Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-6kn8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T13:06:49.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds on Kansas Agriculture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dallas E. Peterson
Dallas E. Peterson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, E-mail: dpeterso@oz.oznet.ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicides are important components of weed management programs for most Kansas farmers. Monocropping systems and repeated use of the same or similar herbicides in some areas of the state have resulted in the development of herbicide-resistant weeds. The development of herbicide-resistant weed populations can have an immediate and a long-term effect on the cost, implementation, and effectiveness of weed control programs. In Kansas, resistance to triazine herbicides has been confirmed in kochia (Kochia scoparia), redroot pigweed, common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum) populations, and resistance to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides has been confirmed in kochia, Russian thistle (Salsola kali), common waterhemp, Palmer amaranth, common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), shattercane (Sorghum bicolor), and common sunflower (Helianthus annum). The frequency and distribution of herbicide resistance varies among species. Producers who experience herbicide resistance problems adjust their weed control program accordingly. Producers that have not encountered an herbicide resistance problem tend to continue with a successful herbicide program until it fails. The recommended management strategies for herbicide-resistant weed populations include an integrated system of crop rotation, rotation of herbicide modes of action, tank-mixes of herbicides with different modes of action, and cultivation. The greatest direct cost to the producer occurs during the first year of poor weed control. The first response to an herbicide failure often is to reapply the same herbicide that has worked well previously. By the time the producer realizes that the treatment is not going to work, it usually is too late for any other remedial action. Consequently, the farmer experiences reduced crop production from weed competition, high herbicide costs, and a tremendous increase in the seed bank. The increase in seed bank may cost the farmer the most in the long run because the increased weed pressure often requires an intensified control program for several years.

Keywords

Common cocklebur, Xanthium strumarium L. # XANSTcommon sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. # HELANcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer # AMATAdowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEkochia, Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. # KCHSCPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S.Wats. # AMAPAshattercane, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench # SORVURussian thistle, Salsola kali L. # SASKAHerbicide resistanceweed resistanceseed bankALS, acetolactate synthase

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 632 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Al-Khatib, K, Baumgartner, J. R., Peterson, D. E., and Currie, R. S. 1998. Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Weed Sci. 46:403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in north America. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J. R., Al-Khatib, K., and Currie, R. S. 1999. Suvery of common sunflower (Helianthus animus) resistance to imazethapyr and chlorimuron in northeast Kansas. Weed Technol. In press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cress, D.C., ed. 1998. Kansas Agricultural Chemical Usage—1996 Corn Pesticide Summary. Kansas State Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. and Coop. Ext. Serv. MF 2326. 36 p.Google Scholar
Gaeddert, J. W., Peterson, D. E., and Horak, M. J. 1997. Control and cross resistance of an acetolactate synthase inhibitor-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) biotype. Weed Technol. 11:132–137.Google Scholar
Gunsolus, J. L. 1993. Herbicide Resistant Weeds. St. Paul, MN: North Central Regional Extension Publication 468. 10 p.Google Scholar
Hager, A. G., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Stoller, E. W. 1997. Water–hemp Management in Agronomic Crops. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Vocational Ag. Service X855. 11 p.Google Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192–195.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Kendig, A., and Null, D. E. 1996. Waterhemp Management in Missouri. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Coop. Ext. Guide G4871. 4 p.Google Scholar
Kendig, A., Fishel, F., and DeFelice, M. 1995. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Coop. Ext. Guide G4907. 8 p.Google Scholar
Machado, V. S. 1982. Inheritance and breeding potential of triazine tolerance and resistance in plants. In LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 257–273.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:169–172.Google Scholar
Regehr, D. L. and Morishita, D. W. 1989. Questions and Answers on Managing Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University Coop. Ext. Service MF-926. 8 p.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 1995. Herbicide resistance: where are we? How did we get here? Where are we going? Weed Technol. 9:850–856.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., Mallory-Smith, C. A., and Shafii, B. 1994. Characterization of chlorsulfuron resistant and susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Technol. 8:470–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar