Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T01:23:56.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea maculosa) on Surface Runoff and Sediment Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John R. Lacey ,
Clayton B. Marlow  and
John R. Lane
John R. Lacey
Affiliation:
Dep. Anim. Range Sci.
Clayton B. Marlow
Affiliation:
Dep. Anim. Range Sci.
John R. Lane
Affiliation:
Plant Soil Sci. Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence of spotted knapweed on surface runoff and sediment yield was determined under simulated rainfall conditions near Garrison, MT. Comparisons were made in 12 paired plots: one of each pair dominated by bunchgrass and the other dominated by spotted knapweed. Runoff and sediment yield were 56% and 192% higher, respectively, for the spotted knapweed, rather than the bunchgrass vegetation types. Spotted knapweed invasion onto bunchgrass range of western Montana is thus detrimental to the protection of soil and water resources.

Keywords

Spotted knapweed, Centaurea maculosa Lam. ♯3 CENMAErosionCENMA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 1989 , pp. 627 - 631
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Branson, F. A., Gifford, G. F., Renard, K. G., and Hadley, R. F. 1981. Rangeland Hydrology. Society for Range Management. Range Science Series. Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., Dubuque, IA.Google Scholar
2. Dee, R. F., Box, T. W., and Robertson, E. Jr. 1966. Influence of grass vegetation on water intake of Pullman silty clay loam. J. Range Manage. 19:77–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dwyer, D. D., Buckhouse, J. C., and Huey, W. S. 1984. Impacts of grazing intensities and specialized grazing systems on the use and value of rangeland: summary and recommendations in NRC/NAS Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
4. Harris, P., and Cranston, R. 1979. An economic evaluation of control methods for diffuse and spotted knapweed in western Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:375–382.Google Scholar
5. Lacey, C. A., Lacey, J. R., Chicoine, T. K., Fay, P. K., and French, R. A. 1986. Controlling knapweed on Montana rangeland. Mont. State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Circ. 311.Google Scholar
6. Meeuwig, R. O. 1970. Sheet erosion on Intermountain summer ranges. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. INT-85. Intermountain For. Range Exp. Stn., Ogden, UT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Morris, M. S., and Bedunah, D. 1984. Some observations on the abundance of spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa Lam.] in western Montana. p. 77–81 in Knapweed Sympos. Proc., Plant Soil Sci. Dep. and Coop. Ext. Serv., Mont. State Univ., Bull. 1315.Google Scholar
8. Myers, J. H., and Berube, D. E. 1983. Diffuse knapweed invasion into rangeland in the dry interior of British Columbia. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:981–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Packer, P. E. 1951. An approach to watershed protection criteria. J. For. 49:639–644.Google Scholar
10. Roché, B. F. Jr., and Talbott, C. J. 1986. The collection history of Centaureas found in Washington State. Agric. Res. Cent., Wash. State Univ. Res. Bull. XB 0978.Google Scholar
11. Watson, A. K., and Renney, A. J. 1974. The biology of Canadian weeds. Centaurea diffusa and C. maculosa . Can. J. Plant Sci. 54:687–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar