Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-bnl7t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:45:08.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Non-selective and Selective Herbicide Combinations in Stale Seedbed (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David E. Hydrick  and
David R. Shaw
David E. Hydrick
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant & Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were established in 1991 and 1992 on silty clay and sandy loam soils to evaluate combinations of non-selective and selective herbicides for stale seedbed soybean weed control. Metribuzin PRE controlled sicklepod and pitted morningglory more consistently than other treatments. At 9 wk after planting, antagonism occurred in most cases on sicklepod control when metribuzin was tank-mixed with a non-selective herbicide. Other selective herbicides required addition of a non-selective herbicide at planting to effectively control sicklepod and pitted morningglory. Sicklepod and pitted morningglory control was better with POST selective herbicides when following glufosinate or paraquat than when following glyphosate or SC-0224. In most instances a follow-up POST treatment was needed to maintain weed control from non-selective herbicides applied PRE. Metribuzin and metribuzin plus chlorimuron increased soybean yields when tank-mixed with paraquat compared with yields obtained with paraquat alone.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]-carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acid]glufosinate, 2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acidglyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl)glycinemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneparaquat, 1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ionSC-0224, trimethylsulfonium carboxymethylaminomethylphosphonatepitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin and Barneby # CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 515.’Burndown herbicidestillageAC 263,222chlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinglyphosateglufosinateSC-0224paraquatCASOBIPOLA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 158 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Basham, G. W. and Lavy, T. L. 1987. Microbial and photolytic dissipation of imazaquin in soil. Weed Sci. 35:865–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Best, J. A. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Disappearance of s-triazines as affected by soil pH using a balance sheet approach. Weed Sci. 22:364–378.Google Scholar
3. Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1987. Weed control in a conservation tillage rotation in the Texas Blacklands. Weed Sci. 35:695–699.Google Scholar
4. Bruff, S. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Tank-mix combinations for weed control in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6:45–51.Google Scholar
5. Carey, J. B. and Defelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application for weed control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39:232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:401.Google Scholar
7. Hyzak, D. L. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1974. Rate of degradation of metribuzin and two analogs in soil. Weed Sci. 22:75–79.Google Scholar
8. Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329–334.Google Scholar
9. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 36:90–95.Google Scholar
10. Rhodes, G. N. Jr. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass. Weed Sci. 32:595–597.Google Scholar
11. Savage, K. E. 1980. Metribuzin persistence on the soil surface. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:288.Google Scholar
12. Selleck, G. W. and Baird, D. D. 1981. Antagonism with glyphosate and residual herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 29:185–190.Google Scholar
13. Sims, B. D. and Guethle, D. R. 1992. Herbicide programs in no-tillage and conventional-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) double cropped after wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 40:255–263.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Wilson, J. S. and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of non-selective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:648–652.Google Scholar