign noxious weeds. Weed Technol. 1:52–55.Google Scholar
2. Dillon, S. P., and Forcella, F. 1985. Fluctuating temperatures break seed dormancy of catclaw mimosa (Mimosa pigra). Weed Sci. 33:196–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Isely, D. 1973. Leguminosae of the United States: I. Subfamily Mimosoideae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 25:1–152.Google Scholar
4. Joyce, J. C. and White, D. 1985. Mimosa pigra, a new aquatic weed in Florida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:394.Google Scholar
5. Lonsdale, W. M., Hartley, K.L.S., and Miller, I. L. 1985. The biology of Mimosa pigra L. Proc. Asian Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. 10:484–490.Google Scholar
6. Miller, I. 1981. Mimosa in the Northern Territory. Tech. Bull./Northern Territory. Dep. Primary Production, ISSN 0158-2763:T.B. No. 51, Agdex 647, 23 p.Google Scholar
7. Napompeth, B. 1982. Background, threat, and distribution of Mimosa pigra in Thailand. in Proc. Int. Symp. Mimosa pigra, Management. IPPC. No. 48-A-83:15–26.Google Scholar
8. Salisbury, F. B., and Ross, C. W. 1987. p. 285–287 in Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc., Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
9. Turner, B. L. 1959. The Legumes of Texas. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin and London. 284 p.Google Scholar
10. Wara-Aswapati, O. 1983. Seed production and germination of Mimosa pigra L. in Chiang Ma Thailand. in Proc. Int. Symp. Mimosa pigra Management. IPPC No. 48-A-83:81–83.Google Scholar