Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T11:57:33.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Evaluation of Electrocution for Weed Control and Tall Fescue Seedhead Reduction in Missouri Pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2025

Grant Coe
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant Sciences and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Gatlin Bunton
Affiliation:
Director, Wurdack Extension and Education Center and Field Specialist in Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Rusty Lee
Affiliation:
Field Specialist in Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Valerie Tate
Affiliation:
Field Specialist in Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Nick Wesslak
Affiliation:
Field Specialist in Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
Kevin Bradley*
Affiliation:
Professor, State Extension Weed Scientist and Education Director, Department of Plant Sciences and Technology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
*
Author for correspondence: Kevin Bradley, Professor, State Extension Weed Scientist and Education Director, University of Missouri, 108 Waters Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211. (Email: bradleyke@missouri.edu)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite its efficacy, little research has been conducted to evaluate the potential for electrocution to control common weeds in pastures. Electrocution could also potentially be utilized as a management tool to minimize the production of tall fescue seedheads to prevent fescue toxicosis in cattle. Separate experiments were conducted in Missouri in 2023 and 2024 to: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of electrocution on tall fescue seedhead management, and 2) evaluate forage injury and weed control following electrocution in comparison to common pre-packaged pasture herbicide combinations in mixed tall fescue and legume pastures. Sequential electrocution passes spaced 2 wk apart was the only electrocution treatment that resulted in reduced tall fescue seedhead density more than the nontreated control. However, metsulfuron-containing herbicide treatments reduced tall fescue seedhead density by 70 to 77%. In the weed control experiments, electrocution was compared to herbicide application in six mixed tall fescue and legume pastures and two johnsongrass-infested pastures in Missouri in 2023 and 2024. Most pre-packaged herbicide combinations tested eliminated white clover whereas electrocution and weed wiping had minimal effects on this species. The best electrocution treatments resulted in control of common ragweed, ironweed, common cocklebur, johnsongrass, and tall goldenrod and were comparable to that observed with the best herbicide treatments. Blackberry, sericea lespedeza and coralberry were most effectively controlled by weed wiping with glyphosate compared to all other treatments. Two passes of glyphosate with the weed wiper at 5 km/h spaced 2 wk apart providing the highest and most consistent control of johnsongrass. Results from these experiments indicate that electrocution can be used as a viable alternative to broadcast herbicide treatment for the control of several weeds that commonly occur in mixed tall fescue and legume pastures without significantly impacting forage yield or causing legume injury.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America