Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-lvtpz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-20T21:04:13.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Hexazinone on ‘Tifton 85’ Bermudagrass Growth and Forage Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

B. Wilder ,
J.A. Ferrell ,
B.A. Sellers  and
G.E. MacDonald
B. Wilder
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
J.A. Ferrell*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
B.A. Sellers
Affiliation:
Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona, FL 33865
G.E. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jferrell@ufl.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smutgrass is a clump-type grassy weed that is commonly found in grazed pastures throughout the Southeast. Currently, the only herbicide registered for control of smutgrass is hexazinone and it is unknown if hexazinone negatively impacts bermudagrass forage growth and quality. Experiments were conducted to determine the impact of hexazinone rate on bermudagrass yield and crude protein. All rates of hexazinone reduced bermudagrass yield at 4 wk after treatment (WAT). From 6 to 12 WAT, no bermudagrass yield reduction was observed except for the 2 kg/ha treatment. The yield reducing effects of hexazinone were transitory at the 0.5 and 1.0 kg/ha rates; cumulative yield for the season was reduced by 17 and 23%, respectively. Although yield was negatively influenced by hexazinone, crude protein generally increased in a linear fashion with increased hexazinone rate.

Keywords

Hexazinone, bermudagrass, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. × C. transvaalensis Burtt-Davy, ‘Tifton-85’Crude proteinforage yieldinjurynear infrared reflectance spectrometry

Information

Type
Weed Management — Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , September 2008 , pp. 499 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Ball, D. M., Hoveland, C. S., and Lacefield, G. D. 2002. Southern Forages. 3rd ed. Norcross, GA Potash and Phosphate Institute and Foundation for Agronomic Research. 322.Google Scholar
Brecke, B. J. 1981. Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Sci. 29:553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buxton, D. R. 1996. Quality-related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim. Feed Sci. Techol. 59:37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambliss, C. G., Johnson, F. A., and Adjei, M. B. 2006. Bermudagrass production in Florida. University of Florida—IFAS extension circular SS-AGR-60. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/AA200. Accessed: May 13, 2008.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A. and Mullahey, J. J. 2006. Effect of mowing and hexazinone application on giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) control. Weed Technol. 20:90–94.Google Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Mullahey, J. J., Dusky, J. A., and Roka, F. M. 2006. Competition of giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) in a bahiagrass pasture. Weed Sci. 54:100–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCaleb, J. E. and Hodges, E. M. 1971. Smutgrass control at the Range Cattle Station, Ona, Florida. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 24:182–186.Google Scholar
McCaleb, J. E., Hodges, E. M., and Kirk, W. G. 1966. Smutgrass control. Fla. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. S-149 4.Google Scholar
Mears, P. T., Hennessy, D. W., Williamson, P. J., and McLennan, D. J. 1996. Growth and forage intake of Hereford steers fed giant parramatta grass hay (Sporobolus indicus) and the effects of dietary nitrogen supplements. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 36:1–7.Google Scholar
Mislevy, P. and Currey, W. L. 1980. Smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii) control in south Florida. Weed Sci. 28:316–320.Google Scholar
Mislevy, P., Martin, F. G., and Hall, D. W. 2002. Indian dropseed/giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Technol. 16:707–711.Google Scholar
Mislevy, P., Shilling, D. G., Martin, F. G., and Hatch, S. L. 1999. Smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus) control in bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures. Weed Technol. 13:571–575.Google Scholar
Mullahey, J. J. 2000. Evaluating grazing management systems to control giant smutgrass (Sporobolus indicus var. pyramidalis). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:59.Google Scholar
Sheaffer, C. C., Peterson, P. R., Hall, M. H., and Stordahl, J. B. 1992. Drought effects on yield and quality of perennial grasses in the North Central United States. J. Prod. Agric. 5:556–561.Google Scholar
Simon, B. K. and Jacobs, S. W. L. 1999. Revision of the genus Sporobolus in Australia. Aust. Syst. Bot. 16:165–176.Google Scholar
Watson, L. and Dallwitz, M. J. 1992. The Grass Genera of the World. Wallingford, Oxon, UK CAB International. 1038.Google Scholar